Jillian Myers Web Site Evaluation Form

Jillian Myers Web Site Evaluation Form URL: http://www.primarygames.com,b

1) Website Title: Two minute Warning

/flashcards/multiplication/start.htm

Target Learner: 3rd Grader

Subject/topic:

Evaluator: Jillian Myers

Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity.

13 14 15 16

DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly.

17 18 19 20

NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate.

5

x X X X X X X

Subtotal:

Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Good: 75-89

1

x x

Subtotal:

Excellent: Above 90

RATING 4 3 2 x

Fair: 60-74

X 45/60 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 X X x X 18/20 points 63/100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form 1) Website Title: Discovery Education Puzzlemaker

URL:

Target Learner: 3rd Grader

Subject/topic:

Evaluator: Jillian Myers

Date: 10/30/09

http://puzzlemaker.discoveryeducation.com/

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity.

13 14 15 16

DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly.

17 18 19 20

NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate.

5 x

x

x x 5

Subtotal:

Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Good: 75-89

1

x x x x x x x x Subtotal:

Excellent: Above 90

RATING 4 3 2

Fair: 60-74

56/60 points 4 3 2 X

x x x 18 /20 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20 /20 points 94 /100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form 1) Website Title: National Target Learner: 3rd Grader

Geographic Kids

Evaluator: Jillian Myers

URL: http://kids.nationalgeographic.com/ Subject/topic: Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity.

13 14 15 16

DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly.

17 18 19 20

NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate.

5 x

X X X X X X X X

Subtotal:

Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Good: 75-89

1

X

Subtotal:

Excellent: Above 90

RATING 4 3 2

Fair: 60-74

X X 55/60 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 95 /100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form

Target Learner: 3rd Grader

URL: _http://questgarden.com/41/48/7/061112165309/ Subject/topic:

Evaluator: Jillian Myers

Date: 10/30/09

1) Website Title: Enthusiastic About Edison

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity.

5

DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly.

17 18 19 20

NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate.

X X X X X x

Subtotal:

Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Excellent: Above 90

Good: 75-89

1

x x X X

Subtotal: 13 14 15 16

RATING 4 3 2 x

Fair: 60-74

X 54/60 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20 /20 points 94 /100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .