A
, 9tir cAcCirm
Ex.ndota gifrs f
#
of evaluations = 8
Feedback RESULTS Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Advisory Committee January 151 2009
Ciidethe,reSPOitse that rn
(Toëflàtthis.4.!Ciiii:':..0011jlaiii'.
The meeting accomplished the outcomes: The meeting addressed the charge of this 1 = no comment
•
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
6 Strongly Agree 5 Strongly Agree
1 Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
3 Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
1
3
3
Strongly Agree 5 Strongly Agree 4 Strongly Agree _3 Strongly Agree 2 Strongly Agree 5 Strongly Agree 4
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
2 Agree
1 Disagree
Strongly Disagree
3 Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
2 Agree
2 Disagree
Strongly Disagree
4 Agree
2 Disagree
Strongly Disagree
3 Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
committee.
•
Strongly
Reviewed action steps Revised future meetings agendas
(note: action was deferred to the agenda subcommittee)
1 = no comment
•
Provided input on revision of Policy IOA
•
Provided input of Policy IOA Revision Overview 1 = no comment -ffective means were used to achieve outcomes. 1 = no comment The pacing was appropriate. There were opportunities for me to interact with others during the meeting. I felt valued and involved.
4
Tellms what you think. What did you find most helpful about the meeting? - Working on the policy language and voting. - The truly thoughtful consideration given to participant requests for voting. - A number of contentious points were discussed. What changes/upgrades would you recommend? - We are spending too much time on word-smithing. - More focus on creating edits and voting on language. - Present the voting/vetting process on the screen for review and clarification before starting. It's hard to hear that process verbally. •
That else should we consider? - Focus on the Policy Revision. - I would like to add a discussion of the math curriculum and acceleration goals to our agenda. If necessary, I could wait until the next school year.