1.
(a) Leaf number
Leaf area / mm2
Total indentation depth / mm
12
173
23
4
184
19
11
193
20
7
194
33
10
198
34
6
211
31
8
213
28
3
245
44
1
271
42
5
277
40
9
278
36
2
306
54
[shaded column optional] 1.
Neat table correctly formatted;
2.
Correct rows and columns with units;
3.
Leaf area ranked(ascending or descending);
4.
All totals correct;
(b)
A
(correctly orientated) and labelled axes with units;
S
Scale correct and suitable size (more than ½ graph paper);
P
Plotted points correct;
F
Format correct scatter graph without line or if line drawn must be good line of best fit;
(c)
(d)
4
4
Correct substitution or stage in calculation 1 – (6 × 44) (123 - 12) OR 1 – (264 1716); Correct answer is 0.85 / 0.846
2
There is a significant positive correlation between leaf area and degree of indentation;
1 [11]
W2 Jan 2006 MS
1
2.
(a)
Estimating squirrel population 1.
Traps laid in wood in random manner described;
2.
Reference to humane treatment of squirrels / unharmed by traps / marking inconspicuous / eq;
3.
How captured squirrels marked / non-toxic dye / shave off patch of fur / eq;
4.
Marked animals counted and released;
5.
Traps inspected again after suitable time (1-2 days);
6.
Number marked and unmarked counted;
7.
Details of calculation: no. marked 1st sample total trapped in 2nd sample ; N no. marked in 2 nd sample [accept from part(b)] Estimating acorn numbers
8.
Use of quadrats of stated size (0.5 m > 1.0 m);
9.
Number of measurements (minimum 10);
10.
Method of randomisation described (not thrown);
11.
Numbers of acorns in each quadrat counted;
12.
Counts repeated at exactly the same time of year (not just Autumn);
Style
10
Account is concise and well-organised, there is good use of technical vocabulary and almost no spelling errors -2 marks There is some lack of organisation, limited vocabulary and a number of spelling errors –1 mark The account lacks organisation, there is little or no technical vocabulary and many spelling errors – 0 marks
(b)
1.
Table with organisation for all raw data with units;
2.
Reference to calculation of mean acorn count;
3.
Suitable graphical format (scatter or line of best fit) with correctly orientated axes;
4.
Use of (named) correlation test; [details of Lincoln Index calculation to be credited in plan]
W2 Jan 2006 MS
2
4
2
(c)
Limitations 1.
Squirrels eat other foods than acorns / other animals eat acorns;
2.
Reference to one limitation of Lincoln Index method(assumes random mixing of population / marking may affect individuals / eq);
3.
Other named factor may affect population size (e.g. harsh winter / predators immigration / emigration);
4.
Acorns may not be randomly spread / oak trees may be concentrated in one area / eq; Further work
5.
Estimate abundance of other possible food supplies;
6.
Check age profile of squirrels;
7.
Investigate areas where red and grey squirrels are present;
8.
Investigate variations in acorn abundance throughout the year;
5 [21]
W2 Jan 2006 MS
3