Hortonville Final Project Rubric

Fall Term 2009

STUDENT NAME:

Hortonville EDL 501 & 506 Finance and Negotiations

Amy Rashkin, Instructor

Evaluation Criteria for Finance and Negotiations Evaluation Criteria: 1: Does Not Meet Required Standards of Expectations (F) 2: Minimally Meets Required Standards of Expectations (C) 3: Meets Required Standard of Expectations (B-A) 4: Exceeds Required Standards (A) 5: Outstanding Work (A+) Consider Publishing

CONTENT CRITERIA

EDL 501 Candidate demonstrates an understanding of how, to obtain, allocate, align, and efficiently utilize human, fiscal, and technological resources. (ISLLC 3.B) Candidate demonstrates knowledge of ways to create and implement plans to achieve goals that align resource allocation with the district’s vision. (ISLLC 1.B) Candidate demonstrates the ability to develop a plan of action for focusing on effective organization and management of fiscal, human, and material resources (ELCC 3.1b)

5

4

3

2

1

A+

A

A-B

C

F

EDL 506

5

4

3

2

1

A+

A

A-B

C

F

5

4

3

2

1

A+

A

A-B

C

F

Candidate demonstrates an awareness of ways to act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning. (ISLLC 6.B) Candidate demonstrates the capacity to model principals of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior. (ISLLC 5.B) Candidate demonstrates the ability to communicate effectively with all stakeholders in the realization and implementation of a school improvement initiative. (ELCC 1.5 a-b)

FORMAT CRITERIA

Candidate has demonstrated the ability to articulate a school improvement plan, including a detailed budget and internal/external publics analysis (negotiations) that aligns with the vision of the school/district. Candidate has demonstrated the ability to produce a product that includes all steps of the product development process as outlined in the syllabus. Candidate has demonstrated the ability to express written thoughts in a well-organized, coherent, and grammatically correct format. Candidate has demonstrated the knowledge and understanding of APA style requirements.

TECHNOLOGY CRITERIA

5

4

3

2

1

A+

A

A-B

C

F

5

4

3

2

1

A+

A

A-B

C

F

Candidate has demonstrated the ability to use appropriate software for aggregation, disaggregation, analysis, and presentation of school improvement initiative, including a detailed budget.

PROFESSIONAL CRITERIA

Candidate’s work contributed to the collective learning of the entire class. Candidate’s work reflected scholarly habits of mind. The candidate has maintained an open mind, demonstrated both objectivity, as well as sensitivity to multiple viewpoints. Candidate’s work has been submitted according to stated timelines.

Comments: