Govts Future Urban Land Transport Planning
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Govts Future Urban Land Transport Planning as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 11,039
- Pages: 28
PAPER ORIGINALLY PREPARED FOR THE NZAA
Government’s future urban land transport planning
Risks and inconsistencies posed by the proposed updated New Zealand Transport Strategy Peter King, Policy Research Editor February 2008
The Government is simultaneously planning to invest billions in urban roading and propose a New Zealand Transport Strategy update which includes targets to reduce motor vehicle use. This paper examines the targets derivation and potential impacts. Government’s Future Land Transport Planning
Page 1
Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 1. Role of a Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Government Expenditure ............................................................................................................... 4 3. Expenditure Efficiency..................................................................................................................... 4 4. Past Cost of “Strategic Gaps” between the NZTS and the National Land Transport Programme .. 5 5. UNZTS Conflicts with the National Land Transport Programme .................................................... 5 6. Demand gap between proposed UNZTS and demographic change ............................................... 7 7. Acceptability Gap between some target implications and society. .............................................. 10 8. Gaps between the existent Regional Land Transport Strategies and the proposed UNZTS......... 11 Targets under the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy ................................................... 11 Targets under the Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 2007‐2016 .............................. 11 Targets under the Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy ................................................ 11 Summary of RLTS Targets and comparison with UNZTS targets .................................................. 12 9. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 12 10. Recommendation ........................................................................................................................ 12 Appendix 1 Auckland National Land Transport Programme 2007/08 with UNZTS targets retrospectively applied. .................................................................................................................... 13
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 2
Executive Summary In 1997 the Ministry of Transport published its first draft National Transport Strategy. In that document it pointed out that while Regional Government had developed Regional Land Transport Strategies since 1993 Government had not developed an over‐arching national strategy in order to guide regional government. This was to be the task of the National Transport Strategy. A surprising number of themes contained in the 1997 draft strategy remain in the 2008 update to the New Zealand Transport Strategy document. Concerns with road pricing, environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions are consistent across the decade that separates them. However some have changed. The 1997 strategy did not countenance full hypothecation of fuel excise duty and raised questions about funding the land transport fund. The 1997 strategy did concern itself with efficiency and effectiveness and it was concerned with international competitiveness. Neither of these themes have survived into the current draft. Roading remains by far the largest transport concern of Government and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. While Government policy in other sectors of transport may have a bearing on market behaviour in the roading sector the Government is the exclusive funder and provider of infrastructure. Concern with efficiency of expenditure led the Government to establish a Ministerial Advisory Group On Roading Costs which led on to the Next Steps Review of the Government’s transport agencies. That review found that the most significant cause of cost escalation was changes to project scope created by design change to meet obligations under the Land Transport Management Act and the National Transport Strategy. The Government responded to the Ministerial Advisory Group’s recommendations by proposing a Government Policy Statement which would interpret the objectives and goals in the Transport Strategy into shorter duration statements of objectives and outcomes. These are intended to reduce the uncertainty surrounding major projects. However the updated draft Transport Strategy contains targets which are to a large extent inimical to road construction. Thus Government appears to be setting out on a collision course with itself for no GPS endorsing roads will match a strategy which requires that non‐vehicle solutions are progressed at a faster rate than they have to date. This may place up to $6 billion worth of roading projects at risk of review and delay. The targets included in the update Strategy contradict the objective of assisting economic development. Most are focused on getting people out of cars in our urban areas. The targets are far more ambitious than those contained in any Regional Land Transport Strategy. Indeed there is, to date, minimal evidence that the Regional Land Transport Strategy targets are being achieved. The reasons for this may well be based in demographic changes relating to an aging population and settlement patterns particularly in Auckland. Because the targets in the Strategy do not include any provisions for assisting economic development, improving competitiveness or economic efficiency the Strategy is unbalanced in favour of the other Strategy objectives. This not only has the potential to stall projects intended to meet this objective currently under investigation or design but also to cause long term economic harm to our urban areas as regional strategies are compelled to meet a narrow set of targets. Government’s future land transport planning
Page 3
1. Role of a Strategy In 1997 the Ministry of Transport published its first draft National Transport Strategy. In that document it pointed out that while Regional Government had developed Regional Land Transport Strategies since 1993 Government had not developed an over‐arching national strategy in order to guide regional government. This was to be the task of the National Transport Strategy. A surprising number of themes contained in the 1997 draft strategy remain in the 2008 update to the New Zealand Transport Strategy document. Concerns with road pricing, environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions are consistent across the decade that separates them. However some have changed. The 1997 strategy did not countenance full hypothecation of fuel excise duty and raised questions about funding the land transport fund. The 1997 strategy did concern itself with efficiency and effectiveness and it was concerned with international competitiveness. Neither of these themes have survived into the current draft. Since 1997 there have been significant changes to the transport sector in New Zealand. Much of the sector has been privatised or corporatised. Private agencies have tended not to pay particular interest in Government strategies however the roading sector remains firmly in the control of the Public sector where the guiding role of the strategy is of particular significance.
2. Government Expenditure Road transport (including public transport) accounts for 97% of all annual Government expenditure on transport1. It is also 93% of the $5.5 billion allocated in the latest National Land Transport Programme. In 2007 the Government spent a total of $2.1 billion on transport1. This level of expenditure is likely to remain for the foreseeable future given the advent of full hypothecation of the Fuel Excise Duty under the Land Transport Management Bill. Roading accounts for 67% of all Government expenditure on transport. The most expensive roading projects are in urban regions.
3. Expenditure Efficiency Ensuring the efficiency of Government’s expenditure is a key role of the New Zealand Transport Strategy. The quality of the New Zealand Transport Strategy can be measured by the way in which it improves the efficiency of Government expenditure (ie facilitates transport at least on‐going cost). While the NZTS is intended to guide the investment of taxpayers capital it also has a role to ensure that its guidance does not itself impede the deployment of taxpayers capital which is already allocated. This matter was raised by Government itself via the Ministerial Advisory Group On Roading Costs which reported August 2006. A key finding of that group was: The Advisory Group believes that there is a strategic gap between the NZTS and existing strategic and planning processes that needs to be filled. The development of a national strategy for land transport, together with a more detailed roading strategy, is required to provide better direction for the agencies, with clearly defined and measurable national objectives against which roading projects can be evaluated. This framework would enable better alignment in the planning and decision‐ making processes between the agencies and regional and local government. The strategies would 1
MOT Annual Report pages 70‐71 Statement of Non ‐Departmental Expenditure and capital expenditure Appropriations for the year ended 30 June 2007
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 4
take account of the urban planning context and the roading network considerations that will influence all major roading projects in the future.
4. Past Cost of “Strategic Gaps” between the NZTS and the National Land Transport Programme While the ‘gap’ is being filled with the Government Policy Statement the nature of the ‘gap’ will depend on any changes to the NZTS in the interim. If the NZTS is fundamentally inimical to roading the gap between the GPS and the uNZTS could become unbridgeable. The question that must be considered falls out of the Advisory Group’s findings is whether the Update strategy increases uncertainty or decreases it. Page 12 of that Group’s report details a number of projects which have suffered extensive cost increases from the time they were first proposed to the time when they were started. Section 3.1 details the cost escalation of the Alpurt B2 project due largely to threatened legal challenges to the project invoking the need to “ensure environmental sustainability” (which remains undefined in the UNZTS). This objective is enshrined in the Land Transport Management Act but first arose in the NZTS. The Land Transport Management Act requires any transport programme to take account of the NZTS as well as the NEECS. If these can be interpreted to be in any way in conflict with the programme then there is scope for legal challenge with its consequent delay and cost increases.
5. UNZTS Conflicts with the National Land Transport Programme Potential conflicts will arise from any principles or targets which conflict with or impinge on the fundamental objective of road construction and improvement of the $2.1 billion National Land Transport Programme – particularly projects which “Assist Economic Development. This will include the following targets: 1. “Reduce the kilometres travelled in single occupancy vehicles in major urban areas on weekdays by ten percent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007.” 2. ”Increase public transport mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys in Auckland Wellington and Christchurch from an average of nine percent to 20 percent and work with each region to optimise peak hour travel targets.” (targets to 2040) 3. ”Increase walking and cycling and other ‘active modes’ to 30% of total trips in urban areas (currently about 17%). 4. At least double the overall public transport mode share to seven percent of all passenger trips (currently about 2‐3%)” (Targets to 2040) Were these targets applied to the existing National Land Transport Programme for the Auckland Region $1.218 billion of the $2.366 billion budgeted would be challengeable against the achievement of these targets2. The Road construction industry requires a level of policy stability in order to gear up for the existing NLTP. If this is put in jeopardy the risk must be passed on – to taxpayers. This may not be the most efficient use of taxpayers funds.
2
see Appendix 1
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 5
These targets may not also be compatible with the following projects from the State Highway Land Transport Programme which are still in the design stage: AUCKLAND
Value
Conflict
Key Del3
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/PT lanes
Yes
Te Atatu Interchange Upgrade
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/PT lanes
No
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Waterview Connection
$1b+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
No
Victoria Park Tunnel
$100m+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Brigham Creek Extension
$20‐100m
Yes
Yes
Papakura Interchange Upgrade State 1
$20‐100m
No
Yes
Kopuku Realignment
$20‐100m
Yes
No
Second Waitamata Crossing in time for replacement of “Nippon clip‐on” lanes
$2b+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
No
WELLINGTON
Transmission Gully
$1b+
Yes, Competes with PT rail
No
Basin Reserve Improvements
$20‐100m
Yes
No
Melling Interchange
$20‐100m
Depends on park and ride
No
CHRISTCHURCH
Christchurch Southern Motorway Expansion
$20‐100m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Christchurch Northern Arterial Rural
$20‐100m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Memorial Ave Intersection
$5‐20m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Memorial Ave to Yaldhurst Road 4L
$5‐20m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Sawyers Arms to Memorial Ave 4L
$5‐20m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
The total value of these projects approaches $6 billion. This does not include any potential “scope change” created by the requirements of the UNZTS. Fundamentally it is difficult to see how major urban roading projects can assist in meeting these targets unless they are heavily oriented towards public transport. This can only occur if they reserve a significant share of lanes for modes targeted under the UNZTS. Typically a bus‐only lane will have a significantly lower Benefit Cost Ratio under the Project Evaluation Methodology than a high‐ 3
Key deliverables expected under 5‐year funding package 2006/07 to 2010/11
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 6
occupancy vehicle lane. That said a short‐run HOV lane which does not make up a significant proportion of a trip (eg Paramata) is simply a nuisance. This will be made all the more difficult by the demographic shifts which will impact on the demand side of the equation:
6. Demand gap between proposed UNZTS and demographic change There is evidence the targets conflict with projected demographic change. The following targets impose an output requirement on the developers of regional land transport strategies. 1. “Reduce the kilometres travelled in single occupancy vehicles in major urban areas on weekdays by ten percent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007.” 2. ”Increase public transport mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys in Auckland Wellington and Christchurch from an average of nine percent to 20 percent and work with each region to optimise peak hour travel targets.” (targets to 2040) 3. ”Increase walking and cycling and other ‘active modes’ to 30% of total trips in urban areas (currently about 17%). 4. At least double the overall public transport mode share to seven percent of all passenger trips (currently about 2‐3%)” (Targets to 2040) According to the Ministry of Transport Travel Survey
source: http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Comparing‐travel‐modesv1.4.pdf Altogether this means the UNZTS is proposing that mode share of “active mode” trip legs effectively doubles. It can only do so at the expense of the car. According to the Statistics Department4 the aging population means that from 2025 the number of people 65 plus will begin to out‐number those under 15. 4
http://www.stats.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/152C242E‐E6F8‐4A7A‐87C7‐ 8C0A3E48D790/0/nationalpopulationprojections2006basehotp.pdf
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 7
As indicated by the graph
Because older people use active modes less (16‐21%) and will be more numerous than young people who use active modes more (20%) it therefore seems unlikely that car trip mode share will decrease naturally. Older people are decidedly less enthusiastic about public transport than younger people (4% vs 11%) indicating a further gap between the targets and likely demand.
Moreover as life expectancies lengthen it is likely that the 75+ category will become an 85+ category by 2040 and the 65‐74 pattern will extend out to age 84. According the Census 2006 (excluding non‐travellers) public transport’s mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys is Auckland (7%), Wellington (17%) and Christchurch (3.7%). This will require Auckland to triple public transport share of all journeys in 33 years and increase it six‐fold in Christchurch over 33‐years. It should be noted that this implies more than these levels of growth because of current growth levels in the light vehicle fleet. Thus these targets may require a reversal of historical car use trends to be realised. Government’s future land transport planning
Page 8
Currently trip purposes are dominated by trips to work, shopping and social visits. If the population over 65 grows as expected more trips will be shopping and social and fewer will be work related.
Source: http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Comparing‐travel‐modesv1.4.pdf
The active mode target therefore implies some very serious changes to trip demand. To meet the public transport target regions and Government will have to make substantive changes to transport costs or demand. Potentially this suggests that one objective of the strategy is discourage older people from living in New Zealand’s cities. Even when one considers the journey to work one must also take into consideration the likely development of origin‐destination pairs. The following diagram illustrates the estimated development of Auckland. This points out that bulk of new employment development is expected to occur in Albany and Manukau City. It is an axiom of public transport that it works best when servicing highly agglomerated and centralised employment centres. It is clear Auckland is developing Northern and Southern industrial zones not a centralised CBD.
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 9
This calls into question the degree to which the UNZTS targets for land transport are in any way compatible with existent Regional Land Transport Strategies which are based on considerably more supplied evidence. While it can be argued that these are “Aspirational targets” for a time in the distant future even aspirational targets cannot be taken idly by those bound by them. This places an onus on those proposing targets that they are reasonable based on some degree of evidence. Experience with targets from Regional Land Transport Strategies does not furnish any evidence that the proposed aspirational targets are in any way reasonable at all.
7. Acceptability Gap between some target implications and society. The detail of the following target: Reduce the kilometres travelled by single occupancy vehicles, in major urban areas on weekdays, by ten per cent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007. Contains the first disclosure by the Government that: “a reduction of ten percent on 2007 kilometres travelled per capita by 2015 is an ambitious target that will require major and comprehensive travel demand management strategies for urban areas, including economic levers such as road pricing and congestion charging initiatives.” (page 52) The Automobile Association carried out a survey of its Auckland Members in April 2006 responding to the Auckland Road Pricing Evaluation Study proposal. The survey had a margin of error of 2.5% (n=1,690) and found that Members opposed all the options by an overwhelming ratio of 3:1. In general those most in favour were those least affected. It is highly unlikely that proposals introducing road pricing and congestion charging will meet approval from the Auckland electorate.
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 10
8. Gaps between the existent Regional Land Transport Strategies and the proposed UNZTS Targets reached under the Regional Land Transport Strategies are based on detailed analysis of the costs and feasibility of meeting them. There is no evidence this is the case for UNZTS targets therefore the gap between UNZTS targets and RLTC targets must be regarded as of dubious feasibility and hence value. Targets under the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy By 2016 11% of trips are expected to be made by public transport in peak periods, up from 7%.5 By 2016, 15.5% of trips are expected to be by active modes (see Figure 9.9).6
To date there has been no change in mode share reported7 Targets under the Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 20072016 Passenger transport accounts for at least 21% of all region wide journey to work trips. (17% in 2006)8 Active modes account for at least 15% of region wide journey to work trips. (13% in 2006)6 There is to date no change in either mode share9 Targets under the Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy Increase proportion of all trips (excluding walking trips) made by cycle to twelve percent. (In 1996, six percent of total trips by car, cycle and public passenger transport were made by cycle.)10 Increase proportion of all trips (excluding walking trips) made by public passenger transport to six percent. (In 1996, three percent of total trips by car, cycle and public passenger transport were made by public passenger transport.)7 No reports on progress of the RLTS have been published to date
5
Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005‐2016 Page 111 Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005‐2016 Page 114 7 Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy Annual Report 8 Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 2007‐2016 Page 26 9 2006/2007 Annual Monitoring Report on the Regional Land Transport Strategy page 6 10 Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005 – 2015 Page 3 6
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 11
Summary of RLTS Targets and comparison with UNZTS targets Public Transport Targets: 11% Auckland; 21% Wellington; 6% Christchurch. Average 12.6%. Active Mode Targets: 15.5% Auckland; 15% Wellington; Christchurch 12%. Average 14.1%. (While Christchurch’s active mode targets do not include walking the city’s active mode share is comparatively low so the cycle value is taken as a proxy target) While Wellington aims to meet the UNZTS target of 20% by 2040 by 2016, there is no evidence that Auckland or more significantly Christchurch can or will. The uNZTS target of 30% of all trips by active mode is double the current targets of the Regional Land Transport Strategies. There is no evidence as yet of any progress towards the RLTS transport targets. It is therefore impossible to suggest there is any trend to predict share values for 2040.
9. Conclusions The aspirational targets contained in the updated New Zealand Transport Strategy are: 1. Very significant to local and national Government expenditure on urban roading. 2. Do not place any value on assisting economic development 3. Not based on any evidence from Regional Land Transport Strategy trend reporting or targets that they can be achieved 4. Apparently run counter to demographic trend data and public opinion gathered to date 5. May put at risk of delay $6 billion of largely committed expenditure.
10. Recommendation Any targets included in the updated New Zealand Transport Strategy should be: 1. 2. 3. 4.
Based on reasonable evidence. Balanced across all the NZTS objectives Thoroughly modelled and understood before being included in any final strategy. Targets implying contentious solutions such as congestion pricing should not be included
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 12
Appendix 1 Auckland National Land Transport Programme 2007/08 with UNZTS targets retrospectively applied. Please note this assessment is indicative only as it applies retrospectively to projects already under construction. For the purposes of evaluation the currently operative Auckland NLTP is assessed against the proposed UNZTS targets. If the project meets any of the target objectives it is assumed to not be at risk. Otherwise it is potentially at risk. In general terms projects which are intended to “assist economic development” are at risk because they have no UNZTS targets. Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Auckland City Council
Preventive maintenance
Cliff Rd St Heliers Palisade wall protection works
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Green Lane/Great South Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Tiverton Rd/Wolverton St Route Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Advanced Destination Signs Installation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Alfred St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Central Sector (Auckland City Council componment)
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bus Priority Implementation (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bus Priority Investigations (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Church St / Captain Springs Rd Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Dominion Rd PT
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Hobson St / Nelson St Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Kingdon St Rail Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Kuaka/Oue Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lannan Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mt Wellington Quarry Link Road
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Neilson Street Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
OHUG (Overhead to Underground Improvement Programme)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Otahuhu Western Bypass
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Pavement Reconstruction (324)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Queen St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Schooner Bay Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Street Light Upgrades
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Tamaki Edge roading links
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Wero Bridge
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Victoria St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Whangaparapara Road Seal Extension 2007/08
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Yes Yes
No
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 13
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Road studies
Blockhouse Bay Rd / New North Rd Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ellerslie Panmure Highway Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Great North Road Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Onehunga Town Centre Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ponsonby Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Selwyn Street Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wynyard Quarter Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Hauraki Gulf Islands Transport Studies
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mt Albert Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Owairaka / Richardson Rd Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Property
Tiverton Rd/Wolverton St Upgrade (LP)
No
Dominion Rd PT
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,500
No
No
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community advertising (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programme (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programme (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Studies
Central Area Access Study (CAAS) Stage 2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM measures for SH20 Manukau Harbour Crossing
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Funding Strategy
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Northern Sector
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Parking and land use management strategies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management studies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management studies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management
Parking and land use improvements (2007/08)
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Rugby World Cup Improvement Projects
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Cycling & Walking Implementation (2007/08)
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 14
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Ian McKinnon Drive Transport Improvements
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Kingsland Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,000
Onehunga to Hillsborough cycle improvements
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
School travel plan infrastrucure
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Sea View Road Pedestrian Safety
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
South ‐ Western Cycleway ‐ SH 20
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
University Travel Plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s) $ ‐
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Central Transit Corridor
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Civic bus station
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Matiatia Passenger Terminal Improvements
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
(2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Civic bus station
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Safety improvements around PT interchanges
Auckland Regional Transport Authority
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure Intersection Safety Pilot Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Regional Road Safety Small Project Fund
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Advertising
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Neighbourhood Accessibility Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Neighbourhood Accessibility Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Outer Regional Cycling Maps & Social Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Walking and Cycling Social Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Land Use and Transport Projects final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM School Travel Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Workplace Travel Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Three Cities Suburbs Cycling Maps Social
Studies
TDM Sustainable Transport Policy and Planning final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Passenger Transport
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 15
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Services and operations
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus & ferry concession fares
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus & ferry facilities maintenance and operations
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger rail services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger transport services management
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Replacement wheelchair hoists
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Total mobility services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
New passenger transport infrastructure
Real Time Passenger Information System (RTPIS) capex
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Ferry Terminal Upgrades
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Integrated Ticketing
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Ferry Terminal Upgrades
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Administration
Passenger Transport admin.
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
RLTP admin.
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Franklin District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure Bombay Stock Effluent Disposal Facility
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 150
Linwood Rd
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 300
Cape Hill Road Rail Bridge Widening
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 220
Pavement Smoothing/Road Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,636
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 750
Bridge Widening and Strengthening ‐ Yates Bridge,
Pukekohe East/Belgium Road Int Improvement ‐ Construction Pukekohe East/Belgium Road Int Improvement ‐ Land Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 600
Street Lighting Asset Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Road studies
Pukekohe CBD Transportation Study
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 16
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination Acitivties
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Walking and cycling
Cycling Facility Construction
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Pedestrian Facility Construction
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Pukekohe Pedestrian Footbridge Facility
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
School Travel Plan Infrastructure
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Manukau City Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Flat Bush ‐ Ormiston West Bridge Const and Approach Rd U/G
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 11,912
Nesdale Liverpool Construction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 27,000
Savill Drive Bridge
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,228
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 180
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 378
Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,025
Bus Priority Initiatives ‐ 2007‐08
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Bridge
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,560
Flat Bush School Rd Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,300
Flat Bush School Road Upgrading (Chapel to Murphys)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,189
Great South Rd / Cavendish / Te Irirangi Bus Priorities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 4,679
Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,600
New Traffic Signals
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 770
Pakuranga Bridge Repairs
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Papatoetoe, Shirley Road Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 980
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 780
Road Reconstruction ? Great Sth Rd Manurewa (Browns Road) Road Reconstruction ? Gt Sth Rd (Kevale Place to Mahia Rd) Beachlands / Whitford ‐ Maraetai Intersection
Flat Bush ‐ Chapel Road Realignment and Bridge Replacement Flat Bush ‐ Ormiston Murphys Int. and Ormiston East
Great South Road Realignment & Beaumonts Bridge Replacement Kimptons Road and Twilight Road Safety
Road Reconstruction ‐ Preston Road (Dawson to Ormiston) Road Reconstruction ‐ Preston Road (Flatbush to Dawson)
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 17
Road Reconstruction ‐ Springs Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Road Reconstruction ? Redoubt Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 901
Road Reconstruction ? Te Irirangi Drive (Westbound)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 741
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
$ 680 Value At Risk ($000s)
Road Reconstruction‐Bucklands Bch Rd(Vivian Wilson‐ Macleans)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 690
SH 20 Extension ‐ Local Road Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,500
Station Road Bus Priority Measures
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Whitford Maraetai Rd ‐ Jack Lachlan to Okaroro
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,060
Road studies
Mill Rd/Redoubt Rd Corridor Study (MPP)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 405
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Alcohol,Licencing,Restraints,Youth,Education
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Co‐ordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
CommAdvertising‐
Community Programmes ‐ Alcohol & Driver Licensing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes ‐ Youth Focused Road Safety
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes‐Child Restraints, Road Safety Education Manukau Workplace Travel Planning Project
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes ‐ Youth Focused Road Safety
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Education
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Manukau Workplace Travel Planning Project
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes‐Child Restraints, Road Safety
Studies
Cycle Parking Study
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Demand Management Plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Citywide Safer Routes Implementation
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycle Routes 2007/8 Supplementary Schemes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Flat Bush Off‐Road Cycle and Walkway Network
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH20 Extension ‐ Cycleways
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Park and Ride Developments. Pedestrian Facilities
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Half Moon Bay
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
North Shore City Council
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 18
Maintenance and operation of local roads
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Value At Risk ($000s)
Routine maintenance
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Anzac Street Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 580
Lake Road Widening 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 600
Taharoto/Wairau Corridor 2005/06
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,600
Akoranga Drive Stage 2 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 250
Albany Civic Cresent PT Measures
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Albany Highway (Sunset to SH18) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Albany Highway Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 137
Anzac Street Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,360
Archers/Chartwell Int 06‐07 ‐ 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 280
Beach Road (Milford to Browns Bay) ‐ 2006/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 20
Beach Road (Milford to Browns Bay) ‐ 2006/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 80
Beach Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 461
BPM ‐ North Harbour Industrial 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 40
BPM ‐ North Harbour Industrial 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 229
Carlisle Road BPM (East Coast Rd to Browns Bay) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 437
East Coast Rd Widening (Hastings ‐ Rosedale)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,752
East Coast Road / Aberdeen Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 807
East Coast Road BPM (Milford to Forrest Hill) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
East Coast Road BPM (Sunset to Forrest Hill) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 800
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,630
07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 41
Fairview Ave Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Forrest Hill Transit and Cycle Lanes 06/07
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 200
Glendhu Rd Upgrading & Link 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,800
Glenfield Rd (Bentley‐Sunset) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 15,172
Bentley)
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Glenvar Road 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Glenvar Road 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 420
Hillside Rd/Poland Intersection Improvements 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 330
Hurstmere Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 261
Kyle Road Reconstruction / Upgrading 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,158
Lake Road (Jutland to Eversleigh) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 500
Lonely Track Rd (Fairview to East Coast Road)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 54
East Coast/Glenvar/Lonely Track Intersection Improvements 06 ECR / Forrest Hill Road Intersection Improvements
Gills Road (Living Stream Avenue to Oteha Valley Road)
Glenfield Road Bus Priority Measures (Downing to
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 19
McClymonts Rd Widening 06/07‐14/15
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
McClymonts Rd Widening 06/07‐14/15
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
Mokoia Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 375
Onewa Road ( Lake to Sylvan) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 4,400
Porana Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 403
Rawene Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
SH17 / The Avenue 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 111
Sunset Road / Ramp Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Sunset Road / Ramp Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Target Road Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Target Road Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 250
Wairau Road 1 Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 326
Wairau Road 2 Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 922
Property
Lake Road Widening (LP)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,900
Albany Highway Corridor Upgrade 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 240
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Use of the land transport system
$ 120
Community focused activities
NSCC Community Focused activities Coordination.
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC‐ Road Safety ? Community Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Safety and Cycle use programme
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Community Focused activities Coordination.
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC‐ Road Safety ? Community Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Studies
Strategic Studies 07/08
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Lake road cycleway (Takapuna to Devonport)
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Strategic Cycle Network 07/08
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travelwise to School Programme 06/07
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 20
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry Wharf ‐ Takapuna
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Takapuna Bus Station Redevelopment
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
College Road HOV Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry Wharf ‐ Takapuna
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Papakura District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Great South Road‐Beach‐Settlement Intersection Imp
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,323
Clevedon Rd 5‐way Interchange
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,200
District wide streetlight improvement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 200
Dominion Road Extension to Old Wairoa Rd
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 430
Projects
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Intersection Improvement @ Wellington St ‐ GSR
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
South Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 51
Local Area Traffic Managment (LATM Scheme)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
New link via Railway Street West
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Pavement Smoothing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 768
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 80
Great South Road/Broadway/Elliot St intersection upgrade Implementation of Mill Road Corridor & Related
Intersection Improvement @ Wood Street ‐ Great
Porchester Rd Improvement Alfriston Rd to Papakura Stream Porchester Road Construction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 816
Realignment of Papakura Clevedon Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Road studies
Corridor Study for Mill Road Link via MCC & PDC
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 300
Property
Porchester Rd Land Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 376
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 21
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Papakura District Council Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Papakura District Council Community Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Papakura District Council Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Walking and cycling
Implementation of Cycling Facilities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Implementation of Pedestrians Facilities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rodney District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Preventive maintenance
Preventative Maintenance ‐ High Risk Slips 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Pavement Smoothing 2007/08
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ahuroa Rd (14069‐15069)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ararimu Valley Rd (5966‐6966)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Forestry Rd (2287‐2930)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Forestry Rd (3493‐4190)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Inland Rd ( 7653‐8653)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Kiwitahi Rd (3977‐4977)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Pakiri Rd (6115‐7446)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Weranui Rd (11849‐12849)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Whitmore Rd (1000‐2000)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Safety‐Realign C‐R Highway(adj O'Brien Rd)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Matakana Valley Rd (9629‐10629)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ocean View Rd, Te Arai (0‐1000)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Whitehills Rd (1700‐3221)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Stock Effluent Disposal Station ‐ Wellsford
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Wainui Rd / Silverdale St Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Warkworth SH1 Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
PENLINK Construction
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road studies
HBC Traffic Corridor Study
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Integrated Transport Plan ‐ Waimauku
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 22
Property
SH16/Taupaki Road Int. Upgr. Land Puch. 2007/08
No
No
No
Reduces
PT mode
Active
SOV
share
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
No
No
No
Yes
$ ‐
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Value At Risk ($000s)
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety ‐ Community Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety‐ Community Advertising
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety‐Community Programmes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety ‐ Community Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Walkway ‐ HBC Highway(SH1); Jelas Rd to Moffat Rd
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walkway ‐ Waitoki School
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel Wise Plan 07/08
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walkway ‐ Motutara Road
Yes
No
$ ‐
Waitakere City Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Advanced Traffic Management 06/07
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
AIS Safety Physical Works (2007/08)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
WCC reg
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Central Park Drive Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Rd/West Coast Rd)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Great North Road ‐ Henderson 2006/08
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Town/Edmonton‐Alderman‐Trading 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Valley/Catherine/Vitasovich Connection
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lincoln Road Corridor Improvements 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lincoln Road Corridor Improvements 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Arterial VMS Strategy ‐ Design and Implementation in
Great North Rd Pavement Smoothing (Awaroa
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 23
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
New Lynn ToD Project
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
New Lynn ToD Project
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
WCC region
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH18 ‐ Buckley Interchange 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Street Lighting Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Sturges Road Overbridge Renewal 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Atatu Road Integrated Development 2006/09
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Universal Drive Extension 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Drive Bus Route 2007‐2008
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Whau River Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Road Event Management ? Investigation Design in
Road studies
Signal / Route Optimisation in WCC region
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Strategic Freight Study
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Advertising 433
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Coordination 431
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Progammes 432
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Advertising 433
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Coordination 431
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Studies
Strategic Bus Priority Study
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Strategic Parking Study
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Transportation Strategic Investigations ‐ Corridor Studies
Walking and cycling
Cycleway ‐ Triangle Rd thru Central Park Dr
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Twin Streams Walk and Cycleway
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Extension (North Western Link)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ North Western Motorway
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Triangle Rd thru Central Park Dr
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Westgate Off‐Road Route
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway on Seabrook to Clark Street
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Pomaria and Rathgar Roads
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Upgrade Henderson Creek
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
New Footpaths
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 24
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
School Travel Plans for Te Atatu South 07/08
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Walking Facilities (as per WCC Strategy)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Walking Facilities (as per WCC Strategy)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Clearwater Cove Ferry Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Clearwater Cove Ferry Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Transport Interchange Stage 2
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rapid and Quality Transit Network and Systems
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rapid and Quality Transit Network and Systems
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Bus Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Transit ‐ Auckland
Maintenance and operation of state highways
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of state highways
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of state highways
New road infrastructure
AHB Storm Water Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV ‐ Central Motorway Junction Tranche
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Esmonde Rd (TNZ Share) I/C Stg 2
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 40,711
Greenhithe Deviation (Enabling Works)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 106,337
Mt Roskill Ext(1) (SAR & AEE)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 192,595
Mt Roskill Ext(1) (SAR & AEE)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 11,791
Northern Busway
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Northern Motorway TDM (Ramp Signalling)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Northwestern Motorway TDM (Ramp Signalling)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
SH 20 to SH 1 ‐ Manukau Motorway Link
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 208,002
SH20 Manukau Harbour Crossing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,600
Southern Motorway TDM
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 26,530
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 75
Upper Harbour Bridge Duplication Stg 2
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 36,870
Vic Park Tunnel
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,805
Warkworth Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 840
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,700
Western Ring Route Toll Development
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,371
WRR Ramp Signalling
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 17,000
AHB ‐ Moveable Lane Barrier
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s)
Page 25
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Brigham Creek Ext
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Hobsonville Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 194,830
Integrated Transport Control Centre
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Integrated Transport Control Centre
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,750
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Manukau Hbour. Xing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Newmarket Viaduct
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,000
Newmarket Viaduct
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 150,100
Newmarket Viaduct to Greenlane Aux
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Northcote ‐ Sunnynook Aux.
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 9,100
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,545
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Punganui Stream Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
Punganui Stream Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Vic Park Tunnel
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Warkworth Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 15,000
WRR Ramp Signalling
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s)
Page 26
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Block programme
AHB Northbound Extension Structural Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,800
AHB Northern Approach Sth Bd Lane Light Trial
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 52
AHB Northern Approach Sth Bd Lane Light Trial
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
AHB Southbound Extension Structural Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,800
Auckland Regional Growth Strategy
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Auckland State Highway Strategy
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Auckland State Highway Walking and Cycling
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bombay Hills (Mercer) EF
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 258
Drury Interchange Traffic Signals
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ellerslie SB OFF Ramp Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 440
Glenbrook Rd Int Impvt
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 93
Glenbrook Rd Int Impvt
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 21
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Hoteo River SB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 721
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 62
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mangawhai Rd SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
McKinney Road Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Moveable VMS
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Portable CCTV
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Quay St ‐ Ronayne Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Relocatable VMS
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH20A and 20B Airport Access
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH22, Strategic Study Review
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Sheepworld SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Southern/Northern Motorway Lighting Safety Retrofit.
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
assists uNZTS TARGET? > Takanini I/C Upgrade
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s) $ ‐
Page 27
Takanini I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Takanini I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Taupaki Rd/Old Nth Rd I/S Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Toovey Rd SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Waitangi Bridge to Basil Orr Road Seal Widening
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wayby Valley Road Intersection
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wellsford EF
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Whau River Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Walking and cycling
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Pedestrian Facility
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TOTAL AUCKLAND PROJECTS AT RISK
$ 1,218,411
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 28
Government’s future urban land transport planning
Risks and inconsistencies posed by the proposed updated New Zealand Transport Strategy Peter King, Policy Research Editor February 2008
The Government is simultaneously planning to invest billions in urban roading and propose a New Zealand Transport Strategy update which includes targets to reduce motor vehicle use. This paper examines the targets derivation and potential impacts. Government’s Future Land Transport Planning
Page 1
Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 1. Role of a Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Government Expenditure ............................................................................................................... 4 3. Expenditure Efficiency..................................................................................................................... 4 4. Past Cost of “Strategic Gaps” between the NZTS and the National Land Transport Programme .. 5 5. UNZTS Conflicts with the National Land Transport Programme .................................................... 5 6. Demand gap between proposed UNZTS and demographic change ............................................... 7 7. Acceptability Gap between some target implications and society. .............................................. 10 8. Gaps between the existent Regional Land Transport Strategies and the proposed UNZTS......... 11 Targets under the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy ................................................... 11 Targets under the Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 2007‐2016 .............................. 11 Targets under the Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy ................................................ 11 Summary of RLTS Targets and comparison with UNZTS targets .................................................. 12 9. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 12 10. Recommendation ........................................................................................................................ 12 Appendix 1 Auckland National Land Transport Programme 2007/08 with UNZTS targets retrospectively applied. .................................................................................................................... 13
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 2
Executive Summary In 1997 the Ministry of Transport published its first draft National Transport Strategy. In that document it pointed out that while Regional Government had developed Regional Land Transport Strategies since 1993 Government had not developed an over‐arching national strategy in order to guide regional government. This was to be the task of the National Transport Strategy. A surprising number of themes contained in the 1997 draft strategy remain in the 2008 update to the New Zealand Transport Strategy document. Concerns with road pricing, environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions are consistent across the decade that separates them. However some have changed. The 1997 strategy did not countenance full hypothecation of fuel excise duty and raised questions about funding the land transport fund. The 1997 strategy did concern itself with efficiency and effectiveness and it was concerned with international competitiveness. Neither of these themes have survived into the current draft. Roading remains by far the largest transport concern of Government and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. While Government policy in other sectors of transport may have a bearing on market behaviour in the roading sector the Government is the exclusive funder and provider of infrastructure. Concern with efficiency of expenditure led the Government to establish a Ministerial Advisory Group On Roading Costs which led on to the Next Steps Review of the Government’s transport agencies. That review found that the most significant cause of cost escalation was changes to project scope created by design change to meet obligations under the Land Transport Management Act and the National Transport Strategy. The Government responded to the Ministerial Advisory Group’s recommendations by proposing a Government Policy Statement which would interpret the objectives and goals in the Transport Strategy into shorter duration statements of objectives and outcomes. These are intended to reduce the uncertainty surrounding major projects. However the updated draft Transport Strategy contains targets which are to a large extent inimical to road construction. Thus Government appears to be setting out on a collision course with itself for no GPS endorsing roads will match a strategy which requires that non‐vehicle solutions are progressed at a faster rate than they have to date. This may place up to $6 billion worth of roading projects at risk of review and delay. The targets included in the update Strategy contradict the objective of assisting economic development. Most are focused on getting people out of cars in our urban areas. The targets are far more ambitious than those contained in any Regional Land Transport Strategy. Indeed there is, to date, minimal evidence that the Regional Land Transport Strategy targets are being achieved. The reasons for this may well be based in demographic changes relating to an aging population and settlement patterns particularly in Auckland. Because the targets in the Strategy do not include any provisions for assisting economic development, improving competitiveness or economic efficiency the Strategy is unbalanced in favour of the other Strategy objectives. This not only has the potential to stall projects intended to meet this objective currently under investigation or design but also to cause long term economic harm to our urban areas as regional strategies are compelled to meet a narrow set of targets. Government’s future land transport planning
Page 3
1. Role of a Strategy In 1997 the Ministry of Transport published its first draft National Transport Strategy. In that document it pointed out that while Regional Government had developed Regional Land Transport Strategies since 1993 Government had not developed an over‐arching national strategy in order to guide regional government. This was to be the task of the National Transport Strategy. A surprising number of themes contained in the 1997 draft strategy remain in the 2008 update to the New Zealand Transport Strategy document. Concerns with road pricing, environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions are consistent across the decade that separates them. However some have changed. The 1997 strategy did not countenance full hypothecation of fuel excise duty and raised questions about funding the land transport fund. The 1997 strategy did concern itself with efficiency and effectiveness and it was concerned with international competitiveness. Neither of these themes have survived into the current draft. Since 1997 there have been significant changes to the transport sector in New Zealand. Much of the sector has been privatised or corporatised. Private agencies have tended not to pay particular interest in Government strategies however the roading sector remains firmly in the control of the Public sector where the guiding role of the strategy is of particular significance.
2. Government Expenditure Road transport (including public transport) accounts for 97% of all annual Government expenditure on transport1. It is also 93% of the $5.5 billion allocated in the latest National Land Transport Programme. In 2007 the Government spent a total of $2.1 billion on transport1. This level of expenditure is likely to remain for the foreseeable future given the advent of full hypothecation of the Fuel Excise Duty under the Land Transport Management Bill. Roading accounts for 67% of all Government expenditure on transport. The most expensive roading projects are in urban regions.
3. Expenditure Efficiency Ensuring the efficiency of Government’s expenditure is a key role of the New Zealand Transport Strategy. The quality of the New Zealand Transport Strategy can be measured by the way in which it improves the efficiency of Government expenditure (ie facilitates transport at least on‐going cost). While the NZTS is intended to guide the investment of taxpayers capital it also has a role to ensure that its guidance does not itself impede the deployment of taxpayers capital which is already allocated. This matter was raised by Government itself via the Ministerial Advisory Group On Roading Costs which reported August 2006. A key finding of that group was: The Advisory Group believes that there is a strategic gap between the NZTS and existing strategic and planning processes that needs to be filled. The development of a national strategy for land transport, together with a more detailed roading strategy, is required to provide better direction for the agencies, with clearly defined and measurable national objectives against which roading projects can be evaluated. This framework would enable better alignment in the planning and decision‐ making processes between the agencies and regional and local government. The strategies would 1
MOT Annual Report pages 70‐71 Statement of Non ‐Departmental Expenditure and capital expenditure Appropriations for the year ended 30 June 2007
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 4
take account of the urban planning context and the roading network considerations that will influence all major roading projects in the future.
4. Past Cost of “Strategic Gaps” between the NZTS and the National Land Transport Programme While the ‘gap’ is being filled with the Government Policy Statement the nature of the ‘gap’ will depend on any changes to the NZTS in the interim. If the NZTS is fundamentally inimical to roading the gap between the GPS and the uNZTS could become unbridgeable. The question that must be considered falls out of the Advisory Group’s findings is whether the Update strategy increases uncertainty or decreases it. Page 12 of that Group’s report details a number of projects which have suffered extensive cost increases from the time they were first proposed to the time when they were started. Section 3.1 details the cost escalation of the Alpurt B2 project due largely to threatened legal challenges to the project invoking the need to “ensure environmental sustainability” (which remains undefined in the UNZTS). This objective is enshrined in the Land Transport Management Act but first arose in the NZTS. The Land Transport Management Act requires any transport programme to take account of the NZTS as well as the NEECS. If these can be interpreted to be in any way in conflict with the programme then there is scope for legal challenge with its consequent delay and cost increases.
5. UNZTS Conflicts with the National Land Transport Programme Potential conflicts will arise from any principles or targets which conflict with or impinge on the fundamental objective of road construction and improvement of the $2.1 billion National Land Transport Programme – particularly projects which “Assist Economic Development. This will include the following targets: 1. “Reduce the kilometres travelled in single occupancy vehicles in major urban areas on weekdays by ten percent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007.” 2. ”Increase public transport mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys in Auckland Wellington and Christchurch from an average of nine percent to 20 percent and work with each region to optimise peak hour travel targets.” (targets to 2040) 3. ”Increase walking and cycling and other ‘active modes’ to 30% of total trips in urban areas (currently about 17%). 4. At least double the overall public transport mode share to seven percent of all passenger trips (currently about 2‐3%)” (Targets to 2040) Were these targets applied to the existing National Land Transport Programme for the Auckland Region $1.218 billion of the $2.366 billion budgeted would be challengeable against the achievement of these targets2. The Road construction industry requires a level of policy stability in order to gear up for the existing NLTP. If this is put in jeopardy the risk must be passed on – to taxpayers. This may not be the most efficient use of taxpayers funds.
2
see Appendix 1
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 5
These targets may not also be compatible with the following projects from the State Highway Land Transport Programme which are still in the design stage: AUCKLAND
Value
Conflict
Key Del3
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/PT lanes
Yes
Te Atatu Interchange Upgrade
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/PT lanes
No
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Waterview Connection
$1b+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
$20‐100m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
No
Victoria Park Tunnel
$100m+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Brigham Creek Extension
$20‐100m
Yes
Yes
Papakura Interchange Upgrade State 1
$20‐100m
No
Yes
Kopuku Realignment
$20‐100m
Yes
No
Second Waitamata Crossing in time for replacement of “Nippon clip‐on” lanes
$2b+
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
No
WELLINGTON
Transmission Gully
$1b+
Yes, Competes with PT rail
No
Basin Reserve Improvements
$20‐100m
Yes
No
Melling Interchange
$20‐100m
Depends on park and ride
No
CHRISTCHURCH
Christchurch Southern Motorway Expansion
$20‐100m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Christchurch Northern Arterial Rural
$20‐100m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Memorial Ave Intersection
$5‐20m
Depends on PT extension
Yes
Memorial Ave to Yaldhurst Road 4L
$5‐20m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
Sawyers Arms to Memorial Ave 4L
$5‐20m
Depends on HOV/ PT lanes
Yes
The total value of these projects approaches $6 billion. This does not include any potential “scope change” created by the requirements of the UNZTS. Fundamentally it is difficult to see how major urban roading projects can assist in meeting these targets unless they are heavily oriented towards public transport. This can only occur if they reserve a significant share of lanes for modes targeted under the UNZTS. Typically a bus‐only lane will have a significantly lower Benefit Cost Ratio under the Project Evaluation Methodology than a high‐ 3
Key deliverables expected under 5‐year funding package 2006/07 to 2010/11
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 6
occupancy vehicle lane. That said a short‐run HOV lane which does not make up a significant proportion of a trip (eg Paramata) is simply a nuisance. This will be made all the more difficult by the demographic shifts which will impact on the demand side of the equation:
6. Demand gap between proposed UNZTS and demographic change There is evidence the targets conflict with projected demographic change. The following targets impose an output requirement on the developers of regional land transport strategies. 1. “Reduce the kilometres travelled in single occupancy vehicles in major urban areas on weekdays by ten percent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007.” 2. ”Increase public transport mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys in Auckland Wellington and Christchurch from an average of nine percent to 20 percent and work with each region to optimise peak hour travel targets.” (targets to 2040) 3. ”Increase walking and cycling and other ‘active modes’ to 30% of total trips in urban areas (currently about 17%). 4. At least double the overall public transport mode share to seven percent of all passenger trips (currently about 2‐3%)” (Targets to 2040) According to the Ministry of Transport Travel Survey
source: http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Comparing‐travel‐modesv1.4.pdf Altogether this means the UNZTS is proposing that mode share of “active mode” trip legs effectively doubles. It can only do so at the expense of the car. According to the Statistics Department4 the aging population means that from 2025 the number of people 65 plus will begin to out‐number those under 15. 4
http://www.stats.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/152C242E‐E6F8‐4A7A‐87C7‐ 8C0A3E48D790/0/nationalpopulationprojections2006basehotp.pdf
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 7
As indicated by the graph
Because older people use active modes less (16‐21%) and will be more numerous than young people who use active modes more (20%) it therefore seems unlikely that car trip mode share will decrease naturally. Older people are decidedly less enthusiastic about public transport than younger people (4% vs 11%) indicating a further gap between the targets and likely demand.
Moreover as life expectancies lengthen it is likely that the 75+ category will become an 85+ category by 2040 and the 65‐74 pattern will extend out to age 84. According the Census 2006 (excluding non‐travellers) public transport’s mode share of peak hour travel to work journeys is Auckland (7%), Wellington (17%) and Christchurch (3.7%). This will require Auckland to triple public transport share of all journeys in 33 years and increase it six‐fold in Christchurch over 33‐years. It should be noted that this implies more than these levels of growth because of current growth levels in the light vehicle fleet. Thus these targets may require a reversal of historical car use trends to be realised. Government’s future land transport planning
Page 8
Currently trip purposes are dominated by trips to work, shopping and social visits. If the population over 65 grows as expected more trips will be shopping and social and fewer will be work related.
Source: http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Comparing‐travel‐modesv1.4.pdf
The active mode target therefore implies some very serious changes to trip demand. To meet the public transport target regions and Government will have to make substantive changes to transport costs or demand. Potentially this suggests that one objective of the strategy is discourage older people from living in New Zealand’s cities. Even when one considers the journey to work one must also take into consideration the likely development of origin‐destination pairs. The following diagram illustrates the estimated development of Auckland. This points out that bulk of new employment development is expected to occur in Albany and Manukau City. It is an axiom of public transport that it works best when servicing highly agglomerated and centralised employment centres. It is clear Auckland is developing Northern and Southern industrial zones not a centralised CBD.
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 9
This calls into question the degree to which the UNZTS targets for land transport are in any way compatible with existent Regional Land Transport Strategies which are based on considerably more supplied evidence. While it can be argued that these are “Aspirational targets” for a time in the distant future even aspirational targets cannot be taken idly by those bound by them. This places an onus on those proposing targets that they are reasonable based on some degree of evidence. Experience with targets from Regional Land Transport Strategies does not furnish any evidence that the proposed aspirational targets are in any way reasonable at all.
7. Acceptability Gap between some target implications and society. The detail of the following target: Reduce the kilometres travelled by single occupancy vehicles, in major urban areas on weekdays, by ten per cent per capita by 2015 compared to 2007. Contains the first disclosure by the Government that: “a reduction of ten percent on 2007 kilometres travelled per capita by 2015 is an ambitious target that will require major and comprehensive travel demand management strategies for urban areas, including economic levers such as road pricing and congestion charging initiatives.” (page 52) The Automobile Association carried out a survey of its Auckland Members in April 2006 responding to the Auckland Road Pricing Evaluation Study proposal. The survey had a margin of error of 2.5% (n=1,690) and found that Members opposed all the options by an overwhelming ratio of 3:1. In general those most in favour were those least affected. It is highly unlikely that proposals introducing road pricing and congestion charging will meet approval from the Auckland electorate.
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 10
8. Gaps between the existent Regional Land Transport Strategies and the proposed UNZTS Targets reached under the Regional Land Transport Strategies are based on detailed analysis of the costs and feasibility of meeting them. There is no evidence this is the case for UNZTS targets therefore the gap between UNZTS targets and RLTC targets must be regarded as of dubious feasibility and hence value. Targets under the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy By 2016 11% of trips are expected to be made by public transport in peak periods, up from 7%.5 By 2016, 15.5% of trips are expected to be by active modes (see Figure 9.9).6
To date there has been no change in mode share reported7 Targets under the Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 20072016 Passenger transport accounts for at least 21% of all region wide journey to work trips. (17% in 2006)8 Active modes account for at least 15% of region wide journey to work trips. (13% in 2006)6 There is to date no change in either mode share9 Targets under the Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy Increase proportion of all trips (excluding walking trips) made by cycle to twelve percent. (In 1996, six percent of total trips by car, cycle and public passenger transport were made by cycle.)10 Increase proportion of all trips (excluding walking trips) made by public passenger transport to six percent. (In 1996, three percent of total trips by car, cycle and public passenger transport were made by public passenger transport.)7 No reports on progress of the RLTS have been published to date
5
Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005‐2016 Page 111 Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005‐2016 Page 114 7 Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy Annual Report 8 Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 2007‐2016 Page 26 9 2006/2007 Annual Monitoring Report on the Regional Land Transport Strategy page 6 10 Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy 2005 – 2015 Page 3 6
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 11
Summary of RLTS Targets and comparison with UNZTS targets Public Transport Targets: 11% Auckland; 21% Wellington; 6% Christchurch. Average 12.6%. Active Mode Targets: 15.5% Auckland; 15% Wellington; Christchurch 12%. Average 14.1%. (While Christchurch’s active mode targets do not include walking the city’s active mode share is comparatively low so the cycle value is taken as a proxy target) While Wellington aims to meet the UNZTS target of 20% by 2040 by 2016, there is no evidence that Auckland or more significantly Christchurch can or will. The uNZTS target of 30% of all trips by active mode is double the current targets of the Regional Land Transport Strategies. There is no evidence as yet of any progress towards the RLTS transport targets. It is therefore impossible to suggest there is any trend to predict share values for 2040.
9. Conclusions The aspirational targets contained in the updated New Zealand Transport Strategy are: 1. Very significant to local and national Government expenditure on urban roading. 2. Do not place any value on assisting economic development 3. Not based on any evidence from Regional Land Transport Strategy trend reporting or targets that they can be achieved 4. Apparently run counter to demographic trend data and public opinion gathered to date 5. May put at risk of delay $6 billion of largely committed expenditure.
10. Recommendation Any targets included in the updated New Zealand Transport Strategy should be: 1. 2. 3. 4.
Based on reasonable evidence. Balanced across all the NZTS objectives Thoroughly modelled and understood before being included in any final strategy. Targets implying contentious solutions such as congestion pricing should not be included
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 12
Appendix 1 Auckland National Land Transport Programme 2007/08 with UNZTS targets retrospectively applied. Please note this assessment is indicative only as it applies retrospectively to projects already under construction. For the purposes of evaluation the currently operative Auckland NLTP is assessed against the proposed UNZTS targets. If the project meets any of the target objectives it is assumed to not be at risk. Otherwise it is potentially at risk. In general terms projects which are intended to “assist economic development” are at risk because they have no UNZTS targets. Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Auckland City Council
Preventive maintenance
Cliff Rd St Heliers Palisade wall protection works
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Green Lane/Great South Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Tiverton Rd/Wolverton St Route Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Advanced Destination Signs Installation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Alfred St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Central Sector (Auckland City Council componment)
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bus Priority Implementation (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bus Priority Investigations (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Church St / Captain Springs Rd Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Dominion Rd PT
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Hobson St / Nelson St Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Kingdon St Rail Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Kuaka/Oue Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lannan Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mt Wellington Quarry Link Road
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Neilson Street Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
OHUG (Overhead to Underground Improvement Programme)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Otahuhu Western Bypass
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Pavement Reconstruction (324)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Queen St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Schooner Bay Road Seal Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Street Light Upgrades
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Tamaki Edge roading links
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Wero Bridge
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Victoria St Bus Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Whangaparapara Road Seal Extension 2007/08
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Yes Yes
No
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 13
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Road studies
Blockhouse Bay Rd / New North Rd Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ellerslie Panmure Highway Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Great North Road Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Onehunga Town Centre Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ponsonby Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Selwyn Street Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wynyard Quarter Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Hauraki Gulf Islands Transport Studies
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mt Albert Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Owairaka / Richardson Rd Corridor Study
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Property
Tiverton Rd/Wolverton St Upgrade (LP)
No
Dominion Rd PT
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,500
No
No
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community advertising (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programme (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programme (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Studies
Central Area Access Study (CAAS) Stage 2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM measures for SH20 Manukau Harbour Crossing
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Funding Strategy
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
AMETI Northern Sector
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Parking and land use management strategies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management studies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management studies (2007/08)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel demand management
Parking and land use improvements (2007/08)
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Rugby World Cup Improvement Projects
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Cycling & Walking Implementation (2007/08)
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 14
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Ian McKinnon Drive Transport Improvements
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Kingsland Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,000
Onehunga to Hillsborough cycle improvements
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
School travel plan infrastrucure
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Sea View Road Pedestrian Safety
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
South ‐ Western Cycleway ‐ SH 20
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
University Travel Plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s) $ ‐
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Central Transit Corridor
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Civic bus station
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Matiatia Passenger Terminal Improvements
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
(2007/08)
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
CBD People Mover
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Civic bus station
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Safety improvements around PT interchanges
Auckland Regional Transport Authority
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure Intersection Safety Pilot Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Regional Road Safety Small Project Fund
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Advertising
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Neighbourhood Accessibility Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Neighbourhood Accessibility Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Outer Regional Cycling Maps & Social Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Walking and Cycling Social Marketing
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Road Safety Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
TDM Land Use and Transport Projects final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM School Travel Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Workplace Travel Plans Final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
TDM Three Cities Suburbs Cycling Maps Social
Studies
TDM Sustainable Transport Policy and Planning final
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Passenger Transport
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 15
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Services and operations
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus & ferry concession fares
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus & ferry facilities maintenance and operations
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Bus services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger rail services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger transport services management
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Replacement wheelchair hoists
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Total mobility services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
New passenger transport infrastructure
Real Time Passenger Information System (RTPIS) capex
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Ferry Terminal Upgrades
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Integrated Ticketing
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Ferry Terminal Upgrades
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Administration
Passenger Transport admin.
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
RLTP admin.
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Franklin District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure Bombay Stock Effluent Disposal Facility
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 150
Linwood Rd
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 300
Cape Hill Road Rail Bridge Widening
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 220
Pavement Smoothing/Road Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,636
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 750
Bridge Widening and Strengthening ‐ Yates Bridge,
Pukekohe East/Belgium Road Int Improvement ‐ Construction Pukekohe East/Belgium Road Int Improvement ‐ Land Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 600
Street Lighting Asset Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Road studies
Pukekohe CBD Transportation Study
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 16
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Coordination Acitivties
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Walking and cycling
Cycling Facility Construction
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Pedestrian Facility Construction
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Pukekohe Pedestrian Footbridge Facility
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
School Travel Plan Infrastructure
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Manukau City Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Flat Bush ‐ Ormiston West Bridge Const and Approach Rd U/G
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 11,912
Nesdale Liverpool Construction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 27,000
Savill Drive Bridge
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,228
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 180
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 378
Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,025
Bus Priority Initiatives ‐ 2007‐08
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Bridge
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,560
Flat Bush School Rd Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,300
Flat Bush School Road Upgrading (Chapel to Murphys)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 2,189
Great South Rd / Cavendish / Te Irirangi Bus Priorities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 4,679
Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,600
New Traffic Signals
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 770
Pakuranga Bridge Repairs
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Papatoetoe, Shirley Road Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 980
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 780
Road Reconstruction ? Great Sth Rd Manurewa (Browns Road) Road Reconstruction ? Gt Sth Rd (Kevale Place to Mahia Rd) Beachlands / Whitford ‐ Maraetai Intersection
Flat Bush ‐ Chapel Road Realignment and Bridge Replacement Flat Bush ‐ Ormiston Murphys Int. and Ormiston East
Great South Road Realignment & Beaumonts Bridge Replacement Kimptons Road and Twilight Road Safety
Road Reconstruction ‐ Preston Road (Dawson to Ormiston) Road Reconstruction ‐ Preston Road (Flatbush to Dawson)
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 17
Road Reconstruction ‐ Springs Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Road Reconstruction ? Redoubt Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 901
Road Reconstruction ? Te Irirangi Drive (Westbound)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 741
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
$ 680 Value At Risk ($000s)
Road Reconstruction‐Bucklands Bch Rd(Vivian Wilson‐ Macleans)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 690
SH 20 Extension ‐ Local Road Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,500
Station Road Bus Priority Measures
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Whitford Maraetai Rd ‐ Jack Lachlan to Okaroro
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,060
Road studies
Mill Rd/Redoubt Rd Corridor Study (MPP)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 405
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Alcohol,Licencing,Restraints,Youth,Education
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Co‐ordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
CommAdvertising‐
Community Programmes ‐ Alcohol & Driver Licensing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes ‐ Youth Focused Road Safety
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes‐Child Restraints, Road Safety Education Manukau Workplace Travel Planning Project
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes ‐ Youth Focused Road Safety
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Education
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Manukau Workplace Travel Planning Project
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Community Programmes‐Child Restraints, Road Safety
Studies
Cycle Parking Study
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Demand Management Plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Citywide Safer Routes Implementation
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycle Routes 2007/8 Supplementary Schemes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Flat Bush Off‐Road Cycle and Walkway Network
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH20 Extension ‐ Cycleways
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Park and Ride Developments. Pedestrian Facilities
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Half Moon Bay
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
North Shore City Council
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 18
Maintenance and operation of local roads
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Value At Risk ($000s)
Routine maintenance
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Anzac Street Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 580
Lake Road Widening 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 600
Taharoto/Wairau Corridor 2005/06
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,600
Akoranga Drive Stage 2 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 250
Albany Civic Cresent PT Measures
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Albany Highway (Sunset to SH18) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Albany Highway Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 137
Anzac Street Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,360
Archers/Chartwell Int 06‐07 ‐ 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 280
Beach Road (Milford to Browns Bay) ‐ 2006/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 20
Beach Road (Milford to Browns Bay) ‐ 2006/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 80
Beach Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 461
BPM ‐ North Harbour Industrial 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 40
BPM ‐ North Harbour Industrial 07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 229
Carlisle Road BPM (East Coast Rd to Browns Bay) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 437
East Coast Rd Widening (Hastings ‐ Rosedale)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,752
East Coast Road / Aberdeen Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 807
East Coast Road BPM (Milford to Forrest Hill) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
East Coast Road BPM (Sunset to Forrest Hill) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 800
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,630
07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 41
Fairview Ave Improvements
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Forrest Hill Transit and Cycle Lanes 06/07
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
07/08
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 200
Glendhu Rd Upgrading & Link 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,800
Glenfield Rd (Bentley‐Sunset) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 15,172
Bentley)
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Glenvar Road 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 400
Glenvar Road 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 420
Hillside Rd/Poland Intersection Improvements 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 330
Hurstmere Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 261
Kyle Road Reconstruction / Upgrading 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,158
Lake Road (Jutland to Eversleigh) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 500
Lonely Track Rd (Fairview to East Coast Road)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 54
East Coast/Glenvar/Lonely Track Intersection Improvements 06 ECR / Forrest Hill Road Intersection Improvements
Gills Road (Living Stream Avenue to Oteha Valley Road)
Glenfield Road Bus Priority Measures (Downing to
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 19
McClymonts Rd Widening 06/07‐14/15
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
McClymonts Rd Widening 06/07‐14/15
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
Mokoia Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 375
Onewa Road ( Lake to Sylvan) 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 4,400
Porana Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 403
Rawene Road Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
SH17 / The Avenue 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 111
Sunset Road / Ramp Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Sunset Road / Ramp Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Target Road Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Target Road Corridor 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 250
Wairau Road 1 Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 326
Wairau Road 2 Pavement Reconstruction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 922
Property
Lake Road Widening (LP)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,900
Albany Highway Corridor Upgrade 06/07
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 240
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Use of the land transport system
$ 120
Community focused activities
NSCC Community Focused activities Coordination.
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC‐ Road Safety ? Community Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Safety and Cycle use programme
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Community Focused activities Coordination.
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC‐ Road Safety ? Community Programme
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC TravelWise Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Workplace Travel Plan Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Studies
Strategic Studies 07/08
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Lake road cycleway (Takapuna to Devonport)
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
NSCC Strategic Cycle Network 07/08
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travelwise to School Programme 06/07
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 20
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry Wharf ‐ Takapuna
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Takapuna Bus Station Redevelopment
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
College Road HOV Lanes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Ferry Wharf ‐ Takapuna
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Papakura District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Great South Road‐Beach‐Settlement Intersection Imp
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,323
Clevedon Rd 5‐way Interchange
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,200
District wide streetlight improvement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 200
Dominion Road Extension to Old Wairoa Rd
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 430
Projects
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 100
Intersection Improvement @ Wellington St ‐ GSR
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
South Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 51
Local Area Traffic Managment (LATM Scheme)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
New link via Railway Street West
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Pavement Smoothing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 768
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 80
Great South Road/Broadway/Elliot St intersection upgrade Implementation of Mill Road Corridor & Related
Intersection Improvement @ Wood Street ‐ Great
Porchester Rd Improvement Alfriston Rd to Papakura Stream Porchester Road Construction
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 816
Realignment of Papakura Clevedon Road
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 50
Road studies
Corridor Study for Mill Road Link via MCC & PDC
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 300
Property
Porchester Rd Land Purchase
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 376
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 21
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Papakura District Council Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
Papakura District Council Community Programme
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Papakura District Council Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Walking and cycling
Implementation of Cycling Facilities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Implementation of Pedestrians Facilities
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rodney District Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Preventive maintenance
Preventative Maintenance ‐ High Risk Slips 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Pavement Smoothing 2007/08
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ahuroa Rd (14069‐15069)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ararimu Valley Rd (5966‐6966)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Forestry Rd (2287‐2930)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Forestry Rd (3493‐4190)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Inland Rd ( 7653‐8653)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Kiwitahi Rd (3977‐4977)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Pakiri Rd (6115‐7446)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Weranui Rd (11849‐12849)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Whitmore Rd (1000‐2000)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Safety‐Realign C‐R Highway(adj O'Brien Rd)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Matakana Valley Rd (9629‐10629)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Ocean View Rd, Te Arai (0‐1000)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Seal Extn ‐ Whitehills Rd (1700‐3221)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Stock Effluent Disposal Station ‐ Wellsford
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Wainui Rd / Silverdale St Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Warkworth SH1 Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
PENLINK Construction
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road studies
HBC Traffic Corridor Study
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Integrated Transport Plan ‐ Waimauku
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 22
Property
SH16/Taupaki Road Int. Upgr. Land Puch. 2007/08
No
No
No
Reduces
PT mode
Active
SOV
share
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
No
No
No
Yes
$ ‐
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Value At Risk ($000s)
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety ‐ Community Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety‐ Community Advertising
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety‐Community Programmes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Road Safety ‐ Community Coordination
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Advertising
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Coordination
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Travel Plans‐ Community Programmes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Walking and cycling
Walkway ‐ HBC Highway(SH1); Jelas Rd to Moffat Rd
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walkway ‐ Waitoki School
Yes
No
$ ‐
Travel Wise Plan 07/08
Yes
No
$ ‐
Walkway ‐ Motutara Road
Yes
No
$ ‐
Waitakere City Council
Maintenance and operation of local roads
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of local roads
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of local roads
New road infrastructure
Advanced Traffic Management 06/07
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
AIS Safety Physical Works (2007/08)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
WCC reg
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Central Park Drive Extension
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Rd/West Coast Rd)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Great North Road ‐ Henderson 2006/08
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Town/Edmonton‐Alderman‐Trading 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Valley/Catherine/Vitasovich Connection
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lincoln Road Corridor Improvements 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lincoln Road Corridor Improvements 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Arterial VMS Strategy ‐ Design and Implementation in
Great North Rd Pavement Smoothing (Awaroa
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 23
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
New Lynn ToD Project
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
New Lynn ToD Project
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
WCC region
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH18 ‐ Buckley Interchange 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Street Lighting Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Sturges Road Overbridge Renewal 2006
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Atatu Road Integrated Development 2006/09
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Universal Drive Extension 2006/07
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Drive Bus Route 2007‐2008
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Whau River Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Road Event Management ? Investigation Design in
Road studies
Signal / Route Optimisation in WCC region
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Strategic Freight Study
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
Minor improvements
Minor improvements allocation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Community focused activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Advertising 433
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Coordination 431
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Progammes 432
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Advertising 433
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
WCC Community Coordination 431
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Studies
Strategic Bus Priority Study
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Strategic Parking Study
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Transportation Strategic Investigations ‐ Corridor Studies
Walking and cycling
Cycleway ‐ Triangle Rd thru Central Park Dr
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Twin Streams Walk and Cycleway
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Extension (North Western Link)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ North Western Motorway
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Triangle Rd thru Central Park Dr
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway ‐ Westgate Off‐Road Route
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway on Seabrook to Clark Street
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Pomaria and Rathgar Roads
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Cycleway Upgrade Henderson Creek
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
New Footpaths
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 24
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
School Travel Plans for Te Atatu South 07/08
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Walking Facilities (as per WCC Strategy)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Walking Facilities (as per WCC Strategy)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Value At Risk ($000s)
Passenger transport
New passenger transport infrastructure
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Clearwater Cove Ferry Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Clearwater Cove Ferry Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Henderson Transport Interchange Stage 2
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rapid and Quality Transit Network and Systems
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Rapid and Quality Transit Network and Systems
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Bus Park & Ride
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Transit ‐ Auckland
Maintenance and operation of state highways
Routine maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Renewal of state highways
Periodic maintenance
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Improvement of state highways
New road infrastructure
AHB Storm Water Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV ‐ Central Motorway Junction Tranche
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Esmonde Rd (TNZ Share) I/C Stg 2
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 40,711
Greenhithe Deviation (Enabling Works)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 106,337
Mt Roskill Ext(1) (SAR & AEE)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 192,595
Mt Roskill Ext(1) (SAR & AEE)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 11,791
Northern Busway
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Northern Motorway TDM (Ramp Signalling)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Northwestern Motorway TDM (Ramp Signalling)
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
SH 20 to SH 1 ‐ Manukau Motorway Link
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 208,002
SH20 Manukau Harbour Crossing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,600
Southern Motorway TDM
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 26,530
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 75
Upper Harbour Bridge Duplication Stg 2
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 36,870
Vic Park Tunnel
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,805
Warkworth Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 840
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 10,700
Western Ring Route Toll Development
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 5,371
WRR Ramp Signalling
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 17,000
AHB ‐ Moveable Lane Barrier
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s)
Page 25
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
ATMS Stage IV
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Brigham Creek Ext
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Hobsonville Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 194,830
Integrated Transport Control Centre
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Integrated Transport Control Centre
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kirkbride Rd Grade Separate
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,750
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kopuku Deviation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Manukau Hbour. Xing
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Newmarket Viaduct
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 6,000
Newmarket Viaduct
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 150,100
Newmarket Viaduct to Greenlane Aux
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Northcote ‐ Sunnynook Aux.
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 9,100
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 1,545
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Papakura Interchange Upgrade Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Punganui Stream Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 120
Punganui Stream Bridge Replacement
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Schedewys Hill Dev
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu I/C Westbd OFF Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Vic Park Tunnel
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Warkworth Stage 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 15,000
WRR Ramp Signalling
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
$ ‐
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Constellation to Albany I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Puhinui to Mangere 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosebank to Te Atatu 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Te Atatu to Royal 6L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview Connection
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
assists uNZTS TARGET? >
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s)
Page 26
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Waterview to Rosebank 8L
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Block programme
AHB Northbound Extension Structural Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,800
AHB Northern Approach Sth Bd Lane Light Trial
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 52
AHB Northern Approach Sth Bd Lane Light Trial
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
AHB Southbound Extension Structural Upgrade
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 3,800
Auckland Regional Growth Strategy
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Auckland State Highway Strategy
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Auckland State Highway Walking and Cycling
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
$ ‐
Bombay Hills (Mercer) EF
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 258
Drury Interchange Traffic Signals
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Ellerslie SB OFF Ramp Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 440
Glenbrook Rd Int Impvt
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 93
Glenbrook Rd Int Impvt
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 21
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Greville Rd NthBd OFF LT Slip Lane
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Hoteo River SB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 721
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
$ 62
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Kumeu No.2 Bridge WB PL
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Lighting Safety Retrofit (SH 1, 16 and 17)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mangawhai Rd SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
McKinney Road Intersection Improvements
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Mercer to Oira Lighting Improvement
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Moveable VMS
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Orewa Township Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Portable CCTV
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Quay St ‐ Ronayne Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Relocatable VMS
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH20A and 20B Airport Access
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
SH22, Strategic Study Review
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Sheepworld SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Southern/Northern Motorway Lighting Safety Retrofit.
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Reduces
PT mode
Active
RT
Safety
Other
Potentially At
SOV
share
mode
Info
2040
targets
Risk
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
assists uNZTS TARGET? > Takanini I/C Upgrade
Government’s future land transport planning
Value At Risk ($000s) $ ‐
Page 27
Takanini I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Takanini I/C Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Taupaki Rd/Old Nth Rd I/S Upgrade
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Te Hana Rail O/B NB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Toovey Rd SB PL
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Waitangi Bridge to Basil Orr Road Seal Widening
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wayby Valley Road Intersection
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Wellsford EF
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Whau River Crossing
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
$ ‐
Use of the land transport system
Walking and cycling
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
Westgate Pedestrian Facility
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
$ ‐
TOTAL AUCKLAND PROJECTS AT RISK
$ 1,218,411
Government’s future land transport planning
Page 28
Related Documents
Govts Future Urban Land Transport Planning
October 2019 5
Future Transport
May 2020 1
Urban Planning
November 2019 18
Urban Planning
June 2020 13
Future Planning
May 2020 6