Upper Secondary Art Review 2008
Feedback on Upper Secondary Art Curriculum
O / N(A) / Both * * Please delete where applicable.
Name of School:____________________ Name of Teacher: __________________ CPDD is currently doing a Mid-Term Review of the Upper Secondary ‘O’ and ‘N(A)’ Levels Art Syllabuses. We hope you can take some time to fill in this questionnaire in order for us to understand your needs and thoughts about possible improvements for the syllabuses. We also hope that you can return the completed forms via fax (6778 4352) within one week of receiving this form. Thank you. A. Syllabus Document 1.
What do you think are the strengths of the revised syllabus and why?
Studio Practice
Study of Visual Arts
Assessment
2.
How can the syllabus be improved?
Studio Practice
Study of Visual Arts
1
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008
Assessment
B. Curriculum Time and Deployment 3. How much curriculum time is allocated to the following per class, per week in your school? Upper Secondary Art Lower Secondary Art 4.
periods periods
min/period min/period
Please provide details for the following:
Name of Art Teacher
Status (Permanent / Adjunct / Contract / Relief / Service Provider)
Levels / Stream (No. of classes)
Eg. Ms Rosemary Kok
Permanent
Sec 2 Exp (2); Sec 2 NA (3); Sec 3 NT (1)
2
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008
C. Implementation 5.
How is Studio Practice implemented in your school?
Aspects Curriculum Time
Description (Please give some details)
Mode of Delivery
Mode of Assessment
What has been covered
3
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008
6.
How is the Study of Visual Arts (SOVA) implemented in your school?
Aspects Curriculum Time
Description (Please give some details)
Mode of Delivery
Mode of Assessment
What has been covered
4
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008
Other Comments
Thank you for your feedback. CPDD Art Unit
5