Etsy And Fine Art

Etsy and Fine Art Current issues with Art on Etsy Etsy has I believe great potential to develop as a site for the sale of art online. It already has a large market share, it gets significant press coverage and, given the context, it looks good. However, if that potential is to be realised, some changes are needed. To some extent Etsy has recognised this by employing a taxonomist to look at the categories and tags used to describe what is for sale. My comments now are intended to feed into that process of review. I have based them on discussions in various forum threads, on discussions elsewhere both face-to-face and online and on personal research. Except where I quote directly from others the opinions expressed are mine alone. Any interpretation of the words of others is also mine. My comments focus on four areas: •

How visible is art on Etsy. It is common to see reports in forum threads that people ‘out there’ simply don’t think of Etsy as a place to look for art. This is linked to another common view that Etsy simply doesn’t understand art or is only interested in a particular type of art – there are many references to an Etsy ‘aesthetic’.

•

The site structure as it relates to art and in particular categories and tagging. Ambiguities and apparent duplications abound. The categories/tags offered are very confused – and confusing to anyone trying to use them and this is compounded by the way search appears to work..

•

Related to categories and tagging is the specific issue of originals, prints and reproductions.

Summary of Proposals 1. Etsy should create a new top-level category of Fine Art to sit alongside the existing ones of Handmade, Supplies and Vintage. 2. The existing lists of categories and sub-categories under art should be extensively revised. 3. It should be made clear that these are actually suggested tags, rather than hierarchical categories. 4. The tagging process should exclude certain combinations of tags 5. The search process should be revised to look only within a top-level category as the default – this would prevent for example searches in Art bringing up items in Handmade (and vice versa) unless explicitly chosen. 6. Original, print, reproduction and giclée should be clearly defined by Etsy along the lines set out here. 7. Use of original and reproduction as tags for the same item should be impossible. Until this can be achieved by programming means it should be set out in new guidelines. 8. Use of ‘print’ in isolation as a synonym for ‘reproduction’ should be prohibited. 9. Unless originals and reproductions can be easily separated in searches, use of the original materials as tags for reproductions should be prohibited. 10. Photography should remain as a separate art category 11. Digital art should be included within printmaking. Visibility

One thread, (http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=6105708 begun by derekcollins) summarised how art is represented on Etsy. For convenience I have reproduced the first post in that thread below. Detailed numbers may have changed since then but the broad picture still remains true. There are 31 categories on the Etsy front page. Most of the categories state exactly what the product is. When you read the Name you know exactly what the product is, ie. Candles, Bags and Purses, furniture, jewelry, pottery, knitting, you get the point. Art is a generic term that doesn't directly describe the product. POINT 1: Art being only 1 category out of 31, makes it look like it is a small category. If you glance though the list, you will miss it. It's Marketing 101, you only have a few seconds to get the shoppers attention. Within a few seconds the person decides to stay on the site or leave. If they are looking for paintings, photography or sculpture and they are not on the list, they will probably leave. POINT 2: All of the products in the art category are not visible, they are a click away. You have to click ART to find out what the products are. This puts those products at a distinct disadvantage to the products whose title are directly listed on the front page. POINT 3: Art is a Huge category, it is the largest actual product on Etsy, surpassed only by the category SUPPLIES. There are 31 categories on the Etsy home page. What I am going to do now is list some of the categories that are within the sub-category of art. I am listing them by the number of items listed On Etsy. I am comparing how they would rank in size compared to the 31 categories listed on the Etsy front page. (The list was hard to compile a click at a time, so it may be slightly off, I may have missed 1, but it is pretty close) The 5th largest product category on Etsy is: 5th = Handmade Prints 124,000 items 6th = Painting 113,000 8th = Photography 106,000 9th = Illustration 60,000 12th = Mixed Media 51,000 16th = Drawing 39,000 18th =Collage 31,000 Is this fair that these categories are so large and have no visibility on the front page? Just asking. This is a list of some of the products that are listed on the front page that have fewer items than these.

• • • • • • • • •

Sport = 327 items Toys = 1000 items Furniture = 4,500 items Candles 15,000 Quilts = 16,000 Books = 21,000 Woodworking 23,000 Dolls 26,000 Pets = 26,000

POINT 4 : The term for ALL THINGS HANDMADE doesn't really refer to Paintings, Photography, and a lot of other Items in the Art category. If you read that term, you wouldn't expect to find Prints of paintings on Etsy, for an example. Not having Prints, Photography, or paintings listed on the Front page only further enhances that perception.

POINT 5: The pictures on the Etsy Home page. We have established that the Art category is huge. But, from what I have seen, there is a very small percentage of items out of that category on the Front page at any one given time. This further enhances the perception that there is [not] a lot of Art on Etsy.

The discussion on this telling post kicked around a number of options, such as breaking out art in the category list into a greater number of headings, before coming up I think with the simplest. Etsy has already recognised that for the art category, the strap line ‘Hand Made’ is not appropriate – it doesn’t fit with common usage. With that in mind it was proposed that a new, top level, category be created of Art, to go alongside the existing ones of Handmade, Supplies and Vintage. This would I think require a different approach to the front page to make this four-way split more explicit. It could be argued for example that burying the existing Supplies and Vintage categories in that list of 31 fails to give them adequate coverage either. If coupled with a revamp of the search process so that a search on one category would not bring in items from the others unless specifically requested this would mean that the present situation, where birdhouses, brooms, jewellery and many other things turn up in an art search, would no longer be possible. The new front page could begin by asking the question ‘What do you want to look at?’ with the four choices being graphically highlighted. Perhaps each choice could have a graphic drawn at random from the appropriate main category, changing every 60 seconds or so. The link would be however to the detailed front page for that category, to avoid the current obsession with front page appearances. It would also be important I think to retain as many other ways as possible into the site so the other items currently on the front page would be retained wherever possible – links to the Storque, to showcases, curated choices etc. In many ways it would be better to use ‘Fine Art’, because that would, of itself, give a clear message about Etsy’s intentions. However, my personal position is that this would be incompatible with the sale of reproductions. I know however from discussion in the forums, others do not agree with this position. Recommended: 1. Etsy should create a new top-level category of Fine Art to sit alongside the existing ones of Handmade, Supplies and Vintage. Structure Although the terms ‘categories’ and ‘sub-categories’ are commonly used, in practice it seems that there is no real hierarchical structure to the site and everything other than the very top level of Handmade, Supplies and Vintage is actually a tag. This is suggested by the way in which search brings up items in other categories. Assuming that is the case, they should be presented as ‘suggested tags’ not as discrete categories and changes made to the search process to prevent for example something tagged with painting in the ceramics category showing up in art. It seems likely that much of the alleged mis-tagging is because of problems with search rather than any deliberate attempt to mislead. Mistagging does occur, but it would be much less value if search was changed. I have attached a detailed analysis of the categories and sub-categories as an appendix. My comments in the appendix and below apply whether these are actually hierarchical categories or tags. In both cases a much greater degree of rigour and clarity is essential.

Looked at overall, the sub-categories identified under each art category show no sign of any logic. Too often they appear to be the outcome of a perfunctory brainstorming carried out in isolation even from the other art forms. I can see no other explanation for what we are faced with on the site. Long term it might be advisable to look at ways to exclude materials from tags and add the present materials field into the search process. Recommended: 1. The existing lists of categories and sub-categories under art should be extensively revised. 2. It should be made clear that these are actually suggested tags, rather than hierarchical categories. 3. The tagging process should exclude certain combinations of tags. 4. The search process should be revised to look only within a top-level category as the default – this would prevent for example searches in Art bringing up items in Handmade (and vice versa) unless explicitly chosen. Original, print, reproduction Although this issue is related to tagging and categorisation, it is an area that causes particular argument and confusion. The term giclée is another source of difficulty, but that is best considered as part of the original – print – reproduction question. The key issue revolves around establishing the meaning of an original, a reproduction and a print. An original has been defined as a “one-of-a-kind piece executed by the artist’s hand. This art category includes such media as paintings, sketches, colorings, collages, calligraphy, scratchboards, and animation cels.”1 There have been attempts in various forum threads to muddy the waters by confusing two meanings of the word original - 'physical original' as against 'original idea'. Since Etsy is not a juried site, we can only really consider the first – the physical original. By contrast a reproduction is a copy of an already existing original piece of art. On Etsy the waters have again been muddied from time to time by suggestions that the term reproduction only applies to a copy made using the same techniques. On that basis a painted copy of the Mona Lisa would be a reproduction, but a photographic copy would not - a rather bizarre conclusion. It is the area of prints that seems to generate the most problems. Some of these are created by Etsy’s muddy categories, but even setting that aside much confusion still exists. Printmaking according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica is: "...broadly, the production of images normally on paper and exceptionally on fabric, parchment, plastic or other support by various processes of multiplication; more narrowly, the making and printing of graphic works by hand or under the supervision of the artist." “A fine art print is a "multiple original." That is to say, usually within the confines of a limited edition, the artist conceives and executes his work specifically in the context of one or another of the serial techniques: etching, woodcut, silk screen, lino cut, etc. Most artists feel that the technique itself adds a new dimension to an original work of art, transforming a mere 1

Taken from here: http://www.customdesignworkshop.com/cdw/art_glossary.asp

drawing into something more sublime through one or another of the processes of serial reproduction”.2 Outside the world of fine art, ‘print’ has developed another meaning to the 'fine art' one defined above. This secondary meaning has been created by marketers not artists and is literally applied to anything from posters to high quality drum scanned reproductions of old masters. Almost without exception prints sold under the marketing definition are in fine art terms, reproductions. They may be sold as ‘Giclée’, ‘fine art limited editions’, ‘artist prints’ or one of a myriad other terms, but unless the image was “conceived and executed …specifically in the context” of that print medium and has not been copied from other media, they remain reproductions. Incidentally this marketing usage of the print has also degraded the meaning of giclée since that has also been increasingly used to mean a reproduction. The parallel categories of prints and printmaking used by Etsy are unhelpful in this context. They add even more uncertainty to an already muddled situation and should be merged, probably as ‘printmaking’. I will come back to the sub-categories included in print, but not printmaking later. There is a related question of how to tag reproductions. As things stand there is a main art sub-category of reproductions, but the majority of such appear to be placed in other categories, sometimes print or printmaking but sometimes even the original medium. Etsy guidelines on tagging seem quite clear: •

If the word describes what something is, don't use that unless your item *is* that. A reproduction of a painting is not a painting, so a reproduction should not use 'painting' as a tag.

•

What is the main material? A reproduction of an oil painting doesn't use oil paint, so a reproduction should not use 'oil' as a tag.

•

What method or technique did you use to make it? A reproduction of an oil painting is not painted so should not be tagged 'painting'.

•

Are there synonyms? Painting is not a synonym for reproduction, so reproductions should not be tagged ‘painting’.

Given the current state of search, tagging a reproduction with the media of the original image is potentially misleading and may in some legal jurisdictions be illegal. Unless originals and reproductions can be clearly separated it should be avoided. Use of ‘print’ as a synonym for reproduction is grossly misleading and should not be possible. Two other areas of uncertainty for the printmaking category remain, photography (both digital and film) and ‘digital art’ (the meaning of which is of itself subject to much uncertainty). The idea of a fine art print does not traditionally include photographs, but the concept of fine art photography is well established and it is traditional to talk of a photographic print. Photography could be incorporated into the Printmaking category, but would probably be best left outside as now. 2

Taken from: http://www.worldprintmakers.com/english/pmdef.htm

A much greater difficulty arises with digital art. One suggestion in this thread (http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=6301596&page=58#post43165985) was for a specific category with sub-categories as below: 3-D

algorithmic

animation

collage

drawing

fractal

illustration

mixed media

montage

painting

photomanipulation

pixel

vector Should digital art be a main category in any case? Should it be a part of printmaking instead, in which case should a digital print be described as an ‘original print’ in the same way as say a linocut? As for the suggested sub-categories, they again mix up media, style and to a degree, subject. Pixel and vector are in any case redundant, since all the others are either pixel based e.g. painting or vector based e.g. fractals. Photomanipulation is ambiguous, since it could equally be in photography, depending on the degree of manipulation. It is not necessarily a digital process in any case. What is digital mixed media? I’m not aware of anyone selling video art on Etsy, so I am not sure how animation would fit in. If it were to be included where would non-digital animation go? I have not found anyone selling moving images on Etsy, so other than digital collage sheets (which would be a Supply) it seems reasonable to assume all digital artists on Etsy are selling a physical image. It seems probable that most digital artists see themselves as working within the printmaking tradition, although terms like digital painting are also common. However since digital images are by definition multiples it seems most appropriate that digital art should be placed within printmaking. There remains the question of whether digital prints are also ‘original prints’ in the same manner as linocuts etc. In my view the test is the same - is the image made by or under the direction of the artist? If so, then it would be an 'original print'. I'm not sure how that would affect those prints produced and sent to the buyer without the artist seeing them but as I understand it that is not allowed on Etsy anyway. Like ‘print’, ‘giclée’ is a much abused term. Giclée is a printing process but as with linocut etc it is also used to describe the prints made by that process. It properly describes the output from Iris printers that can produce variable size dots and use dye based inks.3 Giclée is also often used to mean prints from high-end inkjets using pigment-based inks. These should properly be described simply as archival (if that applies) and pigment based prints. It has also been debased to mean simply reproduction. A giclée print is not of itself a reproduction. The test of a reproduction remains that described earlier and is independent of the printing process. Recommended: 1. Original, print, reproduction and giclée should be clearly defined by Etsy along the lines set out here. 2. Use of original and reproduction as tags for the same item should be impossible. Until this can be achieved by programming means it should be set out in new guidelines. 3. Use of ‘print’ in isolation as a synonym for ‘reproduction’ should be prohibited.

3

Giclée , the short history of inkjet digital printmaking: http://www.worldprintmakers.com/english/giclee.htm (article written about 2002)

4. Unless originals and reproductions can be easily separated in searches, use of the original materials as tags for reproductions should be prohibited. 5. Photography should remain as a separate art category 6. Digital art should be included within printmaking.

Appendix: Art categories and sub-categories on Etsy The sub-categories within Art are repeated below. aceo

collage

drawing

fiber art

illustration

mixed media

painting

photography

print

printmaking

reproduction

sculpture

These are a mess. ACEO is a format, not a medium; the difference between print and printmaking is obscure, while reproduction is at odds with the rest. How does a reproduction fit with the idea of Handmade in the first place? As you know these sub-categories are further sub-divided. The first of these, ACEO appears to have the other main categories as sub-categories below it. I can understand the logic of this since ACEOs are a very popular format. However, the problem of distinguishing between print and printmaking and the appropriateness of reproduction still apply. If these are indeed tags and not hierarchical categories it creates major problems for search unless the searcher is skilled in Etsy search syntax. The Collage sub-categories are extremely confused. abstract painting portrait

digital paper print

original collage photo surreal

The selection seems arbitrary. They mix styles, medium and subject, it isn’t clear why ‘original collage’ is thought to be needed while reproduction isn’t, why ‘painting’ is there at all, or why ‘abstract’, ‘portrait’ and ‘surreal’ are in the list, but not say maritime or landscape. Why is ‘paper’ there but not fabric? Why not mixed media? Why is ‘print’ repeated from the top level of art categories? How can a collage also be a print? Where is ‘printmaking’? Drawing is even more confused. abstract

charcoal

digital

ink

landscape

marker

original

original drawing

pastel

pencil

pop

portrait

print

surreal

Again styles are mixed with media and subject, but added to that are other strange things. What for example is the difference between ‘original’ and ‘original drawing’? What does ‘pop’ mean? How can a drawing also be a print? Many people think of pastel as being a form of painting. How would you categorise ink and wash? Where is ‘printmaking’? Fibre art (sorry – I’m English!) Why is this here at all? How is it different from crochet, knitting or needlecraft? On a related point does the search pick up fiber/fibre?

Confusion also reigns within the Illustration category. Abstract

charcoal

digital

fashion

ink

landscape

marker

nude

original illustration

pastel

pencil

pop

portrait

print

still life

surreal

Styles, subject and medium are again mixed up. Why original illustration (and not reproduction)? Still life appears here but not in drawing – why? What is an illustration as opposed to other forms of art? Do cartoons go in drawing or illustration? At the moment they are in neither. Again ‘print’ appears but not ‘printmaking’ (or reproduction). Mixed Media gets worse. 3d

altered

assemblage

mixed media original

mosaic

scrapbooking

book

How does 3d differ from sculpture? Altered what? What is a mixed media book? Does it mean altered book? Yet again why do we have ‘mixed media original’? Mosaic is just wrong. It is a medium in its own right. If it has to be at this level it should surely be under Collage? This time neither print, printmaking or reproduction appear. Painting has the usual mix of media, subject and style. abstract

acrylic

canvas

digital

encaustic

gouache

landscape

oil

original painting

pop

portrait

print

reproduction

still life

surreal

watercolor

Why original painting? Why print? Why is reproduction suddenly in there (especially when it also has a category of its own) although still no printmaking? Why some subjects and not others – e.g. still life, maritime, aircraft, animals, nude? Why canvas but not paper or board? Photography is equally confused, in fact almost bizarre. abstract

black and white

collage

cyanotype

digital

film

landscape

lomography

macro

nature

pinhole

polaroid

pop

portrait

surreal

ttv

We have the usual mixture of medium (film/digital), subject and style, plus other options unique to photography. Why cyanotype, but not sepia or platinum or gold toning? Why black and white but not colour? Lomography and Polaroid are about types of camera so why not 35mm, medium format, large format? Is pop here a subject (music) or a style? If a style what does it mean? Why no fashion or nude as subjects? What about urban, photojournalism, candid? Why ttv? (I had to Google it to even find out what it was.) Why not photography with other vintage cameras? Toy cameras?

The Prints and Printmaking categories raise many questions, starting of course with why both? What is the difference if any? Linked to these is the Reproduction category, which has sub-categories that overlap with both, but doesn’t include the categories that one might assume are actually being reproduced. Prints has these sub-categories aquatint

collograph

digital

drypoint

engraving

etching

giclee

gocco

letterpress

linocut

lithograph

mixed media

monotype

screenprint

stencil

woodblock

Printmaking has all of these except ‘digital’ and ‘giclee’. Reproduction on the other hand only has these: archival

digital

giclee

limited edition

open edition

painting

illustration

I understand that at some stage the printmaking category was added, printmakers haven’t apparently expressed concern over the terminology. It isn’t clear however why the existing print category was retained, unless it was in related to some confused thinking about the nature of an original print and the idea of a reproduction. Why are digital and giclée included in ‘print’, but not in ‘printmaking’? The concept of prints as multiple originals is inseparable from the idea of an edition – whether limited or open – and yet these terms are not included in either prints or printmaking, only in reproductions. Gocco is simply a form of screen print made using a particular piece of commercially available equipment. Once produced I’m not sure it can be identified as being specifically produced that way? If not why is it separately listed? Linocut is there but not woodblock – or is woodblock meant to be a part of engraving? Sculpture is not an area I have great knowledge of but also appears to have problems. abstract

animal

assemblage

ceramic

clay

fiber

figure

found object

glass

installation

metal

mixed media

mobile

mosaic

painted

paper

people

plaster

stone

wood

Again there is a mixture of styles, materials and subject. What is the difference between ‘people’ and ‘figure’, or ‘assemblage’ and ‘mixed media’? Is mosaic a form of sculpture in its own right? What is the appropriate category for a sculpture assembled from pieces of wood – ‘assemblage’ or ‘wood’?