Large eddy simulation of rotating turbulence Hao Lu, Christopher Rutland, Leslie Smith Force low energy data by Gaussian white-noise scheme
Objectives Direct numerical simulation (DNS) of rotating turbulence: We have small scale forced cases, large scale forced cases and decaying cases. DNS provides data for LES model development. Developing sub-grid scale models: Model has the capability to capture small-scale turbulence properties, and anisotropic features of rotating turbulence.
Development of new models Dynamic structure model [5] Lij ijDSM 2k sgs , where Lij are modified Leonard terms. L mm Consistent dynamic structure models for rotating flow Gij GCDSM ij 2ksgs , where Gij are gradient terms. G mm
ij 2k sgs , where ij are modeling of Lij Cij . mm 2 ' 3 4 Mixed modeling, ij u S ij , u Ck k sgs SCDSM ij
m tr u
3D Spectra @t=0.3 k
yS pe c
1.0
Kr/Kr,ini
16 14
slope= β=1.003
11
τ
SCDSM
8 6 4
variance is described by: ρ=0.999
0 6
8
DNS
τ11
10
12
14
Too dissipative at large scales via SM
E(k)
SSM
1E-4
sm
MixSCDSM MixGCDSM
1E-5
3
128 DNS SM
3
0.7
128 DNS 0.0
0.1
0.2
Time
0.3
0.4
1
k
10
Ω=1[rad/s],
υ=0.002
2
SCDSM
DNS
τ11
1
τ11
1
Energy spectra
SGS energy production, dissipation, backscatter
y
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3 -2
-1
0
1
x
2
3
-3
-2
-1
0
x
1
A-priori test
2
0.8
0.6
DSM GCDSM SCDSM SSM GM
0.4
0.2
A-posteriori test of large scale forced rotating turbulence using MixGCDSM Time sequence
1.0 40
60
80
100
120
k= π /∆
[Case description] Rotating flow forced at large scales with rotation rate of 12 [rad/s]. [Tested quantities] Regression coefficients of τ 33 and ∂τ 3i /∂x i
140
Quasi 2D flow at large scales
Cyclonical vortices
Reverse energy transfers from small scales to large scales Computational efficient (less CPU cost) using MixGCDSM (spectral code, on Intel P4 3.4GHz Linux Cluster, 1cpu, 323) TSM : TMixGCDSM : TMixSCDSM : TDynSM =
0.24 :
0.33
:
0.59
:
1.00
Literature cited
[4] C. G. Speziale. Subgrid scale stress models for the large-eddy simulation of rotating turbulent flows. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics, 33:199–222,1985.
3
[Traditional models] SSM: Scale Similarity Model GM: Gradient Model DSM: Dynamic Structure Model [New models] GCDSM: Gradient type Consistent DSM SCDSM: Similarity type Consistent DSM
1.0
[3] L. M. Smith and Y. Lee. On near resonances and symmetry breaking in forced rotating flows at moderate Rossby number. J. Fluid Mech., 535:111–142, 2005.
0
y
0
Comparison of contour plots of SGS stress τ11 (left) and similarity type consistent dynamic structure modeled stress τ11SCDSM (right) at z=0 layer. Flow is the small scale forced case ( (c) at slide 3). Cutoff wave-number: k=11.6.
20
[2] C. Cambon, N. N. Mansour, and F. S. Godeferd. Energy transfer in rotating turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 337:303–332, 1997.
17.20 2.306 0.3093 0.04147 0.005561 7.457E-4 1.000E-4
17.20 3 2.306 0.3093 0.04147 0.005561 7.457E-42 1.000E-4
-3
0
Energy decay rate
[1] C. Cambon, N. N. Mansour, and K. D. Squires. Anisotropic structure of homogeneous turbulence subjected to uniform rotation. Proceeding of the Summer Program, pages 397–420, 1994.
16
3
Scatter plot analysis, and correlation/regression analysis. The correlation coefficient can represent the variance between the modeled and the exact terms on the scatter plot and on the PDF diagram. The regression coefficient can represent the contour level ratio between the modeled and the exact terms, the slope of the regression (scatter) line.
SSM
1E-3
Assume: b a . Ideally, expect 1, 1 ab a b Regression: a 2 a 2 ab a b Correlation: 2 a a 2 b2 b 2
12
4
New models able to duplicate important features of forced rotating turbulence
Without Model
Without Model
A-posteriori test of intermediate scale forced rotating turbulence using MixGCDSM Time sequence
Scatter plot of τ 11 by SCDSM
2
New models more accurate
rg En e
0.01
Development of cyclonic two-dimensional coherent structures appearing in rotating turbulence as indicated by iso-surfaces of vorticity, contours of kinetic energy and velocity vectors: (a) initial very low energy level isotropic turbulence; (b) final state (at normalized time 3.88) of large scale forced rotating case; (c) final state (at normalized time 3.68) of small scale forced rotating case.
0
initial Reλ=86, Roω3=0.41
-3
MixSCDSM MixGCDSM
β 33
Researchers have used SGS models to simulate rotating turbulence. For rotating turbulence, however, there still exists a need for a better understanding of SGS models [4] because anisotropic characteristics may influence LES modeling and comparative studies of model performance in rotating turbulence are insufficient.
Decay at 1283. And filter the initial data into 323 for LES
0.8
2
Conclusions
Energy Evolution
0.9
10
Many features are well known. The trends toward 2D [1, 2], the cyclonic/anti-cyclonic asymmetry in favor of cyclones [3], and the influence of the background rotation on the energy transfers [2], are among the most challenging issues for rotating turbulence.
A-posteriori test of decaying flows
m ctru Spe rgy Ene
Turbulence subjected to system rotation provides a simple configuration for studying the characteristic features of both anisotropic turbulent flows and model performances in anisotropic turbulent flows. It is of great importance in engineering and geophysics. The most important application in the first case is the development and the design of turbo-machinery. Here one has to take into account the detailed properties of the turbulent fluids, which pass through the device and are rotated (e.g., by the motion of the turbine blades). A detailed understanding of rotational effects on flow characteristics is essential for an advanced layout of these machines. Second, the whole field of geophysics is crucially determined by planetary rotation, which influences both atmospheric flows and oceanic flows and affects global climate as well as short-term weather forecasting. Understanding the fundamental processes in these fluid layer forms the basis for a detailed analysis of complex phenomena such as the development of climate anomalies (such as El Niño), the formation of hurricanes and tidal waves, the spreading of pollutants, and the oceanic circulation of nutrients.
Forced rotating turbulence – by DNS
β 3
Introduction
Sponsors: NSF, SCREMS
[5] E. Pomraning and C. J. Rutland. Dynamic one-equation nonviscosity large eddy simulation model. AIAA Journal, 40(4):689–701, April 2002.
Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 0500056 and by the NSF Scientific Computing Research Environments in the Mathematical Sciences (SCREMS) under Grant No. DMS-0532085. We would like to thank Dr. Yun-Liang Wang for helpful discussions and the Engine Research Center at the University of Wisconsin - Madison for providing computing resources.
0.8
For further information
DSM GCDSM SCDSM SSM GM
0.6
0.4
Please contact
[email protected]. More information on this and related projects can be obtained at http://homepages.cae.wisc/~luh
0.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
k= π /∆
140
University of Wisconsin –– Engine Research Center