Page 1 of2
Dana Hyde From:
Peter Rundlet
Sent:
Monday, April 19, 2004 12:43 PM
To:
Dan Marcus
Cc:
Christine Healey
Subject: FW: DOJ/FJ „•*****"
Dan, ^..-""" i have tried to keep my distance from the storm resulting from Ashcroft's swipe atx Jamie, but I wanted to make sure that you recalled that in DOJ Document Request No. 11, which was sent on February 6, 2004, we requested in Item #1 the following:
1 . The Memorandum of Understanding that required or allowed the sharing of information related to thefirstWorld Trade Center bombing case between the Criminal Division at the Department of Justice and the National Security Division of the FBI. This suggestion was given to us by none other than Jamie herself, as the forwarded e-mail below demonstrates. As you know, the Justice Department failed to fulfill this request (until our hearing, of course) .
Jami
the fact that the request came at Jamie's suggestion is telling about .s integrity, despite allegations to the contrary. _,.-
I just thou
you should know.
Peter Original Message From: Christine Healey Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 6:28 PM To: Dan Marcus; Barbara Grewe; Peter Rundlet Subject: FW: DOJ/FBI Peter is preparing a document request that was going to incorporate the items on Jamie's handwritten list plus others we need to get. I think this list is longer and we can add the extra items. Original Message From: Jamie Gorelick Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:54 PM To: Dan Marcus;
[email protected]; Barbara Grewe Subject: DOJ/FBI During the course of our Mueller interview and afterward, several items came up that I want to make sure we get: Mueller's confirmation briefing book The record of the SAC conference in 2000 to tell the SACs the al-Qa'ida priority The record of the SAC conference in 2001 (Lansdowne) at which the AG and Freeh gave different priority to terrorism The pre-9/11 Bureau Strategy document that Mueller referred to The MOU requiring/allowing the movement of information to and from the Criminal and National Security sides of the DOJ/FBI house in the World Trade Center case
4/23/2004