LED Lighting Solutions Steven DenBaars Group Head, LED UC Santa Barbara
Why LED Lighting? Long life – lifetimes can exceed 100,000 hours as compared to 1,000 hrs for tungsten bulbs. Robustness –no glass, no filaments. Size – typical package is only 5 mm in diameter. Energy efficiency – up to 90% less energy used translates into smaller power supply. Non-toxicity – no mercury.
LED University
Versatility – available in a variety of colors; can be pulsed. Cool – less heat radiation than HID or incandescent Leading Global Energy Solutions
What is LED Lighting? L.E.D.= Light Emitting Diode (Runs on 3.2V DC Power)
Blue LED
LED produces light by combining Positive and negative charges inside Gallium nitride crystal Leading Global Energy Solutions
Luminous Efficacy of Various Light Sources
LED x Current number for GaN white LED at UCSB is 152 lm/W partner chip (But at Low Current 20mA)
2006 Graph taken from www.lampteck.co.uk
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Lighting: Large Electricity Consumption Lighting is single biggest users of Electricity • Incandescent Light Bulb -1-4% efficient • Fluorescent – 15-25% efficient • LED- 25-60% efficient (90% theoretical) U.S. lighting uses the equivalent of 50% of the energy used by all cars on American roads. LED lighting can reduce that to 5-10%. Leading Global Energy Solutions
2 Methods of Generating White LEDs
280 lm/W possible
152 lm/W (2008)
Blue GaN LED
Green, Red phosphors Blue Light
Blue GaN LED
Green GaN LED
Substrate
Red LED
Blue+ Phosphors -lowest cost - 100 lm/W ->90%market share
Direct Semiconductor RGB -good efficiency -highest cost -tunable color
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Energy Usage Comparison “Best”“The White Promise” LED and Compact Fluorescent vs. 60Watt Light Bulb Comparison
Power Used (Watts)
53watts saved
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Global Warming/Energy Savings Potential of LEDs
->Lighting Consumes 22% of all Electricity Produced ->If a 150 lm/Watt Solid State White LED “system” was developed, and employed, then in the United States alone: • Alleviate the need of 133 new power stations!* • Eliminate 258 million metric tons of Carbon* • “The Promise of Solid State Lighting” OIDA Report , • http://www.netl.doe.gov/ssl/PDFs/oida_led-oled_rpt.pdf Leading Global *
Energy Solutions
The Reality • • • •
Commercial White LED “Bulb” 50-80 LPW Fixture Efficiency all over the map 30-80% Lumina ire System Efficacy 15- 64 LPW HEAT is the Biggest Problem
60 LPW 30 LPW
25C
60C in fixture
Leading Global Energy Solutions
LED Eff. vs. System Eff. • Company LED Efficacy
Fixture Eff.
System
80%
64LPW
– LED A
80 LPW
– LED B
45LPW
50%
22.5LPW
– LED C
50LPW
30%
15LPW
– CFL
60LPW
50%
30LPW
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Fixture Efficiency
Lighting System Efficacy
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Courtesy Cree Inc
Current LED Market $4B/yr
Cell phone
Traffic signals Large Displays
streetlights
Residential (down light))
Automotive
Leading Global Energy Solutions
LEDs in Architectural Lighting
Installation Benjamin Franklin Bridge PA, USA (Philips Lumileds.)
Water Cube (Beijing Olympics)
Leading Global Energy Solutions
Energy Eff. LED TV
New Samsung LED TV uses 40% less power than CFL backlit (Mass Market May 2009) Leading Global Energy Solutions
AUTOMOBILE LED Headlights expected 2008 from Tokyo Motor Show
Nissan
Honda
Toyota Daimler Chrysler Leading Global Energy Solutions
LED Lighting /Solar Cell Off-Grid www.lutw.org • Kerosene lighting and firewood are used by 1/3 of the world; they cause countless fires and are very inefficient (0.03 lm/watt). • The average villager spends 10-25% of their annual income on kerosene. • LED Lighting costs much less on an annual basis and payback period is
just 6 months.
www.lutw.org “In the few months we have had the White LED lamps the improvement in the children’s academic performance has been absolutely remarkable” Headmaster, Mubarak Village, Pakistan June 2004 Leading Global Energy Solutions
CONCLUSION • R&D Level LED Single lamp efficacy (150lm/W) now exceeds CFL, but: • HIGH COSTS >$40/lamp • Commercial based LED Lamp Fixtures performance is much lower than promised are much lower due to several factors that need further research and development in – – – –
Fixture Efficiency, Efficiency Droop Heat Sinking Scale up to Mass production Stay Tuned…. Leading Global Energy Solutions
What's Next?? Michael Krames, Executive Vice President, Advanced Labs, Philips Lumileds Bruce Pelton, Director of Engineering, California Lighting Technology Center, UC Davis Jim Sanfilippo, President and CEO, Nila Inc. Leading Global Energy Solutions