Debate

“ claiming that parents should take responsibility for their own child which will ease violent behavior linked to video games, making there no need for stronger classification” There is a thing called a user password before logging into a computer if parents don’t know how to use it then they shouldn’t own a computer. Technology can be blamed for the responsibility of children’s access for things on the internet, television and other media’s but if there is no responsibility for these technologies you might as well ask yourself the real ethical problem is not just censorship rather then faulty responsibilities on parental half’s. Censorship can eliminate the accessing of information created by the small authorships and thus can develop more structuralism and less diversity with view. This can lead to economic and social dualism by the cause of overall mass media’s control of our opinions and censorship of choice. Coming back to children censorship do you really want you child growing up loving the previous president of America (George bush) Mass media could of made me look like a God and you wouldn’t of known any different. That could be the cause if mass media, T.N.C’s, governments and other wealthy companies and people can be given more voice in the media and presenting us knowledge only allow one sides of a story. Media can become a social propaganda of the mass medias high-ark parties, thus overall resulting in a structural society with limited information with limited views and opinions. “Social network sites, allow the emergence of symbolic artifacts in ways that blur the original authors’ intents and the boundaries between language and other signs, match a poststructural perspective.” Warschauer, M Grimes, D 2007, 'Audience, Authorship and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0', Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 27, pp. 1-23

Censorship debate