Criteria
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Criteria as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 352
- Pages: 1
Criteria
5
4
3
1-2
Literacy
No spelling or grammar errors, allowing the reflection of the journal to be easily read and ideas flow easily
Minor spelling or grammar errors, still allowing the reflection of the journal to be easily read and ideas flow
Spelling or grammar errors cause the reflection to be confusing or misinterpreted in parts
Many spelling or grammar errors cause the reflection to be very confusing illegible
Design
3 designs or more have been created and annotated to a high standard
2 designs have been created and annotated to a high standard
1-2 designs have been created and annotated to a satisfactory standard
1 design has been created with little to no annotation provided.
Refining
Reasoning for selection of final design is clear and explained in detail using specific reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is clear and explained in detail using broad reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is vague and explained in some detail using general reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is unclear and not well explained
Construction Final product is presented very well. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces fit with design and rules easy to follow.
Final product is presented well. Use of colour, game mechanics and game pieces fit with design and rules easy to follow.
Final product is presented but needs detail added or refinement. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces mostly fit with design.
Final product is presented poorly. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces do not fit with design and rules too abstract to follow.
Evaluation
Evaluation of designs are thorough and explore both strengths to the design as well as improvements and comparisons to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are completed and explore both strengths to the design as well as improvements, however, does not compare to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are brief and explore either strengths to the design or improvements. Does not compare to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are thorough and explore both strengths to the design, as well as improvements and comparisons to other designs in detail.
5
4
3
1-2
Literacy
No spelling or grammar errors, allowing the reflection of the journal to be easily read and ideas flow easily
Minor spelling or grammar errors, still allowing the reflection of the journal to be easily read and ideas flow
Spelling or grammar errors cause the reflection to be confusing or misinterpreted in parts
Many spelling or grammar errors cause the reflection to be very confusing illegible
Design
3 designs or more have been created and annotated to a high standard
2 designs have been created and annotated to a high standard
1-2 designs have been created and annotated to a satisfactory standard
1 design has been created with little to no annotation provided.
Refining
Reasoning for selection of final design is clear and explained in detail using specific reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is clear and explained in detail using broad reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is vague and explained in some detail using general reasons
Reasoning for selection of final design is unclear and not well explained
Construction Final product is presented very well. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces fit with design and rules easy to follow.
Final product is presented well. Use of colour, game mechanics and game pieces fit with design and rules easy to follow.
Final product is presented but needs detail added or refinement. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces mostly fit with design.
Final product is presented poorly. Use of colour, game mechanics, game pieces do not fit with design and rules too abstract to follow.
Evaluation
Evaluation of designs are thorough and explore both strengths to the design as well as improvements and comparisons to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are completed and explore both strengths to the design as well as improvements, however, does not compare to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are brief and explore either strengths to the design or improvements. Does not compare to other designs.
Evaluation of designs are thorough and explore both strengths to the design, as well as improvements and comparisons to other designs in detail.
Related Documents
Criteria
May 2020 40
Criteria
June 2020 37
Criteria
November 2019 43
Hibernate Criteria
June 2020 3
Hl Criteria
June 2020 10