Boaz Huss, The Mystificaton Of Kabbalah (in Hebrew)

  • Uploaded by: Boaz Huss
  • 0
  • 0
  • July 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Boaz Huss, The Mystificaton Of Kabbalah (in Hebrew) as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 8,954
  • Pages: 24
‰Ï·˜ ‚‰Ó ∫‰ÙÈËÚ·

Ʊπ∏¥ ¨Â· ¨ÔÂÒÓ¯·‡ ȯ‡Ï ˙·Ȅ‡· ¨¯ÈÈ ÏÚ ˜ÈÏȯ˜‡ ÆÔÓ‡‰

ÌÈÓÚÙ· ÌÚÙ‰



‰ÚÈ„È ∫Ì”·Ó¯‰ Ï˘ ÒÂ‡Ó Â˙ÂÓÏÒ‡˙‰

µ

¯ÂÊÓ ¯ÈÓ‡ Ø ‰˘„Á Ï˘ ÒÂ˙ÈӉ ‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

π

Ò‰ ÊÚ· Ø ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙Ï·˜· ‰Èχ ÍÂÁ Ï˘ Ì˙ÈÈÏÚ

≥±

Èχ¯˘È „„ÂÚ Ø ‰¯˘Ú ˘ÂÏ˘‰ ÔÓ ∫‰˘„Á‰ ˙Ú· ˙ÂÈ„Â‰È ‰Ú·˘‰ ˙ÂÁψ

µµ

ȯ¯‰ Ï·ÂÈ Ø Ï‡¯˘ÈÏ ÈÓÏÒÂÓ‰ ·Á¯Ó‰ ÂÏÈ· ̯ÂÈ Ø ˙ÈÏÂÙÈË ‰˘È‚Ù „ÂÚÈ˙ — ‰·È˙η ÈÂÙȯ ∫ÁÙÒ

∑π

ÈÈÒ¯Ó· ˙ÒΉ È˙· ˙ÂÓ„Ï ÌȘ

∏µ

˜ÈÙ ·‡Ê ‰ÓÏ˘ Ø ÌÈÈÈ·‰ ÈÓÈ· ̉Ȃ‰ÓÂ

±∞∏ ’ÌÈÓÚÙ’· ·ÏΖԇ‰„ ËÈȯ‰ Ï˘ ‰¯Ó‡Ó ÏÚ ˙·‚˙ Ø ¯˜Ù‰ ‰„˘Î ‰È‚ÂÏÂȈÂÒ· ÌÈÁ¯ÊÓ‰ ¯˜Á

±±µ

˜ÒÈÏ ‰˘Ó Ô¯˜ÈÒ ‰˘Ó Ø ‰·Â‚˙

±≤≤

·ÏΖԇ‰„ ËÈȯ‰ Ø ‰·Â˘˙

±≤¥

˙¯Â˜È·Â ÌÈÂÈÚ — ‚„¯È· χٯ È·¯Ï ÌÈ„ÂÓÈÏ ÔÂ˘Ï ÏÚ

±≤π

ÔÓÓ Ô¯‰‡ Ø ¯˘‡–¯· ‰˘Ó ˙¯Â„‰Ó

˙¯˜ÈÒ ˙ÂÈ„¯ÙÒ ˙ÂÏȉ˜ ÏÚ „ÂÓÈÏ ¯ÙÒ ÏÚ Ò˜ÂÙ ¯Ó˙ ‰‡Â˘·

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

7

10.06.2007, 07:34

±¥∑

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

8

10.06.2007, 07:35

9

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÒÂ˙ÈӉ Ò‰ ÊÚ· The work of an intellectual is… through the analyses that he carries out in his own field, to question over and over again what is postulated as self-evident, to disturb people’s mental habits, the way they do and think things, to dissipate what is familiar and accepted, to reexamine rules and institutions, and on the basis of this re-problematization… to participate in the formation of a political will± ¨Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ‰¢‡¯‰ ˙ȈÁÓ· ÈÓÂ¡ ¯˜ÁÓ ‰„˘Î ¯ˆÂ˘ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜Á ‰ÈÏÙȈÒÈ„Î Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈÈ˘‰ ˙ȈÁÓ· ÒÒ·˙‰ ¨ÂÈ„ÈÓÏ˙ ÌÂÏ˘ Ì› ÷¯‚ È„È ÏÚ ¨È·¯ÚÓ‰ ÌÏÂÚ· ÌÈ·¯ ÌÈÈÓ„˜‡ ˙„ÒÂӷ χ¯˘È· ˙‡ËÈÒ¯·È‡‰ Ïη ˙È˙¯˜ÂÈ ˙ÈÓ„˜‡ Ô˘‡¯·Â ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙˘ ‰Á‰‰ ÏÚ ˙˙˘ÂÓ ‰Ê ¯˜ÁÓ ‰„˘ ≤Æ˙ȯ·‰–˙ˆ¯‡· ¯˜ÈÚ· ‡ˆÂÈÎ ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ‰Ù¯ȇ Á¯ÊÓ ˙„ÈÒÁ ¨Ê΢‡ ˙„ÈÒÁ ¨˙ÂÏÎȉ‰ ˙¯ÙÒ ÔΩ ‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ‡È‰ ÂÊ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ÈÙȈÙÒ È„Â‰È ÈÂËÈ· Ô‰ ®‰Ï‡· ˙ÒÙ˙ ¨È„ÂÁÈÈ ‰Ú„Â˙ ·ˆÓ· ‰Î¯Ή ¨˘‚ÙÓ‰ ˙ÈÈÂÂÁ ¨˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ Â‡ ˙ȉÂχ ˙Â˘È ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ ‰˘Ó ȯ·„· ˘È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ÂÊ ‰˘È‚ Ï˘ ˜‰·ÂÓ ÁÂÒÈ Æ˙È˙„‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ‰‡È˘Î ‡ ‰˙ȈÓ˙Î ∫ßÌÈ˘„Á ÌÈ˷ȉ ∫‰Ï·˜ß ¯ÙÒ· τȇ Æχ‰ ÌÚ „ÂÁȇ‰ ˙ÈÂÂÁ ‡È‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ȈÓ˙ ¨˙„‰ ˙ȈÓ˙ ‡È‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ̇ ‰‡È˘Ï ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ‰ÚÈ‚Ó ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯ˆ ·Â¯ ˙‡ ˙ÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ ¨ÌÈÈ˙„‰ ÌÈÈÁ‰ ˙ÓˆÚ‰ ˙ÂÈÂ˘È ÌÚ „ÂÁȇ ÈÒÁÈ Ï˘ Ìȯ‡È˙· ÚÈÙÂÓ È˙¯ÙÒ‰ ÔÈÈÂËÈ·˘ ¨˙ÂÈÚ·Ë–ÏÚ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ· ≥

ÆÂÓˆÚ Ï‡‰ ÌÚ Û‡ ÌÈÓÚÙÏ ˙ÂȇÏÈÚ

ËÒ‚‡· ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È· ÌÈȘ˙‰˘ ¨˙„‰È‰ ÈÚ„ÓÏ ¯˘Ú ‰Ú·¯‡‰ ÈÓÏÂÚ‰ Ò¯‚˜· È˙‡ˆ¯‰ ÏÚ ÒÒÂ·Ó ‰Ê ¯Ó‡Ó Ï˘ ˙ÂËÂÈË Â‡¯˜˘ ¨¯·Á Á¯ ‰‡È¯Ó ÔÂ¯Ó ˙È¯ ¨¯·Á ÔÁ ¨È¯¯‰ Ï·ÂÈ ¨¯˜‰ χÂÈÏ ‰„ÂÓ È‡ Æ≤∞∞µ ÆÈ˙‡ ÂÓÈÎÒ‰ „ÈÓ˙ ‡Ï ̇ Ì‚ ¨È˙ÂÚË ˙‡ „„ÁÏ ÈÏ Â¯ÊÚ ˙·¢Á ˙¯ډ ÈÏ Â¯ÈÚ‰ ¨‰Ê ¯Ó‡Ó Æ≤∂µ ßÓÚ ¨Â˜ÂÙ Æπ¥≠π± ßÓÚ ¨ÌÈÈÓ„˜‡ ÌÈ„ÂÓÈÏ ¨Ï„ȇ ∫‡¯ ‰Ï ‰˙ÎÊ˘ ‰·¯‰ ‰¯˜Âȉ ÂÊ ‰ÏÂÎÒ‡ ÏÚ Æµ≥ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ï·˜ ¨Ï„ȇ



± ≤ ≥

≥∞≠π ’ÓÚ ¨®Ê”Ò˘˙© ±±∞ ÌÈÓÚÙ

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

9

10.06.2007, 07:35

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 10

·È·˘ ‰Á ∫ÌÂÏȈ ÆÌÂÏ˘ Ì˘¯‚

Ì˙¯ˆÂÂÈ‰Ï ÒÈÒ· ‰˘ÓÈ˘ ¨‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó· ‰Ù¯ȇ· ‰˘·‚˙‰˘ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÂÊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰ÚÙÂ˙Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜Á· ˙˜ÒÂÚ‰ ˙ÂÈÓ„˜‡ ˙ÂÈÏÙȈÒÈ„ Ï˘Â ¯˜ÁÓ ˙„˘ Ï˘ Âχ ˙ÂÈÓ„˜‡ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· Æ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ӂ„ ¨˙ÂÈÙȈÙÒ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ¯˜Á·Â Ô‰ ‰Ï‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙˘ ÌÈÁÈÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚Ë˜Ï ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙Ó ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ÌÈÎÈÈ˘Ó ÆÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë‰ ‡ ȉÂχ‰ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ÔÙ„ ˙‡ˆÂÈ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁÏ ¨‰˜Â„‰ ‰˜ÈÊ· ˙„ÓÂÚ Â‡ ¨ÈÂËÈ· ˙˙È ‰ȇ˘ ¨˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ˙Â‰Ó ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï˘ Ìȯ·ÂÒ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ˘ ¯Á‡Ó ¯˜ÁÓ· ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ˘È˘ ÌÈÚÂË Ì‰ ¨ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ ÌÈÈ˙¯·Á ¨ÌÈÈÏÎÏÎ ÌÈÓ¯Â‚Ï ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯Ï ˙Ϸ˜Ӊ ¨˙È˙‡Â¢‰‰ ‡ ˙È‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ‰ ‰„Â˙Ó· ¯˜ÈÚ· ¨˙„ÁÂÈÓ ˙„Â˙Ó· Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ˙·‰Ï ͯ„‰˘ ‡È‰ ÂÊ ‰„Â˙Ó· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ „ÂÒÈ·˘ ‰Á‰‰ Æ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜Á· ÆÔ‰Ï ÌÈÙ˙¢Ӊ ÌÈӯ‚‰ ˙‡ Û¢ÁÏ ‰¯ËÓ· ÂÊÏ ÂÊ Ô˙‡Â¢‰ ‡È‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙·˘ ˙ÂÈ˙ÈÈÚ·‰ ÏÚ ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ „ÓÚ ‰¯·Ú˘ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÂÓ˘‰ ˙Â˘Ó ÏÁ‰ ˙˘· Æ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘ „ÂÒȉ ˙ÂÁ‰·Â ®Religion ¯ÓÂÏΩ ˙„ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ Âȯ·„Ï Æ˙ȯ˜ÁÓ ‰ÈȈ˜Â¯ËÒ˜ ‡Ï‡ ‰ȇ ˙„‰˘ ˙ÈÓÒ ßÊ Ô˙Âß‚ ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜ÂÁ Ú·˜ ±π∏≤

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

10

10.06.2007, 07:35

11

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

‰‡Â¢‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÂÈÓ„ ˙ÂÏÂÚÙ ˙ÂÚˆÓ‡· ¨‰¯ˆÂ ‡È‰ Ư˜ÁÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰¯ÈˆÈ ˜¯Â ͇ ‡È‰ ¢˙„¢ß ¥

Æ߉ÈÓ„˜‡Ï ıÂÁÓ È‡ÓˆÚ ÌÂȘ Ôȇ ˙„Ï Æ¯˜ÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÈËÈÏ‡‰ ÌÈίˆ‰ ÔÚÓÏ ¨‰ÏÏΉÂ

‡Ï˘ ¨ß˙„‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈ‚Âχ‚ß Â¯ÙÒ· ¨±ππ≥ ˙˘· ÔÚË ®Asad© „Ò‡ χÏË ‚ÂÏÂÙ¯˙‡‰ ¯ˆÈ˘ ˙ÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ‰È·‰ ‡Â‰ ˙„ ‚˘ÂÓ‰˘ ÍÎ ÏÚ „ÓÚ ¨˙„‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰¯„‚‰ ÔÎ˙È˙ ˙„ÂÒȉ˘ ÈÙÓ ˜¯ ‡Ï ¨˙„ Ï˘ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰¯„‚‰ ÔÎ˙È˙ ‡Ïß Â˙ÚËÏ ÆÈ·¯ÚÓ‰ ÌÊÈ¯„ÂÓ‰ ‡È‰ ‰ÓˆÚ ‰¯„‚‰‰˘ ÈÙÓ ‡Ï‡ ¨ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ Ìȇ˙ ÈÈÂÏ˙ ̉ ˙„‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÂÎÓ‰ ÌÈÒÁȉ µ

ÆßÌÈÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ÌÈÎÈω˙ Ï˘ ȯÂËÒȉ ¯ˆÂ˙

È˙ÂÓÈË ¨®McCutcheon© ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ÏÒ¯ ̉ÈÈ· ¨ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ‚Ȉ‰ ˙Â¯Á‡‰ ÌÈ˘· ˙È‚Âχ˙‰ ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó· ÌÈÈ˙¯Â˜È· ÌÈÂÈ„ ¨®Dubuisson© ÔÂÒȷ„ χÈ„ ®Fitzgerald© „ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ∂

Æ· ‰‚‰‰ ˙È‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ‰ ‰„Â˙Ó‰ Ï˘Â ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜Á ‰„˘ Ï˘ ¨˙„ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈËÈÏÂÙ‰Â

ÔÁ·˘ ¨‚Ș „¯ßˆÈ¯ ̉·Â ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ È˙¯Â˜È· ¯˜ÁÓ· Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ‰ÓИÒÚ „·· „· Ë·Ó ˙„˜Ó ÌÊȉ„·‰Â ÌÊȇ„ȉ‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙‡ ß˙„ ÌÊÈÏËÈÈ¯Â‡ß Â¯ÙÒ· ‰¯˜È· ß˙ȯˆÂ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¯„‚Ó ¨ÁÂÎß ‰¯ÙÒ·˘ ¨®Jantzen© ÔˆÈ ÒÈȯ‚ ¨˙ÈχÈÂϘ–ËÒÂÙ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰˘ ‰Á‰‰ ˙‡Ê ˙¯ÓÏ ∑Æ˙ȯˆÂ‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓ ˙‡ ˙ȯ„‚Ó ‰·È˘ÙÒ¯ÙÓ ¨ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁÓ· ÔÈÈ„Ú ˙Ï·Â˜Ó ¨‰˙·‰Ï ˙„ÁÂÈÓ ˙„Â˙Ó ˙˘¯Â„‰ ¨˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ ‡È‰ ∏

Æ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ï˘ ÌÈÈÂËÈ·Î ˙ÂÒÙ˙‰ ˙ÂÙÒÂ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ‰Ï·˜‰ ¯˜ÁÓ „ÂÒÈ· ˙„ÓÂÚÂ

Æ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰È‚Âχ‚·Â ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· È˙¯Â˜È· ÔÂÈ„ ÚȈ‡ ‰Ê ¯Ó‡Ó· ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ¨˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ˜¯Â ͇ ¨˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎÏ ˙ÂÙ˙¢Ӊ ˙ÂÂÎ˙ ‡ ‰ÂÎ˙ Ì¢ Ôȇ ¨È˙ÚËÏ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ˙È„ÂÁÈÈ ‰„Â˙Ó Ì¢· ͯˆ Ôȇ˘ Ô‡ÎÓ Æ˯ٷ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÏÏη ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ì˘· ‰˜„ˆ‰ Ôȇ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ì˘· ¨˙ÂÚË· ¨ÌÈÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ Ï˘Â ÌÈËҘˉ Ï˘ ‘Religion is solely the creation of the scholar’s study. It is created for the scholar’s analytic purposes by his imaginative acts of comparison and generalization. Religion has no independent Æ®±± ßÓÚ ¨˙ÈÓÒ© existence apart from the academy’ ‘There cannot be a universal definition of religion, not only because its constituent elements and relationships are historically specific, but because the definition is itself the historical product Æ¥∏≠¥∑ ¨¥≥≠¥∞ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®≤π ßÓÚ ¨„Ò‡© of discursive processes’ ÆÏ¯‡ ªÔ‡¯· ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â ÆÔÂÒȷ„ ª‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ª˙„‰ ˙˘Â¯Á ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ÌÈ·Â˘Á‰ ÌÈÈ˙¯Â˜È·‰ ̉ÈÂÈ„ ˙¯ÓÏ ÆÛ¯˘ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ≤µ≠¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔˆÈ ª±∏∂≠±∂± ¨≥¥≠∑ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ¨Ì˙„ÓÚÏ „‚È· Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰È¯Â‚˘Π˙ÓÈȘ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ÈÎ ‚Ș ԈÈ ÂÁÈ‰ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ¯Â˙ÈÂÂÏ ‰Úˆ‰ ÆÈ¯Ó‚Ï ‰ÈÏÚ ¯˙ÂÂÏ ‡Ï‡ ¨Âʉ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ˙‡ Ô˜˙Ï ÚÈˆÓ Èȇ Ìȇ·‰ Ìȯ·„· ÂÏȇ ¨®Religion© ˙„ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ Ï˘ ‰ÓÂȘ ˙‡ ϷȘ ‡Â‰ ͇ ¨¯Ù ¯·Î ‰ÏÚ‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ÏÚ ˙¯˜ӷ ‡¯ ¯˜ÁÓ· ˙„ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ÏÚ ˙¯Â˜È·Ï Æ˙ÂÚËÓ ˙¯˙ÂÈÓ ˙Âȯ‚˘‰ È˙˘˘ ÔÚÂË È‡ Æ˙ӄ˜‰ ‰¯Ú‰· ¯Îʉ˘ „ÏÂȯ‚ Ï˘ÓÏ ÆȄ‰ȉ ¯˘˜‰· ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰Ó ˙Á ¯ÒÂÁ ÂÚÈ·‰ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ‰Ó΢ Û‡ ˙‡Ê ȉÈÊ ÏÚ ˙¯Â˜È· Æ≤π≠≤∏ ßÓÚ ¨„ÏÂȯ‚ ∫‡¯ ¨®Spirituality© ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ˙‡ ÛȄډ ÍÎÓ ‚ÈÈ˙Ò‰ ¯ÊÁ ¨ÂÊ ˙‚ÈÈ˙Ò‰ ˙¯ÓÏ Æ≤±≠±∏ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈÈÚӉ ·Ï‰ ¨Ô„ ∫Ì‚ ‰¯Á‡Ï ‡¯ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÎ ‰Ï·˜‰ ÔÚË Ò·ÈÏ ‰„Â‰È Ì‚ Æ≤± ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫‡¯ ªÌÂÏ˘ Ë˯˘˘ ‰ÓÎÒ‰ Õ ÈÙ ÏÚ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙‡ ¯‡È˙ Ԅ ßÓÚ ¨Ò·ÈÏ ∫‡¯ Æ˙ÁψÂÓ ‰ȇ ‰Ï·˜‰ ˙‡ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ï È„Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÓ ‰¯ÂÊ‚‰ ‰ÏÈÓ· ‰¯ÈÁ·‰˘ ‰¯Á‡Ï ¨ÔÏ‰Ï ‚Ȉ‡˘ ÂÏ‡Ó ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÚË Â· ˙‚ˆÂÓ˘ ¨‰Ï·˜‰ ¯˜Á· ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘· È˙¯Â˜È· ÔÂÈ„ Æ∂ Ʊ∞¥≠±∞∞ ßÓÚ ¨¯ß‚„È‡ ∫‡¯

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

11

10.06.2007, 07:35

¥

µ

∂ ∑



Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 12

¨ÌȯˆÓ ¨¯Â‰Ó„· ‡¯ÈˆÁ·‡ ·˜ÚÈ Ï·Â˜Ó‰ ·¯‰ Ï˘ ¯·˜ ÏÚ ˙ÂÏÏÙ˙Ó ÌÈ˘ ¨ıÈ˘ÙÈÏ È„„ ÔÓ‡‰ ˙·Ȅ‡· ¨±ππ∂ ¨’¯Â‰Ó„ ˘„˜’ ÌÈÓÂψ˙‰ ˙¯„Ò ÍÂ˙Ó Ë¯Ù

‰˜ÈËÒÈӉ ÏÏη ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¨‰‡¯‡˘ à ÈÙÎ Æ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ È„ÂÁÈÈ ¯˜ÁÓ ‰„˘ Ï˘ ÂÓÂÈ˜Ï ˙·Á¯‰ ˙·˜Ú· ¨‰˘„Á‰ ˙Ú· ‰Ù¯ȇ· ¯ˆÂ˘ ¨˙ÂÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ˙ÂÈ·‰ Ô‰ ˯ٷ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‡Ï˘ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ ÏÚ Â˙ÏÁ‰Â — ˜‰·ÂÓ È¯ˆÂ È‚Âχ˙ ‚˘ÂÓ — ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó‰ Ï˘Â ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÏÁ‰‰ ÆÂÏ ÛÙÂÁ‰ ‚˘ÂÓ Ì¢· ¢Ó˙˘‰ ‡Ï˘Â ¨‰Ê ‚˘ÂÓ Â¯ÈΉ ÌÊÈχȯÙÓȇ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ‰˙˘Ú ˙ÂȯˆÂ–˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ ÏÚ ¨˙„ ¨ÂÈχ ˙ÈÂÂÏ‰ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ· ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙ÂÈÂ‰Ê ˙ÈÈ·‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ·Â ¨·¯ÚÓ‰ Ï˘ ÌÊÈχÈÂϘ‰Â Æ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ì‚ ‰¯ˆÂ — ÔÚˇ ÍÎ — Âχ Ìȯ˘˜‰· ÆÌÈÈÙ¯ȇ ÌÈÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ÌÈÏÏÎ‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰Â ÌÈËҘˉ Ï˘ ÌÓÂȘ ˙‡ ˘ÈÁÎÓ Èȇ˘ ˘È‚„‰Ï Èˆ¯· ¯ÙÂÎ Èȇ ÆÌ‰Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓÏ „‚˙Ó Èȇ ˙ÂÈ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó ˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Î ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ÌÈ·ÏÓ ˙ÂÓ˘ ÂÈ˘ ¨˙ÂÁ·˘˙ ˙Â¯È˘ ¢ÁÏ ¨Ì‰Èί· ÔÈ· Ì˘‡¯ ˙‡ ÂÁÈ‰ ÌÈ˘‡˘ Íη ˙˜È˘¯Ù· ¢Ó˙˘‰˘ ÌÈ˘‡Ï˘ Íη ˜ÙÒ ÏÈËÓ Èȇ ªÌȘȄˆ ȯ·˜ ÏÚ ÂÁË˙˘‰Â „„·˙‰ ‡ ‰‡Â· ¨Ô„Ú‰ Ô‚Ï ‰ÈÈÏÚ ¨‰·Î¯ÓÏ ‰„ȯÈΠ¯‡È˙ ̉˘ ÔÙ„ ȇˆÂÈ ÌÈÚ¯ȇ Âگȇ ÂÏω ȯÂËÒȉ‰ Ô¯˘˜‰· Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÂÁ·˘ ÌÈ·Â˘Á‰ Ìȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ˙‡ ÏÒÂÙ Èȇ ªÔȇ· ˙˜·„ Ô‰ ÂÏω ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰˘ ¨È¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘· ÌÂÈÎ ˙ËÏ¢‰ ‰Á‰‰ „‚Î ˙ÈÙÂÓ È˙ÚË ÆÈ˙¯·Á‰Â ˜ÙÒ ÏÈËÓ È‡ ÆÂÊ ‰Á‰Ó ˙ÂÚ·Â‰ ˙Âȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ „‚Π¨˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ï˘ ‰ÈÈÂËÈ· ¨˙ÂȯˆÂ© ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎÏ ÂÓÎ ¨ÂÏω ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎÏ˘ Íη ÌÈÙ˙¢Ӊ ÌÈӯ‚ ‡ ̯‚ ˘È ¨®‰Ï‡· ‡ˆÂÈΠ˙ÂÈ˜È¯Ó‡ ¨˙ÂȄ‰ ¨˙ÂÈÙÈ ¨˙ÂÈÈÒ ¨˙ÂÈÓÏÒÂÓ ˙‡Â ¨˙Á‡ ‰È¯Â‚Ë˜Ï ˙ÂÎÈÈ˘ Ô‰˘ ‰Á‰‰ ˙‡ ¨‰Ê Ì˘· ÔÈÂÈÎ ˙‡ ÌȘȄˆÓ‰Â ¨Ô‰Ï ˜¯Â ͇ ¨Ô‰Ï

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

12

10.06.2007, 07:35

13

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ˙‡ È˙Ú„Ï πÆÔ‰Ï ÌÈ„ÁÂÈÓ‰ ‰‡¯Â‰Â ¯˜ÁÓ ˙ÂËÈ˘Â ¯˜ÁÓ ÈÓÂÁ˙ Ï˘ ÌÂÈÎ ÌÈÈÂËÈ·Î ¯Â˜ÁÏ Ôȇ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘· ÌÂÈÎ ˙ÂÏÏÎ‰ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙‰ ‡Ï‡ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰· ÌÈ¢ ÌÈ·Ï˘Î ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙È˙„ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈ˙¯·Á ˙ÂÈÏÎÏÎ ¨˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÌÈÈËÈÏÂÙ ÌÈίˆ ÍÂ˙Ó Â¯ˆÂ˘ ˙·¯˙ ȯˆÂ˙Î ˙‡ ¨˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ È˙Ú„Ï ¯Â˜ÁÏ ˘È ͯ„ ‰˙‡· ˜ÂÈ„· Æ˙ÂÈÙȈÙÒ È¯ˆÂ˙ ˙Âȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ ˙‡Â ¨ÂÊ ‰È¯Â‚˘ ÏÚ ÒÒ·Ӊ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘ Ï˘ ‰È‚Âχ‚‰ ÆÂÊ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ¯ˆÂ˘ ˙·¯˙‰ ¨˙˜È˘¯Ù Ï˘ Ì˙ÏÏΉ ÏÚ ÒÒÂ·Ó ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘ ¯Á‡ ‚˘ÂÓ ÏΠ‰ÂÓΠ— ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ú„ÈΠƉ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˙Â¢ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ÌÈËÒ˜Ë ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂȯˆÂ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ‡Ï ±∞¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙·¯˙· ÌÈȘ ‰È‰ ‡Ï — ‰Ó„ ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó ÏÚ· ˙Â¢‰ ˙¯„‚‰‰ Ï˘ Ô„ÂÒÈ· „ÓÂÚ˘ ¨‰ÈÂÂÁ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ì‚ Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ô‰· ‰‰ÊÓ ¯˜ÁÓ‰˘ ÌÈȘ ‡Â‰ Ôȇ ±±¨Ô„¯Â‚ „„ Ô¯‰‡ È„È· ‡ˆÓ‰˘ „Ú ˙ȯ·Ú· ÌÈȘ ‰È‰ ‡Ï ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ¯˜ÈÚ· ¨˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ˙ȯ·Ú· ıÂÙÏ ÌÓ‡ ÍÙ‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÁÂÓ‰ ±≤Æ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÙ˘· ¨ÌÈ‚ÂϯËÒ‡© Ìȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ì˘· ˙¯·Â„Ó‰ ‰Ù˘· ÌÈÂÎÓ˘ ÈÓ ‡˜Â„ Ìχ ¨˙Â¯Á‡‰ ÌÈ˘· ÌÈÏÏÎ Ìȇ ±≥®‰Ï‡· ‡ˆÂÈΠ‰Ù˜· ÌÈÁ˙ÂÙ ¨ÌÈÙϘ ȇ¯Â˜ ¨ÌÈÈ·ÈË¯Ëχ ÌÈ‡Ù¯Ó ¨Ìȯ˘˜˙à ӟ ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ·ÈÂÁÓ ¯˜ÂÁ‰˘ ¯Â·Ò Èȇ ÌÓ‡ Æ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘· ‰˜„ˆ‰ ‰‡Â¯ Èȇ ˙Ú· ‰· ͇ ¨ÂÏ˘ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ȇ˘ÂÓ ˙‡ ÌÈ˘Ó˘Ó‰ ˙Âȯ‚˘·Â ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ·

¨‰Ù˘ ȘÁ˘Ó ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ∫‡¯ ¨˙„ ‚˘ÂÓÏ ¯˘‡· „ϯ߂ˆÈÙ Ï˘ ÂÈ˙ÂÁ·‰ ÂÓ¯˙ ÏÈÚÏ„ Ìȯ·„‰ ÁÂÒÈÏ Æ≤¥π ßÓÚ ‚˘ÂÓ· ¢Ó˙˘‰ Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯· ÌÈ„Â‰È ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ Æ±∏ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈÈÚӉ ·Ï‰ ¨Ô„ ª≤∏ ßÓÚ ¨„ÏÂȯ‚ ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ¨˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ˙ÈÂÂÈ ‰È‚ÂÏÂÓÈˇ ÌÈÏÈÓ‰ È˙˘Ï˘ Û‡ Ìχ Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓÏ Ì‚¯˙Î ¨ÔȯÂ˙ÒÓ È¯·Ú‰ Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· È¯„ÂÓ‰ ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰Ó ‰¢ ÔȯÂ˙ÒÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· È˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ȯ·Ú‰ ÈÊÎ¯Ó „ȘÙ˙ ‡ÏÈÓ˘ ¨Erlebniss ÈÓ¯‚‰ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ Ì‚¯˙ ‡Â‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Æ≤∑∑≠≤∑∂ ßÓÚ ¨Ô„¯Â‚ „˘‡–¯ω Æ≤≤ ‰¯Ú‰ ¨≤∏ ßÓÚ ¨„˘‡–¯ω ∫‡¯Â ÆÌȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯· ˙ÂÈËÓ¯–‡‰ ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙· ‰ÏÈÓß ∫‰Ê ¯„ÚÈ‰Ó ˙Ú·Â‰ ˙ÂÈ˙ÈÈÚ·Ï ‡Ï ͇ ¨‰¯˜Á˘ ˙¯˜ӷ ÂÊ ‰ÏÈÓ Ï˘ ‰¯„ÚÈ‰Ï ˙Ú„ÂÓ ‰˙Èȉ Â‡ ÆԇΠÌÈ„‰ ÌÈȄ‰ȉ ˙¯˜Ӊ Ïη ËÏ·‰ ‰¯„Ú‰ ˙‡ ˙‡ÏÓÓ ¨Ô„¯Â‚ ڷˢ ÂÊ ‰˜È˙Ú–‰˘„Á ¨˙Â·˙‰Â ÔÂÈÚ Ï˘ ˙Â¢ ˙¯ˆ ˙¯‡˙Ó‰ ÌÈÏÈÓ ˙¢‚¯ ˙¯‡˙Ó‰ ÌÈÏÈÓ ˙ȯ‰Âʉ ˙ÈÓ¯‡· ÌȇˆÂÓ ˙‡ ¯‡˙Ï È„Î ¨‰È‰ ‰ÏӉ ÌÈÈÁ ‰ÏÈÓ‰ ÔÈ· Ô„¯Â‚ ¯ˆÈ˘ „ÁÂÈÓ‰ ¯Â·ÈÁ‰ ¨˙ȯ·Ú· ÂÓÎ ¨‰· ¯ÒÁ ͇ ÆßÔ‰È˙˘ ˙„ÎÏ˙‰ keiken ¨‰Ê ‚˘ÂÓÏ ÌÈÈÙȉ ÌÈÁÂÓ‰˘Â ¨‰ÈÂÂÁ ‰˙‡¯Â‰˘ ‰ÏÈÓ Ôȇ ‰Ó„˜‰ ˙ÈÙÈ·˘ ÍÎ ÏÚ „ÓÚ Û¯˘ experience ÌÈÁÂÓÏ ÌÈÓ‚¯˙Î ®±π±≤≠±∏∂∏© Èß‚ÈÓ ˙Ù˜˙· ¯ˆÂ˘ ÌÈÈ¯„ÂÓ ÔÂ˘Ï È˘Â„ÈÁ ̉ ¨taiken– ¨ÌÈÓÈȘ ‰Ï‡ ÌÈÁÂÓ Ôȇ ˙ÈÈÒ· Û‡˘ ÛÈÒ‰ Û¯˘ Æ˙ÂÈ¯„ÂÓ ˙ÂÈ·¯ÚÓ ˙ÂÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ ˙¯Ȉȷ erlebniss– ≠ππ ßÓÚ ¨Û¯˘ ∫‡¯ ÆÌÈÈ·¯ÚÓ‰ ÌÈËÒ˜ËÏ Ì‰ÈÓ‚¯˙· ˙ÂÈÙȉ ÌÈÏÈÓ‰ ˙‡ ˆÓȇ ÌÈÈÈÒ‰ ÌÈÓ‚¯˙Ó‰˘Â ‰ÏÈ·˜Ó ¯„Úȉ ÏÚ Æ˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÙ˘· ‰ÏÈ·˜Ó Ôȇ ®Spirituality© ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ‚˘ÂÓÏ Ì‚˘ ÔÈÈˆÏ ˘È Ʊ∞∞ ÔÂÈ„Ï Æ∑∞ ßÓÚ ¨¯È ¯„ Ô ∫‡¯ ¨˙ÂȄ‰‰ ˙Â˙„‰ ÌÂÈÎ ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó Â·˘ ¨˙ÂÈÁ¯ ‚˘ÂÓÏ ˙È„ȉ·Â Ëȯ˜ÒÒ· Ƶ≥≠≥∞ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ˯˜ ∫‡¯ ˙È¯„ÂÓ ˙È·¯ÚÓ ‰È·‰Î ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ‚˘ÂÓ· Â˙¯˙Â΢© ÔÁ Ï˘ ‰¯ÙÒ· ÔÂÈÚÓ „ÂÓÏÏ Ô˙È ˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ˙ȯ·Ú· ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÁÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ÈËÓÒ‰ ‰„˘‰ ÏÚ ÌÈ˘„˜ÂÓ‰ ˙ȯ·Ú· ÌÈÈÊίӉ Ë¯Ëȇ‰ ȯ˙‡Ó ÔΠ®ßÛȘӉ Íȯ„Ó‰ ∫ÌÈχ¯˘È ÌÈ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ±∞±ß ¨‰Ó„‡ ‡Ó‡ Ï˯Â٠‡ ªhttp://alternativly.co.il/msn ¨ÈÏ–·ÈË¯Ëχ Ï˯ÂÙ ˙ӂ„ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ http://www.ima-adama.co.il

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

13

10.06.2007, 07:35

π ±∞

±±

±≤

±≥

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 14

˙¯‚ÒÓ· ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰È¯Â‚˘Π˙ȯˆÂ‰ ‰È‚Âχ˙‰Ó Á˜ω ‚˘ÂÓ· È˙¯Â˜È· È˙Ï· ˘ÂÓÈ˘Ï Æ‰¯·Á‰Â Á¯‰ ÈÚ„Ó· ÈÓ„˜‡ ¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘ ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ÔÈÚ¯‚Ï ˙Â¢ ˙¯„‚‰ ¨ÁÒÏ ÌÈÎÈ˘ÓÓ ¨ÂÁÒÈ ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ÌȂ‰ ‰Ê‰ Û˙¢Ӊ ÔÈÚ¯‚‰ ˙‡ ˙¯‡˙Ó ÂÏω ˙¯„‚‰‰ ˙È·¯Ó Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓÎ ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎ ±¥

Æ˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ Â‡ ˙ȉÂχ ˙Â˘È ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁÎ

˙È‚Âχ˙‰ ‰Á‰‰ ¨ÈÂÓÒ ÔÙ‡· ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ˘¯ÂÙÓ ÔÙ‡· ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ¨˙„ÓÂÚ Âχ ˙¯„‚‰ Ï˘ Ô„ÂÒÈ· ¨˙ÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ ÌÈÂÂÁ ̉ ·˘ ‰Ú„Â˙ ·ˆÓÏ ÚÈ‚‰Ï ÌÈÓÈÂÒÓ Ìȇ˙· ÌÈÏ‚ÂÒÓ Ì„‡ È·˘ ̯‚‰ ‡È‰ ÂÊ ‰ÈÂÂÁ˘Â ¨ÌÈÏÈ‚¯‰ ‰Ú„Â˙‰ ÈÚˆÓ‡· ˙ÒÙ˙‰ ˙ȯÓÂÁ‰ ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ‰Ó ‰¢‰ Ìȯ˜ÂÁÏ ˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ÂÊ ˙È‚Âχ˙ ‰Á‰ Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓÎ ˙¯‡Â˙Ó‰ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯Â ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘ Ï˘ ˙ÂȯËÂʇ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï ¨˙Â˙„‰ ÈÚ„Ó ÌÂÁ˙· ÌÈ·¯ ÏÒÂÙ Èȇ ±µÆÌȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈÈ˘‰ ˙ȈÁÓ‰ Ï˘ ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï ÔΠÌȯ˘Ú‰ ˙Âȯ‚˘ ÏÚ „ÂÒÈ ˙ÂÁ‰ ÏÚ ÈÓ„˜‡ ¯˜ÁÓ ÒÒ·Ï ˘È˘ ¯Â·Ò Èȇ Ìχ ¨ÂÊ ˙È‚Âχ˙ ‰„ÓÚ ÔÂÎ˙ ‡ χ‰ Ôˆ¯ ÍÓÒ ÏÚ ˙ÂÈ‚ÂÏÂÈ·Â ˙ÂÈϘÈÊÈÙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ È‚Âχ˙ ¯·Ò‰˘ Ì˘Î Æ˙ÂÈ‚Âχ˙ ÈÚ„Ó· ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁÓ· Ï·˜Ï Ôȇ È˙Ú„Ï ÍÎ ¨Ú·Ë‰ ÈÚ„Ó· ÈÓ„˜‡ ¯˜ÁÓ· ÏÈ·˜ Âȇ È·˙ ‡Â‰ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÈ˙¯·Á ¨˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï Ì¯Â‚‰ ÂÈÙÏ˘ È‚Âχ˙ ¯·Ò‰ ‰¯·Á‰Â Á¯‰ Æ˙ÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ ÌÚ Â‡ ˙‰Âχ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ ˙ÂÈ˙„‰ ̉È˙ÂÙ˜˘‰Ï ̇˙‰· ¨˙Â¢ ˙¯ˆ· ÌÈÁÒÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈӉ ˙„‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ Ìȯ‡˙Ó Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ÆÈËÒÈÓ‰ ·ˆÓ· ˙ÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙‡ȈӉ Ï˘ ‰˙Â‰Ó ˙‡ ¨˙ÂÈ‚Âχ„ȇ‰Â ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ÏÚ Ìȯ·„Ó ¨ÌȘ‰·ÂÓ ÌÈÈËÒȇ˙ÂÂÓ ÌÈÈ‚Âχ˙ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ· ÂÊ ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ ¨ËÏÁÂÓ‰ — ¯˙ÂÈ ÌÈÈÏÏÎ ÌÈÈÊÈÙËÓ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ· ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘Ó ̉ ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ¨È‰Âχ‰ ÌÚ Â‡ χ‰ ±∂

Ɖχ· ‡ˆÂÈΠÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë‰ ¨‰¯Â‰Ë‰ ‰Ú„Â˙‰ ¨˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ‰ ˙‡ȈӉ

Æ≥¥≥≠≤∂µ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó ∫‡¯ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈ¯„ÂÓ‰ ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙‰ Ï˘ ˙˯ÂÙÓ ‰¯È˜ÒÏ ß˙„‰ ¯Á‡Ï˘ ˙„ß Ì¯ËÒ¯Ò ‰È΢ ‰„ÓÚ‰ „ÂÒÈ· ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ˙„ÓÂÚ ÂÊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙ Ʊ∂≥≠±∂≤ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ¨Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÚÈÙ˘Ó‰ ˙„‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ˙˘ÂÏ˘Ï Â˙Ú„Ï ˙Ù˙¢Ӊ ‰„ÓÚ ¨®Religion after Religion© ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜ÁÓ ÔÈ· ‰˜Èʉ ÏÚ Æ≥∞≠≤π ßÓÚ ¯˜ÈÚ· ¨Ì¯ËÒ¯Ò ∫‡¯ ÆÌÂÏ˘Â ÔÈ·¯Â˜ ȯ‰ ¨‰„‡Èχ ‰ßˆ¯ÈÓ ÏÚ Æµ±≠≥∑ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫‡¯ Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯ Ï˘ ˙ÂȯËÂʇ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï ˙ȯˆÂ‰ ‰Ï·˜Ï È¯„ÂÓ‰ ª≥≥∞≠≥≤∑ ßÓÚ ¨Û¯‚‰ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â ª±¥≥≠±¥≤ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫‡¯ ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜Á ÔÈ· ¯˘˜‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ È¯˜ÂÁ Ï˘ ̉ȯÙÒ· ÈÂËÈ· È„ÈÏ ‰‡·˘ ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ Ï˘ ˙˜‰·ÂÓ ‰È‚Âχ„È‡Ï Æ≤≥ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ¨Ò‰ ∫‡¯ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ·¯˜· ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÓ‚Ó ÏÚ Æ˜·ω ª‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ ∫‡¯ Æ˘„Á Ô„ÈÚ ¨ÒÓÈÈß‚ Ʊµ ßÓÚ ¨ÒÂß‚ ∫‡¯ ªÒÂß‚ Ï˘ ‰ÚÙ˘‰‰ ˙·¯Â ˙ÓÒ¯ÂÙÓ‰ ‰¯„‚‰· ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ‡˘ÂÓ ‡Â‰ χ‰ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙„Á‡‰ ˙ÈÈÂÂÁ ‡˘ÂÓ ÈÎ ÔÚË ¨˙ÂÈÂÏÈÁ ˙ÂÈËÒȇ˙ÂÂÓ ‡Ï ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ì‚ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ÏÏ΢ Ï˘ ÌÈÚÂ„È È˙Ï·Â ÌÈ¢ ÌÈÓÂÁ˙ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ÏÚ ¯·È„ Ï‡Ë˘ Æ≤∑µ≠≤∑¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÒÓÈÈß‚ ∫‡¯ ªËÏÁÂÓ‰ ‡Â‰ ¯Â˜Ó‰Â ˙ËÏÁÂÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÓˆÚ‰ ˙ÚÈ„ÈÏ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙‡ ¯˘˜ ‰¯Ù„ Ʊπµ ßÓÚ ¨Ï‡Ë˘ ∫‡¯ ª˙‡ȈӉ ‰Ú„Â˙Î ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ‡˘ÂÓ ˙‡ ¯‡È˙ ÔÓ¯Â٠Ʊ∞≤ ßÓÚ ¨‰¯Ù„ ∫‡¯ ªÈÓˆÚ‰ Ï˘ ÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë‰ Æ≤µ≠≤± ßÓÚ ¨‰¯Â‰Ë ‰Ú„Â˙ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ ∫‡¯ ª‰¯Â‰Ë‰

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

14

10.06.2007, 07:35

±¥ ±µ

±∂

15

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

ÌÈÚÈˆÓ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÈÊÈÙËӉ ÌÈÈ‚Âχ˙‰ Ìȯ·Ò‰Ï ÌÈ„‚˙Ó‰ ¨ÌȯÁ‡ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁÏ — ±∑ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ–Â¯È Õ ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ ¨ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂȈÂÒ — ÌÈÈËÒÈϯÂË Ìȯ·Ò‰ ˘È È˙Ú„Ï˘ Û‡ ±∏ÆÌÈÈËÒÈÂȈ˜Â„¯Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ˙È·¯Ó È„È ÏÚ ÌÈÁ„ ̉ȯ·Ò‰Â ˙Â˘È‚ Ï·˜Ó Èȇ ¨‰¯·Á‰Â Á¯‰ ÈÚ„Ó· È‚Âχ˙ ‡Ï ¯˜ÁÓ· ÌÈÈËÒÈϯÂË Ìȯ·Ò‰· ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ȯˆÂ È‚Âχ˙ ‚˘ÂÓ — ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰˘ ˙È˙ÈÈÚ·‰ ‰Á‰‰ ÏÚ ˙ÂÒÒÂ·Ó Ô‰ Û‡˘ ÌÂ˘Ó ¨Âχ ˙˙Ï ˘È˘ ‰ȇ ‰Ê ¯Ó‡Ó· È˙Úˢ ¯È‰·‰Ï Èˆ¯· Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈÈˆÓ — ˜‰·ÂÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ‰ÚËÓ‰ ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ÏÚ ¯˙ÂÂÏ ˘È˘ ‡Ï‡ ¨ÌÈÈËÒÈϯÂË Ìȯ·Ò‰ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ÈËÒÈϯÂË — „Á‡ ¯·Ò‰ ÚȈ‰Ï ͯˆ‰ ÏÚ ¨Ô‡ÎÓ ¨˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙˜È˘¯Ù ÔÂÈÙ‡Ï ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÆÈ˙Â‰Ó ¯˘˜ Ô‰ÈÈ· Ôȇ˘ ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ·Á¯ Ô‚ÓÏ — È‚Âχ˙ ‡ ˙„ÓÂÚ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎ „ÂÒÈ·˘ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ÔÓ ÌÈ‚ÈÈ˙ÒÓ ÌȯÁ‡ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ È¯˜ÂÁ Æ®perannial© ˙ÈχÈ¯Ù‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ‰ÂÎÓ‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙ — ‰¯Â‰Ë ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ‰ÂÎÓ‰ ¨Ì˙˘È‚ Æ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÈÂÏ˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ô‰ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï΢ ÌÈÚÂË ‰Ï‡ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ Ôȇ˘ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ‚Ȉ‰˘ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ÏÚ ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ˙ÒÒÂ·Ó ¨˙ÈÂÂÈ˘¯ËÒ˜ ‡ ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ˙È·¯Ó ±πÆ˙ÓÈÂÒÓ ˙È˙„ ˙¯ÂÒÓ Ï˘ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ˜¯ ‡Ï‡ ¨‰ÓˆÚÏ˘Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÛÂÒ· ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ È„È ÏÚ ‰ÁÒÂ ‡È‰Â ≤∞¨ÂÊ ‰˘È‚ ÂϷȘ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ÌÏÏη ∫ÔÚˢ ¨ı¢Î Ô·ÈËÒ Ì˘‡¯·Â ¨Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÚ·˘‰ ˙Â˘ ˙¯ˆ ÔΠ¨˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Æ®˙λ˙Ó ‰ȇ˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ¯ÓÂÏΩ ‰¯Â‰Ë ‰ÈÂÂÁ ˙ÓÈȘ ‡Ï Ô‰˘ ¨Íη ÔÈÓ‡‰Ï „ÂÒÈ ÏÎ Ôȇ ¨ÔÓÈÒ Ì¢ ˙Â˙Â Ôȇ ¨‰ÈÂÂÁ Ï˘ ¯˙ÂÈ ˙ÂÏÈ‚¯ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ˘ ÌÈÓÈÎÒÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ Â‡ ˙È‚Âχ˙ ‰ÒÈÙ˙· ÌȘÈÊÁÓ‰ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ ˙È·¯Ó Ì‚˘ ÔÈÈˆÏ ˘È ÌÈÚˆÓ‡· ˘ÂÓÈ˘ ÂÓΩ ÌÈÈÓÈΠۇ ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ–Â¯È Õ ¨ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ ÌÈӯ‚ ˙·˜Ú· ˙¯¯ÂÚ˙Ó ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙‡ȈӉ Ï˘ ÌÈ˷ȉ ˙ÂÂÁÏ È‡˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ Ìȯ˘Ù‡Ó Âχ ÌÈӯ‚ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ Ì˙‡ ˙Ú„Ï Ìχ Æ®ÌÈÈ˘¯ ƉÏÈ‚¯‰ ˙È˘Â‡‰ ‰Ú„Â˙‰ ˜ÙÂ‡Ï ¯·ÚÓ ÌÈȈӉ ¨ÔÓÏ‚ ª≥¥≥ ¨≥≥≤≠≥≥± ßÓÚ ÔÈ‚˜Ó ∫‡¯ Ô˙ÈÈÁ„ ÂÏω ˙ÂÈËÒÈϯÂË‰ ˙„ÓÚ‰ ÔÓ ‰ÓÎ Ï˘ ‰¯È˜ÒÏ ªµ≥ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ï·˜ ¨Ï„ȇ ª≤≥ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î ∫‡¯ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯ „‚Πª±∞≤≠∑µ ßÓÚ ‰‡¯‰ ÏÎÎ ÂÁÈ‰ ÌÈÈËÒÈÂȈ˜Â„¯Î ÌÈÈËÒÈϯÂË Ìȯ·Ò‰ ÂÏÒÙ˘ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ Æ≤π≥ ¨≤≤π≠≤≤∑ ßÓÚ ¨˜·ω Â˙Á·‰ ˙‡ ÍÎ ÏÚ Â‡¯© ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯ ‰ÂÂ‰Ó ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ¯·Ò‰ ÏÎ Ìχ ƉχΠÌȇ Ì‰Ï˘ Ìȯ·Ò‰‰˘ ÔÈ· ‡Ï‡ ¨‰ÊÎ Âȇ˘ ¯·Ò‰Ï ÈËÒÈÂȈȘ„¯ ¯·Ò‰ ÔÈ· Âȇ Ï„·‰‰Â ®±∑ ßÓÚ ¨˙„‰ ˙˘Â¯Á ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó Ï˘ ÆÌÈÈÊÈÙËÓ ÌÈÓ¯Â‚Ï ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯ ÔÈ·Ï ÌÈÈËÒÈϯÂË ÌÈÓ¯Â‚Ï ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯ ‘There is no mysticism as such, there is only the mysticism of a particular religious system, Æ®∂ ßÓÚ ¨ÌÈÓ¯Ê ¨ÌÂÏ˘© Christian, Islamic, Jewish Mysticsim, and so on’ ÏÚ ¨Ô„ ªµµ≠µ¥ ¨µ≤ ¨∑ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ ∫‡¯ ÂÊ ‰„ÓÚ ÂˆÓȇ˘ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ È¯˜ÂÁÏ Æ±∂π ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ÌÂÁ˙· ÏÈ·ÂÓ‰ ¯˜ÂÁ‰ ¨Ï„ȇ ˙‡Ê ˙ÓÂÚÏ Æ≥∞≠≤π ßÓÚ ¨„˘‡–¯ω ª±∏ ßÓÚ ¨¯Â‡Èχ ª∑π ßÓÚ ¨‰˘Â„˜‰ È„È ÏÚ ÌÈ˙ÈÚÏ ‰ÁÂÓ È‡˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰˘ ˙¯˘Ù‡‰ ˙‡ ˙ÂÁ„Ï ‡Ï·ß ∫ÂÊ ‰„ÓÚ ‰Á„ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯ÒÁ ‡È‰ ÌȯÁ‡ Ìȯ˜Ó·˘© Â˙ÈÈÂÂÁ ˙‡ ·ˆÚÏ ËÏÁ‰· ÌÈÈ¢ډ ¨‰Èχȯ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈ˯Ù ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ ¨ÌÈÈÂÓÈ„ ÌÈËÓχ‰ ˙˘‚„‰ Æ‰ÓˆÚ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ÏÚ ¯˘‡Ó ¯˙ÂÈ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ÈÂËÈ· ÔÙ‡ ÏÚ ÌÈÚÈÙ˘Ó ‰Ï‡˘ È¯Â·Ò ¨®‰¯Âˆ ßÆÆÆ‰Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÙÈËÒÈÓ–‰„Ï ˘¯ÂÙÓ ‡Ï ÔÓÈÒ ‰¯˜ÈÚ· ‡È‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙‡ ¯˜ÈÚ· ÌÈ·ˆÚÓÎ ÌÈÈ˙ÈÈÂÂÁ–̯ˉ ‰Ê ¯Ó‡Ó· ȯ‰ ¨Ï„ȇ ¯˜È·˘ ˙ÈÂÂÈ˘¯ËÒ˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ˙‡ ıÓ‡Ó Èȇ˘ Û‡ ¨®µµ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ï·˜ ¨Ï„ȇ© ‰„ÓÚ‰ ÏÚ ˙ÂÙÒÂ ˙Â¯Â˜È·Ï Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÙÈËÒÈÓ–‰„ ˙¢ÚÏ ÚÈˆÓ Ô· È‡ Ï˘ Â˙Ó„˜‰· ¯˜ÈÚ·Â ¨‰¯Â‰Ë ‰Ú„Â˙ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ ∫ı·Â˜· ÌÈÏÂÏΉ ÌȯӇӉ ˙‡ ‡¯ ˙ÈÂÂÈ˘¯ËÒ˜‰ Ʊ∑≠±≤ ßÓÚ ¨˜·ω ª≥≤¥≠≥≤≥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó ª±∏ ‰¯Ú‰ ¨±∂π ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ∫„ÂÚ Â‡¯Â ª¥π≠≥ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

15

10.06.2007, 07:35

±∑

±∏

±π ≤∞

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 16

¨¯˙ÂÈ· ˙·ίÂÓ ˙ÂÈ˙¯Î‰ ÌÈί„· ˙„·ÂÚÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Ï΢ ˙¯Ó‡ ˙‡Ê Æ˙Âλ˙Ó Ôȇ ÂÊ ‰„·ÂÚ Ï˘ ‰ÁÂÎ ‰Î¯Ú‰ ÆÆÆÂ¯Â·Ú ‰˘È‚ ˙ÎÙ‰ ˙‚¯Â‡Ó ‡È‰ Ô˙ÂÚˆÓ‡·˘ Ï˘ ÌÈÁÂÂÈ„‰ „ÂÓÈÏ· È„ Ôȇ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙‡ ÔÈ·‰Ï È„Î˘ Íη ¯ÈÎ‰Ï Â˙‡ ‰ÏÈ·ÂÓ ‰·˘ ‰¯Âˆ‰ ÔΠ¨‰ÓˆÚ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰˘ Íη ˙Â„Â‰Ï ˘È ÆÈ˙ÈÈÂÂÁ‰ Ú¯ȇ‰ ¯Á‡Ï ȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ÌÈ·ˆÚÓ‰ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ ¨ÂÓÚ ‡È·Ó ȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰˘ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ‰ È„È ÏÚ ˙·ˆÂÚÓ ¨˙¯‡Â˙Ó ‡È‰ ≤±

ÆÂ˙ÈÈÂÂÁ ˙‡

˙ÈÙÂÏÁ ‰¯„‚‰ ÂÚȈ‰ ‡Ï ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ· ÌȘÈÊÁÓ‰ ÌȯÁ‡ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ı¢Î Ìχ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ÌÈÙ˙¢Ӊ ÌÈӯ‚‰ ‡ ̯‚‰ Ì‰Ó Â¯È·Ò‰ ‡Ï ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓÏ ˙˜ÙÒÓ Ï˘ ÔÂÈÚ¯‰ ˙‡ ‰Á„˘ ¨ı¢Î ÆÔ‰Ï˘ È˙‡Â¢‰‰ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ˙‡Â ‰Ê ‚˘ÂÓ· ÔÈÂÈÎ ˙‡ ÌȘȄˆÓ‰ ˙‡ ÔΠ¨˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ „ÂÒÈ· ˙„ÓÂÚ‰ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Û˙¢Ӊ ̯‚‰ Â‰Ó ¯È‰·‰ ‡Ï ≤≤¨ÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÎÈÒÙ ÌÈ·ˆÓÏ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯‰ ¯˜ÁÓß „ÈÓÚ‰Ï Ô˙È ‰Ó ÍÓÒ ÏÚ ¨Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ¯Â‡È˙Ï ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ˙‡ ˜È„ˆÓ‰ ı¢Î ˙·˜Ú· ‰Á„˘ ¨®Wolfson© ÔÂÒÙÏ ËÂÈχ ≤≥Æ߉˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ Ìω ÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ ȂÂÏÂÓÂÙ ÁÈ‰ ¨¯˘˜‰ ˙ÈÂÏ˙ ‡È‰ ¨‰ÈÂÂÁ ÏÎ ÂÓÎ ¨˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰˘ ÔÚË ¨˙ÈχÈ¯Ù‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ˙‡ ÌÈ„ÓÂÚ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ÈÓ‚„ ˙‡Â ˜ÓÂÚ‰ È·Ó ˙‡ Û¢ÁÏ Ô˙È ‰ÂÂ˘Ó ¯˜ÁÓ ˙ÂÚˆÓ‡·˘ ˙‡Ê Ïη ‰ÏÏÎ‰Ï ÌÈÂȯËȯ˜‰ Ì‰Ó ¯È‰·‰ ‡Ï ÔÂÒÙÏ Ìχ ≤¥Æ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ „ÂÒÈ· ÛÒÂÈ Æ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ¨Û¢ÁÏ ˘˜È· Ô‰Ï˘ ˜ÓÂÚ‰ È·Ó ˙‡˘ ¨˙¯ÂÒÓ Ô˙‡ Ï˘ ÏÏÎÏ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙‡ „Á‡Ï ˙˘˜·Ó‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙ ÏÎß Ï˘ ȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ͯډ ˙‡ ‰Á„˘ ¨Ô„

‘There is NO pure (i.e. unmediated) experience. Neither mystical experience nor more ordinary forms of experience give any indication, or any grounds for believing, that they are unmediated. That is to say, all experience is processed through, organized by and makes itself available to us in extremely complex epistemological ways… A proper evaluation of this fact leads to the recognition that in order to understand mysticism it is not just a question of studying the reports of the mystic after the experiential event but of acknowledging that the experience itself as well as the form in which it is reported is shaped by concepts which the mystic brings to, and which ÌÈ·¯· ˙¯ÊÂÁ ÂÊ ‰„ÓÚ ÆÈ¯Ó˘‰ ÈÙ‡‰ ¨Ï¢‰ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®≤∂ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î© shape, his experience’ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨Ï¢‰ ª˙ÂÈ˙„ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ı¢Î ∫‡¯ ¨ı¢Î Í¯Ú˘ ÌȈ·˜‰ È˘· ÌÈÏÂÏΉ ÌȯӇӉ ÔÓ ∫‡¯ Ô‰· ÌȘÈÊÁÓ‰ ÔÈ· ÁÂÎȉ ˙„ÏÂ˙ ˙„ÓÚ‰ È˙˘ ¯Â‡È˙Ï Æ¯ÂÓ ∫¯˜ÈÚ· Ì˘ ‡¯Â ªÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ ÁÂ˙È ßÓÚ ¨ÁÂΉ ¨·¯‡‚ ª±∑≠µ ßÓÚ ¨˜·ω ª≥≤∂≠≥±∑ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó ª≥≥π≠≥≥µ ßÓÚ ¨ÔˆÈ ª±∏∂≠±∂≤ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș Æ≤≤≠≤± ßÓÚ ¨‰ÓÙ‰ ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó ª≤π∞≠≤∏π Ʊ∏µ ßÓÚ ¨ÂÏÓÈ‚ ÚȈ‰ ÂÊÎ ‰ÈȈ˜Â„¯ Æ≤≥ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î Â˙„ÓÚ ÌÚ ‰˜ÈËÈÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ È‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ı¢Î Ï˘ Â˙Ùȇ˘ ˙‡ ·˘ÈÈÏ È˘Â˜‰ ÏÚ Æ∂µ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î Æ®≤π ‰¯Ú‰ ¨ÔÏ‰Ï Â‡¯Â© ≥≤¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó „ÓÚ ¨˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‘the interpretative framework of a mystic’s particular religion shapes his or her experience at the phenomenal level and not merely in the description or narrative of the experience. This does not, however, logically preclude the possibility of underlying patterns of experience or deep structures ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ© that may be illuminated through a comparative study of various mystical traditions’ ‰ÈÎ ‡Â‰˘ ¨˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜ÁÏ ‰„‡Èχ Ï˘ ‰˘È‚‰ ÏÚ Â˙„ÓÚ ˙‡ ÒÒÈ· ÔÂÒÙÏ Ʈµµ≠µ¥ ßÓÚ Æ˙Èϯ¢¯ËÒ

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

16

10.06.2007, 07:35

≤±

≤≤ ≤≥ ≤¥

17

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

¨¯˘˜‰ ˙ÈÂÏ˙ ¨˙ÈË‚ÈË˜ ‰˘È‚ ‰ÙÂÏÁÎ ÚȈ‰ ≤µ¨ßÌÈÈ·ÂÈÁ‰ ÌÈÎ˙‰ ˙ÈÁ·Ó Û˙Â˘Ó ‰ÎÓ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ïη ÂÓÎ ¨„ÈÓ˙ ˙‡˘Â‰ ¨˙ȯÂËÒȉ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ ‰È˯ÙÏ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙· ‰‡Â¯‰ß Ï˘ ‰ÏÏÎ‰Ï ÌÈÂȯËȯ˜‰ Ì‰Ó ÔÈȈ ‡Ï Ô„ Ì‚ Ìχ ≤∂ÆßÌÈÈÓÚÙ–„Á „ÂÁÈ È˜ ˙ȯÂËÒȉ ÈÏÚ· ¯Â‡È˙Ï ‰¯„‚‰Ï ˙˙È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ß ÈÎ Â˙ÚË Æ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ËÒ˜Ë Â‡ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ via negative ÔÈÚÓ ¨‰¯‡˙Ï È„Î ÌÈÈÏÈÏ˘ ÌÈÈÂËÈ·· ˜¯ Â‡ ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘Ó „ÂÚ ÏÎ ˙ÏÏÂÎ ‰ÏÂÁ˙ ‰È¯Â‚˘Π‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ͢Ӊ ˙‡ ‰˜È„ˆÓ ‡ ‰¯È‰·Ó ‰ȇ ≤∑¨ß˙ȯ˜ÁÓ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙‰˘ ‰˘È‚„‰ ‡È‰Â ¨¯Â‡Èχ ÏÁ¯ Ì‚ ‰˜ÈÊÁÓ ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜ ‰„ÓÚ· Æ˙ȯ˜ÁÓ ˙È‚˘ÂÓ ‰·¯˜ Ï˘ ‰„ÈÓ ÏÚ ÚÈ·ˆ‰Ï ¯˘Ù‡ ÌÈ˙ÚÏ˘ ˙¯ÓÏß ∫ȯÂËÒȉ ¯˘˜‰Â ˙·¯˙ ˙ÈÂÏ˙ ‡È‰ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙·Â ˙Â˙„· ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÈ˙‰Ӊ ‰ÈÂÂ˜Ó ‰Óη È‚ÏÂÓÂÙ ÔÂÈÓ„ Ï˘ ‡ ¯˘˜‰· ‰ÁÂÚÙ ˙‡ ÌÈ·ÈÈÁÓ ‰ÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ ‰˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó· ‰˜ÓÚ‰‰Â ÔÂÈÚ‰˘ ȯ‰ ÆÆÆ˙Â¢ ‰¯È·Ò‰ ‡Ï ¯Â‡Èχ Ì‚ Ìχ ≤∏Æß˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó ‰Ï ˘È · ˜¯Â · ¨‰¯ˆÂ ÂÓÂÁ˙·˘ ÌÈÂÒÓ È˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ Ô˙¯„‚‰ ˙‡ ÌȘȄˆÓ‰ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÈ˙Â‰Ó ÌȘ Ì˙‡ Ì‰Ó Ï˘ Ú„ȉ ¯˜ÂÁ‰ ¨®McGinn© ÔÈ‚˜Ó „¯¯· Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Î ˙·¯˙‰ ˙ÂÈÂÏ˙ ˙Â¢‰ ÏÎÏ Û˙Â˘Ó Ì¯Â‚ Ôȇ˘ ‰˜ÒÓ‰ ˙Ú·Â ı¢Î Ï˘ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ÔÓ˘ ÍÎ ÏÚ „ÓÚ ¨˙ȯˆÂ‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‡¯˜ ˙‡Ê ˙·˜Ú· ÆÔ‰Ï˘ È˙‡Â¢‰ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ˙¯˘Ù‡ Ôȇ˘ Ô‡ÎÓ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ≤π

Æ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÂÂ˘Ó ¯˜ÁÓ ¯˘Ù‡˙˘ ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈ„ÂÓÏ

ÒÈÒ·‰ ÏÚ ‰ÓÎÒ‰ ¯„Úȉ ÏÚ ÚÈ·ˆ‰˘ Íη ˜Ù˙҉ ¨‰ÊÎ ÈÂÈ˘ ÚȈ‰ ‡Ï ‡Â‰ Ìχ ≥∞

Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÏ ˙Óω ‰ÂÂ˘Ó ‰˘È‚ ˙Â·Ï Ô˙È ÂÈÏÚ˘ È‚ÂÏÂÓËÒÈÙ‡‰

˘È˘ Ì‚ ÔÚË Í‡© ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜ ‰„ÓÚ· Âȯ·„Ï ˜ÈÊÁÓ‰ ¨®Hollenback© ˜·ω Ô¯ÈÈ· Òß‚ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÈÈÙ‡Ó ‰Ú·˘ ‰Ó ≥±¨®ÂÊ ‰Ó‚È„¯Ù ÈÙ ÏÚ ¯·Ò‰Ï ˙Â˙È Ôȇ˘ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ ‰Ï‡ ÌÈÈÈÙ‡Ó Ìχ Æ˙È˘Â‡ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Ï˘ ˙¯Á‡ ˙Â¯ÂˆÓ ‰˙‡ ÌÈÈÁ·Ó Âȯ·„Ï˘ ¨˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Æ∂∑≠∂∂ ¨∂≥ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙Â¢ ˙¯„‚‰‰Ó Â˙‚ÈÈ˙Ò‰ ˙‡ ‡¯Â Æ∑π ßÓÚ ¨‰˘Â„˜‰ ÏÚ ¨Ô„ Ï˘ ¢¯„Ó ˙È·Ó ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ÔÈ·Ï ˙ÈË‚ÈË˜‰ Â˙ËÈ˘ ÔÈ· ÔÂÈÓ„‰ ˙‡ ÔÈȈ ‡Ï Ô„ ÆÌ˘ Æı¢Î ¯˘‡· ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ÌÈÙ˙¢Ӊ ˙„ÂÒȉ ˙‡ ‚Ȉ‰Ï ÌÈ˘˜·Ó Â‡ ÂÊ ˙ÂÏÏΉ ˙ίÚÓ·ß ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ∑∑ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ Âȇ Ô˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰Ó Ô˙ÂÚˆÓ‡· Ú·˜Ï Ô˙È ÆÔ‰ ˙ÂÈÏÈÏ˘ ¨ÏÈÚÏ ¯Ó‡˘ ÈÙÎ ¨‰Ï‡ ˙ÂÏÏΉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‡È‰ ÌÈÂÈÙ‡‰ ÌÂÁ˙Ï ÌÈÎÈÈ˘‰ ¨ÂÈ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙ Ï˘ ÌÈÈ˙‰Ӊ ÌÈÎ˙‰ ˙‡ ˙È·ÂÈÁ ‰¯Âˆ· ¯‡˙Ï ÔÁÂη Ôȇ ͇ Ʊ≥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈÈÚӉ ·Ï‰ ¨Ï¢‰ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®∂π ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘© ßÌÈÈË‚ÈË˜‰ Ʊ∏ ßÓÚ ¨¯Â‡Èχ ‘These and other reactions to Katz’s position show that there are serious reasons for holding that this form of what might be called “mystical nominalism” based on an unqualified contextualism, needs to be modified in the direction of a position that will both recognize the mediated aspects Æ®≥≤¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó© of all mystical experience and still not preclude the possibility of comparison’ Æ≤≥ ‰¯Ú‰ ¨ÏÈÚÏ Â‡¯Â ƉÊ΢ ¯˜ÁÓ ÏÚ ¯˙È ‡Ï ÂÓˆÚ ı¢Î˘ ÍÎ ÏÚ „ÓÚ ÔÈ‚˜Ó ‘There is obviously no agreement on the epistemological basis upon which a more cautious and more adequate comparitivism based on a qualified contextualism should be reconstructed’ Æ®Ì˘© ‘Although I confirm the contextualist thesis... I suggest that various sorts of supernormal ¨˜·ω© experiencesÆ.. do not appear to be explicable in terms of the contextualist paradigm’ Ʊµ≠±≥ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®∑ ßÓÚ

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

17

10.06.2007, 07:35

≤µ ≤∂ ≤∑

≤∏ ≤π

≥∞

≥±

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 18

¯È‰·‰Ï È„ÎÓ ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó È¯ÒÁ ÌÈÏÙ¯ÂÚÓ Ì˜ÏÁ·Â ¨È„Ó Ìȯˆ ̘ÏÁ· ¨È„Ó ÌÈÈÏÏΠ̘ÏÁ· ̉ ¨˙ÈÂÂÈ˘¯ËÒ˜ ‰„ÓÚ· ˜ÈÊÁ‰Ï ÔˆÈ Ï˘ ‰ÂÈÒÈ Û‡ ≥≤Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó‰ ˙‡ ˙ÂÏ„·‰ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁÏ ÂÏÈÙ‡˘ ‰ÚȈ‰ ÔˆÈ ÆÚÎ˘Ó Âȇ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ ÏȈ‰Ï ˙‡Ê Ïη ¯·ÚÓ˘ ‰˘Ó ÌÈÈÁ· ˘È˘ Íη ‰¯Î‰‰ Ï˘ÓÏ ÂÓÎ ¨Û˙Â˘Ó Ì¯Â‚ ˙ÂÈ‰Ï ÈÂ˘Ú ¨‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ÂÊÓ ÂÊ ˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ì˘· ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎÏ˘ ÚÎÂ˘Ó Èȇ˘ ˜¯ ‡Ï Ìχ ≥≥ÆÈÊÈÙÏ ȯÓÂÁÏ ˙È˙·¯˙ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÂÏÚÙ Ìȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÌÈÂÎÓ‰ Âχ ÔÈ·Ó ÌÈ·¯ ȯ‰˘© ˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ ˙‡Ȉӷ ‰¯Î‰ ȯ‰ ¨ÔÂÎ ¯·„‰ ̇ Ì‚˘ ‡Ï‡ ¨®˙ÈÊÈÙËÓÏ ˙ȯÓÂÁ ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ ÔÈ· ‰Á·‰ ‰· ˙ÓÈȘ ‰˙Èȉ ‡Ï˘ Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ÏÂÏÎÏ ‰ˆÂ¯ ‰˙Èȉ ‡Ï ȇ„· ÔˆÈ˘ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ¯ÂÙÒ–ÔÈ‡Ï ˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ÂÊÎ ‰¯Î‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ˙‡¯Ï ÌÈÎÈ˘ÓÓ‰ ͇ ¨˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜ ‰„ÓÚ· ÌȘÈÊÁÓ‰ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ÌÈÁȈÓ ÌÈÏÙÎ˘Ó ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ ‰ÂÂ˘Ó ¯˜ÁÓ ‰˜È„ˆÓ‰ ‰È¯Â‚˘ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ „ÂÒÈ· ˙„ÓÂÚ‰ ˙È‚Âχ˙‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ˙‡Â ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È˙‰Ӊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ˙‡ ÔÓ ÌÈ·¯ ψ‡ ˙ˆ·ˆ·Ó ˙¯ÊÂÁ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ‰ ‡ ˙È‚Âχ˙‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ÔÎ‡Â Æ‰Ê ¨Â˙ÒÈÙ˙ ÏÚ ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ˙ÒÒÂ·Ó ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰˘ ¨ÂÓˆÚ ÌÂÏ˘ ÆÂÏω Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ Û˘ÂÁ Â˙‡˘ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁÏ Û˙Â˘Ó ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó ˘È˘ ˘ÈÁÎ‰Ï „¯ÂÒ·‡ ‰Ê ‰È‰È˘ ÊȯΉ ÌÚ ¨È‰Âχ‰ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ‰ ‡Â‰ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ȯ·„Ï ¨‰Ê‰ Û˙¢Ӊ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ ≥¥ÆÔ‰Ï˘ ‰Â¢Ӊ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ Û˙¢Ӊ˘ ÔÚË ı¢Î ≥µÆ˙È˘Â‡‰ ˘Ù‰ ȘÓÚ·˘ ËÏÁÂÓ‰ ˘È‰ ÌÚ Â‡ ˙ÈÊÈÙÈËÓ‰ ˙‡ȈӉ ˙‡ȈÓ߉ Ì˘· ‰È΢ ‰Ó ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ‡Â‰ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï

·ˆÓ· ˘Á¯˙Ó‰ ‰Ú„Â˙‰ Ï˘ ÈϘȄ¯ ÈÂÈ˘ ‡È‰ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ — Ô¢‡¯‰ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ Æ¥±≠¥∞ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ‰˘È‚ ȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ˜ÈÚÓ‰ ‰Ú„Â˙ ·ˆÓ ‡È‰ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ — È˘‰ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ ªÈ„Ó ÈÏÏÎ ‡Â‰ — ˙Â¯Ú ˙ÈχÂËÒ˜Ë˜‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ Ï˘ Ï·¯ÂÒÓ ÁÂÒÈ ‡Â‰ — È˙ӇΠ‰‡Â¯ ÂÏ˘ ˙ÈÙȈÙÒ‰ ˙È˙„‰ ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰˘ ‰ÓÏ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ — È˘ÈÏ˘‰ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ ª®Â¯ÙÒ· ÌȯÁ‡ ˙ÂÓ˜ӷ ˜·ω Ï˘ ÂÈ˙ÂÚ„ ÌÚ ·˘ÈÈ˙Ó Âȇ© È„Ó ®Ï·¯ÂÒÓ© ¯ˆ ¨ÈÏ‚ÚÓ ‡Â‰ — ‰Ïȉ˜· ‰Ú¢ÈÏ ÌÈÚ‚Â‰ ÌÈÈÈÚ ˙„‡ ÏÚ ®°© ÈËÒÈÓ Ú„È ‰˜ÈÚÓ ÈÚÈ·˘‰Â È˘È˘‰ È˘ÈÓÁ‰ ¨ÈÚÈ·¯‰ ÌÈÈÈÙ‡Ó‰ ª˙ÂÈËÒÈÓÎ ‰‡Â¯ ÂÓˆÚ ˜·ω˘ ˙·¯ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÏÏÂÎ Âȇ ‰¯Âˆ ˙¯ÒÁ ‡È‰ ª˙Á‡ ‰ÂÚ·Â ˙Ú· ˙ȯÂÙËÓ ˙È˘ÓÓ ‰¯‡‰ ‡È‰ ª˙ÂÏÚÙȉ ‰ÂÚË ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰© ‡ ¨·Âˉ ‰¯˜Ó· ¨Ìȯȉ· Ìȇ ®˙ÂÊί˙‰· ·Â¯Ï ‰¯Â˜Ó ª‰È¯ÂËÒȉ ÈÂÏ˙ ‡Â‰ ‰ÎÂ˙ ÈÒÈÒ· ÔÙ‡· ÆÈ¯Ó‚Ï ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó È¯ÒÁ ‘Constructivist analyses of mystical experience have the advantage of making obvious sense of the wide diversity of experiences to be found more even in the literature of Christian mysticism, let alone that of other religious traditions… Nor does it make nonsense of the idea that even experiences that differ sharply may still have some things in common, such as, for instance, a Æ®≥≥∏ ßÓÚ ¨ÔˆÈ© recognition that there is more to life than the physical or material’ ‘That there remains a common characteristic it would be absurd to deny, and it is this element ¨ÌÂÏ˘© which is brought out in the comparative analysis of particular mystical experiences’ Æ®∂ ßÓÚ ¨ÌÈÓ¯Ê ÔÈχ Ï˘ ‰¯ÙÒ ÏÚ ÌÂÁ· ıÈÏӉ ¨ÒÓÈÈß‚ Ï˘ ÂÈ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙Ó ÚÙ˘Â‰ ¨ÒÂß‚ Ï˘ Â˙¯„‚‰ ÏÚ ÍÓ˙Ò‰˘ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ‘The fundamental© ˙ÈÊÈÙËÓ‰ ˙‡ȈӉ ‡ χ‰ ÌÚ Ú‚ÓÎ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙‡ ¯‡È˙ ¨®Underhill© Ïȉ¯„‡ experience of the inner self which enters into immediate contact with God or the metaphysical ‘the encounter with the© ˘Ù‰ ȘÓÚ· ˙ËÏÁÂÓ‰ ˙Â˘È‰ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓΠ‡ ®˛¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÌÈÓ¯Ê ¨ÌÂÏ˘¸ reality’ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ÌÂÏ˘ Ï˘ ˙¯„‚‰· ÔÂÈ„Ï Æ®˛±µ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘¸ absolute being in the depths of one’s own soul’ Æ≤∂≠≤≤ ßÓÚ ¨Ì„‡ ˘„˜Ó ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó ªµ∂ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ ªπ≠µ ßÓÚ ¨„ÈÈ·˘ ∫‡¯

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

18

10.06.2007, 07:35

≥≤

≥≥

≥¥

≥µ

19

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

˙È‚Âχ˙‰Â ˙È˙‰Ӊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ÏÚ ¯ÊÁ ¨˙ÈχÈ¯Ù‰ ‰„ÓÚ‰ ˙‡ ‰Á„˘ Û‡ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ ≥∂Æß˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ≥∑

Æß˙ȉÂχ‰ ˙ÂÁÎÂ‰ Ï˘ ˙È„ÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁß ‡Â‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó‰˘

˙ÂÈ˙‰Ӊ ˙¯„‚‰·˘ ˙ÂÈ˙ÈÈÚ·‰ ÏÚ Â„ÓÚ˘ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ¯ÙÒÓ ÂÚȈ‰ ˙Â¯Á‡‰ ÌÈ˘· Ô˙ÂÈ ÚȈ‰ ‰¯Á‡Ï ≥∏ÆÈ˙ÁÙ˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„ ÈÈÈˢ‚Ëȉ ‚˘ÂÓ· ‰˙¯„‚‰Ï ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ¨˙„‰ Ï˘ ‰¯Â‚Ò ‰ÓÈ˘¯ ‚Ȉ‰Ï ÔÂÈÒÈ‰ ÔÂÏ˘ÈÎ ·˜Ú ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯„‚‰Ï ‰Ê ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ·¯‡‚ ˙‡¯Ï ˘Èß Âȯ·„Ï Æ˜·ω ˙¢ÚÏ ‰ÒÈ˘ ÈÙÎ ¨˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁÏ ÌÈÈ„ÂÁÈÈ ÌÈÈÈÙ‡Ó Ï˘ Ì‚¯˙ÈÓ ¨ÁÈ˘ ‡ ‰Ù˘ Ï˘ ‚ÂÒ „ÎÂÏ ‰Ê Ì˘ ªÈÈÈˢ‚Ëȉ Ô·ÂÓ· ‰ÁÙ˘Ó Ì˘ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ≥π

Æß˙ÈÈÈÙ‡ ˙È˙¯ÙÒ ‰„ÓÚÏ ˙·¯ ÌÈÓÚÙ

‰ˆÂ·˜ Ïη ÂÓΩ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÔÈ· È˙ÁÙ˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„ ‡ÂˆÓÏ Ô˙È˘ ˜ÙÒ Ôȇ ÏÚ ÔΠ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ÏÚ ÏÈÁ‰Ï ¯˘Ù‡˘Â ¨®‰Ù˘· ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘Ó‰ È„È ÏÚ ˙¯„‚ÂÓ‰ ˙¯Á‡ Ôȇ˘ ‰Úˆ‰‰ Ìχ ¥∞ƘÁ˘Ó ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ÏÚ ÔÈÈˢ‚ËÈÂ Ï˘ ÌÈÓÒ¯ÂÙÓ‰ Âȯ·„ ˙‡ ˙„ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ͇ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Â‡ ˙„ Ì˘· ÌÈÎÓ Â‡˘ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÏÎÏ ÌÈÙ˙¢Ӊ ÌÈÒÁÈ Â‡ ÔÂÈÓ„ Ș ¨‰ÂÎ˙ ˙‡ ÌȈÂÁ ÌÈÙÙÂÁ‰ ‰·¯˜Â ÔÂÈÓ„ ÈÒÁÈ Ï˘ ˙ηÂÒÓ ˙˘¯ ˙ÓÈȘ˘ ‡Ï‡ ¨‰Ï‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ˜¯Â ‰„˘ ÔÂÈη ˙ÏÚÂ˙‰ ÏÚ ‰Ï‡˘ ÔÓÈÒ ‰·ÈˆÓ ¨Âχ ÌÈÁÂÓ· ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰Â ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ÔÚˢ ÈÙÎ ÆÔ‰Ï˘ È˙‡Â¢‰ ¯˜ÁÓ ÏÚ ÒÒ·˙Ӊ ¨ÂÏω ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ˘„˜ÂÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓ ÌÈÎÈ˘ÓÓ‰ ͇ ¨˙ÈÈÈˢ‚Ëȉ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ˙ÂÚˆÓ‡· ˙„ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ ÌȯȷÒÓ‰ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ ˙È‚Âχ˙‰ — ˙È˙‰Ӊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ˙‡ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ‰¯ÊÁ ÌÈ·È‚Ó ¨ÂÊ ‰È¯Â‚˘ ÏÚ Ì‰È¯˜ÁÓ ˙‡ ÒÒ·Ï ∫˙„‰ Ï˘ — ‰„ÂÒÈ· ‡Ï ̇ ȯ‰˘ ¨Â‰˘ÏÎ È˙Â‰Ó ÔÈÈÙ‡Ó ˙ÂÈ‰Ï ·ÈÈÁ ˙„ ‚˘ÂÓÏ ¨ß˜ÂÈ˙‰ ˙‡ ÏȈ‰Ïß È„Î ˙È˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó È˙Ï·Ï ‰˘ÚÓÏ ˙ÎÙ‰ ‡È‰˘ „Ú ¨ÍÎ ÏÎ ‰·Á¯ ˙È˘Ú ˙„ Ï˘ ‰ÁÙ˘Ó‰ ¨ÔÎ ‘Thus, for example, the nature of the Christian mystic’s pre-mystical consciousness informs the mystical consciousness such that he experienced the mystic reality in terms of Jesus, the Trinity Æ®≤∑ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î© or a personal God’ ‘the immediate experience of the divine presence that is characteristic of mysticism as an historical Æ®µµ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ© phenomenon’ ˙¯„‚‰Ï ÔÈÈˢ‚ËÈÂ Ï˘ ‰Ù˘‰ ˜Á˘Ó ˙Èȯ‡˙·Â È˙ÁÙ˘Ó‰ ÔÂÈÓ„‰ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘Ó˙˘‰Ï ˙ÂÂÈÒÈ ÏÚ ÆÔÂÈ˜Ó ª¯ÏÒ ªË¯ÓÒ ∫‡¯ ˙„ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ‘At the same time, listing a limited and closed set of “distinctive features” of mystical expression, a la Hollenback, also fails to capture this vast array. Instead, one should see “Mysticism” as a “family name” in the Wittegensteinian sense. This name captures a certain language or discourse, Æ®≤π∏ ßÓÚ ¨˙¯˜ȷ ¨·¯‡‚© which often translates into a characteristic literary stance’ ¨ÌÈÙϘ ȘÁ˘ÓÏ ¨ÁÂÏ È˜Á˘ÓÏ È˙ÂÂΠƢÌȘÁ˘Ó¢ Ìȇ¯Â˜ Â‡ Ì‰Ï˘ ÌÈÎÈω· ÌÚÙ Ï˘ÓÏ ‡–ÔÈÈÚß Ì‰Ï ˙ÂÈ‰Ï ·ÈÈÁ¢ ∫¯Ó‡˙ χ — ø‰Ï‡ ÏÎÏ Û˙¢Ӊ Â‰Ó Æ‰‡Ï‰ ÔΠ¨‰ÓÁÏÓ È˜Á˘ÓÏ ¨¯Â„ΠȘÁ˘ÓÏ ¯·„ ‰Ï‡ ÏÎÏ ˘È ̇‰ ˜Â„·Â Ô·˙‰ ‡Ï‡ — ¢ÌȘÁ˘Ó¢ ÌÈȯ˜ Âȉ ‡Ï ̉ ÔΖ‡Ï ̇˘ ¨Û˙Â˘Ó Â‰˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„ ÈÒÁÈ ‰‡¯˙ Ï·‡ ¨ÌÏÂÎÏ Û˙¢Ӊ ‰Ó–¯·„ ‡ˆÓ˙ ‡Ï ÌÓ‡ ¨Ì‰· Ô·˙˙ ̇ Ô΢ — ÆÛ˙Â˘Ó ‰Ó ˙ηÂÒÓ ˙˘¯ Ìȇ¯ Â‡ ∫‡È‰ ‰Ê ÔÂÈÚ Ï˘ ‰‡ˆÂ˙‰Â ÆÆÆ‰Ï‡Î˘ ÌÈÒÁÈ Ï˘ ‰ÓÏ˘ ‰¯„Ò ÂÏÈه ¨‰·¯˜Â ·ÂË ÂÏω ˙ÂÈÓ„‰ ˙‡ ÔÈÈÙ‡Ï ÏÂÎÈ Èȇ ÆÔ˘·Â Ï„‚· ˙ÂÈÓ„ ÆÂÊ ˙‡ ÂÊ ˙ˆÂÁ ˙ÂÙÙÂÁ‰ ˙ÂÈÂÓ„ Ï˘ ÔÈ· ˙¯¯Â˘‰ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈÂÓ„‰ ˙ˆÂÁ ˙ÂÙÙÂÁ ÍÎ Ô΢ ª¢È˙ÁÙ˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„¢ ÈÂËÈ·‰ ˙ÂÚˆÓ‡· ¯˘‡Ó ¯˙ÂÈ ÌȯˆÂÈ ÌȘÁ˘Ó‰ ∫¯ÓÂÏ ‰ˆ¯‡Â ÆßÂΠßÂΠ‚ÊÓ ¨‰ÎÈω ¨ÌÈÈÈÚ Ú·ˆ ¨ÌÈÙ ÈÂÂ˙ ¨Û‚ ‰·Ó ∫‰ÁÙ˘Ó È·Â¯˜ Æ®∂∂≠∂µ ßÓÚ ¨∂∑≠∂∂ ÌÈÙÈÚÒ ¨ÔÈÈˢ‚ËÈ© ߉ÁÙ˘Ó

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

19

10.06.2007, 07:35

≥∂

≥∑ ≥∏ ≥π

¥∞

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 20

‰¯„‚‰ ‰·È‚Ó ‰ȇ ̇ ¨È˙ÁÙ˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„ Ï˘ ‰È¯Â‡˙‰ Æ˙ÈËÈÏ‡ ˙ÏÚÂ˙ ˙¯ÒÁÏ ÔÈÁ·‰Ï ˙¯˘Ù‡Ó ‰ȇ˘ Íη ¨Ô„·‡Ï ˙„‰ ˙‡ ‰¯È„‚Ó ¨ÔÁÏÂ˘Ï ˙Á˙Ó ˙È˙Â‰Ó ¥±

Æ˙ÂÈÏÏÎ ÌÈÏÓÒ ˙ÂίÚÓ Â‡ ÌÏÂÚ ˙ÂÙ˜˘‰ ¨˙ÂÈ‚Âχ„ȇ ÔÈ·Ï ‰È·

‰ÒÈÙ˙ ‡È‰ Û‡ ‰·È‚Ó ¨ÁÈ˘ ‡ ‰Ù˘ Ï˘ ‚ÂÒ „ÎÂÏ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰˘ ·¯‡‚ Ï˘ Â˙Úˆ‰ ¨È˙ÁÙ˘Ó‰ ÔÂÈÓ„‰ ˙ÒÈÙ˙· ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘Ó‰ ÌȯÁ‡ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ‰ÂÓΠ·¯‡‚ Ɖ˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È˙Â‰Ó ÌÈ„ÎÂÏ Â‡ ÌÈÙ˜˘Ó ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ˙„ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ‰˘ ˙ÂÈ‚¯Â‡ ˙ÂÁÙ˘Ó· ¯·Â„Ó Ôȇ˘ ÍÎÓ ÌÈÓÏÚ˙Ó ÌÈÈÙȈÙÒ ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ ÌÈÈ˙¯·Á Ìȯ˘˜‰· ¨‰Ù˘· ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘Ó‰ È„È· ¯ˆÂ˘ ˙ÂÁÙ˘Ó· ‡Ï‡ ¨Ô˙‡ ∫‚Ș ÔÚˢ ÈÙÎ ¥≤ÆÌȘ‰·ÂÓ ÌÈÈËÈÏÂÙ ÌÈÒ¯Ëȇ ÍÂ˙Ó ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙‰˘ ‰ÁÂÎ ÌÈÎȯÚÓ Ìȇ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙„‡ ÏÚ ÂÓÊ È· Ìȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ÏÎ ËÚÓÎ ¨˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÈÂ˘Ï ˙ÂÈ·‰ Ô‰ ®ÌÈˆÓ‡Ó ÌÓˆÚ Ìȯ˜ÁÓ‰˘ Âχ ÔÏÏη© ßÈËÒÈÓ‰ß Ï˘ ¨‰Ê· ‰Ê ÌÈ·Ï¢Ӊ ÌÈÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ÌÈÎÈω˙ ˙Â˘È‚ ¨˙¯„‚‰ Ï˘ ˙˘¯ ÏÚ ˙ÂÎÓÒ‰ ˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙·ÈÒ· ˙ÂÈÂÏ˙‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù ˙ÂÈ„ÂÁÈÈ ÌÈÈÁ ˙¯ˆ ÏÚ ÌÈÎÂÓÒ ÌÓˆÚ·˘Â ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÁ‰Ï ˜¯ ˙ÂÙÂÙÎ Ôȇ ßÈËÒÈÓ‰ß Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÁÎÂ‰ ˙ÂÒÈÙ˙‰ Æ˙ÂÈÙȈÙÒ ÌÈÎÈω˙ Ï˘ ‰Î¯‡ ‰È¯ÂËÒÈ‰Ï ˙ȘÏÁ ˙ÂÙÙÂÁ ˙ÂÚÙ˘ÂÓ Ô‰˘ ‡Ï‡ ¨ÌÂÈÎ ˙ÂϷ˜Ӊ ¥≥

Ɖ‡¯Â‰ Ï˘Â ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó Ï˘ ÌÈÈÂÈ˘Â ÌȘ˙ÚÓ ¨ÌÈ΢Ӊ ¨ÌÈÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„

ÌÈÁÂÓ‰ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰È‚Âχ‚‰ ÏÚ „ÂÓÚÏ ÔΠ̇ ȇ¯‰ ÔÓ ÌÈÈ˙¯·Á‰ ¨ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ‰ Ìȯ˘˜‰‰ ÏÚ ¨˙„ÈÒÁ‰Â ‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ „ÂÒÈ· ÚȈ‡ ÔÏ‰Ï˘ Ìȯ·„· Ư˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘ ˙‡ ·ˆÈÚ ‰·˘ ͯ„‰ ÏÚ ¨Â¯ˆÂ ̉·˘ ÌÈÈËÈÏÂى ‡˘Â· ˜ÂÒÚÏ ‰ÂÂ˜Ó È‡Â ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰È‚Âχ‚‰ Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ÌȘ¯Ù È˘‡¯ ƯÁ‡ ̘ӷ ‰·Á¯‰·

‘to save the baby, the concept of religion must have some essential characteristic, and if it does not, then the family of religion becomes so large as to be practically meaningless and analytically useless. The theory of family resemblance, if not illegitimately smuggling in an essentialist definition under the table, is defining religion into oblivion by making it indistinguishable from ˙¯Â˜È·Ï Æ®∑≥ ßÓÚ ¨‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ© ideologies, worldviews, or symbolic systems in general’ ‡¯Â Æπ∑≠∑≤ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ ∫‡¯ ˙„‰ ˙¯„‚‰Ï È˙ÁÙ˘Ó‰ ÔÂÈÓ„‰ ‚˘ÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ÏÚ „ϯ߂ˆÈÙ Ï˘ ˙˯ÂÙÓ Æ˙„ ¨Ï¢‰ ª≤≤¥≠≤±¥ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ȘÁ˘Ó ¨Ï¢‰ ∫Ì‚ ¯˘˜· È˙ÁÙ˘Ó ÔÂÈÓ„ ‚˘ÂÓ· ÌÈ˘Ó˙˘ÓÏ ¯˘‡· „ϯ߂ˆÈÙ Ï˘ Â˙Á·‰ ˙‡ Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ≥π ‰¯Ú‰ ¨ÏÈÚÏ Â‡¯ Æ≤±∑ ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ȘÁ˘Ó ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ∫˙„Ï ‘Virtually all contemporary studies of mysticism fail to appreciat the sense in which notions of the “mystical” (including those that are adopted in the studies themselves) are cultural and linguistic constructions dependent upon a web of interlocking definitions, attitudes and discursive processes, which themselves are tied to particular forms of life and historically specific practices. Not only are contemporary notions of the “mystical” subject to the cultural presuppositions of the day, they are also informed by and overlap with a long history of discursive processes, Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®π ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș© continuities and discontinuities and shifts in both meaning and denotation’ Æ®˛Ì˘¸ ‚Ș È„È ÏÚ ÌÈËˈӉ© ±≤ ßÓÚ ¨ÔˆÈ Ï˘ ‰È¯·„ ˙‡

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

20

10.06.2007, 07:35

¥±

¥≤ ¥≥

21

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

¨˙ÈÂÂÈ· Ú„ÈΠ¯˜Ó ¨ÌÈÈÈ·‰ ÈÓÈ Ï˘ ˙ȯˆÂ‰ ‰È‚Âχ˙· ÂÈ˘¯Â˘ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ˙‡ ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ϷȘ ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó· ¥¥Æ‰¯˘Ú ˘˘‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ÛÂÒÓ ÏÁ‰ ÌˆÚ Ì˘Î ÚÈÙ‰ ‡Â‰Â ˙‡ˆÂÈ ‰ÈÂÂÁ ‰„ÂÒÈ·˘ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙È˙„ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ ÂÈȉ„ ¨ÌÂÈÎ ¯˜ÁÓ· ˙Ϸ˜Ӊ Â˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó È‰Ï˘· „ÒÓ˙‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ¥µÆÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë‰ ‡ ȉÂχ‰ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ÔÙ„ ‰˙‡· Á˙Ù˙‰˘ ¨˙Â˙„‰ Ú„Ó ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ¯˜ÈÚ· ¨Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯·Â ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ‰ÒÒ·˙‰ ‰Ù˜˙ ‰˙‡· ¥∂Æ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÔΠ¨‰Ù˜˙ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÚÙÂ˙‰ Ï˘ È„ÂÁÈÈ È„Â‰È ÈÂËÈ·Î ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ï˘ ‰ÓÂȘ ¯·„· ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ÆÈÓ„˜‡ ÌÂÁ˙Î ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓÏ „ÒÓ‰ ¯ˆÂ ¨˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ¯ˆÂ ÂÊ ‰È¯Â‚Ë˜Ï ÂÎÈ¢˘ ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ÈÓ„˜‡‰ ¯˜ÁӉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ‰ÒÙ˙ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Æ˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ˙ÂÈÓ‡ω Ï˘ ‰˘Â·È‚ ÈÙ¯ȇ‰ ÌÊÈχÈÂϘ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ‰ ̉ ¨®Secular© ÔÈÏÂÁ‰ ¨‰‚ÂÊ Ô·Â ‡È‰˘ ¨®Religion© ˙„‰ Ï˘ ‰˙ȈÓ˙Î ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ¨˙È˙ÈÈÂÂÁ ¨˙ÈÂÂÈ˘ÈÈ·ÂÒ ‰ÚÙÂ˙Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯„‚‰ ¥∑Æ˙ÈÙ¯ȇ‰ ‰¯„ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈÂÎÓ‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙ ª˙„‰ Ï˘ ˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ˙‡ ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ‰ˆÓÓ ¨˙ÈËÈÏÂÙ–‡Â ˙È˙¯·Á–‡ ¨˙È˯٠·¯ÚÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈËÒÈχȯÙÓȇ‰ ˙ÂˢÙ˙‰‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ ÏÚ ‰ÏÁ‰ ÂÊ ¨˙¯ÂÒÓ ÂÎÈ¢ ÂÊ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· Æ˙ÈÏ·ÂÏ‚ ‰ÈÂÓ‚‰· ÌÈÈ¯„ÂÓ‰ ÂÈÎ¯Ú ˙‡ ˙ÂÎÊÏ Â˙Ùȇ˘ ÍÂ˙Ó ÂÎÊ Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ¥∏ÆÈËÒÈӉ È˙„‰ ÌÂÁ˙Ï ˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï‰ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ÌÈ¢ ˙„ÒÂÓ ˙˜È˘¯Ù ÏÎ ¨˙ÂÈËÓ¯–‡ Õ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ¯„‡Â‰Â ˆÓ‡ ۇ ¨È·¯ÚÓ‰ ÌÊÈϯ·Èω ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ‰ÈˆÓÈËÈ‚ÏÏ ˙ÂÎÈÈ˘‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Î ¯ÓÂÏÎ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈӉ ˙„‰ Ï˘ ˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ‰ÈȈو˜· ˙ÂÓÂÁ˙ ¯˙Â „ÂÚ ÆÈ˙¯·Á‰Â ÈÏÎÏΉ ¨ÈËÈÏÂÙ‰ ÌÂÁ˙Ï ‰ÚÈ‚ ÂÏ Ôȇ˘ ¨ÈÂÂÈ˘ÈÈ·Â҉ È˙ÈÈÂÂÁ‰ ¨È˯ى ÌÂÁ˙Ï Ï·˜˙‰ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈ˙„Î ˙ÂȯˆÂ–˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ È·¯ÚÓ‰ ‚ÂÈ˙‰ ˙ÂÈÂ‰Ê ˙ÈÈ·‰Ï ‰Ùȇ˘ ÍÂ˙Ó Â˙‡ ÂÁ˙È٠̉ ¨Âχ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ È· ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ ÌÈÏÈÎ˘Ó È„È ÏÚ ¨ÌÈÈËÒÈÓ ÌÈÈÁ¯ ¨ÌÈÈ˙„Π‰ÂÊ˘ ÌÈ¢‰ ˙„ÒÂӉ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ ¨ÌÈÎ˙‰ Æ˙ÂÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·È˘Ï˜ ‰¯Á‡Ï ÂÚˢ ÈÙÎ ¨ÍÎ ¥πÆÌÈ¢ ÌÈ·È˘Ï˜ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÓ‡ω ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ˙ÈÈ·‰Ï ¢ÓÈ˘ Ʊ±≤≠∑∂ ßÓÚ ¨ÂË¯Ò ‰„ ª‰È· ‰Á˙Ù˙‰ ¨˙Â˙„‰ ÏÎ Ï˘ ÈÁ¯‰ ÒÈÒ·‰ ‡È‰˘ ‰Ó„˜ ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰È‚Âχ˙Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ Ʊ∑ ßÓÚ ¨ı· ∫ÍÎ ÏÚ Â‡¯ ªÌÈÓ¯‚‰ Ìȇ˜ÈËÓ¯‰ ·¯˜· Æ≥¥≠±¥ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ª≥¥≥≠≤∂µ ßÓÚ ¨ÔÈ‚˜Ó ∫‡¯ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘Â ‚˘ÂÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰È¯ÂËÒȉ· ÔÂÈ„Ï Æ≤±∞≠≤∞π ßÓÚ ¨‰Ù˘ ȘÁ˘Ó ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ‘“Religion” has been used to accommodate a disparate and disconnected series of institutions that at various times have been singled out as standing in the way of modern rational government. These characteristics of non-western institutions, and of institutions within “premodern” Western societies themselves, have been called traditions, mysticism, despotism, superstition, witchcraft, primitivism, or medieval forms of life. Many of these derogatory references were perhaps originally made by Protestants against Roman Catholics and then extended to other colonial situations. What have been fundamental collective institutions within the peripheral societies in which they operated have been categorized as indigenous religions… and simply by this naming operation have become grist for the mill of the metropolitan religion-secular Æπ≠∏ ßÓÚ ¨‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ¨Ï¢‰ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â Æ®≤≥¥ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘© ideology’ Æ∏ ßÓÚ ¨Èß‚¯Ë߈

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

21

10.06.2007, 07:35

¥¥ ¥µ ¥∂ ¥∑ ¥∏

¥π

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 22

ÂÁ˙ÂÙ ˆÓ‡ ÌÊȉ„·‰Â ÌÊȇ„ȉ‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈӉ ‰ÈˆÊÈχÂËȯÈÙÒ‰ ¨ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ „‰· ÌÈÈËÈÏÂÙ ÌȂȉÓ ÌȂ‰ È„È ÏÚ Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯·Â ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘· µ∞

Æ˙ÈÙȉ ˙Ȅ‰‰ ˙ÂÈÓ‡ω ˙ÈÈ·‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÔÙÈ·Â

Æ˙ÈÓ‡ω ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙‰ʉ ˙ÈÈ·‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ‰Ù˜˙ ‰˙‡· ¢Á¯˙‰ ÌÈÓ„ ÌÈÎÈω˙ Ìȇ˜ÈËÓ¯ Ï˘ ̉ȷ˙ÎÓ ÌÈ„Â‰È ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ ÂˆÓȇ ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈÈ˘‰ ˙ȈÁÓ· ˙·¯˙· ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙·Â ‰Ï·˜· ‡¯Â

µ±

¨˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ ÌȯˆÂ

¯‡È˙ ±∏µ≥ ˙˘· ÍÎ Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ÌÈÈ„Â‰È ÌÈÈÓÂ‡Ï ÌÈÈÂËÈ· ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ·ÈÎ¯Ó ‡È‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈӉߢ ÔÈȈ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÎ ‰Ï·˜‰ ˙‡ ˜ÈÏÈ ®ÛÏ„‡© Ô¯‰‡ „ÓÂÏÓ‰ Ïη ˙ÂÓ‡‰ Ïη ‰˙‡ ‡ÂˆÓÏ Ô˙È˘ ÍÎ È„Î „Ú ˙¢Â‡‰ Ï˘ ˙ÈÁ¯‰ ˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰· È˙Â‰Ó ÌÈÙ¯ȇ ÌÈ„Â‰È ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ Ï˘ ̉ȷ˙η ¯·‚ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ µ≤Æß˙Â˙„‰ ‰ÈÈهϠ‰Ù˜È‰Ï ¯˘‡· „ÂÒÈ ˙ÂÁ‰Â ¨Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯·Â ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘· ˙Âȯ˘„ ¨˙¯ÂÒÓ ÆÂÊ ‰Ù˜˙· ÂÚ·˜ ¨ÌÂÈÎ Ì‚ ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ˙ÂϷ˜Ӊ ¨ÂÊ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ Ï˘ ˙·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï Â¢‰ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ Â¯„‚‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙·¯˙· ˙Â¢ ˙˜È˘¯Ù Ʈ˙ÈÈ҉ ˙Ȅ‰‰ ˙·¯˙· ‰¢‡¯·Â ˘‡¯·© ˙¯Á‡ ß˙ÂÈÁ¯ÊÓß ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ¯˜ÈÚ·Â ˙ȯˆÂ‰ Ï˘ ˙È·ÂÈÁ‰ ‰Î¯Ú‰‰ Ú˜¯ ÏÚ — ‰¯È„‡‰Ï ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙·¯˙‰ ÏÚ Ô‚‰Ï „ÚÂ ‰Ï‡ ÌÈÎÏ‰Ó ¨ß˙ÈÁÂ¯ß ˙È„Â‰È ˙¯ÂÒÓ Ï˘ ‰È·‰ Ì˘Ï ÔΠ— ®Fin de Siècle© ‰‡Ó‰ ‰ÙÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Æ˙È¯„ÂÓ ˙ÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙È„Â‰È ˙Â‰Ê Ï˘ ‰˙¯ÈˆÈ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ¨˙È˙Îω‰ ÂÊÓ ˙Ï„·‰ ߯ ȯÂÙÈÒßÏ ¯·Â· ÔÈË¯Ó Ï˘ ‰Ó„˜‰· ˜‰·ÂÓ ÈÂËÈ· È„ÈÏ ˙‡· ÂÏω ˙ÂÓ‚Ó‰ È˙˘ „Á‡ ‡È‰˘Â ¨®Die Jüdische Mystik© ß˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ß ‰˙¯˙Â΢ ¨±π∞∂ ˙˘Ó ¨ßÔÓÁ ¨¯·Â· µ≥Æ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È¯„ÂÓ‰ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˘Â·È‚· ¯˙ÂÈ· ÌÈ·Â˘Á‰ ÌÈÎÓÒÓ‰ –‡‰ ‰·È˘ÙÒ¯Ù‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ·Â ¨˙ÈÂȈ‰ Â˙ÂÏÈÚÙÏ ‰˜ÈÊ· ‰¯¯ÂÚ˙‰ ˙„ÈÒÁ· Â˙ÂÈÈÚ˙‰˘ ¯ÙÒß — ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ‰Ê ¯Â·ÈÁ· ¯‡È˙ µ¥¨‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘ Ï˘ ˙ÈËÒÈÏËÈȯ‡‰Â ˙ÈËÓ¯

˙ÂÈÁ¯‰ Ï˘ ‰È·‰Ï ¨¯È ¯„ Ô ÔÚˢ ÈÙÎ Æ∑∑≠∂π ßÓÚ ¨¯È ¯„ Ô ª±¥≤≠±≥∂ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș ª±∞≥≠ππ ßÓÚ ¨Û¯˘ Ô‰ÈÈ· ¨˙ÂÈ·¯ÚÓ ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ˙ÂÚÂ˙ Ï˘ ·Á¯ ÔÂÂ‚Ó ÏÚ ‰ÚÙ˘‰ ‰˙Èȉ Ȅ‰‰ ÈÓ‡ω ¯˘˜‰· ÌÊȇ„ȉ‰ Ï˘ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ Ì‚ ‰ÂÎ ÂÊ ‰Á·‰ Æ∑¥ ßÓÚ ¨®Ì˘© ¯È ¯„ Ô ∫‡¯ ª˙ÂÈ¢ÎÚ‰ ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙ Æ˙ÂÈ¯„ÂÓ ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ˙ÚÂ˙· ·Â˘Á ÌÂ˜Ó ˙ÒÙÂ˙ ‡È‰ Û‡˘Â ¨˙ÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙È„Â‰È ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ‰˙·Â‰˘ Ú·˘‰ ‰‡Ó· ÌȯˆÂ ÌÈÏ·Â˜Ó È·˙η ‰Ï·˜Ï ¯˘˜· ‰¢‡¯Ï ÚÈÙ‰ ßÈËÒÈÓß ¯‡Â˙‰ Ì˘ ¨ÈÏ Ú„ȉ ÏÎÎ ®Basnage© ßÊ· ˜ßÊ Ï˘ ‰ÚÙ˘‰‰ ·¯ ¯ÙÒ· ‰¢‡¯Ï ÚÈÙ‰ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È‚Âχ˙Î ‰Ï·˜‰ ¯Â‡È˙ ¨‰¯˘Ú ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó· Æ∑ ßÓÚ ¨ßÊ· ∫‡¯ ª‰¯˘Ú ‰ÂÓ˘‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯· ÒÙ„˘ ¨ÌȄ‰ȉ Ï˘ ‰È¯ÂËÒȉ‰ ÏÚ Ï˘ ‰ÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ‰ß Â¯ÙÒ· ¨˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÎ ‰Ï·˜‰ ˙‡ ®Molitor© ¯ÂËÈÏÂÓ ı¯Ù ÈÓ¯‚‰ ÛÂÒ‡˙‰ ¯‡È˙ ‰¯˘Ú ‰ÂÓ˘‰ ‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘· ÌÈ„Â‰È ÌÈÏÈÎ˘Ó Æ±≥µ ¨¥¥ ßÓÚ ¨¯ÂËÈÏÂÓ ∫‡¯ ªß‰Ï·˜‰ ÏÚ Â‡ ¨‰È¯ÂËÒȉ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ‰Ï·˜‰ ¯Â‡È˙Ï ßÈËÒÈÓß ¯‡Â˙· ÌÈ˙ÚÏ Â˘Ó˙˘‰ ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ Ï˘ ‰¢‡¯‰ ˙ȈÁÓ·Â ‰Ù˜˙· ıÂÙ ‰È‰ ‡Ï „ÂÚ ‰Ï·˜‰ ¯Â‡È˙Ï ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÁÂÓ· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ Ìχ Æ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÈ„Â‰È ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ ¨ÂÓÊ· ·˙Î˘ ‰Ï·˜‰ ˙„‡ ÏÚ ¯˙ÂÈ· ·Â˘Á‰ ¯ÙÒ‰ ¨±∏¥≥ ˙˘· ÒÙ„˘ ¨˜¯Ù ÛÏ„‡ Ï˘ ¯ÙÒ· ÆÂÊ Æ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨Ò‰ ∫‰·Á¯‰· ‡¯Â Æ˙È˙„ ‰ÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙÎ ‡Ï‡ ¨˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÎ ‰Ï·˜‰ ‰¯‡Â˙ ‡Ï ‘Die Mystik ist ein so wesentliches Moment in der geistigen Entwickelung der Menschheit, dass Æ®¥≠≥ ßÓÚ ¨˜ÈÏÈ© sie bei allen Nationen und in allen Religionen angetroffen wird’ Ʊπ≠µ ßÓÚ ¨¯·Â· Æ∂µ≤≠∂≥µ ßÓÚ ¨¯ÂÏÙ–Ò„Ó

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

22

10.06.2007, 07:35

µ∞

µ±

µ≤ µ≥ µ¥

23

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

˙ÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓÓ ˜ÏÁÎ — ˙„ÈÒÁ‰Â ˙‡˙·˘‰ ¨˙È‡È¯Âω ‰Ï·˜‰ ¨ß¯‰ÂÊ߉ ¨ß‰¯ÈˆÈ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ˙‡ ‰Â¢‰œ ¯·Â· µµÆ„ÂÓÏ˙‰ ˙Ù˜˙· ‰˙È˘‡¯˘ ¨‰ÙȈ¯ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÈÓ‡ω ‰„ÂÁÈÈ ˙‡ ˘È‚„‰ ͇ ¨‰Ò˖‡Ï ÒÂÈËÂÏÙ ¨Ë¯‰˜‡ Ï˘ ̉È˙¯Â˙Ï Ï˘ ϯ‚·Â ÈÙ‡· ‰Ï˘ ˙˜‰·ÂÓ‰ ˙ÂÏ˙·Â ‰Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÏ‚ҷ ˙ÂÈ˙„Á‡· ¯ÈÎ‰Ï ÂÈÏÚß ∫˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‡ÏÙ Á¯ÙßÎ ¯‡È˙˘ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰¯„‡‰‰ ˙¯ÓÏ ˙‡Ê ÌÚ µ∂Æ߉ÁÓˆ ÂÎÂ˙·˘ ÌÚ‰ ÈËÒÈÏËÈȯ‡ ÈËÏÂÂÈ·Ó‡ ÒÁÈ ‰È‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ¯·Â· Ï˘ ÂÒÁÈ µ∑¨ßÔÈÓÂÈ ˜È˙Ú ÔÏȇ Ï˘ ¨˙ÈÂ˘ ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ‰¯ÂÎÚ ÌÈ˙ÚÏ ¨˙ÓÈÂÒÓ ‰„ÈÓ· ˙ÊÂ‡Ó È˙Ï·ßÎ ‰˙‡ ¯‡È˙ ‡Â‰ ªÈÈÈÙ‡ ÔÓ ÌÏÚ˙‰Ï ¯˘Ù‡ ȇ ª‰ÒË Â‡Ï Â‡ ÒÂÈËÂÏ٠‡ ¨Ë¯‰˜‡ Ï˘ ̉È˙¯Â˙Ï ‰˙‡ ‰Â¢ ̇ µ∏

Æß˙„˘È‡Ù‡‰ „ˆÏ ‰· Ô·˙ ¯˘‡Î ‰Ï˘ ˙Âȯȯ·˘‰

˜ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ‰‡¯˘ Ô¢‡¯‰ Ȅ‰ȉ ˙ÂÚ„‰ ‰‚‰ ‰È‰ ¯·Â·ß˘ ÍÎ ÏÚ „ÓÚ˘ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ÌȘ· ‰ËË¯Â˘˘ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÒÈÙ˙ ˙‡ ıÓȇ µπ¨ß˙„‰È· ˙„Ó˙Ó ‰ÈÈË ‰ÁÓ ¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘ ˙ÂÎÓ‰ ‰Ó‚È„¯ÙÎ ‰˙‡ ÒÒÈ·Â ßÔÓÁ ߯ ȯÂÙÈÒßÏ ¯·Â· Ï˘ Â˙Ó„˜‰· ÌÈÈÏÏÎ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÏ ÌÂÏ˘ ‰Ù ¨Â˙ÚÙ˘‰·Â ¨¯·Â·Ï ‰Ó„· ∂±

∂∞

ÆÈ¯„ÂÓ‰ ‰Ï·˜‰

ÆÁ¯ÊӉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ÔÓ ˙ÈËÓ¯–‡‰ ˙·‰Ï˙‰‰Â ıÓȇ˘ ˙ÈÂȈ‰ ‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ·

¨˙ÂÏ‚· ‰ÓÂȘ ˙‡ ¯˘Ù‡˘ œ ÈÂÈÁ‰ ÈÓ‡ω ÁÂΉ ˙‡ ˙„‰È‰ Ï˘ ÈËÒÈÓ‰ „ÂÒÈ· ‰‰ÈÊ ÌÂÏ˘ ∫¯Ó‡ ÂÓˆÚ ‡Â‰˘ ÈÙÎ ∂≤Æ˙ÂÂȈÏ ‰Ï΢‰Ï È˘χȄ ÔÙ‡· ‡È·‰˘Â ˙¢„Á˙‰Î ¨ÈÁ ¯·„Î ˙ÂÂȈ· È˙ÂӇ È˙·˘ÁÓ ÍÂ˙Ó ‰Ï·˜‰ ÌÏÂÚÏ ÒÎÈ‰Ï È˙Ȉ¯ ÁÂÎ È„ ‰È‰ ‰Îω‰ Ï˘ ˙„‰ÈÏ Ì‡‰ ∫‰Ï‡˘‰ È˙‡ ‰ÈÈÚ ÆÆÆ„‡Ó ÔÂÂ˙‰˘ ÌÚ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÁ ‰· ˘È ̇‰ øÈËÒÈÓ „ÂÒÈ ÈÏ· ˙ȯ˘Ù‡ ‰Îω‰ ˙Ó‡· ̇‰ øÌÈȘ˙‰Ï „ÈÓ˙‰Ï ∂≥

ø‰˘ ÌÈÈÙχ ͢ӷ ÔÂÂ˙‰Ï ÈÏ· „ÈÓ˙‰Ï ‰ÓˆÚ Ï˘Ó

·Ï˘· ∫˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰· ÌÈȯ˜ÈÚ ÌÈ·Ï˘ ‰Ú·¯‡ ¯·Â· ¯‡È˙ ¯Ӈӷ Ƶ ßÓÚ ¨¯·Â· ˙·È˙η Â˙È˘‡¯˘ ¨È˘‰ ·Ï˘· ªÒÂÓÎ „ÂÒ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰¯Â˙‰ ÔÈÈ„Ú ‰˙Èȉ ¨„ÂÓÏ˙‰ ˙Ù˜˙· ¨Ô¢‡¯‰ ‰· ˜ÂÒÈÚ‰ ͇ ‰Ï·˜‰ ‰Á˙Ù˙‰ ¨ß¯‰ÂÊ߉ ¯Â·ÈÁ· Â‡È˘Â ®˙ÈÚÈ˘˙Ï ˙ÈÚÈ·˘‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ÔÈ·© ߉¯ÈˆÈ ¯ÙÒß ªÈÁÈ˘Ó ÈÙ‡ ‰Ï·˜‰ ‰Ï·È˜ ¨˙‡˙·˘· ÂÓÂÈÒ Ȣ¯‡‰ ˙Ï·˜· Â˙È˘‡¯˘ ¨È˘ÈÏ˘‰ ·Ï˘· ªÌˆÓÂˆÓ ‰È‰ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨Ò‰ ∫‡¯Â Æ˙„ÈÒÁ‰ ‡Â‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ — ‰ÙÂÒ — ‰‡È˘ ‡Â‰˘ ¨ÈÚÈ·¯‰ ·Ï˘‰Â Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó· ÌÈ·¯ ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ Â„ÓÚ ®˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙© ÂÏω ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÔÈ· ‰˜Èʉ ÏÚ˘ ÔÈÈˆÏ ˘È Æ˙È„Â‰È ÂÒÙ˙ ‡Ï ‰¯˘Ú Ú˘˙‰ ‰‡Ó‰ È‰Ï˘ „Ú ¯ÂӇΠÌχ ƉϷ˜‰ ®˙¯Â˜È·· ‡© ¯˜ÁÓ· ˜ÒÚ˘ ‰¯˘Ú ƉÙȈ¯ ˙È„Â‰È ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ Ï˘ ÌÈÈÂËÈ·Î Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ‘doch warden wir ihre Einheit, ihre Besonderheit und ihre starke Bedingheit durch die Art und Æ®Ì˘© Schiksal des Volkes aus dem sie heraufwuchs, anerkennen mussen’ Æ®Ì˘© ‘Die wunderbare Blüte eines uralten Baumes’ ‘Die jüdische Mystik mag recht ungleichmässig erscheinen, oft trübe, zuweilen kleinlich, wenn wir sie an Eckhart, and Plotinus, and Laotse messem; sie wird ihre Brüchigkeit nich verbergen Æ®Ì˘© können, wenn sie gar neben den Upanischaden betrachten wollte’ Æ≥∏± ßÓÚ ¨¯·„ „ÂÚ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ Æ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨Ò‰ ª∏ ßÓÚ ¨Ì„‡ ˘„˜Ó ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó Æ≤≤∏≠≤≤∑ ßÓÚ ¨‰„ÈÏÒ ˙ÂÏÚÙ˙‰ ¨Ò‰ Æ≤≤π≠≤≤∏ ßÓÚ ¨‰„ÈÏÒ ˙ÂÏÚÙ˙‰ ¨Ï¢‰ ª∂∞ ßÓÚ ¨Ï‡˘Ï ‡Ï ¨Ò‰ ª±≤π ßÓÚ ¨ÔȘˆÂ˜¯˜–ʯ Æ≤∑≠≤∂ ßÓÚ ¨Â‚· Ìȯ·„ ¨ÌÂÏ˘

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

23

10.06.2007, 07:35

µµ

µ∂ µ∑ µ∏

µπ ∂∞ ∂± ∂≤ ∂≥

ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨Ï‡¯˘È Ô‡ÊÂÓ ¨„· ÏÚ Ô¯ÙÈÚ ÔÓ˘ Ʊπ∞∂ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ ‰Ó¯Ù „Â„Ï ÁÈË˘Ï ‰ÂÂ˙Ó ¨ÔÈÈÏÈÏ Ó”‡

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

24

10.06.2007, 07:35

| 24

25

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

˙‡ ˘È‚„‰ ‡Â‰ ˙‡Ê ÌÚ Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ‰ÚÙÂ˙Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ˙‡ ¯ÂӇΠıÓȇ ÌÂÏ˘ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ˙ÈÈ·‰ Ì˘Ï ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘Ó˙˘‰Â ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ È„ÂÁÈȉ ˷ȉ‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙‡ ¯‡È˙ ÌÂÏ˘ ÆÌÈÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ‰È˷ȉ· ÔÈÈÚ ÍÂ˙Ó ‡Ï ˙È„Â‰È ˙ÈËÒÈÓ Ì‚ ͇ ¨ß˙ȯÂËÒȉ‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙¯‚ÒÓß· ˙ÏÚÂÙ‰ ¨ßÌÈÈ‚¯Â‡ ˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰ ÈÂÂ˜ß ˙ÏÚ· ‰ÚÙÂ˙Î ˙ÂÏÎȉ‰ ˙˜ÈËÒÈÓ ∫˙È˘χȄ‰ ‰˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰· ˙Âȯ˜ÈÚ ˙ÂÙ˜˙ ˘˘ ‰Ó ¨‰ÓÓ ˙Ï„· ‰ÓÎÒ ∂¥Æ˙„ÈÒÁ‰Â ˙‡˙·˘‰ ¨È¢¯‡‰ ˙Ï·˜ ¨˙È„¯ÙÒ‰ ‰Ï·˜‰ ¨Ê΢‡ ˙„ÈÒÁ ¨‰·Î¯Ó‰Â ˙¯‡Â˙Ó ¨ßÔÓÁ ߯ ȯÂÙÈÒßÏ Â˙Ó„˜‰· ¯·Â· ‚Ȉ‰˘ ÂÊ ÏÚ ‰·¯ ‰„ÈÓ· ¯ÂӇΠ˙ÒÒ·Ӊ ¨ÂÊ Major Trends in Jewish© ß˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ÌÈȯ˜ÈÚ ÌÈÓ¯Êß ÈÒϘ‰ ¯ÙÒ· ‰·Á¯‰· ‰Ï·˜‰ ¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘ ÔÂÎÓ‰ ¯ÙÒÏ ÍÙ‰˘Â ¨±π¥± ˙˘· ‰¢‡¯Ï ¯Â‡ ‰‡¯˘ ¨®Mysticism ˙‡ ‰· ‰‡¯ ‡Â‰ — ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓÏ ÈËÏÂÂÈ·Ó‡ ÒÁÈ ÌÂÏ˘ ˘ ¯·Â·Ï ‰Ó„· ÆÈ¯„ÂÓ‰ ¨˙ÂÈ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ÂÈ˙¯ˆ· ˙ÂÁÙÏ ¨Â„ȘÙ˙ ˙‡ ÌÈÈÒ˘ ¨˙ÂÏ‚‰ ˙Ù˜˙· ˙„‰È‰ Ï˘ ÈÂÈÁ‰ ÁÂΉ ∂µ

Æ˙ÈÓ‡ω ‰Ó˜˙‰ ÌÚ

ËÂÈχ ҷÈÏ ‰„Â‰È ¨Ï„ȇ ‰˘Ó Ì˘‡¯·Â ¨ÌÈ¢ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ Â¯Ú¯Ú ÌÈ¯Á‡‰ ÌÈ¯Â˘Ú· ˙„‡ ÏÚ ÂÏ˘ ÏÚ‰–·È˯ ÏÚ ¯˜ÈÚ·Â ÌÂÏ˘ Ï˘ ÂÈ˙Â¯Ú˘‰Ó ÂÈ˙ÂÁ‰Ó ˙·¯ ÏÚ ¨ÔÂÒÙÏ ‰ÈÊȯ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ∂∂Æ˙ȯÂËÒȉ‰ ‰˙ÚÙ˘‰Â ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È˘χȄ‰ ˙ÂÁ˙Ù˙‰‰ ÈÙÎ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È‚ÂÏÂ¯Ή ˙¯‚ÒÓ‰ ‰ˆ¯Ù Âχ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ÂÚȈ‰˘ ˙ȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ÂÁÙÂÒ ¨Ï¢ÊÁ ˙¯ÙÒ ˙ȇ¯˜Ó‰ ˙¯ÙÒ‰ ̉·Â ¨ÌÈÙÒÂ ÌÈÓÂÁ˙ ¨ÌÂÏ˘Â ¯·Â· È„È ÏÚ ‰ËË¯Â˘˘ Ï˘ ˙ÂÎÓ‰ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ÏÚ Â¯Ú¯Ú ‡Ï ̉ȄÈÓÏ˙ ‰Ï‡ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ Ìχ ∂∑ƉϷ˜‰ ¯˜ÁÓ ‰„˘Ï ∂∏

Æ˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈÁ¯ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ÈÓÂ‡Ï ÈÂËÈ·Î ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÓÂȘ — ‰„˘‰

‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙ÒÈÙ˙ ˙‡ ·ˆÈÚ˘ ÈÓ‡ω ·È˯‰ Ï˘ ‰ÈÂÓ‚‰‰ ˙¯گÚ˙‰ ˙·˜Ú· ˙‡Ê ÌÚ ÌÈÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ÌÈ˷ȉ‰ ˙‡ ˘È‚„‰Ï ‰Ó‚Ó ÌÂÈÎ ¯˜ÁÓ· ˙¯ÎÈ ¨ÂÈ„ÈÓÏ˙ ÌÂÏ˘ Ï˘ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ∂π

Æ‰Ï˘ È˙‡Â¢‰Â È‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ ¯˜ÁÓ· ˜ÂÒÚÏ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ Ï˘

˙ÂÙ˜˙Ó ¨˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ·Á¯ ÔÂÂ‚Ó ¯Â‡È˙Ï ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‚˘ÂÓ· ‰Ï·˜‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ Ï˘ ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ Ôȇ ˙·¯ ÌÈÓÚÙ˘ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈ· ˙È˙·ÏÓ ‰˜ÈÊ ¯ˆÂÈ ¨˙Â¢ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙Ó ˙Â¢ ˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ÌÈ„ÓÂÏÓ ÆÌÈÈ˙ÂÚÓ˘Ó — ÌÈÈ˙¯ÙÒ Â‡ ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ ¨ÌÈÈÙ¯‚‡‚ — ÌÈÈ˯˜˜ Ìȯ˘˜ Ô‰ÈÈ· ÏÚ ¨‰Ï·˜‰ ÏÚ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ ¯ÂӇΠÂÏÈÁ‰ Ìȯ˘Ú‰ ‰‡Ó‰ ˙È˘‡¯· ÌÈ„Â‰È Ìȯ˜ÂÁ ‰˙È˘‡¯˘ ¨˙ÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ˙ÈÈ·‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙¯ÂÒÓ· ˙¯Á‡ ˙·¯˙ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈ·˘ Û‡ Æ®˙ÂÂȈ· — ÌÂÏ˘ ÈÙ ÏÚ ¨È˘χȄ‰ ‰Î˘Ó‰Â© ˙„ÈÒÁ· ‰ÙÂÒ ¨˙ÂÏÎȉ‰ ˙¯ÙÒ· ¨˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙˜ÈÊ Ìȯ˘˜ ˘È ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰ÓÎÒ· ÂÏÏÎ˘ ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰Ó ˜ÏÁ ÆÌÈÈ„ÂÁÈÈ ÌÈÈÈÙ‡Ó ÈÏÚ· ˙¯ÂÒÓÓ Â‡ ̯ÊÓ ˜ÏÁ Ô‰· ˙‡¯Ï ‰˜„ˆ‰ Ì¢ È˙Ú„Ï Ôȇ

Æ≤≥∞ ßÓÚ ¨Ì˘ Æχ˘Ï ‡Ï ¨Ò‰ Æ≤¥∏≠≤¥∑ ßÓÚ ¨˘„Á Ô„ÈÚ ¨Ò‰ ªÔÈÈˢ˜ÂÙ Æ≥∞ ßÓÚ ¨„ÏÂȯ‚ Æ≤µ≤≠≤¥∏ ßÓÚ ¨˘„Á Ô„ÈÚ ¨Ò‰ ª±≥¥ ßÓÚ ¨ÔȘˆÂ˜¯˜–ʯ Æ®Ì˘© Ò‰ ª®Ì˘© ÔȘˆÂ˜¯˜–ʯ

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

25

10.06.2007, 07:35

∂¥ ∂µ ∂∂ ∂∑ ∂∏ ∂π

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 26

‰È¯ÂËÒȉ· ˙Â¢ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈ· ˜¯ ‡Ï ˙È˙·ÏÓ ‰˜ÈÊ ¯ˆÂÈ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ˙ÂÈ„Â‰È ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ˙˜È˘¯Ù ÔÈ· Û‡ ‡Ï‡ ¨˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙ÂÈ‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ ˙„Â˙Ó· ˘ÂÓÈ˘‰Â ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ˷ȉ‰ ˙˘‚„‰ Æ˙¯Á‡ ˙¯ÂÒÓ· ˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÔÈ·˘ „ÂÚ· Æ˙Â¯Á‡‰ ÌÈ˘· ÌÈÁ¯ ÌÈÎω ‰¯˜ÁÓ· ˙¢Ӡ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰ ÔÈ· ȯ‰ ¨Ô‰˘ÏÎ ˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ˙˜ÈÊ ·Â¯Ï ˙ÂÓÈȘ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓÎ ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙„ÓÂÚ˘ Ìȯ˜ÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ‰Á‰‰ ËÚÓÏ ¯˘˜ Ì¢ ·Â¯Ï Ôȇ ‰Ê ÁÂÓ· ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙ÂÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ Ô‰ ¯ÂӇΠ˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ÂÊ ‰Á‰ Æ˙ÈË„ˆÒ¯Ë ˙Â‡ÈˆÓ ÌÚ ˘‚ÙÓ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ Ô„ÂÒÈ· ‰ÈÁ·Ó Æ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï Ô‰Â ‰Â¢Ӊ ˙Â˙„‰ ¯˜ÁÓÏ Ô‰ ¨˙Â¢ ˙ÂȯËÂʇ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Ï — ÏÏη ˙Â˙„‰ Ï˘ ‰Â¢Ӊ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ÂÓÎ — ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ È‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ‰ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ÂÊ ∑∞

Æ˙Ù˙Â˘Ó ˙È‚Âχ„ȇ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ÌÈÏÚÂÙ ˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙Â

‚˘ÂÓ· ¢Ó˙˘‰ ‡Ï ÌÏÂÚÓ ¯ÂӇ΢ ¨ÌÓˆÚ ÌȄ‰ȉ ßÌȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ߉˘ ÔÈÈˆÏ ˘È ˙Âȯ˘„‰Â ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ ÔÈ· ÔÂÈÓ„ ˙·¯ ÌÈÓÚ٠‡¯ ‡Ï ¨Â· ‡ˆÂÈÎ ¯Á‡ ‚˘ÂÓ· ‡ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ Â‡ˆÓ ‡Ï˘ ‰ÓΠ‰ÓÎ ˙Á‡ ÏÚ Æ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÏÂÎÒ‡Ó ÌÈ„Â‰È Ìȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ï˘ Âχ ÔÈ·Ï Ì‰Ï˘ ‡¯ ̉ ˙·¯ ÌÈÓÚÙ˘ ¨˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· Ìȇ˜ÈËÒÈÓ Ï˘ ÂÏ‡Ï Ì‰Ï˘ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ ÔÈ· ÔÂÈÓ„ ÌÈȘ˘ ®˘„Á‰ Ô„ÈÚ‰ ˙ÂÚÂ˙ Ï˘Â© ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ Ï˘ Ì˙ÚË ÂÊ ‰ÈÁ·Ó Ɖ¯Ê ‰„Â·Ú Ô‰· ÌÈ¢ ÌÈÈÂËÈ· Ô‰˘Â ¨˙Â¢‰ ˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙Âȯ˘„‰Â ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰ ÔÈ· ÔÂÈÓ„ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ȇ˘ÂÓ Ï˘ ˙ÈÓˆÚ‰ ‰Ú„Â˙Ï ÛȯÁ „‚È· ˙„ÓÂÚ ¨˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Ï˘ ÆÌ‰Ï˘ ÌÈίډ ÌÏÂÚ· ˙˘‚˙ÓÂ Ì‰Ï˘ ‰˜ÈÊ ÏÎ Ô‰ÈÈ· Ôȇ˘ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈ· È˙·ÏÓ ÔÙ‡· ¯˘˜Ó ˜¯ ‡Ï ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜Á ÆÂÓÈȘ˙‰Â ¯ˆÂ ÌÎÂ˙·˘ ÌÈÈ˘ÓÓ‰ Ìȯ˘˜‰‰Ó Âχ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ˜˙Ï ‰ËÂ Û‡ ‡Ï‡ ¨˙È˘ÓÓ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ˙ÂÓÈȘ˙Ó ˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÂÎÓ‰ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙‰˘ ÌÈÓÈÎÒÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ȯ˜ÂÁ ˙È·¯Ó ˙ÈËÒÈÓ ‰ÈÂÂÁ Ï˘ ÈÂËÈ· Ô‰ ‰Ï‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙˘ ‰Úˉ ͇ ¨˙ÂÈÙȈÙÒ ˙ÂÈ˙¯·Á ˙ÂȯÂËÒȉ ¨˙ÂÈ‚ÂÏÂÓÂÙ ˙ÂÈ˙‡Â¢‰ ˙„Â˙Ó ˙ÂÚˆÓ‡· ‡È‰ Ô˙‡ ¯Â˜ÁÏ Í¯„‰˘Â ¨˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ∑±

ÆÈËÈÏÂى È˙¯·Á‰ ÔÈÈÙ‡ ˘ÂˢËÏ ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ‰ ԉȯ˘˜‰Ó ‰Ï‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ˜Â˙ÈÏ ˙ӯ‚

¯˜ÁÓ Ï˘ „„ȷÏ ˜Â˙ÈÏ Ì‚ ˙ӯ‚ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ˙È˙‰Ӊ ‰ÒÈÙ˙‰ ¨ÔÎ ÏÚ ¯˙È ˙Âȯ˜ÁÓ‰ ˙ÂÓ‚Ó‰ ÔÓ — ÏÏη ˙„‰Â ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ‰Ó„· — ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ∑≤

Ɖ¯·Á‰Â Á¯‰ ÈÚ„Ó· ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÈÏÙȈÒÈ„· ˙ÂÁ¯‰

‚˘ÂÓ ÏÚ ˙ÂÒÒ·Ӊ ˙Âȯ˜ÁÓ ˙Âȯ‚˘ Ô‰ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈӉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¨ÌÂÎÈÒÏ ÌÊÈχȯÙÓȇ‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ· ˙ÂȯˆÂ–˙ÂÈÙ¯ȇ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈ·¯˙ ÏÚ ÏÁ‰ ‰Ê ‚˘ÂÓ ªÈ¯ˆÂ È‚Âχ˙ ÌÈ‚˘ÂÓ· ˙ÂÈ·¯ÚÓ ‡Ï ˙ÂÈÓÂ‡Ï ˙ÂÈÂ‰Ê ˙ÈÈ·‰ ˙¯‚ÒÓ·Â ¨·¯ÚÓ‰ Ï˘ ÌÊÈχÈÂϘ‰Â

Æ≤µ≤≠≤µ± ßÓÚ ¨®Ì˘© Ò‰ ÆÏÏη ˙„‰ ¯˜Á ˙‡ ‡Ï‡ ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜Á ˙‡ ˜¯ ‡Ï ˙ÈÈÙ‡Ó ÂÊ ‰˘È‚ Æ≤¥π ßÓÚ ¨®Ì˘© Ò‰ ª≤¥ ßÓÚ ¨‚Ș Ƶ∂≠µµ ßÓÚ ¨‰ÈÏÙȈÒÈ„‰ ¨Ï¢‰ ªπ ßÓÚ ¨˙„‰ ˙˘Â¯Á ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ª≤∏ ßÓÚ ¨„Ò‡ ∫‡¯ Ƶ± ßÓÚ ¨‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ª≤± ßÓÚ ¨˙„‰ ˙˘Â¯Á ¨Ï¢‰ ∫Ì‚ ‡¯Â ª®Ì˘© ‰ÈÏÙȈÒÈ„‰ ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ˙ÂÈÈȘ»Ù ˙ÂÈχÈÂϘ–ËÒÂÙ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÒ˜¯Ó–‡ ˙ÂÈ˙¯Â˜È· ˙Âȯ‡˙Ó ‰Ï·˜ ȯ˜ÂÁ Ï˘ Ì˙ÂÓÏÚ˙‰ ÏÚ Æ≤¥∑ ßÓÚ ¨˘„Á Ô„ÈÚ ¨Ò‰ ∫‡¯

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

26

10.06.2007, 07:35

∑∞ ∑± ∑≤

27

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

˙ÂÈ·¯˙· ˙˜È˘¯Ù ˙Âȯ˘„ ¨ÌÈËÒ˜Ë ¨˙¯ÂÒÓ Ï˘ ÍÂÈ˘‰ ÆÌÈÈÙ¯ȇ ÌÈÈÂÂÈү˜ÒÈ„ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡‰ ¯·„· ˙È‚Âχ˙ ‰Á‰ ÏÚ ÒÒÂ·Ó ¨‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚Ë˜Ï ˙Â¢ Ô˙‡ ˜˙Ó ˙È˘ÓÓ ‰˜ÈÊ Ô‰ÈÈ· Ôȇ˘ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙ ÔÈ· ˙È˙·ÏÓ ‰˜ÈÊ ¯ˆÂÈ ‡Â‰Â ¨˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙Â‚Ӊ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï ÆÂÓÈȘ˙‰Â ¯ˆÂ ̉·˘ ÌÈÈ˙¯·Á‰Â ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ‰ Ìȯ˘˜‰‰Ó Í‡Â Ô‰Ï ˙ÂÙ˙¢Ӊ ˙ÂÂÎ˙ ‡ ‰ÂÎ˙ Ì¢ Ôȇ ˯ٷ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÏÏη ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ÁÂÓ· ÌÈÈ„ÂÁÈȉ ¯˜ÁÓ ˙„˘ ÌÂȘ ‡ Ô‰Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓÏ ˙ÂÈ„ÂÁÈÈ ˙„Â˙Ó· ˘ÂÓÈ˘ ˙˜ȄˆÓ‰Â ¨Ô‰Ï ˜¯Â ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ÌÂÁ˙· ÌÈÏÏÎ‰ ˙˜È˘¯Ù‰Â ˙¯ÂÒÓ‰ ¨ÌÈËҘˉ ˙‡ ÆÔ‰Ï ˙¯Á‡ ˙ÂÚÙÂ˙Ï Ì˙‡Â¢‰ ÍÓÒ ÏÚ ¨˙ÈÏÒ¯ÂÂÈ‡ ˙È˙„ ‰ÚÙÂ˙ Ï˘ ÌÈÈÂËÈ·Î ¯Â˜ÁÏ Ôȇ ÌÈÈ˙¯·Á‰ ¨ÌÈȯÂËÒȉ‰ Ìȯ˘˜‰· ÌÈ‚ÂÚÓ‰ ˙·¯˙ ȯˆÂ˙Î ‡Ï‡ ¨‰Ê ÁÂÓ· ˙‚ÈÂ˙Ó‰ ˙‡Â ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ‰È¯Â‚˘‰ ˙‡ Ì‚ È˙Ú„Ï ¯Â˜ÁÏ ˘È ͯ„ ‰˙‡· ƯˆÂ ̉·˘ ÌÈÈËÈÏÂى ƉÓÂȘ ˙Á‰ ÏÚ ÒÒ·Ӊ ¯˜ÁÓ‰ ‰„˘ Ï˘ ˙ÂÈËÈÏÂى ˙ÂÈ˙¯·Á‰ ˙ÂÈÂÚÓ˘Ó‰

¨ÔȯÙÏ‚ ȯÓÚ ¨ÔÓ‡· ˙„„·˙‰ ÆÊ¢Ò˘˙ ‰˘‰ ˘‡¯ ˙·Ȅ‡· ÌÂÏȈ‰ ÔÓ‡‰

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

27

10.06.2007, 07:35

Ò‰ ÊÚ·

| 28

ÌÈÈÙ¯‚ÂÈÏ·È· ÌȯˆȘ Moshe Idel, ‘Academic Studies of Kabbalah in Israel, 1923≠1998: A Short Survey’, Studia Judaica 8 (1999), pp. 91≠114 ·È·‡–Ï˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨··Ï–¯· χȯ·‡ Ì‚¯˙ ¨ÌÈ˘„Á ÌÈ˷ȉ ∫‰Ï·˜ ¨Ï„ȇ ‰˘Ó ‚¢˘˙ ±µ ÌÈÈÙχ ¨ß˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ÌÈÂÈÚ ∫˙¯ÈÁ‰ Ï˘ ˙Â¢‰ ‰ÈÙß ¨¯Â‡Èχ ÏÁ¯ ±±π≠π ßÓÚ ¨®Á¢˘˙© Gil Anidjar, ‘Jewish Mysticism Alterable and Unalterable: On Orienting Kabbalah Studies and the Zohar of Christian Spain’, Jewish Social Studies 3 (1996), pp. 89≠157 Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore & London 1993 William E.Arnal, ‘Definition’, Willie Braun & Russel T. McCutcheon (eds.), Guide to the Study of Religion, London & New York 2000, pp. 21≠35 Martin Buber, Die Geschichten des Rabbi Nachman5, Frankfurt a.M. 1920 Louis Bouyer, ‘Mysticism: An Essay on the History of the Word’, Richard Woods (ed.), Understanding Mysticism, London 1981, pp. 42≠55 Jacques Basnage, The History of the Jews from Jesus Christ to the Present Times, London 1708 Ernst Benz, The Mystical Sources of German Romantic Philosophy, Allison Park, Pa. 1983 Willie Braun, ‘Religion’, Willie Braun & Russel T. McCutcheon (eds.), Guide to the Study of Religion, London & New York 2000, pp. 3≠21 Jonathan Garb, ‘“Mystics” Critiques of Mystical Experience’, Revue de l’histoire des Religions 221 (2004), pp. 293≠325 ˙Ï·˜ „Ú Ï¢ÊÁ ˙¯ÙÒÓ ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ· ÁÂΉ Ï˘ ÂÈ˙ÂÚÙ‰ ¨·¯‡‚ Ô˙ÂÈ ‰¢Ò˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨˙Ùˆ Rufus M. Jones, Studies in Mystical Religion, New York 1909 ‡¢È˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨· ¨Ô„¯Â‚ „¢‡ È·˙Î ¨ıÈ·ÈÏÙ˜ ·˜ÚÈ Ì‚¯˙ ¨Ì„‡‰ Ú·Ë· ¯˜ÁÓ ∫‰È‚ÂÒÏ ˙È˙„‰ ‰ÈÈÂÂÁ‰ ¨ÒÓÈÈß‚ ̇ÈÏÈÂ Ë¢È˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨Ï‡ÂÓ˘ Ô·‡ ‰„Â‰È ˙Îȯڷ Robert M. Gimello, ‘Mysticism and its Contexts’, Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Religious Traditions, Oxford 1983, pp. 170≠199 Jerome Gellman, Mystical Experience of God: A Philosophical Inquiry, Aldershot 2001 Ithamar Gruenwald, ‘Reflections on the Nature and Origins of Jewish Mysticism’, Peter Schäfer & Joseph Dan (eds.), Gershom Scholem’s Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism: 50 Years after, Tübingen 1993, pp. 25≠49 Michel De Certeau, The Mystic Fable, I, London 1992 Daniel Dubuisson, The Western Construction of Religion, Baltimore 2003 Louis K. Dupree, Transcendent Selfhood: The Loss and Recovery of the Inner Life, New York 1976 ‰˜È˙Ú‰ ˙Ú‰ ÔÓ ¨˙ÂÓÂÏÁ ˙ÂÂÈÊÁ ¨˙ÂÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈÂÂÁ ¯Á·Ó ∫ÔÈÈÚӉ ·Ï‰ ¨Ô„ ÛÒÂÈ ≤∞∞µ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨ÂÈÓÈ „Ú Ê¢˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨‰˘Â„˜‰ ÏÚ ¨— Jess Byron Hollenback, Mysticism: Experience, Response, and Empowerment, University Park, Pa. 1996

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

28

ÌÈÈÓ„˜‡ ÌÈ„ÂÓÈÏ ¨Ï„ȇ ‰Ï·˜ ¨Ï„ȇ ¯Â‡Èχ ¯ß‚„È‡

„Ò‡ Ï¯‡ ¯·Â· ‰È· ßÊ· ı· Ô‡¯· ˙¯˜ȷ ¨·¯‡‚ ÁÂΉ ¨·¯‡‚ ÒÂß‚ Ô„¯Â‚ ÒÓÈÈß‚ ÂÏÓÈ‚ ÔÓÏ‚ „ÏÂȯ‚

ÂË¯Ò ‰„ ÔÂÒȷ„ ‰¯Ù„ ÔÈÈÚӉ ·Ï‰ ¨Ô„ ‰˘Â„˜‰ ÏÚ ¨Ô„ ˜·ω

10.06.2007, 07:35

29

|

‰Ï·˜‰ Ï˘ ‰Èˆ˜ÈÙÈËÒÈÓ‰

Boaz Huss, ‘Admiration and Disgust: The Ambivalent Re-Canonization of the Zohar in the Modern Period’, Howard Kreisel (ed.), Study and Knowledge in Jewish Thought, Beer Sheva 2006, pp. 203≠237 ˙· ˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜Á ÌÂÏ˘ Ì˘¯‚ ∫˙Âχ˘ ÏΠχ˘Ï ‡Ïß ¨Ò‰ ÊÚ· ∑≤≠µ∑ ßÓÚ ¨®‚¢Ò˘˙© πµ≠π¥ ÌÈÓÚÙ ¨ßÂÈÓÈ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ Ï˘ ‰È‚Âχ‚‰Â ÔÓÁ È·¯ ȯÂÙÈÒÏ ¯·Â· ÔÈË¯Ó Ï˘ Â˙Ó„˜‰ß ¨— ®‰Ή·© ß˙Ȅ‰ȉ ¨®≤∞∞µ© ≤∑ ˙¯Â˜È·Â ‰È¯Â‡È˙ ¨ß˙Ȅ‰ȉ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ¯˜ÁÓ· ˘„Á Ô„ÈÚß ¨— ≤µ≥≠≤¥∂ ßÓÚ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨¯‰ÂÊ· ˙ÈËÒÈÓ‰ ‰ÈÂÂÁ‰ ˙Ù˘ ÏÚ ∫Ô„ÚÓ ‡ˆÂÈ ¯‰ ¨„˘‡–¯ω ‰ÏÈÏÓ ‰¢Ò˘˙ Wouter Hanegraaff, New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought, Albany 1998 Elliot R. Wolfson, Through a Speculum that Shines: Vision and Imagination in Medieval Jewish Mysticism, Princeton 1994 ¨˙ÈÏ‚¯Ó–ÔÓχ ‰„Ú ‰Ó‚¯˙ ¨˙ÂÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ ˙¯ȘÁ ¨ÔÈÈˢ‚ËÈ ‚È„ÂÏ ‰¢˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È Peter van der Veer, Imperial Encounters: Religion and Modernity in India and Britain, Princeton 2001 Steven M. Wasserstrom, Religion after Religion: Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin at Eranos, Princeton 1999 ±πππ ·È·‡–Ï˙ ¨ÛȘӉ Íȯ„Ó‰ ∫ÌÈχ¯˘È ÌÈ˜ÈËÒÈÓ ±∞± ¨ÔÁ ÏÚÈ Adolph Jellinek, Auswahl Kabbalisticher Mystik, I, Leipzig 1853 Grace M. Jantzen, Power, Gender and Christian Mysticism, Cambridge, New York & Melbourne 1997 Steven Katz, ‘The Conservative Character of Mystical Experience’, idem (ed.), Mysticism and Religious Traditions, Oxford 1983, pp. 3≠60 — (ed.), Mysticism and Religious Traditions, Oxford 1983 — (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, London 1978 —¨ ‘Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism’, Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, London 1978, pp. 22≠74 ßÓÚ ¨≤∞Ʊ∞Æ≤∞∞∂ ¨Ê¢Ò˘˙ ȯ˘˙· Á¢Î ¨Ô¢‡¯ ¯Â˜Ó ¨Á¯ ˙ÂÈÁ¯ ¨Ò·ÈÏ ‰„Â‰È ∑≠∂ Franz Joseph Molitor, Philosophie der Geschichte, oder über die Tradition, Frankfurt a.M. 1827 Peter Moore, ‘Mystical Experience, Mystical Doctrine, Mystical Technique’, Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, London 1978, pp. 101≠131 ˢȉ ‰‡Ó‰ ‰ÙÓ Ï˘ ‰˜ÈË˙Ò‡‰ ∫‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ˙ÂÈÏËÈÈ¯Â‡ß ¨¯ÂÏÙ–Ò„Ó ÏÂÙ ∂∏±≠∂≤≥ ßÓÚ ¨®„¢Ó˘˙© ‚ χ¯˘È ˙·˘ÁÓ· ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È È¯˜ÁÓ ¨ß˙Ȅ‰ȉ ˙‰ʉ Bernard McGinn, The Foundations of Mysticism, New York 1991 Russel T. McCutcheon, The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric, London & New York 2003 —¨ Manufacturing Religion, New York & Oxford 1997 Andrew M. McKinnon, ‘Sociological Definitions, Language Games and the “Essence” of Religion’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (2002), pp. 61≠83

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

29

‰„ÈÏÒ ˙ÂÏÚÙ˙‰ ¨Ò‰

χ˘Ï ‡Ï ¨Ò‰ ˙È„Â‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨Ò‰ ˘„Á Ô„ÈÚ ¨Ò‰ „˘‡–¯ω Û¯‚‰ ÔÂÒÙÏ ÔÈÈˢ‚ËÈ ¯È ¯„ Ԡ̯ËÒ¯Ò ÔÁ ˜ÈÏÈ ÔˆÈ È¯Ó˘‰ ÈÙ‡‰ ¨ı¢Î ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ı¢Î ˙ÂÈ˙„ ˙¯ÂÒÓ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ı¢Î ÈÙÂÒÂÏÈÙ ÁÂ˙È ‰Ù˘ ¨ı¢Î Ò·ÈÏ ¯ÂËÈÏÂÓ ¯ÂÓ

¯ÂÏÙ–Ò„Ó ÔÈ‚˜Ó ‰ÈÏÙȈÒÈ„‰ ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ˙„‰ ˙˘Â¯Á ¨ÔÂßˆË˜Ó ÔÂȘÓ

10.06.2007, 07:35

Ò‰ ÊÚ· ∫˙„ÈÒÁ‰ Ï˘ ÌÈ¢‡¯‰ ‰È˙¯„· ‰·˘ÁӉ ˙„‰ ÈÈÁ ˙ÓÙ‰ß ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó Ô¯ ˙ȯ·Ú‰ ‰ËÈÒ¯·È‡‰ ¨¯Â˘„ ˙„Â·Ú ¨ßÌÈÈ‚ÂÏÂÓËÒÈÙ‡‰ ‰ÈÒÈÒ·Â ‰È˙Â¯Â˜Ó Ë¢˘˙ ¨ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È· ˙È˘‡¯· ÌÈÈÓÈÙ‰ ˙„‰ ÈÈÁ ·ÂˆÈÚ ˙È˙„‰ ‰ÓÙ‰‰ ∫Ì„‡ ˘„˜Ó ¨— ‰¢Ò˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨˙„ÈÒÁ‰ Benson Saler, Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories, New York & Oxford 1993 Jonathan Z. Smith, Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown, Chicago 1982 Ninian Smart, The Phenomenon of Religion, London 1973 ˙ÂÈÏÙȈÒÈ„ ÏÂÓÏ ‰È¯ÂËÒȉ ∫ÌÈÁÂÁ‰ ÔÈ· χ¯˘È ˙„ÏÂ˙ß ¨ÔÈÈˢ˜ÂÙ ÒÂÓÚ ≥¥∑≠≥≥µ ßÓÚ ¨®‰¢˘˙© Ò ÔÂȈ ¨ß˙¯Á‡ Michel Foucault, Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and other Writings, 1977≠1984, New York & London 1988 Robert K.C. Forman, Mysticism, Mind, Consciousness, Albany 1999 —¨ (ed.), The Problem of Pure Consciousness, Mysticism and Philosophy, New York & Oxford 1990 Timothy Fitzgerald, ‘Religion, Philosophy and Family Resemblances’, Religion 26 (1996), pp. 215≠236 —¨ The Ideology of Religious Studies, New York 2000 —¨ ‘Playing Language Games and Performing Rituals: Religious Studies Ideological State Apparatus’, Method & Theory 15 (2003), pp. 209≠254 Hans H. Penner, ‘The Mystical Illusion’, Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Religious Traditions, Oxford 1983, pp. 89≠116 Adolph Frank, La Kabbale ou philosophie religieuse des hebreux, Paris 1843 Partha Chatterjee, The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton 1993 Richard King, Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and The Mystic East, London & New York 1999 Jeremny Carrette & Richard King, Selling Spirituality: The Silent Takeover of Religion, London & New York 2005 Ȅ‰È ˙ÈÂȈ‰ ‰ÈÙ¯‚ÂȯÂËÒȉ‰ ∫˙ÂÏ‚‰ Ï˘ ÈÓ‡ω ‰‚ˆÈÈß ¨ÔȘˆÂ˜¯˜–ʯ ÔÂÓ‡ Ê¢˘˙ ¨·È·‡–Ï˙ ˙ËÈÒ¯·È‡ ¨¯Â˘„ ˙„Â·Ú ¨ßÌÈÈÈ·‰ ÈÓÈ È¯˜ÁÓ© È˙¯Â˜È· ÁÂ˙È ∫ÌÂÏ˘ Ì¢¯‚ ÈÙÏ ˙„‰È ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨„ÈÈ·˘ ¯ÊÚÈχ ‚¢Ó˘˙ ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È ¨®· ÛÒÂÓ ¨Ï‡¯˘È ˙·˘ÁÓ· ÌÈÏ˘Â¯È Frits Staal, Exploring Mysticism: A Methodological Essay, Berkeley & Los Angeles 1975 ·È·‡–Ï˙ ¨‡¯ÈÙ˘ ̉¯·‡ ˙Îȯڷ ¨‰ÈÈÁ˙ ‰˘¯ÂÓ È˜¯Ù ∫‚· Ìȯ·„ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ Ì˘¯‚ Â¢Ï˘˙ Gershom Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism3, New York 1974 ±π∏∂ ·È·‡–Ï˙ ¨‡¯ÈÙ˘ ̉¯·‡ ˙Îȯڷ ¨¯·„ „ÂÚ ¨— Robert H. Sharf, ‘Experience’, Mark C. Taylor (ed.), Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Chicago & London 1998, pp. 94≠116

3_Pe110_ Huss_2

30

| 30

‰ÓÙ‰ ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó

Ì„‡ ˘„˜Ó ¨ÔÈÏ‚¯Ó ¯ÏÒ

˙ÈÓÒ Ë¯ÓÒ ÔÈÈˢ˜Â٠˜ÂÙ ‰˜ÈËÒÈÓ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ ‰¯Â‰Ë ‰Ú„Â˙ ¨ÔÓ¯ÂÙ ˙„ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ‰È‚Âχ„ȇ‰ ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ‰Ù˘ ȘÁ˘Ó ¨„ϯ߂ˆÈÙ ¯Ù ˜¯Ù Èß‚¯Ë߈ ‚Ș ‚Ș ˯˜ ÔȘˆÂ˜¯˜–ʯ „ÈÈ·˘ Ï‡Ë˘ ‚· Ìȯ·„ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ÌÈÓ¯Ê ¨ÌÂÏ˘ ¯·„ „ÂÚ ¨ÌÂÏ˘ Û¯˘

10.06.2007, 07:35

Related Documents


More Documents from "Boaz Huss"