2201

  • Uploaded by: sabatino123
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2201 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 316
  • Pages: 3
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

Document 2201

Filed 09/15/2008

EXHIBIT 5

Page 1 of 3

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

Document 2201

Filed 09/15/2008

Page 2 of 3

WEIL. GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

AUSTIN

20 I REDWOOD SHORES PARKWAY

BEIJING

REDWOOD SHORES. CA

BOSTON

94065

BUDAPEST

(650) 802-3000 FAX:

DALLAS

(650) 802-3100

FRANKFURT HONG KONG HOUSTON LONDON MIAMI MUNICH DIRECT LINE

NEW YORK

650-802-3994

PARIS

dana. [email protected]

August 16, 2008

PRAGUE PROVIDENCE SHANGHAI WARSAW

BYE:MAIL

WASHINGTON. D,C,

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Northern District of California 280 South First Street, Courtroom 6 San Jose, California 95110

Re:

Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., et aI, No. C 05·00334 RMW;. Rambus Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et aI, No. C 05·02298 RMW

Dear Judge Whyte: We represent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and the Samsung entities, (collectively, "Samsung") in the above-referenced cases. On August 11, 2008 the Court issued an Order Granting Rambus's Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts IV-VII of Samsung's Counterclaims ("Order"). The Order was issued under seal, and the Court stated that it would be publicly filed in seven days, absent a meritorious request for certain portions to be redacted. Accordingly, Samsung requests that the redactions identified in Exhibit 1 to this letter be made to the publicly filed copy of the Order. These redactions cover quotations and paraphrases of Samsung documents that are privileged and confidential, documents that were produced pursuant only to the Court's limited implied waiver order. Public disclosure would cause material prejudice to Samsung's right to continue to assert attorney-client privilege and/or work-product protection with respect to these documents.

Dana K. Powers

SV I \29853 110 I16#CJOI ',DOCI7 I868,0036

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW WElL, GOTSHAL

&

MANGES

LLP

August 16, 2008 Page 2

cc: David J. Healey, Esq. Anita Kadala, Esq. Robert S. Berezin, Esq. Carolyn H. Luedtke, Esq. Burton A. Gross, Esq.

SV 1:\298531 IOI\6#CJOl'.DOCI71868.0036

Document 2201

Filed 09/15/2008

Page 3 of 3

Related Documents

2201
October 2019 29
09-06-2201
May 2020 2
Tkp 2201 - Bab 2&3
December 2019 10
1.tkp 2201 - Bab 1
December 2019 8

More Documents from ""

2215
October 2019 25
2193
October 2019 20
2408
November 2019 18
2427
November 2019 22
2312[1]
October 2019 21
2344
October 2019 21