1
2 3 .4
5
GILMORE F. DIEKMANN PATRICIA H. CULLISON BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON 505 Montgomery street San Francisco, California 94111-2514 Telephone: (415) 986-4200 Attorneys for Plaintiff FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
6
7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11
Z 0
Z Z
~ _U
12
...,. :ri ~
l~ f.Il Q\
13
~ ~ ~
~ t; ~ 0 7 ~ ~ ~
14.
=-
15
-b :c
!!!
....
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND FOR DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, AND FOR BREACH OF THE AGENCY RELATIONSHIP
v.
RELIEF
HAMILTON TAFT & COMPANY, Defendant.
z. ~ :::
~
0-
:::l
~
-u z
16
DEMAND FOR JURy TRIAL
~-<
~c:
Ll.
0
z
V"l
U)
Z
0
-<
17 18
~
Plaintiff, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, hereby alleges as follows:
:0
19
I.
20
PARTIES
21
1..
Plaintiff FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION ("Federal
22
Express ll )
23
virtue of the laws of the state of Delaware, and maintains its
24
principal place of business in Memphis, Tennessee.
25
2.
is a corporation organized and existing 'under and by
Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges
26
that Defendant HAMILTON TAFT & COMPANY (IIHamilton Taft tl )
27
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
28
laws of the State of California and maintains its principal place COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
is a
1
of business in Texas.
2
3
II.
A
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
Z .......
'.....J
Z
Z
..".
~
~
12
;:;;
':.J
I- :; l.I.l
CI
~
~
t.!J <: ~ .::=.i-Z :d ~ ~ 8
t;; .;, 'CI
:>
z;
~
=:::::i
Z
~
o
...J
~
:::E U z;
""
L:.
0
z
III
0 c::: ~
lA.
3.
.(
This is an action for breach of contract, breach of
fiduciary duty, and breach of agency relationship arising, inter alia, under the California Civil Code section 2322 et seg.
The
amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) exclusive of interest and costs.
The
jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1332 . 4.
Venue
u.s.c. section
properly laid in this Court pursuant to
28
1391(a), in that the claims involved arose in this
district.
15 16
III.
"" < Q ct
V'l
Z
i""
13
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
17
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
18 19
Count One
20 21 22 23
24
25 26 27 28
(Breach of Contract) 5.
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference as
though fully set forth herein each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 4 of this Complaint. 6.
In December of 1989 Federal Express entered into a
payroll tax service contract with Hamilton Taft.
Pursuant to
this agreement, Federal Express would wire transfer its employee payroll taxes to Hamilton Taft.
Under the contract Hamilton Taft
was then obligated to make disbursements to the appropriate COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 2
1
2
IRS, and state and local taxing agencies.
3
performing this service, Hamilton Taft had the use of Federal
4
Express' money from the time of its receipt until the time of its
5
disbursement to the appropriate taxing authority.
6
7
z
t..J !;j ~ ~ '
~
..,
5g ~
~
~ C\
under the contract by promptly delivering to Hamilton Taft all
9
Plaintiff has fully performed all contractual obligations except where prevented by breach of defendant. 8.
Plaintiff is informed and
belie~es
and thereon alleges
12
that defendant has breached its contractual obligations by,
13
rather than paying plaintiff's payroll taxes with the money
14
transferred for that purpose, the money would be held for an
15
additional 30 to 90 days.
16
thereon alleges that in some cases defendant then used a
17
different client's incoming funds to pay Federal Express taxes
18
and any federal or state taxing agency penalties for late
19
payments.
." N
:2
Federal Express has performed all of its obligations
appropriate payroll tax summary reports and payroll tax funds.
11 -or
7•
As consideration for
8
10
o z z
taxing authorities on behalf of Federal Express including the
20
21
22 23
24
25 26
9.
Plaintiff is informed and believes and
Plaintiff is informed and believes that in other cases,
Federal Express taxes simply were not paid, and penalties may be accruing. 10.
Defendant has further breached the contract by not
providing original tax receipts evidencing the tax payments as requested by plaintiff. 11.
As a result of defendant's breach of contract plaintiff
27
has been damaged in excess of
28
true extent of its damages plaintiff is in need of information
$50,000~
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 3
In order to discovery the
1
2 3 A-
from the defendant regarding payroll taxes paid and money currently owed to the appropriate taxing
authorities~
Such
information is within the exclusive control of the defendant and has not been made available to the plaintiff as requested.
5 6
count Two
7
8 9 10
z
11
0
z Z
12
"'!'
:;; ~
~
;J f- ~
~
-
I.Il Ul
a\
III
::::
y
:.:.:
r:
13
<
z:
>- C
0
0
C; ..0 :c
c:"> ~
Z
..J :.n
::! 0 -
co
-.t!. u Z. .....
"J")
Z 0 ::::::
0
15
:z 16
.0(
12.
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference as
though fully set forth herein each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 11 of this Complaint. 13.
Plaintiff is the trustee of the tax funds withheld from
the wages of its employee.
Plaintiff, as trustee of these funds,
is a fiduciary of the withheld funds for the purpose of paying the required amounts to the united states, and state and local agencies. 14.
As custodian of these funds, defendant owed a fiduciary
0::
Z ..... ;.:. z 0 <{ -
14
(Breach of Fiduciary Duty)
17
(,f.J
18
duty to the plaintiff to transmit these funds to the appropriate taxing agency promptly and in the full amount.
Defendant also
;::0
19 20 21
22 23
had a fiduciary duty to invest these funds as a reasonably prudent investor investing his own money would have done so as not to jeopardize the principle.
On information and belief
plaintiff alleges that by investing in high risk non-liquid loans, defendant has breached this fiduciary duty.
24 25
Count Three
26 27 28
(Breach of Agency Relationship) 15.
Plaintiff hereby realleges and incorporates by
reference as though fully set forth herein paragraphs 1 through COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 4
1
2 3 .4
5 6
7
Pursuant to the written payroll tax service contract
entered into between the defendant and plaintiff, defendant became the agent of plaintiff. 17.
Defendant consented to the creation of this
relationship by agreeing to accept payroll tax money from the plaintiff and deposit such money on behalf of the plaintiff in the appropriate amounts and manner on or before the statutory
9
deadlines as herein alleged.
11
Z
16.
8
10 0 Z Z
11 of this Complaint.
18.
In consideration of
i~s
entering into an agency
relationship with the plaintiff, defendant had the use of
12
~ ~ U !Ul Q\ a:: _ w -<
plaintiff's employee payroll tax funds from the time received by
13
defendant until the time of disbursement to the appropriate
~ t; ~ 0 Z ~ &: ~ ~~ ,<0
14
taxing authorities.
"'""
~
:E
aO C'I U"\
z~3 2 a U ~ ::::E z • C3 -< Z U"\ I:c:: z 0 -< V) V) Z 0 r.:::
15
19.
Pursuant to its agency relationship with the plaintiff,
16
defendant owed a duty of loyalty to the plaintiff.
17
loyalty required defendant to pay the payroll tax funds owed by
18
This duty of
the plaintiff to the appropriate taxing authorities in a timely
:::Q
19
manner, and to refrain from administering the payroll tax funds
20
in a manner harmful to the interest of the plaintiff, includIng
2]
22
23 24 25 26 27
28
imprudent investments, or investments which might expose the plaintiff to taxing authority liability. 20.
Also pursuant to its agency relationship with the
plaintiff, defendant owed a duty to disclose promptly upon demand by the plaintiff all documents, including tax receipts, relating to the defendant's administration of the plaintiff's payroll account. 21.
Defendant has breached its agency relationship by
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 5
1
failing and refusing to render to Federal Express, upon its
2
demand, an accounting of its fund.
3
22.
Defendant·s breach of its agency relationship has
4
caused plaintiff damages in an amount to be specifically
5
ascertained at trial but which is presently alleged to be in
6
excess of $50,000.
7
8
Count Four
9
(Injunctive Relief)
10 Z 0
Z
z
reference as though fully set forth herein paragraphs 1 through
12
22 of this complaint.
13
~ ~ >Z ,...
0
c
M "<:T
:is 0'1
~
~
0
~
.r'\
Z~ ~
fl:
0 Z
z
IJ')
0
c::!
~
24.
Unless defendant is restrained by appropriate
14
injunctive relief herein from destroying or otherwise disposing
15
of tax receipts and other information in its control documenting
16
the use and transfer of plaintiff's employee tax funds,
17
unless defendant is restrained by appropriate injunctive relief
18
from continuing to operate the "ponzi scheme", and unless
19
defendant is ordered to immediately produce tax receipts and/or
20
other information regarding the transfer and use of funds,
21
plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable injury for which
22
there is no adequate remedy at law herein.
zv~
~ ~ ~
Plaintiff hereby realleges and incorporates by
11
~
u ~ ~ ~
23.
and
III
23
24
25
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment against defendant as follows:
1.
For preliminary injunctive relief restraining or
26
otherwise preventing defendant from destroying tax receipts
27
and/or other information regarding the transfer of payment of
28
plaintiff's payroll taxes as alleged, pending trial; COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 6
1
For preliminary injunctive relief ordering defendant to
2.
2
cease using plaintiff's payroll tax funds as part of a "ponzi
3
scheme", pending trial; For a temporary restraining order enjoining defendant
3.
5
from destroying tax receipts and/or other information regarding
6
plaintiff's payroll taxes; and
7
For an order mandating the production of tax receipts
4.
8
and/or other information in control of the defendant regarding
9
the payment and transfer of plaintiff's payroll tax funds; and
10 11
For damages for the acts herein alleged in accordance
4.
with proof ..
12 13 1.4 15
JURy DEMAND
Plaintiff Federal Express Corporation hereby makes demand for jury.
16 17
Dated:
March 13, 1991
18
BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON
19
BY:Qz(~~
20
PATRICIA H. CULLISON Attorneys for Plaintiff
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
\PHC\29296 \ 9999\COMPL T• eMP 44S9~J.Allen
28
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 7