1984-reading Log #1

  • Uploaded by: Eamon Barkhordarian
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 1984-reading Log #1 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 363
  • Pages: 2
Moyer Period C English World Culture

Eamon Barkhordarian 10/18/09

Reading Log #1-Analytic "Ungood" will do just as well - better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid" and all the rest of them ? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or "doubleplusgood" if you want something stronger still. -page 46 The quote above was taken from a conversation with Syme and the main character Winston. Syme is explaining and discussing the topic of how slowly the language of Oceania is being changed and transformed into simpler and simpler tongue. By 2050, he says, every word used that time period will have been completely erased and another word would substitute it. Syme tells Winston in the above quote that there is no reason to have so many different ways to express one word. There are no need for synonyms or antonyms for a “word contains an opposite in itself.” This quote in the reading really opened my eyes at the concept Syme brought forth. I remember the days as a kid where I used to imagine an idea similar to Symes. Back in the day when I didn’t know a words true antonym, I would just add a “not” or “un” to the beginning of the word. I had later learned that thinking that way was foolish and ineffective, but Syme reintroduced that utopia with a lot more logical sense. The idea introduced would slowly shrink the dictionary forcing Oceania and its citizens to think to the point and very clearly by taking out those unnecessary words. The question that came to my mind was would the strength of the language still be there after so many words would be erased? Soon writing would become repetitive and language would not be as concise, but rather a broad generalization of a certain topic. People wouldn’t be

Moyer Eamon Barkhordarian Period C 10/18/09 English World Culture able to get their points across, and the language would slowly collapse on the foundations too weak to support it any longer.

Related Documents

Log
November 2019 0
Log
November 2019 0
Log
April 2020 0
Log
April 2020 0
Log
November 2019 0
Log
November 2019 1

More Documents from ""

Review Guide Answers
June 2020 11
Math-lines & Angles 1
April 2020 5
The Preposition
June 2020 11
Manga Carta Answer
April 2020 6
Review Questions Pg. 157
April 2020 12
The Greatest Output
April 2020 5