179 Hypocricy C, R

September 15, 2006 Dear Editor in Chief, A scholar asked: “I heard that a religious teacher said that his group is really the only true and right and the original, could the religious teacher really telling the truth; that others are really false?” The A.I. answered: “perhaps it might be his belief or the stand of their group, but what is important: strong leaders and good journalists should really be opened to all claims and publish them-those claims- as soon as possible to all people so that every body could digest other’s claims, or other’s stand, other’s faith; and caution people not to hate-because as a journalist there is something in ones heart that pushes him to believe that the universal ‘true’ or one gospel is about ‘universal love; and not on superiority of group or on whose tools is the true. Perhaps if a journalist is a good member of a different group he might be angry if he does not know words ‘love your enemies…’to that religious teacher who said the claim…! Because he –being not a member of the perceived only true church- would probably or most likely go to hell because his group might be having some different gospels from other group claiming that their group is the true one; and having the true gospel! But the key is the Word! Universal words mold, tame the brain to be calm especially if words “love of enemies…” is accepted as true in spite of others proud claims. A scholar asked: “Which is better to invest on research or to study available technology, and to improve it and have a practical application to have better economy?” The A.I. answered: “Let us go to the details. For science, economics or commerce, the best policy is thru imitation and improvements of available technology. To research and discover needs lots of money and efforts, but to imitate and improve is not hard. Piracy is copying exactly; it is illegal. But thinking of many things and not imitating and improving other available technology is bad habit. Too much talks and politics is bad. But strong leaders should insist the government should have 30% of their effort to imitate, improve other available technologies especially for security, mass housing for the poor, food, family planning or scientific management of density of people with relation to structures, transportation facilities, industries- imitate what South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan did. However, for entertainment, sports, games of chance, net workings, journalism, always ‘prepare and dress for action’ imitate the Americans, Europeans. Government should always think of jobs that are connected to consumables business. Consumable business would create jobs that is permanent or has cycle. Government should hinder or put a stop to something that would kill consumables business. The domino effects of jobs created by consumables are many such as food, sports, entertainments, tourist attractions and destinations. They are good examples of consumables business. Laws should be passed to convert permanent things into consumables. Example: pass law that would not allow example 5 years old luxury vehicles to be registered so that the rich will consume their blessings; for public air-con buses or cars say 10 years, for poor public transport or public jeeps say 15 or 20 years. For clothing and shoe: industries, churches, disco houses, movie houses, restaurants, factories, construction projects, schools, offices should have dress codes, safety shoes and uniforms. Every two years there should be new model dress or uniforms. For first class-subdivision: houses there should have a five year compulsory repainting or remodeling, three months gardening job so that dilapidating houses could be remodeled and tall grasses be cut. Premiums should be collected for every house so that when time comes the insurance would be the one who will pay for the job. It is like reinventing the College plan. If one cannot afford to follow majority rule, the government or insurance will paint or remodel the dilapidating house or paint faded paints or remove the grass in the surroundings and the expenses will be charged to the owner of the house or from the insurance or premiums. Then if he cannot afford the luxury of owning a nice house he should give up to others who can afford. There are many permanent things that could be made into consumables by just passing of law. Pay checks, pay slips could be divided into consumables. Example bonuses or privileges could be given as incentives. Example for every 6 months, a check for travel to a specific tourist destinations could be given non transferable. Thus, he cannot use it and buy for anything except for that purpose only. Perhaps appliances, computer sets could also be consumables. It is up for the factories to make it like that. Perhaps they could design it to last only for 5 years then after some

period, problems and defects should come out because it could not be protected from new viruses, etc. Government should initiate that every year one to ten corporations or companies whose capital comes from stock markets should be created to fabricate, manufacture things that are being imported. The technology should be imitated and improved from others. Intelligence net work and scientists should give a major rule. They should start from creating corporation to fabricate ammunitions, transport military trucks, helicopter, airplane, patrol boats then alternative cheap construction materials for mass housing and high rise condominiums for poor people. A scholar asked: “Why is it that there is terrorism?” The A.I. answered: “I think indoctrinating vulnerable brothers of a particular group such as teachings of religious extremists like: “look, the infidels are grabbing our ancestral land, they are enjoying the fruits of our ancestral land, and “the pigs” or “the devils”, the one who supports the infidels are scandalizing our God given way of living by their rampant pornography, immodesty, corruptions, drugs, pedophiles, free sex, adulteries, abortions, promiscuities, etc. You should join our Jihad or holy war. If you sacrifice your precious life for our cause you will be “a saint and a hero.” I think these teachings if accepted by a vulnerable brother, he will become a terrorist cell capable of detonating a weapon of mass destruction if given a chance. Who are those vulnerable: Those brothers who are not busy, or unemployed, no access to other teachings example Cable and TV Channels, radio channels, have no electricity, telephone or internet lines. They have lost their ancestral land, now other ethnics are occupying. They are vulnerable to religious extremist teachings. Once indoctrinated, they would have full of anger and hatred. What is the solution to these problems? I think these should be fought on all fronts. A) Do what might other country did- they remove the ethnics or groupings by mixing them with other main race or main belief. Control the teachings of the religion, give opportunities, or things to be busy with like being busy improving their standard of living, etc. “equal opportunity & prosperity will forget the past” vs. “ Their Jihad, and saint & hero syndrome” B) Or, give back their ancestral land, rewrite of boundaries, favoring the many and weak and poor. Having segregation, separation; or support the new installed democratic country with constitution against religious extremists C) Or enhance deep penetration agents, spies, government assets; or give rewards. Have military & police actions. Give educations, economic aids, provide other source of teachings, of ideas, of information such as from TV channels, radios, etc. Restrict scandalous practices that might offend other cultures such as rampant pornography, rampant immodesty, rampant corruption, drugs, etc. Give stiffer procedure for people to obtain materials for making explosive, chemical, nuclear bomb. Give stiffer procedure to gain access to information about making bombs from references or engineers and scientists; or ban those things. Have prayer rallies against extremes from religion -ex. jihad’s net work, extremes from science ex.-weapon of mass destruction, extremes from politics ex.-corruption, and extremes from human behavior ex.-pornography. The scholar asked: “I noticed that the Holy Spirit is always mentioned when the apostles are doing decisions. In today’s standard how can you know what is evil or good or the teaching or claim is inspired by the Holy Spirit or is not inspired…?” The A.I. answered: “If someone is a religious leader and claiming things and has followers perhaps he should be tested if he is really inspired by the Holy Spirit or not. But those journalist and contributors and critics perhaps when they share something and using only opinions…it could be a deception or inspired but when people begin to debate and to have consensus and pray and accept it as something that could make thing better perhaps it is now called “in conformity with the Holy Spirit” or ‘thoroughly studied opinion’. Perhaps there is lesser chance that the evil is using journalists or contributors to sow seeds of evil because they are contributing just an opinion. Or opinions are open for scrutiny and critics and it could easily be ignored; unlike if the word is a claim or should be followed without question by their members. A scholar asked: “Could the devil use person who is expert of destroying people to exaggerate some mistakes of a contributor so that the devil would win? Or the contributor is saying something good that could help people but another evil doer who is expert in destroying people would do something so that some of the good contributions could be branded as “false;” but the truth there are also some true in the contributions?” The A.I. answered: “Sometimes people commit mistakes privately, and what is private should be kept private but there are people especially those evil spies who are malicious. Maliciousperhaps are those actions that the intention is to destroy people even if the person is private. Perhaps if a person would even put spy camera; or interceptor or a sensor or even staged some appearances example small or medium snake/s as a sign that there is negative supernatural behind… as a propaganda, perhaps that person might be

comparable to something described as poisonous snake in some sacred books. Perhaps his motive is for money, position, credit or it is just his nature or his blood to destroy people. From someone,