1320 Wetgasrev2009

Wet Gas Measurement Class 1320.1 Philip A Lawrence Director of Business Development Cameron’s Measurement Systems 14450 JFK Blvd Houston, Texas USA. Introduction Wet gas measurement is becoming more prevalent in the modern oil and gas market place. The effect of entrained liquid in gas and its impact on measurement systems is being researched world wide by various laboratories and JIP working groups. The impact can be very significant financially. The subject is quite large and encompasses many different concepts, meter types and opinions, with many new ideas being brought to the forefront each year as more research is done. This paper will discuss and describe the phenomenon of wet gas and some of the various types of meters that are and may be used for this type of measurement, together with some recent thinking and concepts associated with wet gas measurement, The writer will mention some of the terms and mathematical concepts used to enable the reader to grasp a better understanding of what this stuff is about! Only public domain algorithms to determine liquid loading be mentioned. History The concept of entrained liquid effecting a gas meters performance was looked at many years ago an American research engineer Dr J.W. Murdoch, he produced a document from research showing “the effect of liquid overreading”, the publication showing the data is available as written by Murdock and is entitled "Two-Phase Flow Measurement with Orifices", Journal of Basic Engineering, pp.419-433, 1962. “Murdock, J.W. Other wet gas researchers have contributed to the development of the subject and a plethora of data and correlations exist to suit different metering type’s concepts and installations, the major metering devices being used are of a differential pressure type due to the robustness of the design. The subject is hard to deal with because of the lack of test data available to the market place, this sometimes results in data being kept in house and confidential, also the inability to produce a coherent test condition in the laboratory that will match the in field location is also a big issue. Recent laboratory data shows that even with a well managed laboratory facility offering various multi-product fluids, at differing pressures and density rations , it may be impossible to match the” in field condition” which means that any meter correlation, or correction algorithm formed from the data may be suspect in other field conditions. This is not all doom and gloom it is possible to work with data sets that are not exactly ideal, but caution must be taken and the metering system uncertainty or accuracy may need to be relaxed, to allow a sensible operation in the field. What is Wet Gas? The term is used to denote a natural gas flow containing a relatively small amount of free liquid by volume, usually this may be limited up to about 10%. The ASME MFC19 Wet Gas Technical Report/Guide offers some guidance although it is circa 300 pages long ! and requires a lot of study. There are presently few techniques or methods available which can measure this type of fluid regime with a reasonable degree of accuracy.

Wet Gas may be considered to be a subset of two-phase flow! The phenomenon of wet gas may occur in several ways. For example:

a) Over time as dry natural gas wells age, changes in flow conditions including a reduction in line pressure may result in the heavier hydrocarbon gases condensing in flow-lines and transportation pipelines.

b) Production wells for gas condensate fields usually may have wet gas flow. c) The quantity of lift gas injected to increase production from many oil wells brings them to flow conditions that can be termed as a wet gas stream. Many gas wells worldwide are now approaching the latter stages of their production life making wet gas metering more common and driving meter manufacturers and users to new ideas and methodology. An ISO DIS (dissertation) 14532 Standard (terminology) also sights the following wet gas definition: Wet Gas is defined as gas with inclusion of desirable or undesirable components like water vapour, free water and / or liquid hydrocarbons in significantly greater amounts than those quoted for pipe line quality natural gas. Typically wet gas may consist of unprocessed, (well head) or partially processed natural gases,and may also contain condensed hydrocarbon, traces of carbonyl sulphide and, process fluid vapour such as methanol and glycol. The ISO TC 193 WG no 1 Technical report also refers to wet gas in the same way as the14532 dissertation. Wet Gas Measurement Terms The Wet Gas measurement fraternity use a specific language and terms to describe wet gas flow and its effects on metering which can be sometimes difficult to grasp and sound complex. The following terms are some of those commonly used today, not all of the terms are used in this paper, but these are presented for the purpose of general knowledge and overview. Superficial Gas Velocity (SGV) This term refers to the gas velocity in a pipeline system that would be present if there were no liquid present in the gas stream, If liquid is however present in the system, the actual gas velocity will be higher due to the reduction in available pipe area caused by the liquid present taking space in the pipe. Superficial Liquid Velocity (SLV) The term superficial liquid velocity refers to the liquid velocity that would be present if there were no gas present in the gas stream and is related to the SGV. Liquid Load (LL) Liquid load, or mass ratio, is a wet gas correlation term that is used to describe the amount of liquid present in the flowing gas stream. This term is usually defined as the ratio of the liquid mass flow-rate to the gas mass flow-rate and is commonly expressed and used in calculations as percentage value. Gas Volume (void) Fraction (GVF.) GVF, or gas volume fraction, is defined as the ratio of the gas volumetric flow-rate to the total volumetric flow-rate. The total volumetric flow-rate is the sum of the liquid volumetric rate and the gas volumetric flow-rate. These volumetric flows are usually expressed in actual (not standardized )volumetric terms. Liquid Volume Fraction (LVF). LVF, or liquid volume fraction, is defined as the ratio of the liquid volumetric flow-rate to the total volumetric flow-rate. The total volumetric flow-rate is the sum of the liquid volumetric flow-rate and the gas volumetric flowrate. These volumetric flows are also usually expressed in actual (not standardized) volumetric terms. Lockhart & Martinelli Parameter (or dimensionless number) very important to review ! The term Lockhart Martinelli Number (X) isa dimensionless parameter that is used to correlate gas and liquid flow in a pipe. It was derived by two engineers Lockhart and Martnelli whom worked on steam flow measurement in the late 50’s in the UK and has been put forward by wet gas researchers in wet gas calculations.

Liquid Hold-up(Hold Up). Liquid Hold-up is described as being the area occupied by the liquid in a wet gas stream when viewed at a specific location of the cross-section of the pipe, relative to the total cross sectional area of the pipe at the same location. Measurement Over-Reading(or over-measurement error). When a flow measurement device operating in a wet gas environment and reports a higher flow-rate than it should, it is considered to have what is termed “ over reading “ or “ over measurement error “. Under Reading(or under measurement error). When a flow measurement device reports a lower flow-rate than is actually occurring it is considered to have produced an under-reading or under-measurement error. Froude Number. The gas velocity may be also expressed as a dimensionless number, known usually as the Densiometric Froude Number: Multiphase Flow. This term describes two or more types of liquid components flowing in the gas stream at the same time, it is then referred to as multiphase flow. Typical liquids include oil, condensate and water, sometimes solids may be entrained which can make the mixture harder to measure and more difficult to determine a mathematical representation of the said components flow-rates. Some Mathematical Terms (US customary units). Gas Volume (or void) Fraction. V

GVF =

(1)

Gas

VGas + V Liquid

Where: QG = Gas Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions, in ft^3 /sec QL = Liquid Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions, in ft^3/sec Superficial Gas Velocity

SGV =

WG

(3)

ρ⋅A

W LL = L x 100% WG

VLiquid

(2)

VGas + VLiquid

Lockhart & Martninelli No X =

QL QG

ρL ρG

(4)

Where: QL = Liquid Volumetric Flow-rate at Flowing conditions, f^t3/sec QG = Gas Volumetric Flow-rate at Flowing conditions, f^t3/sec ρL = Density of Liquid, lb/ft^3 ρG = Density of Gas, lb/f^t3 (5)

Liquid Volume Fraction

LVF =

QL QG + QL

Where: QG = Gas Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions,ft^3/sec QL = Liquid Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions,ft^3.

Where: WL = Liquid Mass Flow-rate, lbm/sec WG = Gas Mass Flow-rate, lbm/sec

Liquid Volume Fraction (LVF) also = 1 – GVF

LVF =

Where: QG = Gas Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions, in ft3/sec QL = Liquid Volumetric Flow-rate at flowing conditions, in ft3/sec

Where: WG = Gas Mass Flow-rate, lbm/sec ρ = Density of Gas, lb/ft^3 A = Area of Pipe, ft^2

Liquid Loading

Liquid Volume Fraction

(7)

(6)

Basic Application Chart of Liquid Loading Showing Quantities/Ratios in some Gas applications.(Figure 1.0)

Application

Bbl/MMSCF

Mass Ratio

0

0

Gas from separator

0-1

.75%

Gas from slug catcher

0-5

3.7%

Wet gas production

0-20

13%

Liquid / Gas production

>20

>13%

Dry gas

Fig 1.0 Standards Meter performance requirements in the wet gas arena are not covered fully in current measurement standards but an API recommended practice is available (No RP 85) describes the use of wet gas meters in an allocation system which was developed for a certain field condition in the G.O.M. Representation of the fluid velocities, types ,measured volumes, and mass have also not been exactly defined or agreed and various regions of the world use different terminology to obtain a measurement result. This can add some confusion and sometimes many tough discussions between interested parties ensue. Current trends indicate approximate ranges of liquid/gas ratios found in most producing gas fields as having GVF > 90-93% or Lockhart-Martinelli parameters to a maximum of approx 0.35. ASME have a wet gas standard underway ASME MFC Sub-Committee 19 (Wet Gas Metering) The ISO TC193 WG-1 SC3 white paper “Allocation Metering in the Upstream Area” makes an good effort to detail some definitions to try to arrive at a common start point, and it also deals with ‘wet gas’ issues and fluid definitions thus : Fluid Definitions Some definitions are given below for single-phase fluid streams (e.g. gas, water and liquid streams) and multiphase fluid stream (e.g. wet gas streams and multiphase streams). Unlike the downstream and transport and distribution businesses, for the upstream area it is not the case that all fluid streams are properly conditioned to one single-phase and indeed stay in one-phase over a large range of pressures and temperatures. In the upstream area, the fluids are often un-stabilized, these fluids are what we experience in the wet gas arena, and any pressure and temperature change (even a Δp in a measurement device or over a valve) might cause a phase change and change a single-phase fluid into a multiphase fluid. Accordingly, all definitions below should be referred to the operation ranges of temperature and pressure that occur in the system under consideration. Dry Gas (treated gas) Clean dry gas (not necessarily only hydrocarbons but may contain other components such as CO , N , etc.) where 2

2

no liquid condensation is expected over the expected normal operating temperatures and pressures at the metering point. As an example, gas with a dew-point of –5°C measured under conditions between 5 and 10°C. Equilibrium Gas (separated at dew-point) Equilibrium Gas is defined as separated gas that basically has no free liquids but may develop a small liquid content by changes in process conditions or meter/pipe-work interaction. Any process changes of the gas may cause a shift in the definition of the gas as wet or dry.

These changes may affect the GOR, GCR, the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter and the gas and liquid properties. Close to critical conditions small changes may cause large variations in the liquid and gas fractions and in the fluid properties. Care should be taken in meter selection so as not to cause additional impact on the line process conditions. The measurement devices that can be used for equilibrium gas are similar to the devices mentioned for dry gas application. However, in the design, care should be taken in that, as soon as liquids start to be formed (e.g. due to pressure drop in the meter) the effect on the reading should be established. Ultrasonic meters are increasingly being used for this service, and the following comments are relevant. At present ultrasonic meters may not be suitable for measuring gas above 0.5% LVF (Liquid Volume Fraction) as the units may produce unstable readings. Care should be taken in systems subject to carry over or liquid entrainment when the ultrasonic meter has a poor location. If the meter is too close to bends, valves or other obstructions, the resulting swirl / turbulence can seriously affect the accuracy of the mathematical techniques used to find the velocity profile and therefore the flow-rate. If the operating temperature is too high there may be a issues over the strength of the bonding material used in the manufacture of some types of Ultrasonic transducers. Testing has shown some transducers may fail at temperatures in excess of 150°C or when there is a sudden pressure fluctuation (an occurrence that can be common in production pipelines). Other installation parameters or concerns that need care are that some signals read by the meter may be very susceptible to background noise from other components in, or close to the pipeline on some designs. Work is however underway to develop ultrasonic meters for wet gas above current norms ! Wet Gas (two or three phase) Any mixture of gas and up to about 10% by volume of liquid hydrocarbon and water. The mass ratio of gas to liquid varies significantly with pressure for a constant Gas Volume Fraction. A convenient parameter to indicate the wetness of the gas is the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter. Gassy Liquids (two or three phases) Any mixture of hydrocarbon liquid and water at a pressure below its equilibrium pressure (bubble point) and where gas is present in the liquid mixture. This typically occurs inside a separator or where the liquid is exposed to a pressure reduction e.g.cavitation. Gas-Oil (or Gas-Condensate) Ratio, GOR or GCR The ratio of produced gas flow rate to the produced oil (condensate) flow rate. Generally the GOR or GCR is 3

3

measured in standard units, e.g. m /m or Scf/bbl. Gas-Liquid Ratio, GLR The ratio of produced gas flow rate to the produced total liquid flow rate. Generally GLR is measured in standard 3

3

units, e.g. m / m or Scf / bbl. Gas and Liquid Behavior in a Closed Conduit The behavior of the gas and liquid in a flowing pipe will exhibit various characteristics of flow depending on the pressure of the gas, velocity of the gas, and liquid content, as well as the piping orientation , (horizontal, vertical or sloping). The liquid may be in the form of tiny droplets or, the pipe may be filled completely with liquid. Despite the complexity of the gas and liquid interactions, various attempts have been made to model this behavior.

These gas and liquid interactions are referred to as “flow regimes” or “flow patterns”. (Figs 2 and 3) Flow regime maps are used to describe the way gas and liquids interact based on various parameters. These maps and charts may also be used to try to predict the performance of a specific flow meter based on the type of regime present.

Figure 2.0 Flow Pattern Map,(CEESI)

Figure 3.0 Flow Regime Map (Horizontal Pipes) (ISO-ASME)

Flow Regimes Annular Mist Flow Annular mist flow occurs at high gas velocities. A thin film of liquid is present around the annulus of the pipe. Usually most of the liquid is entrained in the form of droplets in the gas core. Due to the result of gravity, there is usually a thicker film of liquid on the bottom of the pipe as opposed to the top of the pipe or measurement device.(Figure 4.0)

Figure 4.0 Stratified (Smooth) Flow Stratified or stratified smooth flow exists when the gravitational separation is complete. The liquid flows along the bottom of the pipe as gas flows over the top. Liquid holdup in this regime can be large but the gas velocities are usually low. Stratified Wave Flow Stratified wave flow is similar to stratified smooth flow, but with a higher gas velocity. The higher gas velocity produces waves on the liquid surface. These waves may become large enough to break off liquid droplet at the peaks of the waves and become entrained in the gas. These droplets are distributed further down the pipe. Slug Flow In the slug flow regime, large frothy waves of liquid form a slug that can fill the pipe completely. These slugs may also be in the form of a surge wave that exists upon a thick film of liquid on the bottom of the pipe. Elongated Bubble Flow Elongated bubble flow consists of a mostly liquid flow with elongated bubbles present closer to the top of the pipe. Dispersed Flow Assume a pipe is completely filled with liquid with a small amount of entrained gas. The gas is in the form of smaller bubbles. These bubbles of gas have a tendency to reside in the top region of the pipe as gravity holds the liquid in the bottom of the pipe Other Regime Issues Wet Gas systems are prone to hydrate formation in certain instances and care must be taken in design of systems that may be inaccessible (sub-sea) also transmitter sensing line lengths and the position to the transmitter must be reviewed.

Natural gas pockets between hydrate plugs in a pipe can cause safety concerns. If a pipeline is believed to be depressurized and a gas pocket is present, safety issues arise. When the hydrate plug dissociates, the plug can turn into a high speed projectile driven by the pressure behind it causing catastrophic results. These moving hydrates can snap off thermo-wells off destroy orifice plates and cone devices. Wet Gas Research A large amount of research has been conducted to determine the effect that wet gas flow regimes have on flow measurement devices. This research has been used to help to develop devices that can measure the gas and liquid volumes. Typical Wet Gas Testing Loop To evaluate dry gas flow meters under wet gas conditions, a typical piping setup is commonly used. The apparatus consists of a reference gas flow meter positioned in a dry gas stream. A metered liquid injection point is positioned downstream of the dry gas measurement source. This is the point where liquid is introduced to the dry gas stream. The flow meter under test is positioned after the metered liquid injection point (Figure 5). Both the gas and liquid streams are measured individually before being combined.

Figure 5.0 “Wet Gas Test Loop”(Typical CEESI)

Meter Types used in Wet Gas The main meter types being developed as wet natural gas meters are Ultrasonic and Differential Pressure Meters. These are dealt with in the paper next :

Differential Pressure Meters Orifice Plate Meter Traditionally the Orifice Plate Meter was used to meter wet gas flows. In the last few years this has changed since it is now known that the liquid is held up at the plate and the resulting flow is not steady. The liquid tends to travel through the orifice in slugs. The result is an unsteady DP reading. This can be seen from Orifice Plate Meter wet gas photographs taken at the South West Research Institute in 1997. (See fig 6.0)

Fig 6.0: An Orifice Meter in a Wet Gas Flow.(SWRI) Furthermore, Orifice Plates can be susceptible to distortion if struck by a slug or pressure pulse and the plate tends to act as a liquid trap that can gathers particulates in the downstream and upstream section (Figure 6.0) Venturi Meter The Venturi meter is a more popular wet gas meter. It does not suffer the same problems as an Orifice Plate Meter as it allows slugs and pressure pulses to pass through unobstructed due to the inlet being angled. (This feature also allows the Venturi to be self cleaning. Current Wet Gas Metering Research Joint Industry Projects all include this meter in their test programs and its performance is reasonably well documented.) One main difference between the Wet Gas Venturi Meter and the Wet Gas Cone Type Meter is that the minimum flow area (i.e. the “throat”) of the Venturi is along the center line and the Cone Meters minimum flow area is at the periphery of the pipe which has some advantages. This gives the cone meter an advantage in a wet gas flow as it does in single-phase flow , the meter can condition the flow as it passes the cone. The net result is a steady DP signal seen in cone type devices. Venturi meters do not condition the flow as effectively as cone devices it also may tend to hold up liquid at the inlet and therefore small slugs created by the Venturi meters design periodically flow through the meter causing pressure spikes to be read at the DP ports. Venturi Meter testing in industry has led to the publication of special correlations to correct for the liquid induced error. The Venturi Meters general performance is similar to a Cone Meters and correlations found are very similar to each other , cone meters have a slight edge in operational stability and turndown. Entrained liquid in gas causes an over-reading in the gas flow rate determination (Figure 7.0)

Gas flow overreading

1.25 Venturi

1.20 1.15 1.10

Orifice

1.05 1.00 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

LGR (m3 liquid/million normal m3 gas) Figure 7.0 Wet Gas Cone Meters The Cone Meter is also a self cleaning device. The acceleration of the gas over the cone tends to remove any liquid and particulates that come into contact with the meter. The Cone acts on the flow regime to redistribute it over the pipe area this is advantageous in tight installation spaces and downstream mixing takes place. For gas and wet gas the static and DP taps are usually on the top of the meter. (The drawing fig 8.0 is for illustrative purposes only)

Figure 8.0 Typical Cone Meter (cut away) Wet Gas Preferred Beta Ratio @ 0.75 (Courtesy Cameron Valve and Measurement Inc)

Cone Meter Wet Gas Research In 2002 NEL tested 6” 0.55 and 0.75 beta ratio cone meters and the results and analysis were reported at the 2002 NSFMW It was found that like other DP meters the Cone meter over-reads the gas flow-rate with a wet gas flow and can be a predictable device. The scale of this positive error induced by an entrained liquids presence in a gas flow was found to be dependent on a)The Lockhart-Martinelli parameter (X), b)The pressure (or gas to liquid density ratio) and c)The Gas Densiometric Froude number ( Frg ). The definition of the Lockhart - Martinelli parameter was mentioned earlier and is the square root of the ratio of the superficial liquid flow inertia force to the superficial gas flow inertia force. (equation (4)) The definition of the gas Densiometric Froude number is: the square root of the ratio of gas inertia force to the liquid gravitational force. It is calculated in equation ( 7) Note that in equation 7 the term U sg is the superficial gas velocity which is calculated by equation (8).

Frg =

U sg

ρg

gD ρ l − ρ g

.

mg U sg = ρg A

(7)

(8)

Positive errors induced on any type of DP meter by an entrained liquids presence in the gas flow is commonly presented in the form of the square root of the ratio of the actual read DP from the wet gas flow ( ΔPtp ) and the DP that would be expected to be read from that specific DP meter if the gas phase flowed alone through the meter ( ΔPg ). The over-reading is usually expressed by the term

ΔPtp ΔPg . Alternatively the absolute percentage liquid

induced error for any DP meter can be approximated to be

(

)

ΔPtp ΔPg − 1 * 100% .

It has been found from research that as the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter (X) increased for a set gas to liquid density ratio and gas densiometric Froude number (Frg)….. the over-reading increased. If the gas to liquid density ratio increased for a set Lockhart-Martinelli parameter and gas Densiometric Froude number …… the over-reading may reduce. If the gas Densiometric Froude number increased say for a set Lockhart-Martinelli parameter and gas to liquid density ratio the over-reading can increase. (Figure 9.0)

Figure 9.0 (Courtesy of Cameron Valve and Measurement Inc)

Determining Liquid Loading A popular method for finding the liquid flow-rate in a wet natural gas flow is to use a tracer injection method. The Shell Oil Company developed technique is well documented, it offers water and liquid hydrocarbon flow-rate estimations to about ± 10%. Over the last few years the tracer injection technique has been applied with the Venturi meter and a Venturi meters wet gas flow correlation used to predict wet gas effect and liquid flow-rates. As shown below in Figure 10

DP Meter

Figure 10 Tracer Methodology (Widely Used) A special chemical tracer is injected upstream o f the DP meter into the wet gas stream at a known flow rate. Samples are taken downstream of the meter at around 150 diameters (may be shorter if mechanical mixing is present) to enable mixing to talk place The samples fluorescent intensity is compared with that of the tracer Difference in the fluorescents together with the rate of the tracer injection can be related to flow rate. 10 samples are usually taken over 10 minute intervals, samples are analyzed after being allowed to stand overnight and liquid rate for each sample determined. A flash factor for the condensate is applied. From this data a liquid load data set can be found and then applied to the wet gas DP meter to correct the over-read . Downstream Recovery Pressure Method This method uses the relationship that the recovery pressure measured downstream of any differential pressure meters varies as the liquid loading changes within certain parameters of density ratio and pressure. This phenomenon has been detailed by various laboratories and researchers using various D.P. meters Venturi Cone types and Orifice Plates where trash is not prevalent in the line. The concept of measuring a liquid is a pipe by using just a pressure transmitter after the meter has a real appeal to the problem of liquid determination. Caution must be taken to see if the density ratios, pressures and flow rates fall into the generic wet gas research release data in 2007 by CEESI of Nunn Colorado.

The recovery pressure is read at 4 D’s from the rear face of the cone meter the data collected can be used to develop algorithms that will allow under certain conditions and density ratios to predict liquid loading to a certain uncertainty. The levels of uncertainty for the liquid measurement is not low but usually these types of measurement application have no liquid base line to work from for correction anyhow. “Stevens” records that the following equations used sensibly approximates the liquid value and outputs a gas correction for a simple wet gas meter that determines liquid load using the pressure loss ratio dry to wet.

Other Electronic Non DP Devices Care must be taken when using energy additive (electronic meters) to measure wet gas because there is reduced research available on these types of meters due to certain issues that prevent repeatable measurement and also the devices may only work well in restrictive liquid /gas flow regimes or for that particular set of conditions. Ultrasonic Meters Whilst they are very good for dry gas applications the uncertainty for these devices depends on many factors when used in wet gas flow regimes. Research has been done on stratified flow with certain devices. Issues The chord flooding and failing and liquid bridging the gap between transducer face and pipe wall (causing loss of signal).The signal strength being reduced by absorption in the liquid phase, the signal being deflected away from the desired path by refraction through the liquid phase and the background noise of valves etc.

The signal may be drowned out by the liquid at the transducer location and can make this type of meter fail to perform properly Data released in 2007 shows that for certain types of ultrasonic meter the Lockhart & Martineli numbers must be kept low to obtain a useable result.( Figs 11 and 11 a) Some ultrasonic meter manufacturers are currently researching the possibility of developing an Ultrasonic Meter into a wet natural gas device but so far the published research has shown this to be an extremely difficult technical challenge. Wet Gas Testing Data (Typical Ultrasonic Meter Test Spool and Data Set Fig 11 and 11 a)

Courtesy CEESI Wet Gas Data Release 2007 Figure 11 a.

Coriolis Type Meter Wet Gas Test Data (Two Types Shown A&B). Meters were tested at the CEESI wet gas loop and both types seem to operate with predictability only at low LM numbers. This can be seen in the data sets provided meter a to LM 0.18 and meter B to LM 0.035.

Meter Type A

Test Limit B 0.035 LM.

Meter Type B

Both Data Sets Courtesy of CEESI Wet Gas Data Release 2007

Conclusions Wet Gas measurement is a complicated subject that requires fore-thought in measurement applications ,it is usually at the cutting edge of technology. As more work is done in this field ideas that were valid 10 years ago are now found to be changed slightly. The advent of metering applications were hydrate formation is possible must have a safety review incorporated to make sure that not only measurement but safety issues are dealt with. Newer technologies are entering the market place each year however a uniform test method must be developed to offer the end user the chance for comparison between these types of metering devices.

Index of Some Terms X

The Lockhart-Martinelli Parameter

.

mg

The actual gas mass flow-rate

.

ml

The actual liquid mass flow-rate

Cd Frg

The discharge coefficient

U sg

The superficial gas velocity

g

The gravitational constant

D A M3 E Y M MSCF SCFH

The meter inlet diameter The meter inlet cross sectional area Cubic Meters The DP meter Velocity of Approach The DP meter expansibility factor The Murdock gradient Thousand standard cubic feet Standard cubic feet per hour

The Gas Densiometric Froude number

.

m g (tp ) The overestimated gas mass flow-rate using ρg ρl

ΔPtp

the read wet gas differential pressure. The gas density The liquid density The read wet gas (or “two-phase”) D.P.

ΔPg

The gas superficial differential pressure

References. Murdock, J.W., “Two-Phase Flow Measurement with Orifices”, ASME Journal of Basic Engineering, Dec. Hewitt G.F. , “Measurement of Two Phase Flow Parameters”, Academic Press, London, New York, S.F. Ting V.C ., "Effects of Non-Standard Operating Conditions on the Accuracy of Orifice Meters", SPE Ifft. S. and Mikkelsen. E.D ,“Pipe Elbow Effects on the V-Cone Flow-meter”, ASME Fluids Conference,

1962 1978 1993 1993

Gas Processors Association, “Engineering Data Book”, Volume 1, Sections 1-16, Gas Processors Suppliers Association, Tulsa, OK, Revised Tenth Edition, Ifft S Mccrometer Wet Gas Meter Testing NSFMW Kristiansand Norway Van-Mannen. H.Cost Reduction - Wet-Gas Measm’t Using the Tracer-Venturi Combination”, NEL one day seminar, De Leeuw. H (R), “Liquid Correction of Venturi Meter Readings in Wet Gas Flow”, NSFMW Stewart D., Hodges D., Steven R., Peters R., “Wet Gas Metering with V-Cone Meters”, NSFMW

1994 1997 1999 1997 2002

Kegel,T.M “Wet Gas Measurement”, 4th CIATEQ Semina r on Advanced Flow Measurement, Boca del Rio, John Amdal, Harald Danielson, Eivind Dykesteen, Dag Flølo, Jens Grendstad, Hans Olav Hide, Håkon Moestue, Bernt Helge Torkildsen, “Handbook of Multiphase Metering”The Norwegian Society for Oil and Gas Measurement. Lawrence PA & Steven R “Research Developments In Wet Gas Metering with V-Cone Meters” NSFMW Kinney J ISHM Class # 1320 Wet Gas Measurement ISHM O.K. USA ISO TC 193 WG 1.0 Allocation Metering in the Upstream Area (white paper) Steven R A Discussion on Horizontal Wet Gas D.P.Flow Meters St Andrews Scotland UK…..NSFMW 2007 Lawrence PA Wet gas Measurement ISHM Class 2007 #1320 Wet Gas Data Release Estes Park Colorado (CEESI - Wet Gas Laboratory Nunn CO). Wet Gas test data on a 2 inch cone meter courtesy Cameron Houston Inc - Lawrence

2003 2003 2006 2006 2007 2007 2009