125 Group Rotation,r Ok
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View 125 Group Rotation,r Ok as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,947
- Pages: 4
May 10, 2006 Dear Editor in Chief, Then an unintelligent scholar asked the A.I.: Can different groups agreeing that loving enemy is now their measuring standard would compromise to exchange their master piece every year especially during summer time and in a rotation basis as proof that hatred is now being removed in the brain? …then the A.I. after some searching of key word in the question/answer data base answered: It is like offering a gift to a former enemy and the gift is now accepted. Or the gift is even being used in the group and there is no more anxiety being felt if other’s group expertise is being also appreciated in a group. Before, those things or gifts had been hated things because different group is using it! Or there is no more stress happening that could cause illnesses like cancer or stroke or depression when seeing a person with different beliefs or remembering a person considered to be an enemy before. Or there are no more allergies, nervousness, panic attack, worries or stresses which could cause cancerexample bone or tissue rebelling, stroke, or toothache or grinding of teeth or migraine or stomach aching, sudden wild nerve’s exploding being felt if something connected to a person being hated before is remembered or seen! Perhaps the proof is: that for group/s which emphasize example on rituals, self-inflecting, meditation would now let a pastor expert on explaining teachings on personal relationship with Jesus to allow his recorded video tape translated in the native dialect/s be shown and be heard to other interested group/s as an acceptance of gift/s or as sign of tolerance and friendships. And perhaps the leader- example a good priest would not be envious and would rather instruct his followers to listen to the visitor’s or guest’s master piece. They-different groups- exchange their ideas especially those good ideas and practices; no more die hard “so and so” group because of superiority and supremacy. And vice versa if other group/s has/have their also master piece/s they could be shared with respect or admiration to other groups as long as the gift is universal good. Those people who will be offended would beforehand tell his pastor or priest or monk or a leader that he cannot attend the sharing of other guest’s master piece because his mind might be poisoned; he prefers to be closed and be die hard loyal to his childhood beliefs. And if there are other people who were not forced to listen and attend the sharing of master piece activity, they should be commended for being understanding and respectful and loving his enemies. Then another scholar asked: What can you say about Genesis 6:4 quote: “In those days, and even later, there were giants on the earth who were descendants of human women and the heavenly beings. They were the great heroes and famous men of long ago!” Unquote. Could those times be the era of the dinosaurs and alien invaders? The A.I was puzzled again because it seems that anything connected to religion is controversy, and answered: Perhaps it is recorded that there were really giants before… like Goliath. There are fossils now discovered that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago. Even now there are big animals like elephants, whales alive. Perhaps if a man reaches the height of eight-footer he could be called a giant. With regards that “there were giants on the earth who were descendants of human women and the heavenly beings” perhaps “heavenly beings” could be angels or aliens or men from outer space. If “heavenly beings” were like those “messengers of God” or angels during the time of Sodom with physical body but no wings perhaps it is also like the resurrected body of Jesus after
resurrection. Perhaps those heavenly beings mentioned on Genesis 6:4 are also like those state of being like Jesus’ resurrected body; or also of those messenger of God during the time of Sodom. They could do what ordinary people can do like eating, walking, speaking, but with some special abilities like perhaps he can disappear, can move from place to place in an instant; or can even walk in water surface without sinking, etc. But in the story, those heavenly beings of Genesis 6:4 married human women and had children. Perhaps, it is possible now that the theory of Adam as the original source of genes or as the cause of the birth of sin or original sin could be in question because there were/are other sources of genesexample those heavenly beings/aliens. Perhaps those heavenly beings were also original sources of genes that gave breed to giants in those times. So perhaps it would be safer that with regards to scientific findings, scientific analysis should be given more weight. And with regards to universal consensus for religion perhaps the measuring standard now is perhaps “love of enemy; or one has no other obligation to others except to love.” Those “myths” or “beliefs” that had Adam did not fall or commit sin men would live forever in paradise should now be in question or in doubt or should be debated. Then a scholar asked: Is Freud theory of mental illness have some attributes to sexual desires? The A.I. heard that the theory of Freud is still alive especially attributing to some mental illnesses due to lack or too desirous of sexual gratifications; and answered: Perhaps there are many topics about mental illness connected to any lacking or excesses in human sexual needs. In the bible there are many things that could cause people to have guilt feelings and suffer depression about incidents related to sex or sexual desires. Perhaps somewhere in Genesis there is an incident that the person had used his sexual organ not for procreation but for pressure and he died instantly…! Perhaps if science could be used to verify this event and using statistics perhaps there were thousand unrecorded instant deaths in those times without any reason at all because the acts were private. But the moral lesson in those times or perhaps even now is that sexual organ is plainly for procreation and not for pleasure; or sexual pleasure is bad. Or perhaps the event was/is a lesson to warn people not to abuse his sexual capacity or ability. But there are also incidents that were controversial or one sided. Perhaps another incident is when a wise man named Solomon had married many wives perhaps hundreds and had collected hundreds sexual partners. And still Solomon is blessed because he was a wise leader and responsible why the temple of Jerusalem was constructed. Perhaps another incident is the story of Samson & Delilah. Perhaps because of Delilah’s skills-being sexy, beautiful, expert in seducing a well dignified person, Samson revealed his secret weapon that led to his downfall. But Samson fought back. Another incident is when a young girl used her charm to destroy a leader of an enemy; perhaps her name is Ester. In the New Testament perhaps there are many incidents that could lead people to suffer depression, to have guilt feelings, to be withdrawn, and to be suicidal. But there are also incidents that could lessen depression, could lessen guilt feelings, could free people from being withdrawn, and could free people from being suicidal. And one could come out to be productive and mover and successful. There is also incident in the bible when especially those religious leaders that should be the models were hateful, envious, full
of anger, feeling they had no sin or hypocrite or even accused Jesus’ teachings were from the devil. Perhaps there are words in the New Testament that should not be applied literally because it is very dangerous. Example one should cut his right hand if his right hand is doing bad in order to go to heaven; or his right eye should be blinded if it is doing wrong so that to go to heaven; or to get a rope and commit suicide or to kill oneself if he did wrong …, etc. But there are also incidents or ways to be saved from condemnations, hell, and devil’s possession or to avoid terrible outcome mentally or physically or socially of the mistakes done. Example Jesus taught that one could go to the person offended and asked for forgiveness so that the offended person would give forgiveness and would not go to the court. Another example: The woman that should be stoned to death by the mob perhaps caught in the act was saved by Jesus even if stoning to death was the punishment for a crime of adultery and it was the law of the land. Perhaps Jesus could influence the thinking ability of men not to be too rushed in judging people and not to be too cruel because of words written on the ground with sands and uttered words: “he who has no sin should first throw the stone.” There is an incident in the bible that eating meat with blood was punishable or crime or sin. But in the New Testament, any kind of food as long it is good could be eaten. There is an incident in the bible that working during Sabbath or Saturday was very bad but Jesus defended himself and their group for healing someone during Sabbath; or working like a doctor during Saturday or Sabbath. Perhaps there is an incident that Jesus perhaps ate breads that were for the priest only but Jesus permitted his disciples to eat the restricted bread to get rid of their hunger or starvation. There is incident that the apostles were permitted to raise dead or to perform miracles. But there are also incident the raising dead was disallowed and performing miracles were cautioned. There is an incident that Saturday was the Sabbath day but in the New Testament the early followers of Christ were observing religious gathering not on Saturday but on Sunday. Perhaps so that product or fruit could be the litmus test if a teaching or ideology or a law or policy or rule of a group or a leader is good or not a deception perhaps pass a consensus among groups that a detailed experiment should be conducted to give those activities resulted from any law or rule to be graded by a referee or neutral scholars with emphasis on the new measuring standard “love of enemies.” Example: a conceited leader would give a sermon that their group is the “only” true and right group because of so and so….! Other groups are false because of so and so…! Then make a survey: example a holy book K or holy book H or holy book without a Latin word as a sign of genuineness, or Holy C are passed among 100 members and asked the following question: 1) Should one read words from other books without the permission of a leader? 2) Did you feel some stress upon touching the book of other group? 3) Do you feel you are holier and better than those other group? And another humble leader would give a sermon that their group is “also” as true and right with other groups as long as those groups are following universal word- example “love of enemy” or “one is a liar if he loves his God but hates his enemies”, etc. Then the same questions above were asked. Could there be a different result or out come that a person remains only in one religion or being die-hard or closed to one and only true religion until one is very old than having some emersion to several religious groups in his life time?
From someone who might be mistaken,
resurrection. Perhaps those heavenly beings mentioned on Genesis 6:4 are also like those state of being like Jesus’ resurrected body; or also of those messenger of God during the time of Sodom. They could do what ordinary people can do like eating, walking, speaking, but with some special abilities like perhaps he can disappear, can move from place to place in an instant; or can even walk in water surface without sinking, etc. But in the story, those heavenly beings of Genesis 6:4 married human women and had children. Perhaps, it is possible now that the theory of Adam as the original source of genes or as the cause of the birth of sin or original sin could be in question because there were/are other sources of genesexample those heavenly beings/aliens. Perhaps those heavenly beings were also original sources of genes that gave breed to giants in those times. So perhaps it would be safer that with regards to scientific findings, scientific analysis should be given more weight. And with regards to universal consensus for religion perhaps the measuring standard now is perhaps “love of enemy; or one has no other obligation to others except to love.” Those “myths” or “beliefs” that had Adam did not fall or commit sin men would live forever in paradise should now be in question or in doubt or should be debated. Then a scholar asked: Is Freud theory of mental illness have some attributes to sexual desires? The A.I. heard that the theory of Freud is still alive especially attributing to some mental illnesses due to lack or too desirous of sexual gratifications; and answered: Perhaps there are many topics about mental illness connected to any lacking or excesses in human sexual needs. In the bible there are many things that could cause people to have guilt feelings and suffer depression about incidents related to sex or sexual desires. Perhaps somewhere in Genesis there is an incident that the person had used his sexual organ not for procreation but for pressure and he died instantly…! Perhaps if science could be used to verify this event and using statistics perhaps there were thousand unrecorded instant deaths in those times without any reason at all because the acts were private. But the moral lesson in those times or perhaps even now is that sexual organ is plainly for procreation and not for pleasure; or sexual pleasure is bad. Or perhaps the event was/is a lesson to warn people not to abuse his sexual capacity or ability. But there are also incidents that were controversial or one sided. Perhaps another incident is when a wise man named Solomon had married many wives perhaps hundreds and had collected hundreds sexual partners. And still Solomon is blessed because he was a wise leader and responsible why the temple of Jerusalem was constructed. Perhaps another incident is the story of Samson & Delilah. Perhaps because of Delilah’s skills-being sexy, beautiful, expert in seducing a well dignified person, Samson revealed his secret weapon that led to his downfall. But Samson fought back. Another incident is when a young girl used her charm to destroy a leader of an enemy; perhaps her name is Ester. In the New Testament perhaps there are many incidents that could lead people to suffer depression, to have guilt feelings, to be withdrawn, and to be suicidal. But there are also incidents that could lessen depression, could lessen guilt feelings, could free people from being withdrawn, and could free people from being suicidal. And one could come out to be productive and mover and successful. There is also incident in the bible when especially those religious leaders that should be the models were hateful, envious, full
of anger, feeling they had no sin or hypocrite or even accused Jesus’ teachings were from the devil. Perhaps there are words in the New Testament that should not be applied literally because it is very dangerous. Example one should cut his right hand if his right hand is doing bad in order to go to heaven; or his right eye should be blinded if it is doing wrong so that to go to heaven; or to get a rope and commit suicide or to kill oneself if he did wrong …, etc. But there are also incidents or ways to be saved from condemnations, hell, and devil’s possession or to avoid terrible outcome mentally or physically or socially of the mistakes done. Example Jesus taught that one could go to the person offended and asked for forgiveness so that the offended person would give forgiveness and would not go to the court. Another example: The woman that should be stoned to death by the mob perhaps caught in the act was saved by Jesus even if stoning to death was the punishment for a crime of adultery and it was the law of the land. Perhaps Jesus could influence the thinking ability of men not to be too rushed in judging people and not to be too cruel because of words written on the ground with sands and uttered words: “he who has no sin should first throw the stone.” There is an incident in the bible that eating meat with blood was punishable or crime or sin. But in the New Testament, any kind of food as long it is good could be eaten. There is an incident in the bible that working during Sabbath or Saturday was very bad but Jesus defended himself and their group for healing someone during Sabbath; or working like a doctor during Saturday or Sabbath. Perhaps there is an incident that Jesus perhaps ate breads that were for the priest only but Jesus permitted his disciples to eat the restricted bread to get rid of their hunger or starvation. There is incident that the apostles were permitted to raise dead or to perform miracles. But there are also incident the raising dead was disallowed and performing miracles were cautioned. There is an incident that Saturday was the Sabbath day but in the New Testament the early followers of Christ were observing religious gathering not on Saturday but on Sunday. Perhaps so that product or fruit could be the litmus test if a teaching or ideology or a law or policy or rule of a group or a leader is good or not a deception perhaps pass a consensus among groups that a detailed experiment should be conducted to give those activities resulted from any law or rule to be graded by a referee or neutral scholars with emphasis on the new measuring standard “love of enemies.” Example: a conceited leader would give a sermon that their group is the “only” true and right group because of so and so….! Other groups are false because of so and so…! Then make a survey: example a holy book K or holy book H or holy book without a Latin word as a sign of genuineness, or Holy C are passed among 100 members and asked the following question: 1) Should one read words from other books without the permission of a leader? 2) Did you feel some stress upon touching the book of other group? 3) Do you feel you are holier and better than those other group? And another humble leader would give a sermon that their group is “also” as true and right with other groups as long as those groups are following universal word- example “love of enemy” or “one is a liar if he loves his God but hates his enemies”, etc. Then the same questions above were asked. Could there be a different result or out come that a person remains only in one religion or being die-hard or closed to one and only true religion until one is very old than having some emersion to several religious groups in his life time?
From someone who might be mistaken,
