00711-2nd Supp Decl Smith

11/12/03

23:15

1

2 3 4 5 6

~OO2

KINKOS SPRINGFIELD

FAX

Cindy A. Cohn,Esq.(SBN 145997) WendySeltzer,Esq. ELECTRONICFRONllER FOUNDATION 454 ShotwellStreet SanFrancisco,CA 94110 Telephone:(415) 436-9333xl08 Facsimile:(415)436-9993 Alan Kom, Esq. (SBN 167933) LAW OFFICE OF ALAN KORN 1840 Woolsey Street

Berkeley,CA 94703 Telephone:(510) 548-7300 Facsimile:(510) 540-4821 8

9

10 1 12 13

Attorneysfor Plaintiff 01\LINE POLICY GROUP JenniferStisaGranick,Esq.(SBN 168423) ST~I\NFORD LAW SCHOOL CYBERLAW CLINIC 559NathanAbbott Way Stanford.CA 94305-8610 Telephone:(650) 724-0014 Facsimile:(650) 723-4426

14

Attorneysfor Plaintiffs

15

NELSON CHU PA VLOSKY and LUKE mOMAS SMITH

16

UNITED STATF$ DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18 19

ONLINE POLICY GROUP, NELSON CHU PA VLOSKY, and LUKE mOMAS SMITH,

Plaintiffs,

20 21 22 23 24 25

v

28

I J

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED,andDIEBOLD ~ ELECTION SYSTEMS,INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendants

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF LUKE THOMAS SMITH IN SUPPORTOF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCnON

I, Luke ThomasSmidl, declare I am Luke ThomasSmith,a plaintiff in the above-captioned case.

26 27

No. C-O3-4913JF

2.

On November4, 2003,NelsonPavlosky,Online Policy Group,and I had requested

an injunction againstDiebold orderingit to stop sendingcease-and-desist lettersto Internetservice -1SECONDSUPPLEMENTALDECLARAnON 0

MI1'H

23:15

11/12/03

KINKOSSPRINGFIELD

FAX

[lJOO3

providers of websites publishing the Diebold email archive I understandthat my lawyers

2

submittedwith the injunction requestan attachedset of emailsthat they referredto as the "e-mail

3

archive" and representedthat thosedocumentswere the Diebold emails publishedon the SCDC

4

website.

s

3

The documentssubmittedto this court were a subsetof the entirearchiveof Diebold

6

emails publishedon the SCDC website. The entire e-mail archive, if printed out, would fill an

1

enrirebanker's box with paper. However.the entire archive is not materially different from the

8

subset presented to the Court. It is just mol"e e-mails among Diebold employees during the same

Q

timeframe.

10

4.

On the SCDC website, the entire Diebold email archive was available in a

1

downloadablecomputerarchiveformat known asa .tar file, andalsoin a searchableHlML format

12

on the web page. HTML is the computerlanguagein which manyweb pagesarewritten.

13

5.

In responseto Diebold's cease-and-desist letter to Swarthmore,the collegeblocked

14

accessto the SCDC-hostcdemail archivein both the downloadable.tar format and the searchable

IS

HTML format.

16

6.

Thus,sinceI am currentlypreventedfrom publishingthe entire archive,not just the

17

subset,I hopeto republishthe entire e-mail archive. Accordingly,I askthis court to grantrelief as

18

to -the entire archive.

19

I declareunder penalty of peljury under the laws of the Stateof Pennsylvaniathat the

20

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in S"lIJ~M,:;f'~

21

Pennsylvania.

22

,

Date:

23

24 25

26 27

28 -2-

! ,