00710-20031107 Supp Dec Smith

  • August 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 00710-20031107 Supp Dec Smith as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 918
  • Pages: 6
11/08/03 "---"

.-.18:23

1

FAX -

IINKOS SPRINGFIELD

~OO4

Cindy A. Cohn, Esq. (SBN 145997) WcsndySeltzer,Eaq. ELECfR 0 NI C FR.0 NrIER POUNDAnON 454 Shotwell S~ Sa11 Francisco,CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333xlOS Facsimile: (41S)436-9993

2 3

4

s

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ONLINE POUCY GROUP JenniferStisaGranick, Esq. (SBN 168423) STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR INTERNEI' &; SOCIBTY SS9NathanAbbott Way Stanford,CA 94305-8610 Telephone: (650) 724-0014 Facsimile: (6S0)721-4426

6

7 8 9

10

Auome for Plaintiffs

11

moMAS SMITH

NELSOYNCHU PA VLOSKY and LUKE

UNI"I'EDSTA~

12

DISTRICf COURT

FOR THE NORTHERNDISTRICt OF CALIFORNIA

13

ONLINE POUCY GROUP.NElSON CHU PA VLOSKY. and LUKE mOMAS SMITH

14

IS

Plaintiffs,

16

v.

17

No. C-03-4913 JF

) )

SUPPLEMENTALDECLARA'nON OF LUKE THOMAS SMITH IN SUPPORT APPLICAnON FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

DIEBOID, INCORPORATED, andDJEBOlD ElECIION SYSTEMS,INCORPORATED,

18 19

Defendants.

20

21 22

1.Luke ThomasSmith, declare:

23 I am Luke Thomas Smith, a plaintiff in die abovc..captioocdcue. This Declaration

1,

24

is intendedto supple~t

2S

2.

26

my previousDeclaration,which I incorporatein full by this reference.

As I mentionedpreviously, on October 22, 2003, after receiving a ceaseand desist

notice from Diebold, Swarthmmedecidedto disableaccessto the Diebold e-mail archivesfIom the

27

SCDC websitc. We were told that publishing the archiveswas against Swarthmore'spolicy. On

28 -

:

SUPP. DEcr.ARAnONOFLu:ri -THOMAS SMITHIN SUPPORT OF PLAJNTD'FS'

APP R>R. PRm..IM INJUNcnON

11/08/03 I

18:23

---

--~

PAX

-

KINKOS

---SPRINGFIB.J,D

liJoos

Octo~ 23. 2003.afterI hadposteda link to the archiveshostedclsewherc,I was informedthat 2

the link wasalsoin violationof Swarthmore's policy. As a ~t,

3

my colleagueNelsonPavlosty

removedtile link.

4

At the time of both of thoseactions.neither Nelson nor I were sure that Swarthmore

3

.s

would allow us to republishthe infonnationor a link to it if we filed a counternoticeunderthe

6

copyright law. To the contrary,we were informedthat the publicationand the link violated

7

Swarthmore'spolicy and we were not certain whether SwaIthmore'sposition was that it was acting

8

as our college, or as a serviceprovider that might comply with the counter-noticeprovisions of 17

9

U.S.c. Section512.

10

On October 31, 2003, Sward1moremade a public statementin which it statedthat it

4.

J1

had "advisedstudentson the processfor filing underdie copyrightlaw a 'counter.notification'

12

agoinstDjebold's take-down demand... Based upon d1atpublic st~!~!!l~t. and after consultation

13

with attorneys,Nelsonand I presentedSwarthmorewith a counter-notification on November6,

14

20()3. A trueand~t

IS

5

16

copyof thecounternoticeis attachedheretoasExhibit A.

We understandthat under 17 U.S.C. Sections512(c) and (g). Swarthmoremust not

~lace the removedmatcria11cssthan 10 businessdays following receipt of the COUIItu:notice, or

17

approximatelyNovember 19, 2003

18

Thus,evenif we are allowedto republishthe materialat the end of the 10 days,

6.

19

Diebold's ceaseand desistletter will have resultedin the forced removal of Utee-mail archive from

20

ow" wcbsite for nearly a month, including removal during the critical time period just prior to an

21

C]ectiOD whcre thc Dicbold machineswere used in many locations. We believe that the

22

infonnation revealedin the c.-mailarchive about problems widl the Diebold machinescould have

23

contributed to the important debateand pubJic attention focused on elecb'Onicvoting ~hines

24

aroundelection day. had it not beenfor Diebold's actions.

25

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Statc of Pennsylvania that the

26

foregojngis true and ~

27

and dlat this tkclarationwas executedjn ~~n; 1!f'1fJ~ e .

PennsyJvania.

28

.

-

-

-

--

-2-1'HO~ SUW.DEC..AR.AnONOF LUkE

IN SUPPOR.T~'

OFPLAINTIFFS'APPFORPRELJMINJUNcrION

11/08/03 -"

18:Z3

KINKOS SPRINGFIELD

PAX

iii 006

~ 1

Date: at16;

~~~~2~

~

2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14

is 16 17 18 19

20

21 22 23 24

2S 26 27 28 -

SUPP.DEa.ARA110N OF Lm -3-THOMAS swrH OF PLAJNTIPFS' APP~

IN StJPPORT

PRELIM OOUNCTION

EXHIBIT A

-11/08/03 - -

18:ZZ FAX

- -.-

- - - ~

!!NKOS SPRINGFIELD

~ooz

,.,~~- J. ,f..,. '? ~~~" ~ Novembe::" 6, 2003

~ ~

Judy Do"lning Director of InformanonTechnologySt.-rvices Swrimore College BeardsleyHall 500 College Avenue Swat'thInore,PA 19081

_~~f a.,." "-W

Dear Ms. Downing:

PleasefInd attachedto this letter a list of materials,collectively known asthe Diebold email archive,which were pomd on the SwarthmoreCoalition for the Digital COJJ'Imons wcbsitc and whictl weR removedby die schoolfollowing a complaint from Diebold companyon Octobc1' 22J.J,2003. This lettcr is our countcmotice to that complaint. We are filing this countemotice now, following Swarthmore's rccent notification on October 31,2003 that it would accept COUDtemoticefrom ~q. Until that BDnounCeJMDt,we were "ot sure whether Swarthmore WaAacri11gas our college. or a.~a seMce provider undeT 17 U.S.C. Section 512.

We haveIi good faith belief that the o;ebold cmail archivewas disabledin m'Or asa resuh of mistakeor misidentificationof the material,including that oW'postingof this material constituted fair useunder copyright law. We declared1atthis is troe and accuratcunderpenaltyofpetjury under the laws of the United Statesof AJrIerica. For thc purpo.qes orthis matter,we consentto thejurisdiction ofthc FedCt'alDistrict Comt for die judicial district in which we reside. We alsoconsentto notice of Ser.'iceby the pcrsonproviding notifiC3tionunder Section512 (cX1XC) or~tperson's agent. However,by this lctter, we do not waive my other rights, including the right to p\D8uean action fOTthe removalor disabling of accessto this material.if wrongful. IIaving compliedwith the countemoticerequiremcntsof Section512(S}(3),we expectthat Swarthmoremust now replacethe blocked Ofremovedmaterialsset forth in the attachmentand ceasedisabling accessin ten to fourteendaysof your rece;ptof this notice. Pleasel1otify us when this hu becn donc. We appreciatcyour prompt attent;onto this matter. Tryou haveany questionsabout th;s notice, pleascdo not hesitateto contactus. Sincerel)lyoun,

f

q

<::7 '06

500 College Avenue Swarthmore,PA 19081 610-690-S546 [email protected]

NelsonChu Pavlosky,'06 500 CollegeAvenue Swartbmore,PA 19081 610-6~-3892 [email protected]

.,f"'

~c..~

-

18:23 PAl

II/OS/O",

--I1N1:0S

SPRINGFIBLD

UST OF MATERIALS: '"Diebold e-mail archive"

~

Lwww.9-CCS.~mQIf&&.dY/~~

"Dicbo ld e-mail archivc. compressed" bnQ:lLwww.SCC$...5 flEthmore. eduIor~s~~$.1IJaz;

III 003

l

Related Documents

00711-2nd Supp Decl Smith
August 2019 22
Smith
November 2019 59
Smith
July 2020 31
Smith
November 2019 69
Supp May
October 2019 22