Biotechnology in European Agriculture Politics, public opinion, trends and other key issues
Peter Wynne Davies Programme Director - Agriculture Biotechnology Europe (ABE) ELO Presentation Budapest January 27 2006
About Biotechnology •
An advanced technology that allows plant breeders to make precise genetic changes to impart beneficial characteristics to the crop plants
•
A way to improve crop qualities such as yield, pest resistance, or herbicide tolerance, to a degree not possible with traditional methods
Europe – – – – –
•
1980s - first research in Belgian and German public laboratories 1985 - GM tobacco grown in Belgian fields 1997 - France authorises GM seeds 1998 - Spain starts commercial cultivation 2005 – 5 countries commercial growing, many field trials next products
Bayer Cropscience, BASF, Syngenta
Agricultural Biotechnology • Research for 25 years, cultivation for 10 years • 2005: 8.5 million farmers, 21 countries, 400 mil. hectares – Europe: Spain, Portugal, France, Czech, Germany and Romania – 90% in resource-poor areas: China, India, South Africa Philippines
• Brazil from 5 million hectares to 9.4 million (2005-2006) • India from 500,000 hectares to 1.3 million (2005-2006) • Commercial crops relevant for Europe: – Now - maize, soybean, cotton, rice, rapeseed oil, sugar, potatoes – In development – wheat, tomatoes, sorghum
Is there opposition to GMOs and why? Politics, Public, Farmers and Food industry
Politics – Support increasing Governments becoming more positive to biotechnology – EU regulatory framework complete – recognition of economic/agricultural benefits – understanding that GM and organic are not mutually exclusive
Countries that reject GM damage their own economies – deny their farmers tool that other farmers have – lose political credibility and good will – dampening interest from R&D and private investors
•
“…future competitiveness of Europe’s agricultural and food processing industries will depend on plant genomics, biotechnology and their smart application…”
•
“… biotech can foster growth, create new jobs and benefit a wide range of sectors such as health and agriculture, while at the same time contributing to broader goals, such as sustainable development.” European Commission
Spain, Slovenia
Italy, Austria, Luxemburg, Greece, Malta, Cyprus, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Hungary, Slovakia
SUPPORTERS REPRESENT: 49% of EU Council votes 70% of EU GDP 58% of EU population 51% of EU arable land 63% of acreage of 3 GM crops (maize, rape, sugar beet)
No rd-P r d-P as de C ala is de
Ba sseN N rrm o man di e Br Bretet a gn e
P i card i e
Il e-d e-d ee-F ran ce
al
Lo rra ine
i rree Lo Cent r e
B rgo ou rgo gn e
FFrraa nc nc he
PP
e yssdde ay
Al s a ce
Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, UK, Germany, Denmark, France, Czech Rep, Estonia, Ireland, Belgium
Co mtee t
OPPONENTS
C Cha ham mp A dr ag ne rd en en ne
WAVERERS
N o HH rrmm auteet aann d eei
SUPPORTERS
Po itoto uCh are ar e nt es
Li m ou
si n Auv er uv erggn e
Rhô ne- Al
p es
e M Mii di -Py re n ees
oc ed ng u ng La
si us Ro --R
lllolo
n P rov en c Al p esee-Al Coo te C te -d‘ Az ur
Cr s
A MAJORITY OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC POWER, POPULATION AND ARABLE LAND WANTS TO MOVE AHEAD MORE RAPIDLY.
A qu ti ai n
Public - So where is the opposition now? “There is mass public opposition”
True or false?
Public concern is diminishing rapidly • GM 10th out of 15 on environmental concerns • 56% support GM to support regional crops • 4 out of 10 say they do not know enough, but enough to have a view • • • •
France: 58% support use of GM to allow farmers to live off their work Sweden: 28% would not buy GM – down from 48% in 1998 Belgium: 1% are interested if a product is GM or not Spain: 65% say GM is safe for the environment and health
•
EFSA, national regulators, EU regulation, co-existence – – – –
66% for scientific basis to decision-making 72% for experts to be in the driving seat 33% want moral and ethical considerations over scientific evidence 25% prefer the public over experts in decision-making
Farmers and food industry “GM will help European agriculture tackle its three main challenges: the shift in economic power away from primary producers (countries); the huge changes needed in agricultural infrastructure and systems; and the effect of trade globalisation and liberalisation that could lead to a 20% to 30% cut in European Commission EU agricultural output in the very near future.” Farmers • Spanish farmers growing biotech maize - yield increases of 6.5% - to 15% • Farmer income benefits range from €146-€170 more per hectare • Increasing interest and support from farmers groups Food industry • Increasing use of (imported) GM ingredients • Cost of non-GM sourcing higher • Organic market – separate but small (less than 10%) • Recognition of next generation products with direct consumers benefits
What’s in it for you..?
European farming facing increasing structural challenges • Reductions in direct farm support through new CAP regime • Less assurances for harvests (increased incidents of extreme weather conditions/ pests etc) • Growing demand for more food which puts greater pressure on natural resources and wild lands for agriculture • Pressure from Europe plc to become more sustainable and kinder to the environment (to use less intensive forms of agriculture) • Increased competition from the rest of the world
GM offers.. Farmers options to meet the challenge of managing their land in a more sustainable way • Greater use of conservation tillage • Reduced wind erosion, reduced water usage, improved soil moisture management • Weed control and ease of handling • Energy and insurance savings • Reduced ploughing • Economic advantages
Conclusions • • • • • • • •
Political support increasing Public opposition diminishing Increasing interest by food companies Increasing range of labelled foods Discussions about role of EU sustainable agriculture Choice for farmers and consumers Agriculture a global market Role for biotech in European farming