Wishram Sc-lp 0709

Study Circles Post-Survey Data: HORIZONS COM M UNITY: WISHRAM - CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE OF P OVERTY BEFORE AND NOW/ AFTER STUDY CIRCLES FROM P OSTSURVEYS 2.09 4.0

3.5

3.60

3.51

3.64

3.60

2.82

2.91

3.0

2.5

2.49

3.29

3 . 15

3.26

2.24

2.29 2.24 2.09 B EFOR E a v e r a ge r a t i ng

3.21

2.56

2.0

Wishram

1. 5

N OW/ A FT ER a v e r a g e r a t i ng

1. 0

0.5 0.0

P ossi bl e

D i f f er ent

R easons i t i s

H ow pover t y

St r a t e g i e s t o

I ndi vi dual

C o mmu n i t y

P ol i ci es t hat

causes of

ki nds of

di f f i cul t t o

a f f e c t s my

r educe

act i ons t o

act i ons t o

woul d r educe

pover t y

pover t y

get out of

c o mmu n i t y

pover t y

r educe

r educe

pover t y

pover t y

pover t y

pover t y Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: WISHRAM STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09

100.0% 90.0%

7 8 .9 %

80.0%

6 5 .8 %

70.0%

5 5 .3 %

5 5 .3 %

60.0%

4 2 .1%

50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% I ncr eased

A l r eady t aken

V er y l ikel y in

V er y l ikel y in

V er y l ikel y in

knowl edge of

act i on

f ut ur e t o t ake

f ut ur e t o j oi n

f ut ur e t o

pover t y

i ndi vi dual act i oc n o m m u n i t y a c t i o ns u p p o r t p o l i c i e s t o r educe pover t y

Study Circles 47 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty® 35 Participated in LeadershipPlenty

Community Progress: Study Circles and Leadershipplenty® Survey Results

LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data: LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data:

WISHRAM COMPARED TO ALL WA HORIZONS COMMUNITIES: WAYS PROGRAM HAS HELPED TO ADDRESS/CHANGE POVERTY IN COMMUNITY FROM LEADERSHIPPLENTY

H OR I ZON S C OM M U N I T Y: WI S H R A M P OVER T Y R A T ES C OM P A R I S ON C EN S U S WI TH S T U D Y C I R C L E A D U LT

POSTSURVEYS 6.09

P A R TI C I P A N TS

Wishram

5 7 . 1%

53.6%

All Washington Horizons communities

60.0%

42.9% 50.0%

40.0%

26.3%

53 .8 %

M or e pe opl e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y 30.0%

4 6 .2 %

i n t he c ommuni t y

20.0%

6 6 .8 %

We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd wha t t o do a bout i t

10 . 0 %

6 5.4 %

0.0%

C e ns us

LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G

4 4 .2 %

o e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o M or

4 6 .2 %

a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y

3 3 .6 % 3 0 .8 %

M or e l ow i ncome pe opl e a r e i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: WISHRAM AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09

4 0 .9 % 4 2 .3 %

We a r e wor k i ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s i n publ i c pol i c y

Census 60

2 5.6 % 2 6 .9 %

M or e pe p opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o ge t

5 5 .6

out of pov e r t y

LP Participants

2 3 .6 %

We a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o a ddr e s s pov e r t y

50

2 6 .9 % 0. 0%

40

10. 0%

20. 0%

30. 0%

40. 0%

50. 0%

60. 0%

70. 0%

25 30

19 .4

20

10

9 .7 %

8 0 .6 %

6 .5 %

W ISH HR A M C OM PA R ED T O A LL W A HOR IZ ON S C OM M U N IT IES: B EF OR O E A N D A F T ER SELF R A T IN GS LEA D ER SHIP SKILLS F R O M LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y POST SU R V EY S 6 .0 9

Wi sh r a m B EFOR E Wi sh r a m A F TER

0

Under 18 years

18 to 64 years

A l l Wa shi n g t o n B EF OR E

65 years and over 

A l l Wa shi n g t o n A F T ER 5.0

HO R I Z ON S C OM M U N IT Y : W ISHR A M PR IO R EX PER I EN C E A N D C OM M U N IT Y R OLES O F LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y PA R T I C IPA N T S 4 .0 9

4.5

4 .13 4.0

3 .8 5

4 .0 5 3 .7 3

3.5

4 .0 9

3 .5 8

4 .0 2 3 .7 4 3 .7 3 3 .7 3 3 .8 1 3 .7 2 3 .4 6 3 .5 4 3 .5 4 3 .4 2 3 .2 7 3 .19 3 .12

3 8 .7%

40.0% 35.0%

4 .10

3 2 .3 %

3.0

3 2 .3 %

30.0%

2 .7 2 2 .5 0

2.5

25.0%

2 .6 2 2 2 .5 .4 8 6 2 .2 3

2.0

20.0%

.0 3 8 2 .2

9 . 7%

15 . 0 % 10 . 0 %

3 .2 %

5.0%

3 .2 %

.3 3 2 .2 3 2 2 .12 1.9 2

2 .4 1 2 .15

2 .5 7 2 .3 8 2 .3 5 2 .19

4 .2 8 3 .6 1 3 .0 8

2 .4 5 2 .2 3

2 .13 1.8 5

1.5

3 .8 0 3 .9 5 3 .9 6 3 .7 5 3 .6 9 3 .5 8 3 .6 5 3 .2 7 2 .5 8 2 .4 8 2 .6 8 2 .3 9 2 .4 2 2 .2 7 22.2 .129 2 .11 1.8 5 1.5 4

1.0

0.0%

E ver

P er son who

A ct i ve but

Just an

N ot r eal l y

N or or ever

i nvol ved

ma k e s

not a

or di nar y

pa r t of t he

an elected

l eader shi p

c o mmu n i t y

deci si on

p r o g r a m?

deci si ons

ma k e r

per son

c o mmu n i t y

of f i ci al

I kn ow how t o

I am m able t o

I r ecogn zi e t he

I kn ow how t o

I am able t o

I am able t o

I am able t o e l ad

I kn ow how

I am able t o

I kn ow how

I kn ow how t o

I kn ow t he

r eccogn zi e

r elat o i n ship

wor k wit h t he

appr oach

d i en t fi y t he

guide

pr oduct vi e

con f cil t an d

man age

par t n er ships

plan an d

commun ti y

assess t he

shar e

value of

discuss r ace

e l ader shi s p skisl n i

bet ween

e l ader ship n i my

commun ti y

st ages of

discussion s

meet n i gs.

t en sion

con f cil t n i

n i fu l en ce

m i plemen t

act o i n pr ocess

value of gr oup

n i f or mat o in

br n i gin g

r elat o insn i a

commun ti y

commun ti y

pr oblem- solvn i g

wit h diver se

cit zi en s

n on -

chan ge

ef f or t s.

audien ces.

t oget her t o

t hr eat en n i g

t alk about

way.

ott her s

I am able t o

get t n i gn i volved or gan zi at o in an d civci

an d/ or

e l ader ship.

gr eat er

developmen t

gr oup

amon g diver se

pr oblems.

developmen t .

r oups of people

n i fu l en ce gr oup gr oup wor k. wor k.

I kn ow how t o

pr oblem solvn i g

pr oject s.

I kn ow t he

I n ow how t o

si sues.

commun ti y.

Scal e of 1 = Str ongly Disagr ee to 5 = Str ongl y Agr ee