What Happened On 911

What Happened On 9-11? What does the war in Afghanistan and Iraq have to do with 911? It is supposed to be a war on terrorism. Would you regard someone who had slaughtered your family as a benevolent liberator? Wouldn’t you rather despise them? This would be fertile ground for the growth of terrorism. When you indiscriminately bomb cities, decimating, dismembering, disabling, and disfiguring tens of thousands of people who had nothing to do with 911, the survivors will despise you. When you round up people in a dragnet and ship them off to torture them, what you get is people who will say anything you want to hear to get you to stop hurting them, and they and their families will loathe you. A logically thinking person knows this. The only way the supposed war on terror can work is to kill everyone, and then there will be no one left to hate you. The Bush administration was not so clueless that they didn’t know this. It is as if the war was designed to create more enemies and more terrorism. Calling it a war on terror is their way of getting us to support the looting of foreign countries. Money is power. Jesus said, “the love of money is the root of all evil.” Evil is not a fruit of the Spirit. These people are all heavily invested in the defense industry and the oil industry. They give their own companies no-bid defense contracts. They have stolen the resources of two countries and have their sights on Iran. If they don’t have conflicts of interest, no one ever has. Marvin Bush, George W.'s younger brother, was director of Securacom/Stratesec (likely a CIA front), a company that ran security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines and Dulles International Airport. That is an unbelievable coincidence. Ask yourself who had the motive and the opportunity and what is the root of all evil. 911 was designed to boost the agenda of the new world order (the beast of Revelation). If you want to know who is responsible for 911, follow the money trail. We all believe in a 9-11 conspiracy theory. I am one of those people who believe the Bush government perpetrated 9-11. I believed this from day one. Their motive was a pretext for a preplanned invasion of the Middle East and subsequent American imperialism around the world. In other words, they needed an excuse to invade, so they created one and blamed it on the people they planned to invade. Another motive was the implementation of a police state which they euphemistically call Homeland Security so we will feel warm and fuzzy about it, including U.S.A. Patriot Act I and II, The Intelligence Reform Act and The Military Commissions Act all designed to destroy the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and our freedom. Destroy our freedom is the very thing the President told us the “terrorists” were trying to do. It appears they are succeeding. So who had more to gain from the attacks of 911, Al-Qaeda or the new world order Neocons? They told us 9-11 happened because we were unprepared. They said we never considered the possibility of terrorists hijacking jetliners and using them as weapons. This excuse was a lie. It came out later that NORAD, the Pentagon, the CIA, and various other federal agencies, during the two years prior to 9-11, were running drills precisely about hijackers flying planes into buildings, implicating the Clinton administration as well. On the very morning of September 11, 2001 they were running drills of over twenty scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into buildings. One scenario was the World Trade Center and another the Pentagon. That is another incredible coincidence. NORAD, the North American Air Defense Command, has been protecting America from such possibilities as 9-11 for over fifty years. Why did it fail on that day? The very drills that were supposed to train them to protect us were what prevented them from being able to protect us. The drills were a diversion. For two years, NORAD was mentally conditioned and on 911, they saw everything that was happening as part of the drills. Due to confusion from all of the false blips on the radar, they were unable to distinguish the drills from real life. Someone was pulling those strings, and it was not some crazy bearded Arab living in a cave in Afghanistan. In 1999, pro golfer Payne Stewart and five companions left Orlando, Florida on a Lear jet bound for Dallas, Texas. Four hours later, it crashed in a field in South Dakota. Within minutes of take off, the Lear jet began to veer off course and air traffic controllers were unable to contact the pilot. NORAD was immediately contacted (standard procedure) and F-16s were scrambled. Within minutes of the Lear jets take off, F-16s had caught up with it. During the year prior to 9-11, NORAD had scrambled 67 times for various air traffic infractions. What does this have to do with 9-11?

Why were there no planes scrambled on 9-11 until after the third plane hit the Pentagon? The first plane that hit the World Trade Center had been off course for well over an hour before the last plane hit the Pentagon. Where was our air defense? We all should have asked these questions instead of blindly accepting whatever they tell us. “The first thing that went through my mind was, Is this part of the exercise? Is this some kind of screw up?” Major Larry Arnold, NORAD commander As the drills were a diversion, I also believe the airplanes were a diversion. The planes did not take down the Twin Towers. The planes were for shock value, to take your mind off the fact that there were demolition charges already planted in the buildings. The Twin Towers did not collapse as is hypnotically repeated. The buildings were professionally imploded. The twin towers exploded, pulverized, disintegrated into dust floor by floor from the top down and came down in ten seconds or less for each building. That is eleven floors per second. Can you clap your hands eleven times in one second? World Trade Center Seven, a 47-story building a block away from WTCs 1 and 2, was never hit by a plane yet it inexplicably collapsed at 5:20 on the afternoon of the same day, falling in seven seconds straight down into its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition. Ask yourself why the BBC jumped the gun and reported that building 7 had collapsed twenty minutes before it actually did, while the building was still visible in the background behind the reporter. I also do not believe the Arabs on those planes were hijackers. I believe they were patsies, working with the government as participants in the drills. It has been proven that many of the suspects had been trained in U.S. military bases. Osama Bin Laden himself worked with the CIA since the 1970s. The Arabs on those planes believed it was simply another day of drills just as they had done for two years. They did not know they would die that day. The people on the planes were either killed or incapacitated by gas and the planes were hijacked by remote control. Ask yourself how they could come up with names and photos of the nineteen alleged hijackers within hours of the attack. And what about flight 93 which came down in Pennsylvania? The likely target would have been World Trade Center 7. Witnesses on the ground in Pennsylvania will tell you it exploded in the sky and the debris was scattered over an eight mile area. That is why they had no good excuse for building 7 coming down. Their excuse was shot down. Larry Silverstein, the lease holder of the World Trade Center complex, lied and said that the fire department commander and he “made that decision to pull." Many people believe he was using a demolition term for bringing down the building. What do you think? “I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, “We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.” Larry Silverstein, from a PBS documentary I believe that fabrication was a botched attempt to explain the unexplainable demolition of building seven. The fire department had nothing to do with the collapse. What firefighter in their right mind would go into a burning building to set up demolition charges? Do firefighters even know anything about demolition? How long would it take to set it up for demolition? They only had a few hours in the middle of that chaotic day to accomplish such a feat. That is why Silverstein later came out to “clarify” his statement by saying he meant pull fire fighters from the building. They have yet to come up with a believable explanation for the collapse of World Trade Center Seven, so they try to ignore it, hoping you will go away. Common sense and logic are the only resources you need to decide that 911 was an inside job. All you need to know is that three skyscrapers in NYC came down at the acceleration of gravity, defying the laws of physics and conservation of momentum. One of them was not even hit. It is impossible for floor after floor to crash through the one below it without slowing the speed of the collapse. According to physics, the collapses should have taken minutes not seconds. That could only happen if there was a force working ahead of the collapse to cut the mass out of the way. You don’t need an expert to help you figure that out. The logical conclusion is explosives and an inside job. There are too many coincidences to accommodate the laws of probability and too many unanswered questions. We all believe in a 9-11 conspiracy theory. The question is, which one do you believe, the one featuring Osama Been Forgotten and plastic knives or one substantiated by facts?

A Means to an End The following statements were recorded in Gustave Gilbert’s Nuremberg Diary (1947). This is from an interview with Hermann Goering, president of the Reichstag, Nazi Party, and Luftwaffe Commander in Chief, during the War Crimes Trials at Nuremberg, Germany. Göring: “Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.” Gilbert: “There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.” Göring: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.” To paraphrase Joseph Stalin, “It is not he who votes that counts, but he who counts the votes.” “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Joseph Goebbels: Nazi propaganda minister “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.” Joseph Goebbels “Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” Joseph Goebbels

Hitler, Goring, Goebbels, and Hess

Stirring the Pot In George Orwell’s novel, 1984, there is a character named Emmanuel Goldstein. In the story it is never made clear whether Goldstein is a real person or just a psychological concoction of the Big Brother government used to control the population through fear of terrorism. Goldstein is said to be the leader of an Al Qaeda-like group called the Brotherhood. Here is an excerpt: Winston: “Does the Brotherhood exist?” O’Brien: “That, Winston, you will never know. If we choose to set you free when we have finished with you, and if you live to be ninety years old, still you will never learn whether the answer to that question is Yes or No. As long as you live it will be an unsolved riddle in your mind.” We know that Osama Bin Laden at least did exist and he was used in much the same way as Goldstein. They gave us the perfect Disneyesque villain to fill our imaginations - complete with turban, beard and flowing robes. He certainly is a slippery character. I think he has magical powers like Jafar in Aladdin. He just disappears. Anyway, what we do know is that Bin Laden was CIA backed in Afghanistan (1979 - 1989). I guess he just went bad. That’s funny; we did the same thing with Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party when we supported them in a coup against the existing Iraqi government of Abdul-Karim Qassim in 1963. That’s funny; we did the same thing in Iran in 1953 when Kermit Roosevelt, head of the CIA’s Middle Eastern division and grandson of Teddy Roosevelt, led a coup-d’état against the democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and then installed their puppet dictator, the Shah. That’s funny; we did the same thing when we invaded Afghanistan in 2003 and installed the…, excuse me; he was “elected”, Unocal energy company consultant Hamid Karzai to be their dicta…, I mean president. I wonder why those people hate us so much. And where did Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction go anyway? Well, we destroyed them in the early 1990’s after the first gulf war. Where did they come from in the first place? Well, we gave them to them before, during and after the Iran-Iraq war (1980 - 1988). Iran was also fighting with American arms which we gave them during the tenure of the Shah and after. Remember Iran-Contra? I guess the joke was on them…divide, conquer and we pick up the pieces. How Iran, Iraq, ironic! I wonder why the world stays in such turmoil all of the time. It’s as if someone keeps stirring the pot. “In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

George Orwell’s “1984”

“See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.” George W. Bush’s “911”

Why are we in Iraq? The why of Iraq is far broader than that on which we tend to focus. The people behind the war have a more ominous agenda than stemming the tide of terrorism. Frequently, they are the terrorists. More than simply controlling the resources of the Middle East, theirs is the ancient desire of powerful men to rule the world. We are constantly being assaulted with terms and phrases like globalism, sustainability and new world order. We were railroaded into the global economy by the removal of American jobs to places like Mexico, China and Indonesia in order to take advantage of their endless supply of slave labor. Now they say we are globally interdependent, as huge corporations rape the planet and enslave its people insuring that resentment will continue to grow and fester. Try to extend your focus beyond the particulars, and focus on the big picture. That is what they do. They aren’t concerned with what they can accomplish in Iraq with 20,000 more troops. They are plotting the demise of Iran and beyond. They are planning to drag the entire world down into the morass of another world war. When the smoke clears, their intent is to build the new order upon the rubble of the old order. In the process, they intend to reduce the population of the earth by approximately 80 percent and rebuild their “Novus Ordo Seclorum” with the 20 percent who survive; thereafter, maintaining the population at that level. Of course they are insane, but they believe they can make it happen. This situation is much more apocalyptic than you may imagine. They don’t plan to be among the 80 percent. Where do you suppose they rank you? “A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” Joseph Stalin

Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise, Oct. 24, 2000

That is some coincidence! http://www.thegoodseed.com/911.html