Welcome to the presentation on Feasibility study and
product development of weather insurance products for plantation crops of Kerala Abhilash G Nambudiri
INTRODUCTION • Kerala – 50% of population depending on Agriculture • The total value of the plantation crops produced in the State is about Rs 3,375 crore • Almost all plantation crops in Kerala have the threat of crop loss from weather uncertainties • Opportunity to study the feasibility of weatherinsurance products for plantation crops
SL No
Crop
Area under
Major cultivating
% of net cropped
cultivation (ha)
districts
area (%)
1
Coconut
9.0 lakh1
All over Kerala
40
2
Coffee
0.84 lakh1
Wayanad & Idukky
3.7
3
Pepper
1.84 lakh1
All over Kerala
8.2
4
Tea
0.37 lakh1
Wayanad & Idukky
1.6
5
Cardamom
408671
Wayanad, Ernakulam, Idukky
0.2
Kottayam, 6
Rubber
4.76 lakh1
Ernakulam, Thrissur,
21.2
Kozhikkode, Palkkad 7
Arecanut
0.73 lakh2
All over Kerala
3.2
Wayanad, 8
Banana
279003
Malappuram, Palakkad, Thrissur,
0.1
Ernakulam 9
Vanilla
8124
10
Cashew
0.88 lakh1
Ernakulam, Wayanad, Idukky, Thrissur Kollam
--3.8
OBJECTIVES # To Study the feasibility of weather-based insurance product for plantation crops of Kerala # To Assess the acceptance and demand for weatherbased insurance products # To develop a weather-based insurance product for a specific plantation crop # To identify and evaluate the efficacy of various distribution channels for weather-based insurance products
DATA COLLECTION 1. Secondary Sources o Kerala Agricultural University database o Agricultural department (GOK) data base o Extensive internet search
2. Primary Sources o Interviews with scientists, farmers and farmers’ associations
CRITERIA FOR RISK ANALYSIS 1. Spread of risk The time period available for the farmer to get back his investment. Higher the time period lesser the risk associated. 3. Value-At-Risk (Rs/ha/year) The revenue a farmer is getting from a unit area of crop. Higher the value at risk higher is the feasibility of an insurance product.
CRITERIA FOR RISK ANALYSIS •
•
Cost burden (Rs/ha/year) The average annual investment a farmer has to make to build and maintain a plantation. Higher the cost burden higher is the feasibility of insurance in that crop. Opportunity Total value at risk for that particular crop existing in the state (taking into account the area coverage also)
RISK ANALYSIS
Pepper Coconut
High
Cashew Rubber
Vanilla Banana Rubber
Low
Vanilla Tea Banana Cardamom Coffee
Output risk (Value-at-risk) High Low
Weather risk*
High Low
Output risk (Value
-at -risk)
Input risk (Cost burden) High Low
Cashew Cardamom Tea Coffee
Pepper Coconut
Premium Value-At-Risk Cost burden Area coverageOpportunitypotential Crop Spread of risk (output value (Rs/ ha/ year) (ha) (Crores) @ 5% in Rs/ ha/ year) (Crores) Arecanut Long duration 46718 NA 73000 341 17.05207 Banana Short duration 91663 69250 27900 256 12.78699 Cardamom Long duration Cashew Long duration
65417 25585
34358 6210
40867 88000
267 225
13.36698 11.2574
Coconut Long duration Coffee Long duration
29475 50652
10030 21750
900000 84000
2653 425
132.6375 21.27384
Pepper Rubber
Long duration Long duration
18150 50000
17719 19102
184000 476000
334 2380
16.698 119
Tea Vanilla
Long duration Long duration
120000 720000
48586 22058
37000 812
444 58
22.2 2.9232
Premium Value-At-Risk Cost burden Area coverageOpportunitypotential Crop Spread of risk (output value (Rs/ ha/ year) (ha) (Crores) @ 5% in Rs/ ha/ year) (Crores) Banana Short duration 91663 69250 27900 256 12.78699 Cardamom Long duration 65417 34358 40867 267 13.36698 Coffee Rubber
Long duration Long duration
50652 50000
21750 19102
84000 476000
425 2380
21.27384 119
Tea Vanilla
Long duration Long duration
120000 720000
48586 22058
37000 812
444 58
22.2 2.9232
CROP DETAILS OF BANANA • No: of plants per acre: 650 – 900 (for calculations it’s been taken as 800) • Water requirement: 2 irrigations per week, each of 45 liters = 400 mm • Average farm gate price: Rs 10/- per Kg • Average bunch weight: 10 Kg (8 to 12)
PLANT • Herbaceous monocots, reaching around 2-3 m tall at maturity in cultivation • A banana plant bears fruit 10-12 months after planting • Maturity of fruits occurs 75-80 days after opening of the first hand
SOILS AND CLIMATE • Deep, well-drained alluvial soils are best • Drainage or raised beds are necessary if area is prone to water logging • Temperature range of 10° C to 40° C and an average of 23° C is ideal • Plants require about 9 cm of rain/month, with dry seasons no longer than 3 months
BANANA CULTIVATION IN KERALA • ‘Nendran’ is the preferred variety among Kerala farmers • In Kerala Banana cultivation is mainly focused on the season of ‘Onam’, which comes in the month of September • Onam is the time where the demand for this local variety ‘Nendran’ goes up and also the farmers will fetch good price for their produce
BANANA CULTIVATION IN KERALA • Banana is cultivated both in low lands like paddy fields and in midland areas • Practice of lease cultivation of Banana is prevalent in Kerala. Usually the leased land will be the low-lying paddy fields
District Thiruvananthapuram Kollam Pathanamthitta Alappuzha Kottayam Idukky Ernakulam Thrissur Palakkad Malappuram Kozhikkode Wayand Kannur Kasargode State
Land utilization (ha) 2496 1800 2055 470 3394 1602 6410 2844 8155 9804 1963 11466 2445 764 55668
Production (kg) 16739 14596 18389 3815 32373 13608 46806 19974 65005 67931 16640 77963 20280 7690 421809
Productivity (Kg/ha) 6706 8109 8948 8117 9538 8494 7302 7023 7971 6929 8477 6799 8294 10065 7577
CROP STAGES AND WEATHER PERILS FOR BANANA Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Dec 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 123 4
Perils
Deficit of Rainfall - Bunch formation stage High wind speed - Topling/Breakage hazard Excess Rainfall - Water logging
• Dec 15th to May 31st: Deficit Rainfall, Water required 400 mm • Apr 15th to Sept 14th : Wind, >15 starts affecting, >40 causes heavy damage (50% - 100%) • Jun 1st to Aug 31st: Water-logging, Continuous three days of rainfall > average
Stage 1: Deficit rainfall Strike & Exit: 167 & 29 mm Pay-out chart for stage-1, Deficit rainfall (Dec 15th to May 31) 120
29 100
Pay-out (%)
80
60
40
20
0 0
50
100
150
167
Cummulative rainfall (mm) -20 Pay-out chart for stage 1
200
250
300
Stage 2a: Water logging peril (June) Strike & Exit: 102 & 184 mm Pay-out for stage 2a, Waterlogging peril (J une) 120
184
1/3rd of Total pay-out (%)
100
80
60
40
20 102 0 0
50
100
150
Three day cummulative moving rainfall (mm) -20 Pay-out for june
200
250
Stage 2b: Water logging peril (July) • Strike & Exit: 92 & 167 mm Pay-out chart for stage 2b, Waterlogging peril (J uly) 120
167
1/3rd of total payout (%)
100
80
60
40
20
92
0 0
50
100
150
Three day cummulative moving rainfall (mm) -20 Pay-out for J uly
200
250
Stage 2c: Water logging peril (August) • Strike & Exit: 66 & 129 mm Pay-out chart for stage 2c, Waterlogging peril (August) 120
129
100
1/3rd of totsl pay-out (% )
80
60
40
20
0 0
20
40
60 66
80
100
120
Three day cummulative moving rainfall (mm) -20 Pay-out August
140
160
180
200
Stage 3: Wind peril • Wind is a totally uncontrollable phenomenon • From April first week to harvest (mid Sept) the crop is vulnerable to wind hazards • Wind speed from 15 to 25 Kmph causes breakage, twisting and tearing of leaves, which can be directly mapped to the reduction in yield (around 10%) • High amount of basic risk
Stage 3: Wind peril • The loss that a heavy wind of above 40 Kmph can make is dependent on the width of tract through it moves • Difficult to predict the expected loss • The value of total crop at its maturity is around Rs 80,000/- per acre • Above 25 Kmph, the loss is going exponentially high w.r.t wind speed
Wind speed (Kmph) Strike
Exit 0 to 15
Type of pay-out
Full pay-out as % of insured amount
---
0
Linear
10
25 - 40
Step pay-out
30
> 40
Step pay-out
100
15
25
Stage 3: Wind peril (June 1st – Sept 14th) Pay-out chart for stage-3: Wind peril (J une 1st to Sep 14th) 120
100%
Pay-out (% of insured sum)
100
80
60
40 30% 20 10% 0 0
10
20
30
40
Wind speed (Kmph) -20 0-25 Kmph
25-40 Kmph
>40 Kmph
50
60
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Various distribution channels identified • Vegetable and Fruit Promotion Council, Keralam’s (VFPCK) Self Help Groups (SHGs) • NGOs working in the area of promoting income-generating activities through SHGs. E.g. ESAF, START etc…
Various points of distribution identified • Distributors of props • Krishi Bhavans/nearby areas • Farm input dealers
OPTIONS FOR THE COMPANY TO DEVISE A DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM • OPTION A: Enter the market by tying up with Vegetable and Fruit Promotion Council, Keralam (VFPCK) and expand the reach by increasing the distribution points. • OPTION B: Enter the market by tying up with NGOs and expand the reach by increasing the distribution points. • OPTION C: Launch and expand purely based on company’s independent distribution system.
CRITERIA TO EVALUATE EACH OPTION (as per rating) •
Reach of the selected partnering agency This means the geographical spread and penetration into the farming community.
• • •
Sales force needed Visibility of products and company Scope for expansion Scope for expanding across the state as well as our product range
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS
Options OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C
Criteria Reach
Sales force
Visibility
High Medium High
High Low Low
High Low Medium
Scope of expansion Medium Low Medium
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM VFPCK
Margin approx 10%
SHGs
SHGs
SHGs
SHGs
FARMERS
Through prop distributors
Through point near Krishi Bhavans
Through company’s channels Margin approx 10% - 15%
Through farm-inputs distributors