Urban Accident Analysis Systems
Sistemas de Análisis de la Accidentalidad Urbana [1/4/05 – 30/6/07]
Prof. Dr. Jaime Sanmartín Dr. Mauricio Chisvert Jean François Pace Project co-financed by The European Commission. Directorate-General Transport and Energy (TREN-03-ST-S07.30828). Universitat de València (20040272) Generalitat Valenciana (GVACOMP2006-164/GVACOMP2007-176).
Project objectives Main Objective:
www.uv.es/sau
Design, validation, discussion and diffusion, at a European level, of the ‘best practices’ for the collection, processing and analysis of traffic accident data in urban areas.
[2]
Operative objectives:
Analysing in detail several Spanish cities of different size. Detect the main problems & solutions in several EU cities. Exchange experiences between experts from several EU countries. The final result:
A guide of advices and “best practices” in order to improve the systems that deal with the monitoring of traffic accidents in urban areas.
Structure of the project
www.uv.es/sau
Documentary revision
[3]
Case study (Spain)
Survey study (EU)
Workshop (EU)
Guide of best practices
Urban policies
City/town RS authorities
National/regional RS authorities
Participants in the “case study” Ayuntamiento de Valencia Castellon
Ayuntamiento de Murcia
207.163
Murcia
(Council of Murcia), through the Mobility Service and the local police Servei Català de Trànsit (Traffic Administration responsible in the Catalan Autonomous Community)
377.900
Valencia
761.800
Barcelona
Guardia Urbana de Barcelona 1.750.000
1.500.000
1.250.000
1.000.000
750.000
500.000
250.000
1.527.000
0
www.uv.es/sau
Elche
[4]
(Council of Valencia), through the city’s road traffic department and the local police
163.088
(Urban Guard of Barcelona)
Local police of Elche Local police of Castellón
www.uv.es/sau
Participants in the “survey study”
[5]
20 EU Countries
www.uv.es/sau
European Workshop
[6]
Objectives Present the main results of the project. Interchange experiences. Propose advices and best practices to spread at the EU level: Urban/local Polices. Municipality RS authorities. Regional/National RS authorities.
Participants 12 EU Countries.
The guide of best practices Is mainly based on:
A compilation of detected “best practices”.
www.uv.es/sau
The exchange of experiences between several EU municipalities.
[7]
The practical pilot experiences applied in several Spanish cities. Several adapted recommendations from
the European Statistics Code of Practice. To contribute to the development of local
tools: More reliable and accurate knowledge, to the accident rate problems in each municipality.
www.uv.es/sau
Index of the guide of best practices
[8]
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Institutional context. Adequacy and homogenization of the collection criterions. Improvement in data entry procedures. Improvement of data collection questionnaire. Improvements in the computer system for data management and analysis.
6. Use of new technologies and introduction of the GIS. 7. Integration of the information through the linkage of several data sources
8. Training to the technical staff at any stages. 9. Data quality control. 10. Analysis and statistical production processes.
1. Institutional context
www.uv.es/sau
Urban Accident Analysis Systems
[9]
Urban Safety Management systems Urban Mobility Management. Collaboration of specialists and professionals. Information exchange between agents, other municipalities and regional/central and European administrations. Standardizing and homogenising procedures optimizing local practices. It is important: Participation at European level for establish recommendations. Events for experience exchange between urban polices
2. Collection criterions The standardization and
www.uv.es/sau
[10]
homogenisation comparisons at different levels and clarify an effectively use. Objective tools to detect and transfer the information. Also standardize the procedures to obtain the information, to the homogeneous understanding. Recommendations of specialists in accident data collection and processing. Manuals and training for the police forces must be developed, regarding the EU standardization recommendations.
3. Data entry procedures
www.uv.es/sau
Improving the field work of the police:
[11]
Appropriate quantity of information wide benefits. The TA investigation, reconstruction and legal-administrative management procedure, being synchronised with the statistical practices. Monitoring the evolution of victims at 30 days. It is much easier if carried out locally. Increase the motivation of the police: Taking part in the design of the data collection system. Giving them feedback of statistical results. Participating in the intervention suggestions to improve the road safety.
4. Collection questionnaire
www.uv.es/sau
Standardized collection protocol specifically designed for the urban areas.
[12]
The questionnaire has to be simple, easy, fast to fill out. Information entered electronically, avoiding the task duplication. Specific fields in relation with urban elements, accident types and urban context. Content manuals should exist to describe the criterions to fill out. Information about the sequence of accident evens to define the accident type. Systematic and periodic reviews.
5. Computer systems Local or remote access . Integrate all the procedures. Computerize the
www.uv.es/sau
documentation.
[13]
Automatic queries and
statistics. Flexible system. Adaptable to future. Information in short periods
of time.
6. New technologies and the GIS systems Expert or interactive system:
Less missing data, errors, inconsistencies, time… Geographical Information Systems.
www.uv.es/sau
“In situ” accident data collection with PDA or laptop.
[14]
Text, pictures, videos, sketches, maps, etc.
7. Integration of the information Internal linking mechanisms with other databases available in the police
information system (only for statistical purposes):
www.uv.es/sau
Traffic (density, volume…)
[15]
Infrastructures (characteristics, signs…) Vehicles (vehicle records) Involved persons (offence or complaint records, driving licence records…), etc. Unique identifier fields
allow the linkage with external databases of the health system.
8. Training Courses or training interventions in
the police action programmes: Accident investigation.
www.uv.es/sau
Information obtaining and coding
[16]
Motivational and psychological aspects. Basic statistical and reporting Adapting continuous training to the
new conditions, technologies, methods and procedures.
9. Quality control Optimized entry
and management.
Less information
www.uv.es/sau
but reliable.
[17]
Training and
incentive programmes.
Analyses of missing
data and the errors.
10. Analysis and production of statistics Specialized tools, procedures and
knowledge, adapted to its characteristics.
Risk exposure indicators to
compare the information.
www.uv.es/sau
Other mechanisms of analysis of
[18]
the accident rate patterns when exposure data are not available: Spatial analysis. GIS complementation.
Interventions studies (before-after
or prospective).
Public reports or statistical
documents.
Periodic statistics with as little
delay as possible.
www.uv.es/sau
Finally…
[19]
We need to pay more attention to: Specificity of urban traffic accidents. Quality of traffic accident information and data in urban zones. Not only the information should be standardized but also the procedures to obtain it. The role, training and motivation of urban polices. We should do or impulse: European studies about the current reality of urban traffic accident data quality. An European manual for the urban polices. European guidelines for training and helping the urban policemen. New developments in database and statistical tools and procedures.
Thank you for your attention!
More information and the project reports in:
www.uv.es/sau