Unification Theory Comments Continued

  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Unification Theory Comments Continued as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 386
  • Pages: 1
Comments on the unification theory The one thing Einstein overlooked in his search for the unification theory of everything was simple. It was contained within his theory of relativity. The theory of relativity relates to oneness. In a theory of the relativity of motion how is motion defined. In relationship to another object. Think about it. A single object in space could be moving at enormous speeds through space but how could you measure the motion unless there is something relative to measure its motion by. A singular object in space could be defined a the definition of one divided by zero. Two objects in space allows measurement of motion removing the zero from the undefined equation. In an atom, what is overlooked is there are two motions. The neutron/proton vibration and the electron rotation. Two motions. And I believe this to be angular. In the astrophysical world, the moon is in motion around the earth which rotates on its axis which revolves around the sun which in turn is in motion relative to other stars. An atom is the definition of one. A hydrogen atom. But the ultimate complexity of the universe has to allow for more in the way of motion. Volume (length x width x height) x mass x energy (speed of light) x motion ( distance/ time)x2 Where “x” is the number of motions to be considered. The simple made as complex as you want it to be. Interestingly, matter is a constant. Matter simply changes forms. I admit this takes energy to happen but energy is also matter in a different form. So what I suppose is two kinds of matter. There is simply the matter we know exists. Also, the cosmic forces of the universe with the supposition all motion of planetary ect… nature is due to the big band. Our known physical matter or in another form energy, and cosmic forces represent two different ideas. If one can be converted to matter, the cosmic forces, I would suppose cannot be. It is just an effect. It may well be a constant. It would define cosmic forces as only energy and physical matter as either energy or matter. And as previously defined, there is constant state of motion in the universe. It would indicate the cosmic energy to be constant.