Ued 495-496 Riffle Ronald Final Evaluation Ct P1
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Ued 495-496 Riffle Ronald Final Evaluation Ct P1 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 887
- Pages: 4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
#848 COMPLETE Collector: Started: Last Modified: Time Spent: IP Address:
Web Link 1 (Web Link) Saturday, March 09, 2019 11:49:40 PM Sunday, March 10, 2019 12:05:14 AM 00:15:33 68.10.112.6
Page 1: Placement Information Q1 Student Teacher's Name Ronald Riffle
Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area
Elementary Education, PreK6
Q3 Grade Taught
Fifth Grade
Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/14/2019
Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/07/2019
Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement Bettie F. Williams
Q7 School Division
Virginia Beach City Public Schools
Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last) Lindsay Tomaras
Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address. Email Address:
[email protected]
1/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role
Classroom Teacher
Q11 What time period is this evaluation for?
Final
Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) taught. Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age
Proficient Proficient
group. Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of
Proficient
higher level thinking skills. Links content with other subject areas and real world applications.
Proficient
Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge. Mr. Riffle had professional knowledge that was sufficient.
Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student learning needs. Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; adapts plans as needed. Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and
Proficient Superior Proficient
transitions. Plans for differentiated instruction.
Proficient
Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning. Mr. Riffle was willing to adjust plans using the suggestions that I gave him for improvement. He always approached critique with a positive attitude.
Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery
2/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Engages and maintains students in active learning. Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources.
Superior Proficient Superior Proficient
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning.
Superior
Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery. Mr. Riffle was willing to use technology in different ways to keep students engaged.
Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and instruments Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes.
Proficient Superior
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback.
Proficient
Proficient
Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning. Mr. Riffle still needs to work on providing students with more specific feedback. However, he took initiative to determine which students needed remediation during small group instruction. This is why I was able to give him a superior rating for that objective.
Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Proficient
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors. Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, gender, and special needs. Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and
Superior Proficient Proficient
responses.
3/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to learning. Mr. Riffle has a desire to keep an orderly classroom. He is willing to point out behaviors that he would like to see changed. I would like to see him try to develop stronger relationships with students, however. The stronger the relationships you have with the students, the more they wish to follow directions.
Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Modifies performance based on personal and professional critiques.
Superior
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and
Proficient
professional interactions. Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with
Proficient
teachers and other school personnel. Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical
Proficient
interactions.
Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation. Mr. Riffle was willing to modify his lessons as needed. He was professional and courteous to the teachers in the building.
Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Documents the progress of each student throughout the placement.
Proficient
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Uses available data to document/communicate student progress
Superior Proficient
and develop learning targets.
Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation. Mr. Riffle was attuned to whether or not students had met the goals of small and whole group lessons.
4/4
SurveyMonkey
#848 COMPLETE Collector: Started: Last Modified: Time Spent: IP Address:
Web Link 1 (Web Link) Saturday, March 09, 2019 11:49:40 PM Sunday, March 10, 2019 12:05:14 AM 00:15:33 68.10.112.6
Page 1: Placement Information Q1 Student Teacher's Name Ronald Riffle
Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area
Elementary Education, PreK6
Q3 Grade Taught
Fifth Grade
Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/14/2019
Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/07/2019
Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement Bettie F. Williams
Q7 School Division
Virginia Beach City Public Schools
Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last) Lindsay Tomaras
Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address. Email Address:
[email protected]
1/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role
Classroom Teacher
Q11 What time period is this evaluation for?
Final
Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) taught. Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age
Proficient Proficient
group. Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of
Proficient
higher level thinking skills. Links content with other subject areas and real world applications.
Proficient
Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge. Mr. Riffle had professional knowledge that was sufficient.
Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student learning needs. Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; adapts plans as needed. Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and
Proficient Superior Proficient
transitions. Plans for differentiated instruction.
Proficient
Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning. Mr. Riffle was willing to adjust plans using the suggestions that I gave him for improvement. He always approached critique with a positive attitude.
Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery
2/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Engages and maintains students in active learning. Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources.
Superior Proficient Superior Proficient
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning.
Superior
Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery. Mr. Riffle was willing to use technology in different ways to keep students engaged.
Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and instruments Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative purposes.
Proficient Superior
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback.
Proficient
Proficient
Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning. Mr. Riffle still needs to work on providing students with more specific feedback. However, he took initiative to determine which students needed remediation during small group instruction. This is why I was able to give him a superior rating for that objective.
Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Proficient
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors. Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, gender, and special needs. Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and
Superior Proficient Proficient
responses.
3/4
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation
SurveyMonkey
Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to learning. Mr. Riffle has a desire to keep an orderly classroom. He is willing to point out behaviors that he would like to see changed. I would like to see him try to develop stronger relationships with students, however. The stronger the relationships you have with the students, the more they wish to follow directions.
Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Modifies performance based on personal and professional critiques.
Superior
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and
Proficient
professional interactions. Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with
Proficient
teachers and other school personnel. Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical
Proficient
interactions.
Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation. Mr. Riffle was willing to modify his lessons as needed. He was professional and courteous to the teachers in the building.
Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below. Documents the progress of each student throughout the placement.
Proficient
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Uses available data to document/communicate student progress
Superior Proficient
and develop learning targets.
Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation. Mr. Riffle was attuned to whether or not students had met the goals of small and whole group lessons.
4/4
Related Documents
Ued 495-496 Riffle Ronald Final Evaluation Ct P1
October 2019 3
P1 Final
November 2019 11
Naugatuck Ct Odor Control Evaluation
June 2020 3
Arrowhead Ct Final Eval
June 2020 7
Ct Gov Lrt Final
December 2019 28