RWANDA
KHIN MAUNG SHWE
COORDINATOR, TJP of HREIB
Truth - Justice – Reconciliation - Peace Historic
Background After independent Preparation for Genocide ICTR / National Courts / Gacaca Women role in TP Relevance for Peace and Justice
What is Rwanda?
Beautiful, small, landlocked Size: 26228 sq km Location: Uganda, DRC, Tanzania and Burundi Capital: Kigali and 10 other provinces, 106 districts Population: 8,440,820 million Official languages: Kinyarwanda, French and English Local language(s): Kinyarwanda Three ethnic groups: Twa (1%) Hutu ( 84%), Tutsi (15%) Tutsi- tall, slim, straight nose, long finger Hutu-stockier, broad nose, short finger Religious: Roman Catholic 56.5%, Protestant 26%, Adventist 11.1%, Muslim 4.6%, indigenous beliefs 0.1%, none 1.7% No one knows who got there first
Historic Background • • • • • • • •
Kingdom
Religious European colonial arrived with a racist world vision 1885 the Berlin conference agrees to make RuandaUrandi a German protectorate 1916 Belgian expel the German colonials 1920 Belgian colonizers took over admin; Tutsi collaborated in this colonization 1923 Ruanda-Urandi becomes a mandate territory of League of Nations (Belgian favor Tutsi) 1930, the identity cards that had been introduced by the Belgians 1945 Belgian mandate is to transfer power-UN Trusteeship 1957 Decolonization takes hold in Africa (Tutsi-Power) (Hutu-Democracy)
Beginning of a new political era 1950
The Tutsi King was assassinated in Burundi, upraising 15,000 Tutsi dead, thousand flee 1957: Hutu Manifesto 1959: Social Revolution, first killings of Tutsi (school, workplace, foreign employees expel) 1960: Communal elections won by parmehutu 1/7/1962: Independence (Gregoire Kayibanda) 1/12/1963: Tutsi attack & reach within 20 km of Kigali, Belgians help Hutu retreat to Burundi (20,000 massacring, 100,000 Refugees)
Previous Massacres 1963-64:
President sponsored an anti-Tutsi campaign (ten of thousand massacre, 300,000 refugees)
1967:
renewed massacre of Tutsi (12,000) - UNHCR (300,000 refugee in Uganda, Burundi, Congo, Tanzania) - Belgian and Rwandian cover up info
July
1968: National assembly (Parliamentary Investigation Commission)
In
Burundi, Hutu are massacre by Tutsi in 1972
The First Phrase 1973-75 Relief & Euphoria July
5th 1973 Coup (North Hutu) of Gen. Habyamana, chief of staff (Peace & Reconciliation without talking with resistance groups), and (not only would Tutsis be excluded from power, but also any Hutu who had been infected by Tutsis Quotas for ethnic & regions (policy) Tutsis (9)%, North group satisfied, South ousted from dominant position Habyarimana argued (refugee had to stay in neighboring country because of full up Armed forces from 5,000 to 35,000 1975 system of social & political policy “ Mouvement Re’volutionnaire National Pourle De’veloppement (MRND)
The Second Phrase 1975-86 Political & social control Economics expansion
1978 A new constitution was promulgated
1974-82 Economic growth
Organized his own fiercely loyal militia (Interahamwe)criminal organization Income from robbing and looting Youths joined Paid much more than other gainful or hope employment French trained Presidential Guard
The Third Phrase 1986-90 Economic crisis & Erosion of power 1984-89 economics crisis- more employees unemployed Family of Habyaimana (wife), akazu, a small hut, concentrate (power) World Bank blocked all funds
1986 Tutsis ex-NRA officers formed the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) 1990, 1500-strong RPF invaded
The Fourth Phrase 1990- until Genocide July
5th 1990, President announces initiative dialogue Sep 1st 1990 a group of 33 intellectuals demand multiparty document (MDR, PSD, PL, PDC) Oct 1st 1990 RPF launches from Uganda RPF with military assistance of France, halt (guerrilla war) Gov’t reacts by imprisoning (8,000) Two major demonstrations (Nov 17th 1991, Jan 8th 1992) (30,000-100,000) Apr 16th 1992 President Dismas Nsengiyaremye elected (MDR-MRND) Interim gov’t (to negotiate with RPF, to ensure internal security, to organize general election)
Preparation for and/ or Genocide
Hard line – MRND, CDR- Opposition – MDR, PSD, PL MRND-propaganda Campaign ethnic hatred (Radio Television des Milles Collines-RTML) Well armed equip by French, trained in USA 1993 Opposition party split from Interim gov’t Aug 1993- Arusha Peace Accord The panga- a small machete imported from China-mazu Apr 6th 1994 President’s plane is shot down with 3 hand-launched heat-seeking missiles (French made) near Kigali airport President Guard distributed weapons: death list (moderate Hutu e.g; President of the constitutional court), after one hour-President’s death The first day (intellectuals, HRts activists, journalists,-) PM Agathe Uwilingiyamana guarded by 10 Belgians soldiers Apr 7th-July 4th (800,000 Tutsi + political moderate Hutu, 200,000 Hutu) July 4th RPF seized power (2 million Hutu-Congo) Installed a provisional gov’t consisting of 2 Hutus & 1 Tutsi
Aug 1993- Arusha Peace Accord Commission of National Unity and National Reconciliation ( Established by Presidential order) 12
members were appointed by President
Sensitize Rwandans on National Unity Promote reconciliation Sensitize Rwandans on their rights
Propaganda
The
media participated in a “structured attempt to use media to influence awareness, attitude, or behavior”. Funded by Hutu extremists
Print Newspaper
(back to hill or home) 66 % can read 11 of 42 journals founded in 1991 Kangura (voice of hate) “the voice that seeks to awake and guide the majority people Cartoon, articles (a cockroach cannot give birth to a butterfly) in March 1993 The ten commandments published in 1990
Radio (“Cut the Tall Trees”) 29%
to 58.7% of household had radios Gov’t distributed radios free Only one radio station owned by Habyarimana’s in law (Radio Rwanda, Radio Television Libre des Mille Collines- RTLM) 8 a.m to 11 a.m To prepare the people of Rwanda for genocide. You cockroaches must know you are made of flesh! We won’t let you kill! We will kill you. Stand up, take action… without worrying about Int’l opinion RPF bombed, continued broadcast from armored car
Gender Propaganda “social
construction of permeable boundaries between ethnic groups… nations of racial purity Marriage- Tutsi women & Hutu men were legally Hutu Tutsi women as enemies of the State Tutsi women were more beautiful and desirable, but inaccessible to Hutu men whom allegedly looked down upon and were too good for. Sexual positions (prostitutes)
Four commandments in December, 1990 First Every Hutu should know that a Tutsi woman, wherever she is, work for the interest of her Tutsi ethnic group. As a result, we shall consider a traitor any Hutu who: marries a Tutsi woman; befriends a Tutsi woman; employs a Tutsi woman as a secretary or concubine.
Second Every Hutu should know that our Hutu daughters are more suitable and conscientious in their role as woman, wife and mother of the family. Are they not beautiful, good secretaries and more honest?
Third Hutu woman, be vigilant and try to bring your husbands, brothers and son back to reason. Fourth The Rwandese Armed Forces should be exclusively Hutu. The experience of the October 1990 war was has taught us a lesson. No number of the military shall marry a Tutsi.
Recount statements of their violators such as We
want to see how sweet Tutsi women
are. You Tutsi women think that you are too good for us. We want to see if a Tutsi woman is like a Hutu woman. If there were peace you would never accept me.
Sexual violence 15,700
women 250,000 to 500,000 rapes numbers 2000-5000 pregnancy Suicide 70% of the women raped during the genocide are HIV-positive 13.5% of the Rwandan population living with HIV/AIDS 500,000 people living with HIV/AIDS and requiring triple therapy, only 7000
1. Types of sexual violence
The violation of Tutsi women was not a casualty of war But a step in the process of the deconstruction of the Tutsi group– destruction of the spirit of the will to live, and of life itself Interahamwe forced them into collective and individual sexual slavery, mutilated them The victim ranged from two years old to over fifty year Pregnant women or women who had recently given birth were not spared; their rapes frequently resulted in death from hemorrhaging and other medical complications Forced to kill their own children before or after being raped
Women Perpetrator
5,500 3442
women in 1997 (5%)
of 108215 imprisoned in 2001 (2.3 %)
Rwanda Patriotic Front’s massacre
25,000
to 45,000 from April through August of 1994 Tanzanian border refugee camp killing RPF soldiers in Gacaca court
What is the result?
400,000
widows 500,000 orphans 130,000 imprisoned 70-72 % women in population 2 Millions Hutu refugee in Congo
6000 orphanages in Kigali alone
Family without Parent
Orphans & Detainees
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) set
up 8 of November 1994 after genocide, UN security Council (Resolution 955)
Purpose
Jan1-Dec 31, 1994, to investigate the crimes for genocide & other serious violation of inte’l humanitarian law- Rwanda & neighbor countries to contribute to process of national reconciliation, maintenance of peace – to replace culture impunity
Composition of ICTR ICTR (16)
Trail (3)
Trail (3)
Trail (3)
Appeals Chamber (5)
Composed of Judges elected by the General Assembly- Security Council The Judges are elected for a term for four years 16 Independent judges Prosecutor appointed UN-security Council on 15 Sept 2003 9 Ad Litem judges (maximum 4 attached to the Trial Chambers)
Judges in Order of Precedence Name
Country of Origin
Chamber
1.
Judge Charles Michael Dennis Byron
St. Kitts & Nevis
President ICTR Member, Trial Chamber III
2.
Judge Khalida Rachid Khan
Pakistan
Vice-President ICTR Presiding Judge, Trial Chamber III
3.
Judge Fausto Pocar
Italy
Presiding Judge, Appeals Chamber
4.
Judge William Sekule
United Republic of Tanzania
Presiding Judge, Trial Chamber II
5.
Judge Erik Møse
Norway
Presiding Judge Trial Chamber I
6.
Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen
Guyana
Member, Appeals Chamber
7.
Judge Mehmet Güney
Turkey
Member, Appeals Chamber
8.
Judge Liu Daqun
China
Member, Appeals Chamber
9.
Judge Andrésia Vaz
Senegal
Member, Appeals Chamber
10.
Judge Theodor Meron
United States
Member, Appeals Chamber
11.
Judge Wolfgang Schomburg
Germany
Member, Appeals Chamber
12.
Judge Arlette Ramaroson
Madagascar
Member, Trial Chamber II
13.
Judge Jai Ram Reddy
Fiji
Member, Trial Chamber I
14.
Judge Sergei Alekseevich Egorov
Russian Federation
Member, Trial Chamber I
15.
Judge Inés Mónica Weinberg de Roca
Argentina
Member, Trial Chamber III
16.
Judge Joseph Asoka Nihal De Silva
Sri Lanka
Member, Trial Chamber II
Ad Litem Judges 17.
Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa
Uganda
Member, Trial Chamber II
18.
Judge Lee Gacugia Muthoga
Kenya
Member, Trial Chamber II
19.
Judge Florence Rita Arrey
Cameroun
Member, Trial Chamber III
20.
Judge Emile Francis Short
Ghana
Member, Trial Chamber II
21.
Judge Taghrid Hikmet
Jordan
Member, Trial Chamber II
22.
Judge Seon Ki Park
Republic of Korea
Member, Trial Chamber II
23.
Judge Gberdao Gustave Kam Burkina Faso
Member, Trial Chamber III
24.
Judge Robert Fremr
Czech Republic
Member, Trial Chamber III
25.
Judge Vagn Joensen
Denmark
Member, Trial Chamber III
Budget and Staff
The Total Budget US$246,890,000 for 20062007
Authorized 85
1,042 posts
nationalities ( Arusha, Kigali, the Hague and New York)
Status of Cases Cases
in progress (29 cases) Awaiting Trial (6 Cases) Completed Cases (27 Cases) Cases on Appeal (6 Cases) Transferred to National Jurisdiction (1 Case) Detainees Acquitted (5) Detainees Released (3 Cases) Deceased (3)
Witness Support & Protection o o
o o
The section was established in 1996. Providing impartial support and protection service. All witness and victims called to testify. The following three service are being provided (1. assistance to witnesses and victims, 2. protection of witnesses, 3. medical care in support of witnesses and victims
The United Nations Detention Facility (UNDF)
established in 1996
10 Kilometres from Tribunal’s HQs in Arusha, Tanzanian
International Prison standards (89 individual cells, a kitchen, medical facilities, library, a classroom & a gymnasium)
61 detainees Benin (23), Mali, Swaziland, France, Sweden and Italy
Detainees on Trial Awaiting Trial Awaiting Transfer Pending Appeal Total Detainees in Arusha Serving Sentences Total Detainees
29 6 14 6 55 6 61
Acquitted
5
Released
3
Died
2
Case Transferred to National Jurisdiction
1
Number of accused whose cases have been completed
33
Number of Judgments rendered after appeal judgment
27
Total Arrests
72
National Courts & Category Planners, organizers, instigators, supervisors, leaders of genocide (confession before 200525Y)- death penalty 2. Perpetrators, intentional, serious assaults resulting in death (25-30)-(12-15) (3-5) 3. Committed serious but non-lethal assaults 4. Crimes against property (100,000 suspects awaiting trails, 6,000 cases complete, 6,500 people convicted, 700 have received death sentences, 23 executed) 1.
Gacaca Court (grassy space) GACACA COURTS initiative is very timely because it will make the following possible:
To enable the truth to be revealed about Genocide and crimes against Humanity in Rwanda. To speed up the trials of those accused of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and other crimes. To put an end to the culture of impunity in Rwanda. To reconcile the people of Rwanda and strengthen ties between them. To revives traditional forms of dispensing justice based on Rwandese culture. To demonstrates the ability of local communities to solve their own problems. To helps solve some of the many problems caused by Genocide.
Organization and powers of the Gacaca Courts Judges The judges of the GACACA Courts will be respectable people of at least 21 years of age, and elected by people of voting age. They will take responsibility for e nsuring orderly and fair proceedings. (35%-42%) The Functional Hierarchies of the Gacaca Courts are as follows: The General Assembly The Court Council The Coordination Committee
The Structure of the Gacaca Tribunals in Rwanda Level
Number Competence
Observations
Province 12
To judge appeals for category II crimes
The competence of gacaca tribunals to judge appeals for category II crimes, which carry a life sentence, has been controversial. Many believe such appeals should be heard before a formal tribunal
District
106
To judge category II crimes To judge appeals for category III crimes
Category II crimes were the major category in the traditional gacaca system, covering 80% of all cases
Sector
1,531
To judge category III crimes To judge appeals for category IV crimes
It is likely that there will be few category III crimes
Cell
9,189
To categorize the accused To list dam ages To judge category IV crimes
With respect to the categorization of crimes, a major innovation is the classification of rape as a category I cr ime, and therefore outside the scope of the gacaca trib unals The penalty for category IV crimes is restitution n ot imprisonment
Why Gacaca is to succeed ?
It
will depend upon Rwanda’s women The majority of survivors The majority of witnesses Women’s testimony
Peace Building
Participating as a member of the negotiating team for the 1993 Arusha peac e accords produced a power-sharing agreement designed to end Rwanda’s civil war Integrating peace and reconciliation components into school curricula, as well a s into religious, NGO, and gov’t programs Conducting sensitization sessions on Rwanda’s May 2003 constitution as a mem ber of the Forum of Women Parliamentaria ns Mobilizing women to run for political office Encouraging both single-identity workshops and cross-community initiatives that promote understanding between Tutsis and Hutus Educating, counseling, and rehabilitating survivors of the genocide.
Transition & The Role of Women
Statue Celebrating Women, downtown
Representatives in Parliament During Transition Period
Key finding Following
parliamentary elections in 2003, women hold nearly 50 % of seats During the post-genocide transition years, innovative mechanisms were created that enabled women’s participation in leadership structure at all levels At national grassroots levels, Rwandan women have been at the forefront of post-genocide recovery and reconciliation Women in gov’t have developed models for working across party and ethnic lines and strengthening partnerships with civil society
The Fonds d'aide aux rescapés du génocide (FARG) [genocide survivors' assistance fund]
Victim support provided by the Rwandan government is estimated at 5% of its national annual budget the FARG covers several basic needs, including providing schooling for orphans and lodging for widows only 4000 persons were prosecuted and judged, the Rwandan courts granted close to US$100 million in damages to victims 66.7% of the 491 cases of trauma, illness and other consequences of the rapes were HIV/AIDS-related Out of the 491 women who had serious sequelae, 327 were HIV-positive Of the 18 interviews conducted, 13 women were with mothers who had children before the genocide, one had just given birth, two were young single women and two were minors at the time of the genocide.
Commemoration
Last Saturday, Rwanda began an official national week of mourning to commemorate the 1994 genocide. Nightclubs are closed, flags are being flown at half-staff, and National Radio is playing traditional mourning music. Launching an initiative to have the UN formally declare April 2004 Rwanda Genocide Remembrance Month The United Nations has now declared April 7th as the "International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda."
Relevance for Peace & Justice
Never
again Evolution of political & legal accountability Cooperation of Africa countries Enforcement of prison sentences Political, moral and material support
Acronyms
Government of National Unity (GNU) Republican Democratic Movement (MDR) Minister of Gender & Women in Development (MIGEPROFE) National Revolutionary Movement for Development (MRND) National Unity & Reconciliation Commission (NURC) Centrisemocratic Party (PDC) Liberal Party (PL) Social Democratic Party (PSD) Rwandan Socialist Party (PSR) Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF)