TEACHING STRATEGIES OF THE UNFAIR TEACHER
A SemiBiographical Literature by Ian "Dakbayani" Besina PCIPP, 2009
PHILIPPINE CONTRACT OF INTELLECTUAL PUBLIC PERMIT The user/reader, in using this product resulting from the use of creative and intellectual abilities of its maker and his/her predecessor(s), hereby explicitly expresses his or her agreement to the following terms of use: Section 1. The Divine Creator is the origin of all knowledge and power; thus, the maker(s) of this product shall not charge anyone who wishes to reproduce this product. Section 2. This product is for FREE. The term “free” refers to the price of the use of intellectual faculties, the freedom of modification, reediting and reengineering, and the freedom to reproduce for personal, political, or commercial purposes. The term “free” neither breaches any producer's or user's rights to compensation for the cost of physical production or reproduction, nor does it remove the user's rights for the recognition / modified copyright / copyleft of a modified work or a new title. The term “free” does not also alienate the intellectual property rights of people who permitted the reproduction of parts of their previously copyrighted / patented works EXCLUSIVELY for this product; for this reason, such parts shall be marked “NOT COVERED BY PCIPP”. Section 3. In order to maintain this freedom: a. Any user(s) who reproduces, modifies or edits this product, or uses part of this product under another title shall include this contract in the resulting work. b. Any user(s) who modifies or edits this product, or uses part of this product under another title shall explicitly recognize/cite at least one part excised from this work, with the entry for author as “Name of the Author(s), PCIPP” c. No user of this product shall claim exclusive economic rights over a reproduction or modification of this product, or on any product containing parts of this work. d. THE USER/READER UNDERSTANDS THAT VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION CONSTITUTES BREACH OF CONTRACT, subject to a class suit to be filed by the authors of the work's predecessors, and other endusers who may feel offended by the violation of this contract. Section 4. The author(s)/editor(s)/engineer(s) of this work shall, only upon the challenge of a user, expose the sources/coding/blueprint/masterplan/script of the work. Section 5. Although the author(s)/editor(s)/engineer(s) of this work may have exerted all efforts to ensure its quality, there is neither warranty nor guarantee of quality control, nor any promise of customer support. The user alone shall claim responsibility for any damages resulting from the use or misuse of this work.
INTRODUCTION As soon as I started teaching, as a fresh college graduate, I took the ideals of education hard, and taught the same to my interns who THOUGHT it was cool and tops when it comes to innovativeness. I would give it all during classes, expect my interns to do the same, practice utmost patience, and genuine purehearted involvement in my students' lives beyond class hours that my boss would always remind me to slow down, or suffer burnouts and migraines. In the next few years, I learned to be a bit more strict rather than be the Mr. Nice Guy... and going fast forward into the present, I realized that although my life went well in my first years of teaching, I could see that my students have forgotten the lessons in life, while those with whom I've been strict (or playful) with could still remember the hard lessons they've learned. And why not? It's plain reality that everyone remembers their terror teachers, right? Or at least, a teacher who is different from the rest. Before moving on, it would be wise to know why people acquire this book. Would it be for the Final Demo? To become an effective coach? An unforgettable classroom teacher? A Mahatma? A good health adviser? A preacher of some doctrines? An advertiser? Or a talk show host? Teaching, actually goes beyond the four walls of the classroom. In all of the above, TEACHING is involved, as they all lead to LEARNING, or change in behavior; hating and loving something or someone included. Strategies, or patterns, as I would call them, are just patterns! They can be followed, modified, or at your own risk, mixed up, to make the wanted outcomes possible AND WITH IMPACT. It's what you are teaching that would make it good or evil. Amorally, I would say that it's the IMPACT that counts, and far better is a wellexecuted sermon that makes a student cry, than a studentinitiated discussion that dies out when the student goes out of the room. It is better to spend a dramafilled 20 minutes (with a few moments of WALKING AWAY, if necessary) than a whole hour of meaningless pleading. Far better is a teacher who PROJECTS the (invented) truth than one who acts as a real person but gets the complaints. Far better is a TERROR military nurse who threatens his ward to take the medicine, than a patient health adviser whose advise wasn't followed leading to his patient's demise. Far better is a preacher who GIVES NIGHTMARES of hell, than a counselor who ALLOWS someone to choose hell. Or an illmannered educator who'd scare the students to behave properly, than a goodmannered teacher who is the ONLY behaved person in the classroom. With a few educational idealsmyths demythologized, it's clear that the classroom, as the world is, UNFAIR; so if you carry the rules and etiquette of a boxer in a noholdsbarred fight, better think twice, buddy! Simply ACCEPT THE TRUTH that there's NO RULES (but you'd still need a license)! TEACH THE UNFAIR WORLD AND FIGHT THE UNFAIR FIGHT!
2001 WELCOME TO ST. JOE'S! Before starting, let me tell you a metaphor to set your priorities straight... Once upon a time, there was a juggler who was performing on five balls, each one with its own label: "family", "spirit", "career", "friendship" and "love". Of the five balls, four are made of glass. While the other one is a bouncing rubber... And it bears the label, "career". As a person who had some career flaws too, I know that it was easy to bounce back, even get good ratings; I learned a stern lesson when I dropped a "glass ball", even the "rubber ball" could get "slivered by glass". As much as career and its responsibilities are important, its ecological impact counts just as much, if not more. But being a person who'd rather look at the positive side of life, recalling good, happy, glorious memories and sharing them could be one positive thing growing out of a misery that might bring me back on my career tracks. First of those happy memories was my teaching demo in St. Joseph's High School. The demo wasn't my first time. I have done that a million times before, in my imagination, and before the mirror. People with stage fright or are uncomfortable with strangers ought not to have a demo with an audience for their first time. Good thing, I got a great mentor in the late Bro. Martin Simpson, FSC, who coached me, "when you deal with kids, feel like you would when you were winning over that service crew (member, of McDonald's La Salle) in getting that extra ketchup..." So, how'd that feel? It feels like you're superior; you appear funny, but gets the nod of the crowd. After catching the meaning of what he said, I tried recalling other glorious memories, and... "Expecto patronum!"
Next thing is to think of your students as the people who ARE looking up at you in your good times. Have you ever imagined how it is to be admired by people? If you like, you may be feeling it right now, and that's how it must be in a classroom where you're in charge. To help myself, I listed down all those moments and try to link them to the classroom. Now that I'm done with DEVELOPING CONFIDENCE and the classroom has been my playground, it would be best to master the games as well. So I chose "Causes of Age of Exploration" as my topic, and having been critiqued in my student teaching days on that topic, I asked myself, "What if I used some more clues to help them answer my questions? What if I asked them more of personal opinions just to keep the ball rolling?" So I tried to imagine, and even acted it loud like crazy before empty chairs ("practicing for a demo" has always been my excuse), and even if it was in an unreal world, I know that I have experienced perfecting the technique. In Japanese martial arts, I've been doing the RANDORI (simulated fight) OF CLASSROOM SITUATION. In my demo day, I brought with me eight illustrations, each depicting one of the five causes of Age of Exploration. I'll be using the CONCEPT THESAURUS pattern (also known as the Concept Attainment Method) which is one of the GENERAL INDUCTIVE METHODS, as the students will use the details from the drawings to form a conclusion. Since I was informed that the students in attendance were those who failed in their History class, I was at the option of letting them know what might come out in their quiz. Thus, I asked any one of them to volunteer in reading the "objectives". Silence. Three seconds have gone by, and in the 3SECOND RULE, not getting any response is a bad manifestation. I have to do something... a clue... or a surprise... "Okay, let's have..." and I briskly walked towards the oher end of the classroom and pointed (no touching) to one of the students, who was simply 'not there'. "YOU!" "Whooooaa!" the student cried in surprise. Everyone laughed. When he regained composure, he started reading: "1. Identify the five important facts that are directly related to the topic, 2. Make a generalization by stating the topic, 3. Describe the people and events involved in this topic, and 4. Manifest the value(s) implied in the lesson"
"Well done!" I said, "And for that, you receive..." and I handed him a small chocolate candy. Then everyone started raising his or her hand and making wild guesses for everything. Eventually, I learned that the surprise pointing was a negative reinforcement while the chocolate candygiving is a positve reinforcement; both working to condition students towards a certain behavior. For this demo, I have prepared eight drawings, and allowed the students to interpret them, one by one. "It's a compass..." "It's an ancient navigational device that makes use of the stars..." some students would say, trying their luck to earn some chocolate candies. "Well said!" I would affirm their answers as I wrote them on the chalkboard. As I find it ususal, I gave them followup questions such as: "What made you say it?" "Why do you think they did that?" and "Can you guess what could have happened because of this?" Now, that's values integration onthefly! I kept on writing the pertinent answers on the chalkboard and grouped them inside a circle. "What's common about these things that you have described and explained moments ago?" "They're all navigational equipments that were invented somewhere after the Middle Ages." "Excellent!" I continued, writing the answer on the chalkboard. "Could everyone, please repeat?" "INVENTIONS NAVIGATIONAL EQUIPMENT!" "Good! Now let's move on to the next picture..." and went on using the same procedure. After getting through with all those pictures, it was a great time to have a conclusion: "Given the five important facts which you created using these drawings, what words would describe their common features?"
Silence again. Something has to be done within 3 seconds. So I wrote a clue on the board: "All of them are __________ of the A___ __ E___________" Within half a second after putting on the last underline, hands shot out in the air and I got the correct answer. "Wonderful!!! ALTOGETHER, what are these five causes?" I asked them with high spirits as I pointed to the writings on the board. It was when they started reading the second cause that I started showing the drawings that are related to the first cause. The students didn't mind that, but I learned years later that such trick is known in Ericksonian psychology as DOUBLE INDUCTION, and it works by feeding the facts deep down into the subconscious and that leads to better memory retention. "Great job everyone!!! ...so what are you waiting for? Grab a notebook and copy!" I suggested with a smile, because within a few minutes, memorization work was done times three! With everyone busy with their notes, I took the opportunity to write their home works and as soon as a student noticed it, murmurs of complaints started to well up. "Guys! Relax, this is just a teaching demo! And even if it's for real, consider your homeworks in my class as a "leakage" for your next quiz. Sighs of relief can be heard across the room, and as the bell rang and I have said "goodbye", I know that the rest was "history". After all, my heart was much intact at that time.
WHILE I'M AWAY One of the most pleasant surprises in teaching came in when I was on a day's leave (without pay) for the board examinations. In that weekly plan, dated October 20 24, 2001, the objectives were stated as: "At the end of the lesson, the students are expected to: 1. Explain how the Reformation period started; 2. Identify the persons involved in the significant events of the Reformation period, and their contributions; 3. Compare and contrast the abuses of public figures during the period to those of the present; 4. Write a reaction composition on the present problems of poverty and graft and corruption in the Church and State; and 5. Manifest the appreciation of movements towards positive reforms by being active in reporting abuses." It's a common knowledge in that school that the objectives stated in that form is the standard for PAASCU (Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities), and perhaps, the standard everywhere. Through the years, I've noted the following points to be considered in selecting the objectives: 1. It must cover multiple levels of cognitive intelligence as classified in the Modified Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives 2. It must cover multiple intelligences, that is, must include the affective and psychomotor domains 3. It must be Simple, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timebound. I don't know much about measurable; it is subject to debate. One may say that some manifestations of learning in the affective domain need not be measured, only identified as Absent, Emerging, or Present... otherwise a student may force himself to "hug five persons within the time frame of two days"; and that, would really be an absurd alternative! Another problem with objectives is when another teacher writes the exams, and goes down to the minutest details of the textbook "in the name of academic excellence". Conscientious educators, even when not in their right minds, would not recommend that, not even in college (Especially not in Japan! Try to find out why.). Someone writing a plan in such an environment must write an objective like: "Describe ALL of the proper nouns and dates covered by the topic." Okay, enough with these absurd alternatives!
In the first four days of the lesson, the students were assigned to bring sections and clippings of newspapers that have something to do with how public administrations affect the people and things surrounding them (it may involve the government, Church or business sectors), and started working in groups. "What is the common problem of administrations in your news articles?" Their group sharing started, and I have noticed, there's one member who's busy almost all the time the group secretary. Perhaps they were preconditioned that a graded recitation/reporting follows so I guess, the time was right for me to break the habit. "In relation to your TEST on Friday, may I ask everyone to pull out a piece of paper and make the following 'cheats'?" The reaction was acceptable. After all, I was trying to pull in a DATA GATHERING ANALYSISRECOMPOSITION pattern. So they thought that the questions I gave them would be the same questions that may pop out in the quiz. Perhaps they're correct. I have drawn a FISHBONE on the board and labelled its head with the word "PROBLEM". "Check your news articles, or your groupmates, for the cause of that problem and write it on the bone nearest to the head If you have more than one answer, you may write them down on the following bones . Two minutes starts now." The class is now a noisy yet welloiled machine. The sound of students asking one another for answers ought to be music in the ears of an understanding teacher, and sends the myth of "learning in silence" down the drain. Actually, the class could have discussed the matter in an open forumstyle, which is more orderly. By then however, I still thought that a studentcentered learning is something like getting them into groups to work things out by themselves. "You're not done yet. What you wrote on the fishbones are not only causes, they're also problems in themselves. Now, what do you think must have caused these problems? ...alright, you may write them down on the fishbone." They did so until the time was consumed.
Thursday afternoon, the class completed fillingin a COMPARISONCONTRAST CHART with columns for the "LEADERS DURING THE REFORMATION" versus "PRESENTDAY LEADERS" using the information they were assigned to collect. Then, the moment came to crack the news to them. "Class, I have to apologize now, that I'll surely get sick tomorrow and won't be able to proctor your quiz." "Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrr!!" the class freaked out. "I said, I'm sorry. You don't have to overreact, and I'm expecting you to show your best to my boss tomorrow, do you understand?" I guess they did. After a long weekend, my boss greeted welcomed me back to work with a bundle of paper/outputs to check. These were their answers to the question: "What are the problems that the society continues to suffer since the Reformation times, and what can you do to help in solving them (at present or in the near future)?" Among the most impressive is an envelope with the following addresses on its front part:
Delcilyn Imutan St. Joseph's High School Villamonte, Bacolod City Senator Ramon Magsaysay Jr. Senate of the Philippines Pasay City I never imagined that a student of mine would really aim for such a thing! On the other side of the envelope, it reads: "Please smile before you open". It really looks beautiful as it is adorned with fancy stickers. I opened it, and a neatly folded scented stationery contained this letter:
October 24, 2001 Dear Senator, How are you doing today? I... would like to bring to your attention the dumping of toxic wastes in Subic Bay which is dangerous to the health of the people there. It may even spread through the waters and harm the living things in and near the seas... I believe that as a person in postion... you can do something about it. Sincerely yours, (sgd.) Delcilyn Imutan "Wow!" I said to myself. Of course, I chose to keep the copy; I only sent its photocopy to the senator. I guess, I'll return this letter to her soon. Other works were just as impressive. One is a "Five Theses" (a student's version of Luther's NinetyFive Theses) that was meant to be posted; another is a poster requesting victims of illegal activities of government officials to dial a certain number; still another is a rap; and the rest? Lots and lots of essays to read! But it was such a pleasure to read young people's minds on matters concerning morality, charity and social responsibility. I smiled, believing that they have learned. The end. Epilogue: It feels nice to read my students' views on how they and their leaders ought conduct themselves, right? One of my students even wrote about morality, and that no matter what, she'll never fall into the sins of some immoral members of the clergy. Guess what happened three years later? She got pregnant! Out of wedlock, and she wasn't even eighteen then. It's comparable to this metaphor: I brought them to the cliff to see what harm falling could do plus threaten them with a whipping if they'd jump, but I let them act on focus and will. I guess I should have taken away their focus by making them chase a chicken all the way to kitchen, and have taken their will by letting them enjoy eating the chicken when it was supposed to be their time to decide whether or not to jump. This metaphor of taking away their choices, which I only learned five years later is called the SALESIAN PREVENTIVE system/pattern.
BAGONG BUWAN "Class, what comes in to your mind when I say the word 'Islam'?" "Mindanao." "Yes, that's correct! Two points for you!" "Pork is not allowed." "Good answer! Take two points as well!" "Bin Laden! Bin Laden!" The class laughed. Then the laughing all came to a sudden halt. The class was staring at me as I wasn't even smiling. "Class, that's his opinion. Not bad! You earn two points as well!" Other answers followed, from MILF, to Abu Sayyaf, to Pilgrimage to Mecca, to pirated VCD's (DVD's were still rare by then). All these opinions actually reflect the perceptions of people from Luzon and Visayas in the Philippines, who depend on whatever is being presented by the media. Getting along with REAL Muslims is a different thing. Teaching in a Catholic school however, limits my options and stretches my creativity. Of course, I could not simply invite any Muslim guest for a sharing without literally going through the eye of a needle. It has only been weeks after the 911 bombing, and sadly, being a Moslem (or simply coming from the Maranao or Maguindanaon tribe) bears the social stigma of being a troublemaker. A live talk show is definitely an OUT. If live webcam chats were available at that time, then I would have invited a guest to an Internet cafe while projecting everything on the white screen. It was however, the era in the Philippines where the only way of connecting to the net was the dialup (I could still recall that our school's password was "thequick"), and the only way to chat was mIRC. IT, for that era, was an OUT. Plans, plans! I forgot, the first steps are supposedly to identify and analyze the instructional goals. Then, I may set them up to exhibit a certain uniform behavior that would be the condition in creating their performance objectives and in choosing my method.
So what's the goal? To create a paradigm change about Muslim people. Check. The students would be sitting down quietly glued unto the boobtube unless they fall asleep. Check. Hmmm, if they would be asked to identify the scenes where the word “Muslim” is used, maybe, just maybe they might stay awake. Thus, I made my decision to have a filmviewing; and when the end came near, just as I have reminded them of an upcoming test, a student approached me and said: “Sir, ganyan naman talaga kayong nakikinabang sa isang pirason papel upang kaming mga walang alam ay matanggalan ng karapatan!” “Excellent! Two points for you!” I smiled. I know she has learned a lot from the movie. MAGIC NI KUYA Teaching also requires community work. This is where I switched from being a “teacher-authority” to a “teacher-brother”, especially in dealing with little tykes who are naturally restless, not to mention hungry, considering the situation of most Filipinos. So I pulled out a magic trick – a cut-and-restored rope trick, leaving some kids in awe. While others would say “it's not real.” “Wait!” I cried out. “I know... what's in... YOUR MINE... you're trying to find out how the trick was done, but you thought I got you first, am I right?” “Yes.” They giggled. Nice dirty little angels. Literally, these kids are, and not the kind of “dirty little angels” that could be in YOUR MINE. ;-) I continued “Don't answer my question... just DON'T answer my question... do want me to turn this rope into a snake? ...OOOPPPSS! DON'T ANSWER! I know... what's in... your mine. YOU ANSWERED “YES”? “Yes!” “Ok, but not now, because I got a story of a boy who always cried that there's a snake (pointed downwards) when in fact, there was none.”
Then I continued, “Can everyone raise their hands up? Sidewards? Hands on the head? Hands on your mouth? Hands on your lap? ...Very good, and now, the story: One time, there was a little boy who take care of chickens 'Cluck, cluck!' the chickens went. Then the boy thought of fooling the people so he shouted... 'SNAAAAAAKKKKE! There's a big snake in here (pointed downwards), devouring my chicks!' Then the people came with their sharp bolos, 'Where is it, so we can kill it?' The boy laughed 'Hahaha! There's no snake in here!' Then they told the boy, 'young man, stop doing that or one day, the real snake would come in and no one would help you.' The next morning, the boy was feeding his chickens. 'Cluck, cluck!' the chickens went. Then the boy thought of fooling the people so he shouted... “SNAAAAAKKKKE!” the kids interrupted. “Correct!” I said. “But for now, forget about the snake, don't mind the snake, ok? Don't even think about the snake” Then I continued the story, “There's a big snake in here (pointed downwards), devouring my chicks!' Then the people came with their sharp bolos, 'Where is it, so we can kill it?' The boy laughed 'Hahaha! There's no snake in here!' Then they told the boy, 'young man, stop doing that or one day, the real snake would come in and no one would help you.' The next morning, the boy was with his chickens again. 'Cluck, cluck!' the chickens went. Then the boy thought of fooling the people again so he shouted... “SNAAAAAAKKKKE!” the kids went. Grinning, I remkinded the kids, “Ey, I told you to forget!” The kids were giggling.
So I continued “There's a big snake in here (pointed downwards), devouring my chicks!' Then the people came with their sharp bolos, 'Where is it, so we can kill it?' The boy laughed 'Hahaha! There's no snake in here!' Then they told the boy, 'young man, stop doing that or one day, the real snake would come in and no one would help you.' But one day the real snake came. 'Baaaawwwkkkk!' the chickens cried, and one by one, the snake ate them. And the boy said...” “SNAAAAAAKKKKE!” The kids added. “Right! Then the boy cried, 'the real snake is here! Pleeeaaase!' But the people didn't listen. 'Aw come on!' They said, 'the boy's just fooling us!' So the boy can't do anything but cry. One by one, the snake... swallowed... the chicken. And when the snake was don with the chicken, it turned around! It's yellow eyes met with the boy's eyes... Then it opened its mouth... It stood up... and ate the boy! The end” “Yaaah!” The kids yelled. “It's alright, it's just a story. You know people eat snakes nowadays... So kids, do you want to be like that boy?” “No!” “Good! Do you want to be as big and as strong like that snake (pointed downwards)?” “Yes!” “Okay, what did the snake do with all of it's food, no wonder why it grew big?” “The snake finished them all... Raawwwrr!” A boy replied. “Very good, so do the same – no leftovers ok? Let's pray...”
Now they forgot about turning the rope into a snake. And who says kids don't forget? They do. But what matters, is what they have learned for the day. Then one of my pretty co-volunteer went to my table and gave me her number. We became friends, but with all due respect, I never called her up, perhaps I was dead scared; I don't know what made her do such thing. Or perhaps, I do. *wink* THE ARREST OF MR. OLIVER THE WORLD WAR WORKING SCHOLAR'S SYNDROME GAME KA NA BA? NO MORE NIGHTMARES TEACHER IAN, THE GUITAR MAN PAYAPANG DAIGDIG MY FIRST ONLINE ELEMENTARY CLASS AND THE SALESIAN SEMINAR EXPERT OF DEVIANCE A DIFFERENT KIND OF REPORTING