THESIS TO DO: 1. SUMMARY OF ALL THE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS OF THE PANEL USING RB FORM. WRITE THEM PER CHAPTER (EXAMPLE: CHAP 1 A. PROBLEM RATIONALE B. LIMITATION CHAP 2… ETC INDICATE ON THE LAST COLUMN OF THE SUMMARY THE PAGE NUMBER WHERE REVISIONS WERE DONE 2. PASS AND ASK PANEL TO SIGN APPROVAL SHEET ONCE APPROVED 3. MAKE PUBLISHABLE FORMAT (ATTACHED FILE) 4. COMPILE PLAGIARISM CHECK RESULTS, ERB CERT, APPRIVAL TO CONDUCT THE STUDY, VALIDATION FORM, CONSENT FORM, ETC. 5. SOFT COPY: MANUSCRIPT (MS WORD), PUBLISHABLE FORMAT (MS WORD), COPY OF INTERVENTION. **DOCUMENTS ARE PLACED ON ONE EXPANDABLE FOLDER WITH LABELS MANUSCRIPT REVISIONS: (INCLUDED ALL COMMENTS) To do: 1. print manuscript-okay na 2. print publishable format- okay na 3. hard bound manuscript (dark green) - okay na a. front cover same info as in front page b. TITLE- nasa side 4. soft copy- usb a. pnblishable format b. manuscript c. copy of intervention d. powerpoint presentation 5. buy expandable folder- lagyan ng labels each a. HARBBOUND MANU-okay na
1. CTRL+F ALL CHECKLISTS AND RENAME TO POST-NEURO ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. IMPEDIMENTS: WHY YOU USE OPTED? 4. LIT FOR NEUROSURGICAL ASSESSMENT SKILLS OF NURSING STUDENTS 5. DI KO GETS COMMENT NI MARICA SA RQ1. PAKICHECK 6. DEF OF TERMS: ADD NEURO ASS SKILLS, NEURO ASS CHECKLIST
cud 7. RESEARCH DESIGN- DESCRIBE QUASI AND HOW THE STUDY BECOME QUASI, WHAT IS A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN? 8. 3.4.2- DID YOU ASK PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR? WHAT IS THE RESPONSE? 9. DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE- ADD INTERVENTION PROTOCOL 10. 3.5 FROM VALIDITY TO RELIABILITY, WHERE DID YOU USED THIS? IN WHAT PART OF THE PAPER?
11. 3.6 SOURCE? 12. RECOMMENDATION: MAKE IT MORE VISUAL (BOOKLET WITH PICS, ETC.)
rq 1 better if you explain further the implication if there are assessed - list
top assessed and implication and least plus add rrl implication if not assessed CHAPTER 4- IEDIT YUNG MGA GINAWANG PARTS. 1. ADD SCALES PER PART 2. AND ADD YUNG ITEMS PER MEAN SCORE. EX: OBSERVATION 4.3 OUT OF 5 3. ADD COLUMN FOR HO 4. INTERPRETATION: ACCEPT OR REJECT? 5. MAKE SURE THERE ARE SUPPORTING LITS 6. RQ 1 BETTER IF YOU EXPLAIN FURTHER THE IMPLICATION IF THERE ARE ASSESSED