Suspicious Minds: On Barry Bonds, Lance Armstrong And George Bush

Suspicious Minds: on Barry Bonds, Lance Armstrong and George Bush ©Marc Leeds 3/14/2006 This is a column about sports. Or is it politics. It could be about the wonders of medical science or just about our willingness to overcome our sense of wonder. But above all, this is about Barry Bonds, Lance Armstrong, and George Bush. Let’s see if we have this straight. Barry Bonds and Lance Armstrong never failed a drug test. The San Francisco Chronicle reporters who claim to have the goods on Bonds and his alleged steroid use can only retell the stories of those who have implicated themselves in baseball’s steroid abuse scandal. They have no explanation for Bonds’s ability to pass all those drug tests. Nevertheless, many believe that the sanctity of America’s pastime requires Commissioner Bud Selig suspend Bonds from playing this season to protect the records of Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron. A suspension would be the equivalent of a death sentence on Bonds’s career, based on nothing more than well-written suspicion. There is the matter of Barry’s terrific musculature, but that is beside the point. The real point is that the allegations against Bonds cover a time period prior to baseball having any rules governing steroid use. Even if Bonds used steroids, and there are still those pesky tests he passed, he didn’t break any baseball rules. He may have broken U.S. law, but it is not Major League Baseball’s business to act as the government’s surrogate and impose penalties that keep a man from pursuing his chosen profession. But he is Barry Bonds. The press hates him, fans are at best split in their opinions about him, and he shows little interest in voluntarily surrendering his Fifth Amendment rights and coming clean—whatever the story may be. But they are his rights. Then there is the case of Lance Armstrong. Everybody loves him. Except the French. But that just adds to his badge of honor because America’s unofficial position is that we hate the French. Armstrong won seven consecutive Tours de France bicycle races, all after enduring surgery and grueling chemotherapy treatments to defeat testicular cancer. His daily menu, similar to those of most world-class athletes, is largely composed of multisyllabic nutritional supplements. The French have tested Armstrong a gazillion times, no doubt due to the rules of their beloved race but probably moreso because they are incredulous that a testicular cancer survivor, a guy who sits on a rock-hard splinter of a bicycle seat, can so regularly blow away the field. They haven’t said so, but the French probably feel Armstrong enjoyed an unfair advantage by having one testicle removed. He’s not exactly straddling the seat they way his competitors do.

/var/www/apps/collegelist/repos/collegelist/trunk/collegelist/tmp/scratch9/124326.doc

The point is that Lance never failed those drug tests. Armstrong has his detractors who claim to have assisted him with illegal doping, but those pesky tests still say otherwise. Either a guy who rides a bicycle all day is smart enough to hire evil genius chemists to outwit an entire country, a country that is a member of the exclusive nuclear club, or else he beat the tests because he didn’t cheat. That brings us to George Bush. He was under the impression that Iraq was bulking-up on weapons of mass destruction. All the tests the United Nations ran proved otherwise. He took us to war without proof. He also believed Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld when he said that our military could win with reduced forces because our technological superiority made us more nimble yet more forceful than in years gone by. Grateful Iraqis offering tea and flowers would quickly greet our troops. Didn’t happen. If George Bush were a French bicycling official, his suspicions may have thwarted a well-tested Lance Armstrong from setting a record that few believe will ever be beaten or equaled. If George Bush were commissioner of baseball, his suspicions would probably demand that he suspend a well-tested Barry Bonds from achieving home run immortality. But Bush’s suspicions have proven worthless and self-defeating. He circumvented process (the United Nations’ inspection committee looking for WMD in Iraq; the U.S. Constitution concerning warrantless wiretaps against the nation’s citizens, secret torture prisons around the world, and bogus military tribunals) and could be censured by the senate if it shows any spine and respect for the nation’s laws. In retrospect, Bush’s suspicions were unfounded but he was still free to take action. There are plenty of suspicions in Florida and Ohio that Bush actually lost his two presidential elections. Interestingly, there is no chance of taking action on those suspicions. Apparently, not all suspicions are created equal. For journalists and conspiracy theorists of all political stripes, a suspicion is a terrible thing to waste. Nevertheless, leave Barry alone. For the moment, the proof is on his side —whatever his neck size may be. And leave Lance alone. He’s retired from cycling and proved he’s twice as good as his competitors with just half the equipment. Bush, well, he’s another story. His proven falsehoods distracted the nation’s attention from more vital threats and flaunted the Constitution. Still, there is no recourse for Bush’s flops. Sports records exist as single line entries in record books and now databases, once in a while with asterisks. Historical records are written with extensive footnotes and documentation, nuanced by partisans. In the end, sports legacies harm no one. The same cannot be said for political legacies. Copyright (c) 2006 Marc Leeds. All rights reserved.

/var/www/apps/collegelist/repos/collegelist/trunk/collegelist/tmp/scratch9/124326.doc