Summer 2009

Summer 2009

EDUC 525 Multimedia Team Project Rubric Category

4 Distinguished

2 Apprentice

1 Novice

All text size is easy to read and contrasts well with background

3 Proficient Project The text size is easy to read but the background makes it difficult to see

Text clarity

The text size is not easy to read but contrasts well with the background

Layout

The layout is very clear and consistent. Very easy to navigate on the site. All text is easy to read and contrasts with the background.

The layout is mostly clear and consistent. Easy to navigate. Most text is easy to read and contrasts with the background.

Navigation (links)

All navigation links are clearly marked and functional. All content objectives are met, described, or clearly stated.

Most navigation links are clearly marked and functional. Most objectives are met, described, or clearly stated.

The layout is somewhat clear and consistent. Somewhat easy to navigate. Some of the text is easy to read but does not contrast with the background. Some of the navigation links are not clearly marked or functional. Some objectives are met, described, or stated.

The text size is not easy to read and the background makes it difficult to see The layout is not clear and is inconsistent. Difficult to navigate. Text is difficult to read and does not contrast with the background.

All the media elements operate correctly

Two of the media elements operate correctly Is mostly clear, edited, purposeful, and appropriate for the topic.

One of the media elements operate correctly Is somewhat clear, edited, purposeful, and appropriate for the topic.

Is mostly fluid, purposeful and appropriate for the topic. Is mostly clear, concise, purposeful and appropriate for the topic. Presentation Clear articulation but not as polished

Is somewhat fluid, purposeful and appropriate for the topic. Is somewhat clear, concise, purposeful and appropriate for the topic.

Content: Learner centered, NETS standards, clear DDD-E design, follows design flowchart or storyboard, 3 media elements, clear scaffolding, and assessments Media elements: Audio, Video, & Animation Audio Component

-Is clear, well edited, purposeful, and appropriate for topic.

Animation Component

Is fluid, purposeful and appropriate for topic.

Video Component

Is clear, concise, purposeful and appropriate for the topic.

Clarity of tone

Poised, clear articulation; proper volume; steady rate; enthusiasm; confidence

Explanation of design model: Description given of how the project was decided, designed, developed, and evaluated Full team participation

Subject knowledge is evident throughout the project. All information is clear, appropriate, and correct. Each individual covered material, as well as individual process. Personal experience was integrated where relevant and appropriate. Well-structured and presented in a logical sequence; Within two minutes of allotted time +/–

Subject knowledge is evident in much of the project. Most information is clear, appropriate, and correct. Most individuals covered material, as well as individual process.

Some subject knowledge is evident. Some Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.

Mostly structured, precise but parts may be unconnected to the rest of the presentation; Within four minutes of allotted time +/–

Somewhat structured but too much time spent on unimportant material. Disjointed sequence. Within six minutes of allotted time +/–

No technical issues with using Wimba classroom

Minimal (1-2) technical issues with using Wimba classroom

Moderate (3-4) technical issues with using Wimba classroom

Grade

Comments:

Overall organization

Technicality

Score Totals

Some mumbling (microphone volume too low); uneven rate; little or no expression

A few of the individuals covered the material. Audience was left with minor questions.

None of the navigation links are clearly marked or functional. Few objectives are met, described or stated.

None of the media elements operate correctly Is not clear, not well edited, nor is it purposeful and appropriate for the topic. Is neither fluid purposeful nor appropriate for the topic. Is not clear, concise, purposeful or appropriate for the topic. Inaudible or too loud; rate too slow/fast; speaker seemed uninterested and used monotone Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed. The team did not present the information in such a manner that the audience could follow or understand the process or the concept. Unstructured, strays from the subject. Much of the presentation out of logical order. Too long or too short; ten or more minutes above or below the allotted time Many (>5) technical issues with using Wimba classroom