Presented By: Pankaj Agarwal (President) Mohit Almal (Secretary) Kaushambi Ghosh ( Co- Secretary) Manish Madhukar (Member) 1
2
Agenda Subprime •Traditional Model Vs Subprime Model •Players in the Game
Bubble •Housing Bubble Why it burst?
Global Crisis Impact Events Bailouts What Next? 3
Subprime
4
5
6
Traditional Model Vs Subprime Model
7
8
Players in the GAME
9
Players Player 1: Fed -- Fed kept the interest rate low during much of 1990s and particularly 2001-2005 (low oil prices, and low inflation prompted the policy), fueling the market -- During the 2001-2005, FFR was in the 1% to 3% range, and mostly in the 1% range -- Fed encouraged more risky ARM lending (Greenspan) Player 2: Mortgage Salespersons -- Worked on commission based on the number of arms successfully twisted 10
Contd.. Player 3: Primary Lenders -- No incentives for judicious lending Banks no longer needed to hold on to the mortgage, as use of mortgage-backed securities made risk taking more appealing -- Use of ARMs with low teaser rates (below market rates for a while, followed by much higher rates tied to index, LIBOR + some %). Teaser rates are popular when long-term interest rates are at historical lows (like much of this period), as they help lenders benefit from ARMs as rates rise -- Net Effect: Many loans were made to NINJA’s (people with No Income, No Jobs or Assets). 11
Contd.. Player 4: Other Financial Institutions -- Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae issued many Mortgage Backed Securities -- Other financial institutions that traded in these as well as derivatives based on real estate assets. Many of these were global institutions 12
Contd.. Player 5: Credit rating Agencies and Analysts -- Lack of market for many of these securities, so models were used to price them -- Inflated ratings, mostly in A range (similar to T-Bills) -- Conflict of Interest: Investment bankers’ analysts were rating investment bankers’ clients (scandal) -- For example, 3 months prior to its demise, AIG was rated strong buy (8 analysts), buy(3), hold (10))!!! Player 6: Home Buyers (Taking Excessive Risk) -- Home buyers were enjoying the ride -- New ones were joining the ride, even if unqualified -- Home ownership up from 60% in 1990s to 70%
13
Bubble
14
Historic Bubbles Dutch Tulip Mania South Sea Bubble British Railway Bubble US Railway Bubble Roaring Twenties Multi Bubble Internet Bubble Housing Bubble
(1630s) (1710s) (1840s) (1880s) (1920s) (1960s) (1990s) (2000s)
15
Structure of a Bubble Displacement
(diffusion of new technology starts)
Take off
(stock prices show abnormal increase)
Exuberance
(stock prices grow at very high rate)
Critical Stage
(stock price growth slows down)
Crash
(stock prices start tumbling)
16
Population Dynamics in the Course of a Bubble
17
Housing Bubble
18
fafafafjafkajfajfabf afbabfabfabfabfaf bajfbajabfabfabfa bfabbafbafabfbafb afbafbababfbafbaf babfabfbafbababf bafbabfabfbafbab ababfbafbabababf ababfabfabfbabfa bfbafbafbabfbafba fbabffabfbafbafba bfbafbabfabfabfab fbabfabfbafbfabfa afaaafafafafaffafaa a
19
20
21
Why housing bubble burst????
22
23
Process of Securitization
24
25
Recap: Causes Boom and bust in the housing market
High-risk mortgage loans and lending practices Securitization practices Speculation
26
Contd.. Inaccurate credit ratings Government policies
Policies of central banks Financial institution debt levels and incentives Credit default swaps 27
How bubble burst led to crisis???
28
How did this turn into a crisis ? Step 1 - The housing boom in the US started fading out in 2007
Step 2 - Boom had led to massive increase in supply of housing Step 3 - Thus House prices started falling
Step 4 - This increased the default rate among sub-prime borrowers Step 5 - These borrowers were no longer able/willing to pay high price for a house that was declining in value Step 6 – Security/Guarantee being the house being bought , this increased the supply of houses for sale while lowering the demand, thereby lowering prices even further and setting off a vicious cycle 29
Ripple Effect-Suck Everything The housing bubble Defaults & write A hole in the bubble Banks go belly-up Banks get sucked in 30
31
How it Unfolded???
32
33
34
Impact
35
Banks
Writedown($ billion)
Actions
Citigroup
55.1
Bailout by Fed Reserve($326 billion)
Merrill Lynch
51.8
Taken over by Bank of America
UBS
44.2
$5.3 billion Swiss government bailout
HSBC
27.4
Wachovia
22.5
Bank of America
21.2
Royal Bank of Scotland
14.9
Morgan Stanley
14.4
JP Morgan chase
14.3
Lehman Brothers
8.2
Files for Bankruptcy
AIG
18.5
bailed out by Federal reserve
Wells Fargo
bank holding companies
36
Crashing Stock Indices 30000
Value
25000 20000 15000
10000 17th Jan' 2008
5000
25th Nov' 2008
0
Indices 37
List of events
38
Date
Events
8th September
Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac placed into conservatorship by U.S. Government
14th September
Bank of America agrees to purchase Merrill Lynch for $35B
15th September
Lehman Brothers declares bankruptcy
16th September
Reserve Primary Fund “breaks the buck” U.S. government seizes control of AIG in $85B bailout
18th September
Treasury Secretary Paulson announces bailout plan
19th September
Governments worldwide announce short selling restrictions Treasury establishes Temporary Guarantee Program for money market funds
21st September
Fed allows investment banks Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to become bank holding companies
23rd September
Warren Buffett announces $5B investment in Goldman Sachs
39
Date
Events
25th September
Washington Mutual is seized by FDIC; assets sold to JPMorgan for $1.9B
29th September
Citigroup agrees to acquire Wachovia with FDIC guarantee; a private transaction with Wells Fargo is later announced First bailout bill is rejected by U.S. House of Representatives
3rd October
- Congress passes TARP legislation
FDIC temporarily increases deposit insurance to $250,000 7th October
Fed announces Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF)
8th October
Coordinated rate cut by central banks around the globe
13th October
Mitsubishi UFJ finalizes $9B equity investment in Morgan Stanley
14th October
Mitsubishi UFJ finalizes $9B equity investment in Morgan Stanley Treasury announces TARP Capital Purchase Program
21st October
Fed announces Money Market Investor Funding Facility (MMIFF)
40
Loss in crisis 1000 900 800 700 600 500 Expon. (Series1) 400 300 200 100 0 savings and loan crisis(198695)
Banking crisis(1990-99)
Banking Crisis(98-99)
Subprime crisis(2007-present)
41
IMF raises the loss amount to 1.4 trillion dollars
42
Country wise Action United kingdom Has lined up a $850-billion rescue plan, May nationalise Royal Bank of Scotland Will recapitalise banks by up to $88 billion. Abbey, Barclays, HSBC, Llyods, Standard Chartered, HBOS and Nationwide Building Society can draw from an aggregate of $44 billion to boost their Tier 1 capital Bank of England will infuse liquidity of $351 billion through loans The government will guarantee $439 billion worth of short-and-medium term debt Britain has seized control of mortgage lender Bradford & Bingley Earlier this year nationalised Northern Rock Alarm: The total liabilities of Barclays of £1,300 billion (leverage ratio of over 60), surpass Britain's GDP
43
Contd.. Belgium The government took partial control of the struggling Fortis Bank France, Belgium and Luxembourg stumped up $93 billion to recapitalise Dexia, a French-Belgian lender that ran up huge losses in its US operations Alarm: Fortis Bank's liabilities are several times larger than the GDP of Belgium (leverage ratio of 33)
Iceland The government has nationalised three of Iceland's biggest banks Accounts in these banks stand frozen 44
Contd.. United states May pick up ownership in failing US banks (Morgan Stanley is reported to be one) Fed ready to lend directly to stressed companies
Germany Has guaranteed all bank deposits Has organised a credit lifeline of euros 35 billion for blue-chip commercial real estate lender Hypo Real Estate Holding Alarm: The total liabilities of Deutsche Bank (leveraging ratio of over 50) amount to 2,000-billion euro, which is more than 80 per cent of the GDP of Germany
45
Contd.. Singapore Eased monetary policy for the first time since 2003 after sinking into its first recession in six years, hit by the meltdown in financial markets The government revised its 2008 growth forecast to around 3 per cent from an earlier estimate of 4 to 5
Italy UniCredit Bank has announced plans to raise its capital ratio by spinning of property assets
Ireland Has guaranteed all bank deposits
46
Contd.. Spain Will spend 50 billion Euros ($68 billion) to buy bank assets, almost a third of the proposed 2009 central government budget
Japan Yamato Life Insurance failed with $2.7 billion in debt The government may revive a bank-rescue law of the 1990s banking crisis Tokyo may set up a $100-billion fund to prop up smaller lenders Alarm: Real estate companies are folding up, forcing regional banks to raise reserves against bad loans 47
Bailout Ben
48
Rationale for the Bailout Stabilise the Economy
Improve Liquidity Comprehensive Strategy Immediate and Significant Broad Impact
Second Bailout of $800 billion announced yesterday by FED
Investor Confidence Impact on Economy and GDP 49
50
When the music stops in terms of liquidity, things will get complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance. We're still dancing. Chuck Prince, Citigroup
51
Now What???
52
Liquidity Crunch The reduced availability of liquidity Interest rate premiums U.S.: Banks not lending to each other ROW: London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) Libor is used to set rates on the $360 trillion of financial products worldwide. Three month Libor set an all time high last week at 5.34%.
53
Overview of Credit Exposures and Estimated Losses (September 2008; billions of US dollars) Amount Outstanding
Estimated Losses
Residential Credit: Depository Institution Loans Non-Agency Securities GSE Exposures Subtotal
$2,889 $2,531 $4,807 $10,227
$308 $523 $76 $907
Non Residential Credit: Loans Non-Agency Securities Subtotal
$7,670 $5,440 $13,110
$195 $475 $670
Total
$23,337
$1,577 54
Estimated Costs of Banking Crisis Country
Period
Estimated Cost as % of GDP
United States
1980
2.5 %
Japan
1990
20.0 % est.
Norway
U.S.A.
1987-89
4.0 %
Korea
1997
60.0 % p
Indonesia
1997
80.0 % p
2007-2010
$700 billion = 5.0 % $1600 billion = 11.4 % $3200 billion = 22.8 %
55
Is Depression Imminent: During the Great Depression Combined GDP of 7 largest economies dropped by 20% during 1929-1932 There were no deposit insurance, so people withdrew money from banks and many banks failed Fed increased interest rate (!!) and reduced liquidity U.S. imposed heavy tariffs and other countries reciprocated lowering world trade by 70% The situation is much different as a lot is learned from experiences of the Great Depression 56
57