Structural Issues And 2009 Repairs

  • Uploaded by: Andy Arthur
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Structural Issues And 2009 Repairs as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 562
  • Pages: 29
STRUCTURAL ISSUES

Tom Hoffman, P.E. R-1 Structures Engineer

1

BRIDGE STATISTICS • BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

5521180

• AGE:

Built in 1929

• LENGTH:

14 spans, 2,184 feet

• ROADWAY WIDTH:

26.1 feet

• STRUCTURE TYPE:

Combination of thru truss, deck truss, and deck plate girders

• BIKE / PED ACCOMMODATIONS:

None

• VERTICAL CLEARANCE ON BRIDGE:

14 feet

• MAX VERTICAL CLEARANCE OVER WATER:

95 feet

• AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TAFFIC (2008): • WEIGHT CAPACITY:

3,150 vehicles per day -Restricted since 1994 to less than 102,000 pounds. -Currently reduced to a single lane/ 40 ton posting.

2

“RECENT” WORK HISTORY •1990-91 Bridge Rehabilitation Project

•Appx $7.0 million in 1989 (Appx. $17.3 in 2007 dollars) • Bearings - Some Cleaned, Some Replaced • Spot Painting (Span 4-9, bearings) • Deck Replacement With Lightweight System • Floor Beam Replacement and Strengthening (some spans) • Joint Replacement • Bridge Rail • Approach Slab Replacement • Concrete Repairs on Piers and Abutments • Pier 4 Compression Straps Added (Now occur on Piers 4-8) -The first strapped in 1974 to arrest crack development

• Emergency Repair Contract – Compression Band Replacement - $125,000 in 2005 Pier Repairs - $100,000 in 2008 Steel Repairs - $1 million estimated in 2009 • Maintenance Repair of Bridge Joints – 2005, 2006, 2008 3

INITIAL PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Bridge Condition Rating • Score 3.375 out of a possible 7 points (2009) • Scores between 3 and 4 indicate ”serious deterioration or not functioning as originally designed” • Problems are with main carrying members, bearings, joints, concrete, paint, and wearing surface

Federal Sufficiency Rating • Score 29.2 (2008) out of a possible 100 points • Scores less than 65 qualify for Federal funding

Load Restricted • 40 Ton limit restricts all overloads, including log trucks and milk trucks

Limited roadway vertical clearance of 14’-0”

• Trucks in excess of 14’ have struck the bridge on several occasions, requiring the bridge to be closed for repair 4

Truss Terminology

5

Channel Piers

6

Concrete Compression Strap Replacement

7

Concrete Deterioration

8

Concrete Deterioration Pier 3- Before

9

Concrete Deterioration Pier 3- After

10

Pier 8 Condition (Before)

11

Pier 8 Condition (After)

12

Steel and Paint Condition

13

Steel and Paint Condition

14

Joints

15

Bearings

16

Recent Repairs-

Floorbeams Pier 5 and 8

17

Recent Repairs-

Floorbeams Pier 5 and 8

18

Recent RepairsBottom Chord

19

Recent RepairsBottom Chord

20

Recent RepairsSteel Pier

21

Recent RepairsSteel Pier

22

Recent RepairsGusset Plates

23

24

Other Yellow Flags

Many yellow flags for gussets and strap ties are not being addressed at this time. All red flags, and yellow flags of significance are being repaired. 25

26

What Now?

1) Paint of Select Areas – Some areas are being blasted and painted to slow deterioration of critical areas. 2) Finish Chord Repairs 3) Finish Floorbeam Repairs and Add Troughs 4) Re-Inspect in the Spring

Repair as Needed

5) Possibly Paint Selected Truss Members and under Joint Areas -Chords of Spans 4, 5 and 9 - Entire Truss of Spans 6 and span 8, span 7 (splash zone down) - Under Joint Areas at Piers 3, 5 and 8 - Estimated at $6 Million 27

General Questions….

1) Why was the load posting reduced? 2) What does it mean? 3) Does a single lane really make things better? 4) $64,000 question….Is the bridge safe?

28

Questions????

29

Related Documents

Lentons Repairs
June 2020 2
Concrete Repairs
November 2019 7
Structural
October 2019 47
Flat Roof Repairs
November 2019 5

More Documents from ""