Stern V Kruglak
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Stern V Kruglak as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 276
- Pages: 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE PRESENT:
OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY
Hon. EDWARD H. LEHNER
PART Justice
JOSEPH STERN, INDEX NO.
Plaintiff, MOTION DATE
2/21
MOTION SEQ. NO.
001
-againstBANIA, INC., CRAIG ALONA KRUGLAK,
and MOTION CAL. NO.
Defendants.
The following papers, numbered 1 to
were read on this motion PAPERS NUMBERED
Notice of
Order to Show Cause
- Affidavits - Exhibits ...
Answering Affidavits - Exhibits Replying Affidavits
0 I-
n
Cross-Motion:
Yes
No
W
W U W
a
t U
t-
o W K W
a
o
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion by plaintiff "striking defendant's answer" and entering judgment in favor of plaintiff is denied and the answer dated December 17,2001 is deemed served upon plaintiff. appears that although plaintiff served its complaint in January 2000, he had not entered judgment as of the time of service of the aforesaid answer and offered no valid excuse for his failure t o do so during the 23 months period preceding such service, although plaintiff's counsel did send letters t o the judgment clerk seeking entry. The parties had apparently been negotiating a resolution of the matter and eventually a check dated June 2002 in the amount of $25,000 was sent t o plaintiff's counsel and deposited by him. However, t w o months later the said sum was returned t o defendants. Since there appears t o be a valid dispute as t o the amount owing, a possible meritorious defense has been demonstrated. This action is transferred t o the Civil Court pursuant t o CPLR Dated: February 24,2003 J.S.C.
Check one:
FINAL DISPOSITION
NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY
Hon. EDWARD H. LEHNER
PART Justice
JOSEPH STERN, INDEX NO.
Plaintiff, MOTION DATE
2/21
MOTION SEQ. NO.
001
-againstBANIA, INC., CRAIG ALONA KRUGLAK,
and MOTION CAL. NO.
Defendants.
The following papers, numbered 1 to
were read on this motion PAPERS NUMBERED
Notice of
Order to Show Cause
- Affidavits - Exhibits ...
Answering Affidavits - Exhibits Replying Affidavits
0 I-
n
Cross-Motion:
Yes
No
W
W U W
a
t U
t-
o W K W
a
o
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion by plaintiff "striking defendant's answer" and entering judgment in favor of plaintiff is denied and the answer dated December 17,2001 is deemed served upon plaintiff. appears that although plaintiff served its complaint in January 2000, he had not entered judgment as of the time of service of the aforesaid answer and offered no valid excuse for his failure t o do so during the 23 months period preceding such service, although plaintiff's counsel did send letters t o the judgment clerk seeking entry. The parties had apparently been negotiating a resolution of the matter and eventually a check dated June 2002 in the amount of $25,000 was sent t o plaintiff's counsel and deposited by him. However, t w o months later the said sum was returned t o defendants. Since there appears t o be a valid dispute as t o the amount owing, a possible meritorious defense has been demonstrated. This action is transferred t o the Civil Court pursuant t o CPLR Dated: February 24,2003 J.S.C.
Check one:
FINAL DISPOSITION
NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
Related Documents
Stern V Kruglak
October 2019 2
Stern V. Sony
June 2020 4
Stern Review
September 2019 27
Prospekt Stern
May 2020 21
Live V Howard Stern 03-17-09
April 2020 1