Sso Data
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Sso Data as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 530
- Pages: 2
SSO Name # Size % ELL % Academy for Educational Development PSO 7 447 19.4 Center for Educational Innovation-PEA PSO 71 636 11.6 Community LSO 164 624 9.5 CUNY School Success Network 13 421 7.8 Empowerment Support Organization 511 605 12.4 Fordham University PSO 10 533 21.9 Integrated Curriculum and Instruction LSO 363 864 12.5 Knowledge LSO 97 748 6.9 Leadership LSO 119 621 13.7 New Visions for Public Schools PSO 75 457 9.9 Replications, Inc. PSO 11 319 15.2
Sp Ed% Title I Asian Black Hispanic White PR 07 PR 08 QR 07 QR 22.6 63.4 3.1 39.4 55.4 1.3 66.7 62.6 0 16.5 53.8 11.2 30.7 42.8 14.4 56.5 57.4 34.3 15.9 68.4 4.8 47.9 39.4 6.7 51.4 55.8 16.6 10 56.7 8.6 42.4 42 6.2 53.2 63.5 30 14.3 57.8 9.5 34.3 42.7 12 55.9 60.4 39.5 13.3 68.7 5.8 31 55.3 6.5 52.2 51.3 22.2 14.3 54.1 20.3 24.5 34.2 19.8 54.4 58.8 46.6 14.6 70 8 52.4 29.6 8.6 48 51.3 29.9 17.8 61.9 3.3 32.4 59.2 4 51.2 57.4 32.2 11.7 54.9 5.4 42.3 44.2 4.8 58 58.3 23.7 13.1 67.9 4.5 44.7 46.6 1.9 60.9 54.1 0
#: The number of schools that are members of the school support network Size: The average number of students enrolled in the network's schools % ELL: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are considered English langugage learners % Sp Ed: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are entitled to special education services % TItle I: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools whose families are eligible for free or reduced lunch according to federal poverty guidelines PR 07: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2006-2007 progress reports PR 08: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2007-2008 progress reports QR 07: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on their DOE Quality Review in the 2006-2007 school year QR 08: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on their DOE Quality Review in the 2007-2008 school year Satisfaction: The percentage of principals who reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the SSO % Change PR: The percentage change in the SSO's raw progress report score average from 2007 to 2008 % Change QR: The percentage change in each SSO's proportion of schools that got the highest ratings on their Quality Reviews from 2007 to 2008 All data from the Department of Education's SSO profiles
08 60 65.2 55.2 61.5 64.7 60 63.6 68.1 61.6 44.6 62.5
Satisfaction 100 93 89 85 95 100 94 99 100 95 82
% change PR% change QR -6.55 100 1.57 47.39 7.89 69.93 16.22 51.22 7.45 38.95 -1.75 63 7.48 26.73 6.43 56.09 10.8 47.73 0.51 46.86 -12.57 100
%As 07%As 08 %Bs07 %Bs08 33.3 25 50 37.5 7.7 47.1 53.8 35.3 80 40 20 60 25.6 33.3 44.2 46.3 11.1 10 44.4 50 27.6 45.1 44.4 36 17.6 35.4 31.9 43.8 20.9 31.4 34.2 46.3 25 30.3 42.6 47 6.8 20 35.2 42.1 23.5 40.2 39.5 43.6
Sp Ed% Title I Asian Black Hispanic White PR 07 PR 08 QR 07 QR 22.6 63.4 3.1 39.4 55.4 1.3 66.7 62.6 0 16.5 53.8 11.2 30.7 42.8 14.4 56.5 57.4 34.3 15.9 68.4 4.8 47.9 39.4 6.7 51.4 55.8 16.6 10 56.7 8.6 42.4 42 6.2 53.2 63.5 30 14.3 57.8 9.5 34.3 42.7 12 55.9 60.4 39.5 13.3 68.7 5.8 31 55.3 6.5 52.2 51.3 22.2 14.3 54.1 20.3 24.5 34.2 19.8 54.4 58.8 46.6 14.6 70 8 52.4 29.6 8.6 48 51.3 29.9 17.8 61.9 3.3 32.4 59.2 4 51.2 57.4 32.2 11.7 54.9 5.4 42.3 44.2 4.8 58 58.3 23.7 13.1 67.9 4.5 44.7 46.6 1.9 60.9 54.1 0
#: The number of schools that are members of the school support network Size: The average number of students enrolled in the network's schools % ELL: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are considered English langugage learners % Sp Ed: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are entitled to special education services % TItle I: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools whose families are eligible for free or reduced lunch according to federal poverty guidelines PR 07: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2006-2007 progress reports PR 08: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2007-2008 progress reports QR 07: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on their DOE Quality Review in the 2006-2007 school year QR 08: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on their DOE Quality Review in the 2007-2008 school year Satisfaction: The percentage of principals who reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the SSO % Change PR: The percentage change in the SSO's raw progress report score average from 2007 to 2008 % Change QR: The percentage change in each SSO's proportion of schools that got the highest ratings on their Quality Reviews from 2007 to 2008 All data from the Department of Education's SSO profiles
08 60 65.2 55.2 61.5 64.7 60 63.6 68.1 61.6 44.6 62.5
Satisfaction 100 93 89 85 95 100 94 99 100 95 82
% change PR% change QR -6.55 100 1.57 47.39 7.89 69.93 16.22 51.22 7.45 38.95 -1.75 63 7.48 26.73 6.43 56.09 10.8 47.73 0.51 46.86 -12.57 100
%As 07%As 08 %Bs07 %Bs08 33.3 25 50 37.5 7.7 47.1 53.8 35.3 80 40 20 60 25.6 33.3 44.2 46.3 11.1 10 44.4 50 27.6 45.1 44.4 36 17.6 35.4 31.9 43.8 20.9 31.4 34.2 46.3 25 30.3 42.6 47 6.8 20 35.2 42.1 23.5 40.2 39.5 43.6
Related Documents
Sso Data
April 2020 6
Sso Data 2009
June 2020 3
Sso Guidebook
May 2020 8
Sso Cetak
June 2020 16
Eva Sso-m-i.docx
June 2020 29