Socio Economic Appraisal

  • Uploaded by: Saurabh Suman
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Socio Economic Appraisal as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 664
  • Pages: 16
Project Appraisal and Finance

Socio-Economic Appraisal Mona Iyer

Practical Approaches to SEA • Why - SEA • When-For what type of projects/what stage • Controlled/guided by….. • How to carryout • Limitations/biases/errors

Why • To identify impacts of development activity and facilitate planning and decision making – (eg coastal areas, marine ecology-land reclamation in kerala backwaters, Kalpsar project)

• As a requirement for fund/loan disbursal • As a legal requirement-some aspects • To identify benefits of technology/product in the market – Eg Vodafone- SIM project, AMC Bond

• Benefits of training/technology transfer to the users (eg milk co-operatives)

When • When the project/facility/development/policy change is proposed • After the project/facility/development/policy change is in place

• SEIA Not a Mandate by Law separately, part of EIA- Moral responsibility in larger interest – Defined by Governments • Sector specific • State/ Geographic location specific

– by lending agencies – by Communities/individual affected to have voice in decisions

How-Typical Components

• Generally assessment should be across population- social equity • Assessment could focus on – Gender – Particular class (income) – Particular aboriginal community

• What matters is not only the physical changes around the projects but the meaning, perceptions and social significance of these changes to the local/affected communities.

Typical Socio-Economic Assessment Variables

• Population Characteristics

– Population Change Ethnic and racial /caste distribution – Influx or outflows of temporary workers /Seasonal residents

• Community Structures – – – – – –

Voluntary associations /Interest group change Employment/income characteristics Employment equity Industrial/commercial diversity Presence of planning and zoning activity Change in community infrastructure/resources

• Political and Social Resources – Stakeholder Leadership capability, Distribution of power and authority

• Individual and Family Changes – – – – –

Perceptions of risk, health, and safety Displacement/relocation concerns Trust in political and social institutions Attitudes towards policy/project Residential stability -Family and friendship networks Concerns about social well-being



• •

Methods of projecting the future -the heart of social assessment. • most fall into the following categories:

• Comparative method; Straightline trend projects taking an existing trend and simply projecting the same rage of change into the future); • Population multiplier methods(each specified increase in population implies designated multiples of some other variable, e.g. jobs, housing units);

• Scenarios(1) logical-imaginations based on construction of hypothetical futures through a process of mentally modeling the assumptions about the variables in question; and (2) fitted empiricalsimilar past cases used to analyze the present case with experts adjusting the scenario by taking into account the unique characteristics of the present case; • Expert testimony

• Computer modeling involving the mathematical formulation of premises and a process of quantitative weighing of variables); • Calculation of "future foregone" " (a number of methods have been formulated to determine what options would be given up irrevocably as a result of a plan or project, e.g., river recreation and agricultural land use after the building of a dam).

What does it give • scientifically reasonable assessment of the probable impacts in advance of the development event. • It is a very different matter from providing solid proof of impacts after the impacts occur and all the evidence is in! Generally Environmental and Socio-Economic Appraisals/Impact Assessments are by their nature anticipatory1. • • •

1The Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for

Some limitations/common errors/biases

At every step/stage. Some typical errors are:

• •

• Problem formulation : – objectives v/s data collection tools and techniquesiterative till survey groups and tools are finalised

• Project definition: – Baseline information, influence area/population

• Sample size selection: – Statistical relevance and resource/time availability

• Sample locations: – Within influence area , co-operative respondents/amenable to survey, presence of NGO,CBO

• Questionnaire : – Language-translation to retain essence, length, sequencing. (initiate with FGDs , pilot surveys, informal meetings)

• Data profiling/analysis: – Error in entry, spread sheet errors of formula,

Other useful references • Operational Policies, The World Bank • Guidelines, JBIC, ADB • Sector/Country Specific guidelines based on project type •

Related Documents


More Documents from "Dr.VSR.Subramaniam"