Session7-dscr+conventional Risk Mitigation

  • Uploaded by: Saurabh Suman
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Session7-dscr+conventional Risk Mitigation as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 473
  • Pages: 8
Infrastructure Project Finance Investment Decisions DSCR

DSCR • The amount of cash flow available to meet annual interest and principal payments on debt. • This ratio should ideally be over 1. That would mean the project is generating enough income to pay its debt obligations. • In general, it is calculated by: Amount available to repay (Service) debt/ Debt to be repaid i.e (PADT+ Dep+ Interest on debt) / (Interest on debt + Principal)

DSCR • A DSCR of less than 1 would mean a negative cash flow. A DSCR of less than 1, say .95, would mean that there is only enough net operating income to cover 95% of annual debt payments. • Generally DSCR greater than 1.5 to 2 preferred. However this is not a set rule

Project Risks • Capital budgeting / investment decision techniques were discussed assuming that projects do not involve any risks • However, in real situation risks exist -inability or limitation of the decision maker to anticipate risks and include them in project forecasts • Large number of events influence forecasts which cannot be generalized. However, Broadly can be grouped as follows. – Risks related to General economic conditions • Govt. Fiscal policies, political changes, social conditions etc

– Sector specific factors • Change in sector policy, innovations in the technologies in the sector, changes in the cost of raw material etc

– Project Specific factors • Change in management, natural disaster, labour issues etc.

Project Risks • Project Structuring • Contracts and Agreements • Conventional Techniques to handle risks – Payback – Risk Adjusted discount rate – Certainty equivalent coefficient.

Project Risks • Payback – Oldest and commonly used method – Used more often as risk handling method rather than investment decision – Payback period fixed considering risk factors based on sector experience – Usually prefers short payback to longer ones. Limitations: • Intuitive • Assumption that project would go exactly as per plans for certain fixed period (payback period) • Ignores time value of money

Project Risks • Risk Adjusted discount rate – Riskier projects may have higher uncertainty of returns and hence higher risk premium. – Risk premium rate to be added to the risk free rate while discounting the cash flows NPV= -C0+C1/(1+kf+kr)+C2/(1+kf+kr)^2….. – If IRR method used then IRR>= kf+kr. Limitations: • No easy way of estimating risk adjusted discount rate • Does not make all types of risk adjustment in the cashflows that are forecast over future years

Project Risks • Certainty equivalent coefficient – Riskier projects may have conservative cash flows. NPV= -C0+C1*α1/(1+kf)+C2* α 2/(1+kf)^2….. – If IRR method used then IRR>= kf. However conservative cashflows will be used Limitations: • Intuitive α • If forecasts pass through several layers in larger organization forecasts may become ultra conservative • Some good cashflows may also get reduced in the process

Related Documents

Risk
December 2019 37
Risk
May 2020 24
Risk
November 2019 28

More Documents from ""