Sem Scoring Rubric
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Sem Scoring Rubric as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 984
- Pages: 3
3rd Quarter Physics Project: Simple Electric Motor (SEM) Scoring Rubric Criteria The Motor:
8-10 pts
Durability •
Functionality
The motor is seen to withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is very sturdy.
•
•
•
The motor is working perfectly. • The motor is freestanding. • The coil support is not wobbling when in operation. • The coil turns at the center and does not shift to the left or right. • The coil rotates fast it appears like a blur. • The coil windings are uniform and properly wound.
Materials •
Appearance
The Group:
5-7 pts
Complete set of materials. • Correct materials are used as found in the list of materials. • Relevant addons (i.e. switch, etc…) are incorporated. • The motor is very neat and clean. • The different parts of the motor are distinguishable and very presentable.
8-10 pts
The motor is seen to withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is slightly sturdy. The motor is working well. • The motor is freestanding. • The coil support wobbles slightly when in operation. • The coil turns slightly off center and shifts to the left or right. • The coil rotates fast for a moment then slows down and stops. • The coil windings are slightly uniform yet properly wound. • Complete set of materials. • Some materials used are not in the list of materials. • Some add-ons are incorporated.
•
The motor is neat and clean. • The different parts of the motor are distinguishable and presentable.
4-7 pts
1-4 pts
No point
•
The motor is seen to slightly withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is not sturdy. • The motor is not properly working. • The motor is not freestanding. • The coil support wobbles when in operation. • The coil turns off center and shifts to the left or right. • The coil rotates very slowly. • The coil windings are not uniform and not properly wound.
•
•
Incomplete set of materials. • Most materials used are not in the list of materials. • Add-ons are not incorporated.
•
•
•
The motor is pretty neat and clean. • Some parts of the motor are distinguishable and presentable.
2-3 pts
The motor is seen not to bear up future wear and tear. • The contraption is not durable. • The motor is not working at all. • The motor is not freestanding. • The coil support wobbles when in operation. • The coil does not turn at all. • The coil windings are not uniform and not properly wound.
Incomplete set of materials. • Incorrect materials are used. • Add-ons are not incorporated.
The motor is dirty and not presentable.
1 pt
Creativity and • The finished project shows a lot Originality •
of creativity. It also shows originality by using a unique approach that truly enhanced the project.
Resourcefulne • Most of the ss materials/tools
Time Management
used are not purchased but recycled or reused objects found anywhere were integrated. • The dyad or individual finished early or before the time allotted for the project execution.
The How-to Paper: Format
•
The finished project shows some creativity. • It also shows originality by using a unique approach that truly enhanced the project.
•
The finished project shows limited creativity. • It also shows some originality.
•
•
Most of the materials/tools used are not purchased; some recycled or reused objects were used.
•
Some of the materials/tools used are purchased not recycled or reused objects.
•
The materials/tools used are purchased; recycled or reused objects were never used.
•
The dyad or individual finished just in time.
•
The dyad or individual finished a few moments after the time allotted for the project execution.
•
The dyad or individual did not finish on time.
8-10 pts
5-7 pts
•
•
Organization •
• •
Content •
•
The paper has acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Appropriate font style, size, color and other formatting styles. • Has the correct number of pages.
Extremely well organized. • Has logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; most transitions are easy to follow. • Enhances the effectiveness of the project.
Completely accurate; facts were precise and explicit. • Reflections
The paper has mostly acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Appropriate font style, size, color but the other formatting styles were not chosen wisely. • Has the correct number of pages. Well organized. Has logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; transitions are somewhat easy to follow. • Enhances the effectiveness of the project to a certain, favorable degree.
Mostly accurate; facts were mostly precise and explicit. • Reflections and/or realizations
The finished project shows zero creativity. • It also didn’t show originality.
1-4 pts •
The paper has some acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Inappropriate font style, size, color; the other formatting styles were badly chosen. • Has the wrong number of required pages. • Somewhat well organized. • Has somewhat logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; some transitions are not easy to follow. • Slightly enhances the effectiveness of the project. • Partly accurate; facts were somewhat precise and explicit. • Reflections
No point •
The paper has unacceptable, irrelevant, illogical, unsatisfactory and badly designed format. • Inappropriate font style, size, color; the other formatting styles were badly chosen. • Has the wrong number of required pages. • Not organized. • Has no logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; the transitions are hard to follow. • Does not enhance the effectiveness of the project.
•
Not accurate; facts were imprecise and not clear.
and/or realizations are proper and sincere.
are mostly proper and sincere.
and/or realizations are partly proper and sincere.
•
Reflections and/or realizations are improper and insincere.
TOTAL
8-10 pts
Durability •
Functionality
The motor is seen to withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is very sturdy.
•
•
•
The motor is working perfectly. • The motor is freestanding. • The coil support is not wobbling when in operation. • The coil turns at the center and does not shift to the left or right. • The coil rotates fast it appears like a blur. • The coil windings are uniform and properly wound.
Materials •
Appearance
The Group:
5-7 pts
Complete set of materials. • Correct materials are used as found in the list of materials. • Relevant addons (i.e. switch, etc…) are incorporated. • The motor is very neat and clean. • The different parts of the motor are distinguishable and very presentable.
8-10 pts
The motor is seen to withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is slightly sturdy. The motor is working well. • The motor is freestanding. • The coil support wobbles slightly when in operation. • The coil turns slightly off center and shifts to the left or right. • The coil rotates fast for a moment then slows down and stops. • The coil windings are slightly uniform yet properly wound. • Complete set of materials. • Some materials used are not in the list of materials. • Some add-ons are incorporated.
•
The motor is neat and clean. • The different parts of the motor are distinguishable and presentable.
4-7 pts
1-4 pts
No point
•
The motor is seen to slightly withstand future wear and tear. • The contraption is not sturdy. • The motor is not properly working. • The motor is not freestanding. • The coil support wobbles when in operation. • The coil turns off center and shifts to the left or right. • The coil rotates very slowly. • The coil windings are not uniform and not properly wound.
•
•
Incomplete set of materials. • Most materials used are not in the list of materials. • Add-ons are not incorporated.
•
•
•
The motor is pretty neat and clean. • Some parts of the motor are distinguishable and presentable.
2-3 pts
The motor is seen not to bear up future wear and tear. • The contraption is not durable. • The motor is not working at all. • The motor is not freestanding. • The coil support wobbles when in operation. • The coil does not turn at all. • The coil windings are not uniform and not properly wound.
Incomplete set of materials. • Incorrect materials are used. • Add-ons are not incorporated.
The motor is dirty and not presentable.
1 pt
Creativity and • The finished project shows a lot Originality •
of creativity. It also shows originality by using a unique approach that truly enhanced the project.
Resourcefulne • Most of the ss materials/tools
Time Management
used are not purchased but recycled or reused objects found anywhere were integrated. • The dyad or individual finished early or before the time allotted for the project execution.
The How-to Paper: Format
•
The finished project shows some creativity. • It also shows originality by using a unique approach that truly enhanced the project.
•
The finished project shows limited creativity. • It also shows some originality.
•
•
Most of the materials/tools used are not purchased; some recycled or reused objects were used.
•
Some of the materials/tools used are purchased not recycled or reused objects.
•
The materials/tools used are purchased; recycled or reused objects were never used.
•
The dyad or individual finished just in time.
•
The dyad or individual finished a few moments after the time allotted for the project execution.
•
The dyad or individual did not finish on time.
8-10 pts
5-7 pts
•
•
Organization •
• •
Content •
•
The paper has acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Appropriate font style, size, color and other formatting styles. • Has the correct number of pages.
Extremely well organized. • Has logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; most transitions are easy to follow. • Enhances the effectiveness of the project.
Completely accurate; facts were precise and explicit. • Reflections
The paper has mostly acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Appropriate font style, size, color but the other formatting styles were not chosen wisely. • Has the correct number of pages. Well organized. Has logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; transitions are somewhat easy to follow. • Enhances the effectiveness of the project to a certain, favorable degree.
Mostly accurate; facts were mostly precise and explicit. • Reflections and/or realizations
The finished project shows zero creativity. • It also didn’t show originality.
1-4 pts •
The paper has some acceptable, relevant, logical, satisfactory and well designed format. • Inappropriate font style, size, color; the other formatting styles were badly chosen. • Has the wrong number of required pages. • Somewhat well organized. • Has somewhat logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; some transitions are not easy to follow. • Slightly enhances the effectiveness of the project. • Partly accurate; facts were somewhat precise and explicit. • Reflections
No point •
The paper has unacceptable, irrelevant, illogical, unsatisfactory and badly designed format. • Inappropriate font style, size, color; the other formatting styles were badly chosen. • Has the wrong number of required pages. • Not organized. • Has no logical design (procedure, etc.) that is easy to follow; the transitions are hard to follow. • Does not enhance the effectiveness of the project.
•
Not accurate; facts were imprecise and not clear.
and/or realizations are proper and sincere.
are mostly proper and sincere.
and/or realizations are partly proper and sincere.
•
Reflections and/or realizations are improper and insincere.
TOTAL
Related Documents
Sem Scoring Rubric
July 2020 9
Scoring Rubric Appendix Vi
October 2019 13
Six Traits Scoring Rubric
November 2019 16
Holistic Oral Language Scoring Rubric
May 2020 6
