Scoring Rubric Appendix Vi

76

APPENDIX VI SCORING RUBRIC OF WRITING Criteria

Score

Content

27-30

Description Very good to execellent Knowledgeable- suitable- trough development of topic sentence- relevant to the assigned the topic.

22-26

Average to good Some knowledge of subject –adequate rangetitle substance, inadequate development of topic.

13-16

Very poor Does not show knowledge of subject, non substantive, not pertinent, or not enough to evaluate

Organization 18-20

Very good to excellent Fluent expression, ideas clearly, stated/ supported. Succinct, well organized, logical sequencing, cohesive.

14-17

Average to good Somewhat choppy, loosely organized but main ideas stand out, limited support, logical but incomplete sequencing.

10-13

Fair to poor Non-fluent, ideas confused or disconnected,

77 Criteria

Score

Description lack logical sequencing and development.

7-9

Very poor Does not communicate, no organization, or not enough to evaluate.

Vocabulary

18-20

Very good to excellent Exact word, effective word/ idiom,choice but meaning not obscured

14-17

Good to average Adequate range, occasional errors of words, idiom form, choice, usage meaning confused, or obscured.

10-13

Fair to poor Limited range, frequent errors of word/ idiom form, choice, usage, meaning confused, or obscured.

7-9

Very poor Essentially translation, little knowledgeable of english vocabulary, idioms, word form or not enough to evaluate.

Grammar/

22-25

language use

Very good to excellent Effective complex construction, few errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/ function, articles, pronouns and prepositions.

18-21

Average to good

78 Criteria

Score

Description Effective but simple construction, minor problems in complex construction, several errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/ function, articles but meaning seldom obscured

11-17

Fair to good Major problem in simple/ complex construction. Frequent, errors of negation, agreement, tense and or number, word order/ function, articles, pronouns, preposition, run on, deletion meaning confuse on and/ or fragment run on, deletion meaning confuse on obscured

5-10

Very poor Virtually no master of sentence constructions or rules dominated by errors, does not communicate, or not enough to evaluate

Mechanics

5

Very good to excellent Demonstrate mastery of convention, few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, writing sentences

4

Average to good Occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, pargraphing, but meaning not obscured.

3

Fair to poor

79 Criteria

Score

Description Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured poor handwriting meaning confused not obscured, illegible or not enough to evaluate

2

Very poor No mastery of conventions, dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting, illegible, or not enough to evaluate