Sample Syllabus: Contemporary Moral Issues

  • Uploaded by: Jesse Butler
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Sample Syllabus: Contemporary Moral Issues as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,962
  • Pages: 7
Sample Syllabus: Contemporary Moral Issues 1. Method & Course Description -----------------------------To be in a position to determine the moral status of specific actions or persons, one must understand ethical theories: general explanations of why, and guidelines for, what sorts of actions are morally permissible, morally required or morally impermissible. Is an action morally required because the outcome of that action is the greatest good for the greatest number? Or is an action morally permissible because it has a certain form common to all morally tolerable actions? Should we, on the other hand, use as our model for morally permissible actions the behavior of those we take to be paragons of virtue? Only after we have understood the fundamental ethical theories can we begin to approach the contemporary moral issues which might be decided as consequences of these theories. Even though the issues of pressing importance often rouse the passions of proponents of particular views (and the critics of those views), thought and discussion are most productive when passions and excitements have cooled. We can keep clear and cool heads in matters of contemporary issues by letting the ancient philosophical method of dialectic and argument set the parameters for our investigation. When someone holds a particular view they take to be the correct one (perhaps in terms of a specific issue of morality) and that person wishes to convince someone else of the correctness of that view, the best method is not an appeal to emotion, but rather an appeal to reason. An argument (philosophically speaking) is the clear and concise presentation of one of more starting points (or premises) from which, by the process of sound and careful reasoning, one can come to a conclusion. The process of reasoning represented by an argument should be such that if the premises from which one logically infers the conclusion are good ones, a rational person will accept that conclusion. We test the strengths of premises and arguments by engaging in dialectic or Socratic dialogue – the process of careful, dispassionate examination of premises and the steps by which we reason to a conclusion. Dialectic is most productive when the participants take each other seriously, listen to one another carefully, think carefully about what is being said, think carefully before speaking in response, try to criticize constructively every aspect of any position that is put forward, yet refrain from personal attacks or criticism of a person rather than a position. We shall engage in dialogues of this sort in this class. 2. Instructor Information ------------------------Dr. Jesse Butler <dept. info> Appointments: Please set up an appointment if you're confused about something, need help getting started on an assignment or would like to receive feedback for what you've written.

1

Sample Syllabus: Contemporary Moral Issues

3. Course Information --------------------A. Meeting Places & Times ------------------------<MTWRF>


Related Documents


More Documents from ""