Safety Performance Based On Iogp.pdf

REPORT

2016s

DATA SERIES

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

JUNE 2017

Acknowledgements IOGP acknowledges the participation of the companies that have submitted safety performance indicators. This report was produced by the Safety Committee. Photography used with permission courtesy of ©psphotograph/ iStockphoto (Back cover)

Feedback IOGP welcomes feedback on our reports: [email protected] Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither IOGP nor any of its Members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms. This publication is made available for information purposes and solely for the private use of the user. IOGP will not directly or indirectly endorse, approve or accredit the content of any course, event or otherwise where this publication will be reproduced. Copyright notice The contents of these pages are © International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of IOGP and (ii) the sources are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of IOGP. These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

REPORT

2016s

JUNE 2017

DATA SERIES

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Revision history VERSION

DATE

AMENDMENTS

1.0

June 2017

First release

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

4

Contents Contributing companies

6

Executive summary

7

Introduction and background

10

Scope of reporting and data validation Data series

11 11

1. Summary of 2016 results

12

1.1 General 1.2 Fatalities 1.3 Total recordable injuries 1.4 Lost time injuries

12 13 15 16

2. 2016 results

18

2.1 Fatalities 2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) 2.3 Fatal incident rate (FIR) 2.4 Fatalities by incident category and activity 2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) 2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 2.7 Lost work day case categories and activities 2.8 Severity of lost work day cases 2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases 2.10 Incident triangles 2.11 Causal factors 2.12 Fatal Incident Causal Factors 2.13 High Potential Event Causal Factors 2.14 Life-Saving Rules

18 19 21 23 31 33 35 44 47 50 53 53 56 59

3. Results by region

62

3.1 Fatalities 3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) 3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) 3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF five-year rolling averages 3.6 Severity of lost work day cases 3.7 Individual country performance 3.8 Incident triangles by region

62 63 64 65 66 68 70 73

5

4. Results by function

77

4.1 Fatalities 4.2 FAR, LTIF and TRIR – five-year rolling averages 4.3 Severity of lost work day cases (LWDC) 4.4 Exploration performance 4.5 Drilling performance 4.6 Production performance 4.7 Construction performance 4.8 Unspecified performance

77 78 80 80 83 86 89 92

5. Results by company

96

5.1 Overall company results 5.2 Company results by function

96 104

Appendix A – Database dimensions Proportion of database used in analysis

Appendix B – Data tables Section 1 Summary Section 2 Overall results Section 3 Results by region Section 4 Results by function Section 5 Results by company Database Dimensions (Appendix A)

106 109

111 113 113 117 126 132 135

Appendix C – Contributing companies

137

Appendix D – Countries represented

139

Appendix E – Glossary of terms

144

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

6

Contributing companies The safety statistics for 2016 were derived from data provided by the following 43 IOGP member companies: ADNOC

MAERSK OIL

ANADARKO

MOL

BHP BILLITON

OIL SEARCH

BP

OMV

CAIRN ENERGY

ORIGIN

CCED

PAN AMERICAN ENERGY

CHEVRON

PETROBRAS

CNOOC

PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD

CONOCOPHILLIPS

PLUSPETROL

DEA DEUTSCHE ERDOEL AG

PREMIER OIL

DOLPHIN ENERGY

PTTEP

DONG O&G

RASGAS

ENGIE E&P INTERNATIONAL

REPSOL

ENI

SASOL

EXXONMOBIL

SHELL COMPANIES

GALP

STATOIL

GEOPARK

SUNCOR

HESS CORPORATION

TOTAL

HUSKY

TULLOW OIL

INPEX

WINTERSHALL

KOSMOS

WOODSIDE

KUWAIT OIL COMPANY

Executive summary

7

Executive summary The 2016 IOGP Safety Performance Indicators show that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has increased by 19% compared with 2015. The number of fatalities has decreased from 54 in 2015 to 50 in 2016. The number of fatal incidents has decreased from 40 in 2015 to 29 in 2016. This is against the background of a 22% decrease in work hours reported.

120

Number of fatalities

100 80

Fatal Incidents

3.5

103 87

Fatal accident rate (FAR)

99

94

82 73

67 58

60

3.0

88

80

2.5

65 50

2.0

54

52 43

40

45 42

50

1.5

40 29

20 0

1.0 0.5

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

0.0

FAR fatalities per 100 million hours worked

Fatalities

Figure 1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2007–2016)

In 2016, 6 of the fatalities and 23% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel. 44 of the fatalities and 77% of the work hours were related to contractors. The company and contractor FAR are 0.90 and 1.97 respectively. 19 fatalities resulted from 2 separate helicopter crashes. 6 fatalities resulted from 5 separate process safety events. Analysis of the 29 fatal incident descriptions, in which there were 50 fatalities, has shown that at least 58% of the fatal incidents reported in 2016 related to the IOGP Life-Saving Rules published in March 2012, see IOGP report 459.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

8

Insufficient information 21%

Core rules 24% Insufficient information

Core rules

No appropriate rule 21% No appropriate rule

Supplementary rules 34%

Supplementary rules

Figure 2: Life-Saving Rules applicable to 2016 fatal incidents

There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and high potential events for each year since causal factors were first collected in 2010. The following five causal factors appear consistently in the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events for each of the past seven years. • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment • PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/ procedures. The 2nd most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the top ten for high potential events was: • PEOPLE (ACTS): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire). Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury frequency decreasing by 7% and the total recordable injury rate decreasing by 15% compared with 2015 results.

Executive summary

LTIF and TRIR (per million hours worked)

Total recordable injury rate

9

Lost time injury frequency

3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Figure 3: Lost time injury frequency vs. total recordable injury rate (2007–2016)

2016

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

10

Introduction and background The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, IOGP, has been collecting safety incident data from its member companies globally since 1985. The data collected are entered into the IOGP safety database, which is the largest database of safety performance in the exploration and production (E&P) industry. The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the global safety performance of the contributing IOGP member companies on an annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by IOGP membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance. The IOGP incident reporting system covers worldwide E&P operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies and their contractor employees. The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency, number of lost work day cases and number of lost work days, number of restricted duty case and restricted duty days, and number of medical treatment cases. The report presents contributing IOGP Members’ global results for these indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix C). In 2010, data collection was initiated to capture 'causal factors' associated with fatal incidents and high potential events. These data are presented in section 2.11 of this report. Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. The causal factors and chart data are available to IOGP Members in editable format from the Members’ area of the IOGP website. This report is published with two separate addendums which provide the narrative descriptions for the fatal incidents and the high potential events selected for their learning value that were reported by participating IOGP member companies. These can be downloaded from the IOGP public website http://www.iogp.org/bookstore, reports 2016sf and 2016sh respectively, as well as the IOGP Safety Zone website http://safetyzone.iogp.org/.

Introduction & background

11

Scope of reporting and data validation The data requested from participating IOGP member companies are published in an annual User Guide, report 2016su, which contains definitions and the scope of the safety data submission. This document is published on the IOGP public website. The safety data submission process is used for the collection of data relating to safety performance, process safety performance and motor vehicle crashes. The IOGP safety database has built-in data validation requirements and each company data submission is validated by the IOGP Secretariat and the work group (Safety Committee, Sub-committee, Task Force or Network) responsible for the data set in accordance with the IOGP data collection and reporting procedure. Any communication with reporting companies is conducted by the IOGP Secretariat and any data validated by an IOGP workgroup is blind coded to preserve the anonymity of the reporting companies. A self-assessment questionnaire is included within the data submission process to determine the alignment between the requested data and the company submissions. The information provided in this questionnaire is also used in the validation process. Data that appear to be incorrect and that cannot be confirmed by the submitting company as correct may be excluded from the data set at the discretion of the Secretariat. A new incident category of ‘Aviation Accident’ has been added for 2016 data. Aviation accidents were previously included in the ‘Other’ incident category. The region previously referred to as ‘Former Soviet Union’ has been renamed to ‘Russia, Central Asia’. The scope of data included within this report is detailed in Appendix A.

Data series Other IOGP data reports published annually include: • Environmental performance indicators • Health performance indicators • Process safety event data • Motor vehicle crash data • Aviation Safety Data (in preparation). These are available from the IOGP website http://www.iogp.org/bookstore

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

12

1. Summary of 2016 results Safety performance indicators – 2016 data summarizes the safety performance of contributing IOGP member companies for 2016. The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are; number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate and lost time injury frequency. Third party fatalities are not included in this report.

1.1 General The safety performance of contributing IOGP member companies in 2016 is based on the analysis of 2,896 million work hours of data. Submissions were made by 43 of the 50 operating company IOGP Members. The data reported cover operations in 103 countries. Contractor

Fatal accident rate

5000

20

4500

18

4000

16

3500

14

3000

12

2500

10

2000

8

1500

6

1000

4

500

2

0

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2016

0

Figure 4: Reported work hours and fatal accident rate (1985–2016)

Definitions Fatal accident rate (FAR):

The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked

Lost time injury frequency (LTIF):

The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked

Total recordable injury rate (TRIR):

The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per million hours worked

FAR (fatalities per 100 million hours worked)

Number of work hours (millions)

Company

Summary of 2016 results

13

1.2 Fatalities Against the background of a 22% decrease in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has decreased from 54 in 2015 to 50 in 2016. The 50 fatalities occurred in 29 separate incidents. The resulting fatal accident rate (1.73) is 19% higher than last year’s figure (1.45). The company and contractor FAR are 0.90 and 1.97 respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 1.50 and 2.37 respectively. Each reported fatal incident is allocated a work activity and incident category. With regard to the incident category, the largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 2016 were the result of aviation accidents (19 fatalities in 2 separate incidents). Fatalities categorized as ‘Struck by’ were the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics with 10 fatalities in 10 separate incidents, accounting for 20% of the fatalities (19% in 2015). There were 9 fatalities in 7 separate incidents that were categorised as ‘Explosions or burns’.

Struck by 20%

Aviation accident 38%

Pressure release 2% Falls 4%

Struck by Pressure release

Aviation accident

Falls Explosions/burns Confined space Caught between Cut

Explosions/burns 18% Caught between 12% Cut 2%

Figure 5: Percentage of fatalities by incident category (2016)

Confined space 4%

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

14

The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the IOGP member companies is ‘Transport – Air‘ (38%) with 19 fatalities as a result of 2 separate incidents. Six fatalities (12%) were reported in 4 separate incidents in the ‘Construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ activity, in 6 separate incidents in the ‘Drilling’ activity and in 5 separate incidents in the ‘Maintenance, inspection, testing’ activity. Transport – Water 2%

Construction 12%

Transport – Land 10% Drilling 12% Transport Transport - Land - Water Construction Drilling

Lifting 6%

Lifting Transport - Air Maintenance

Transport – Air 38%

Seismic Production

Maintenance 12% Production 6% Seismic 2%

Figure 6: Percentage of fatalities by incident activity (2016)

Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

The fatal accident rate for 2016 is 1.73, 19% higher than the 2015 rate (1.45). The company only FAR for 2016 is 0.90, 33% lower than the rate for 2015 (1.34). The contractor only FAR is 1.97, 32% higher than the rate for 2015 (1.49). Company

Contractor

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Figure 7: Fatal accident rate by company & contractor (2007–2016)

2014

2015

2016

Summary of 2016 results

15

1.3 Total recordable injuries

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

The rate for all recordable injuries (TRIR) (fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.03 injuries per million hours worked (1.21 in 2015).

Company

Contractor

Overall

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 8: Total recordable injury rate by company & contractor (2007–2016)

2015

2016

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

16

1.4 Lost time injuries The overall lost time injury frequency (LTIF) decreased from 0.29 in 2015 to 0.27 in 2016. This represents a reduction of 7% compared with 2015 and 256 fewer lost time injuries.

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Company LTIF shows a reduction of 20% in 2016 compared with 2015. Contractor LTIF shows a reduction of 3%.

Company

Contractor

Overall

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Figure 9: Lost time injury frequency by company & contractor (2007–2016)

The participating IOGP member companies reported 726 lost work day cases (injuries resulting in at least one day off work); • 572 incidents were contractor related, and • 154 were company related. • The greatest number of incidents was reported as ‘Struck by’ (138 cases accounting for 19.0% of the total; 2015 results showed 193 cases, accounting for 18.7% of the total). • ‘Slips and trips (at the same height)’ accounted for 123 cases, 17% of the total (194 cases, 18.8% of the total in 2015). Participating companies reported 30,102 days of work lost through injuries.

Summary of 2016 results

17

Assault 2.20% Aviation accident 0.14% Other 15.70% Water related 0.14%

Caught between 16.39% Assault

Aviation accident Other

Confined space 0.55% Cut 7.85%

Caught between

Struck by 19.01%

Confined space Water related Cut Struck by Explosions/burns

Electrical ExposureFalls N, C,Exposure B, V Slips/trips Overexertion Pressure release

Explosions/burns 4.27% Exposure electrical 0.69% Exposure N, C, B, V 1.10% Falls 8.13%

Slips/trips 16.94%

Overexertion 5.79% Pressure release 1.10%

Figure 10: Percentage of lost work day cases by incident category (2016)

Unspecified 12.41% Construction 10.31% Transport – Water 4.00%

Diving 3.40%

Transport – Land 3.30% Transport – Air 1.10% Seismic 1.10% Production 12.81%

Unspecified - other

Transport - Land Transport - incl. Airoperations Transport - Water, marine activity Seismic / survey Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Production operations Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

Drilling 21.22%

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing

Office 5.51% Maintenance 16.12%

Figure 11: Percentage of lost work day cases by incident activity (2016)

Lifting 8.71%

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

18

2. 2016 results In this section the primary indicators used to measure contributing IOGP member companies’ safety performance are: the number and nature of fatalities, total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and lost time injury frequency (LTIF). Third party incidents are not included in this report.

2.1 Fatalities Table 1: Number of fatalities (2015 & 2016) Onshore

Offshore

Overall

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

5

5

7

1

12

6

Contractor

28

27

14

17

42

44

Overall

33

32

21

18

54

50

Company

2.1.1 Company/contractor fatalities • 50 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 2016. This is 4 fewer than were reported in 2015 and 5 more than in 2014. • The 50 fatalities occurred in 29 separate incidents.

120

Number of fatalities

100

Fatal accident rate (FAR) 3.5

103 99

3.0

94 88

87

80

80

2.5

65 54

60

45

2.0 50

40

1.0

20 0

1.5

0.5 2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 12: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2007–2016)

2015

2016

0.0

FAR (fatalities per 100 million hours worked)

Fatalities

2. Key performance indicators

19

2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) Table 2: Fatal accident rate (2015 & 2016) Fatal accident rate (FAR) 2015

2016

Relative to 2015 FAR

Company

1.34

0.90

$ 33% lower

Contractor

1.49

1.97

# 33% higher

Overall

1.45

1.73

# 19% higher

Onshore

1.19

1.50

# 26% higher

Offshore

2.21

2.37

# 7% higher

In 2016 there were 6 company fatalities (12 in 2015) as a result of 3 separate incidents. In 2016 there were 44 contractor fatalities (42 in 2015) as a result of 26 separate incidents. The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation over the 10-year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents involving high numbers of fatalities.

Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

All hours in the database were used for calculations of FAR. Company

Contractor

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 13: Fatal accident rate by company & contractor (2007–2016)

2015

2016

Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Onshore

Offshore

20

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Figure 14: Fatal accident rate by onshore & offshore operations (2007–2016)

Definitions Fatal accident rate (FAR): The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked

2016

2. Key performance indicators

21

2.3 Fatal incident rate (FIR) Table 3: Fatal incident rate (2015 & 2016) Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours 2015

2016

Relative to 2015 FIR

Company

0.67

0.45

$ 33% lower

Contractor

1.20

1.17

$ 3% lower

Overall

1.08

1.00

$ 7% lower

Onshore

0.94

1.08

# 15% higher

Offshore

1.47

0.79

$ 46% lower

The FIR is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities, the FIR will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and FIR gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost. Overall the FIR has decreased by 7% compared with last year (29 fatal incidents in 2016, 40 fatal incidents in 2015). All hours in the database were used for calculations of FIR.

Number of fatalities and fatal incidents

Fatalities

Fatal Incidents

120 103

100 80

87

99

94

88

82 73

67 58

60

80

65 50

54

52 43

45 42

40

50 40 29

20 0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Figure 15: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents (2007–2016)

2014

2015

2016

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Company

Contractor

22

Overall

Fatal incident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2014

2015

2016

Figure 16: Fatal incident rate by company & contractor (2007–2016)

Onshore

Offshore

Overall

Fatal incident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Figure 17: Fatal incident rate onshore & offshore (2007–2016)

Definitions FIR - Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours: The number of incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 100 million hours worked

2. Key performance indicators

23

2.4 Fatalities by incident category and activity Table 4: Fatalities - by incident category and activity (2016)

Aviation accident

Assault or violent act

Caught in, under or between

Confined space

Cut, puncture, scrape

Explosions or burns

Exposure electrical

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

Falls from height

Overexertion, strain

Pressure release

Slips and trips (at same height)

Struck by

Water related, drowning

Other

Overall

Incident category

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

0

0

2

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

6

Diving, subsea, ROV

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Drilling, workover, well services

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

3

0

0

6

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

3

Maintenance, inspection, testing

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

6

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Production operations

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

3

Seismic / survey operations

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Transport – Air

19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

19

Transport – Land

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

5

Transport – Water, incl. marine activity

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Unspecified – other

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

19

0

6

2

1

9

0

0

2

0

1

0

10

0

0

50

Activity

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

24

23 of the 29 fatal incidents involved one fatality. 5 land transportation incidents involved 5 fatalities. 19 of the fatalities occurred in 2 separate ‘Transport – Air’ incidents. 2 of the 6 incidents that involved 2 or more fatalities were reported under the ‘Explosions or burns’ category.

Aviation accident The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 2016 were the result of aviation accidents (19 fatalities, 38% of the total reported in 2016), (6% in 2015). • 5 contractors and 1 company employee died when a helicopter travelling to an offshore facility did not reach its intended destination. There were five passengers and one pilot. • 12 contractors and 1 company employee died in a helicopter accident. The helicopter was en-route from an offshore installation to shore when the accident happened and it crashed onshore.

Struck by 10 fatalities, 20% of the total reported in 2016, were categorised as ‘Struck by’ (19% in 2015). • 1 contractor died in a ‘Construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ incident - working in a trench on flowline construction, the pipe clamp used for holding two ends of pipe together during the welding operation, slipped and struck the worker. • 1 contractor died in a ‘Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations’ incident - the contractor trailer driver was hit on head and neck area by a guiding beam. • 1 company employee died in a ‘Maintenance, inspection, testing’ incident when an operator got too close to the moving parts of a beam pump unit and was hit by counter weight. • 3 contractors died in 3 separate ‘Transport – land’ incidents: –– A subcontractor transport lorry was moving behind a log truck along a logging road. At a road hump, there was contact between a protruding log from the truck and the lorry. The log crushed the windscreen on the driver side and fatally injured the driver. –– 1 worker was driving a vehicle when he lost control and collided against the central crash barriers on the road. He died at the scene. –– 1 worker died when a Crane collided against the left rear corner of the truck that was being parked on the road shoulder. Due to severe impact, the crane driver cabin was crushed which resulted in the death of the crane driver.

2. Key performance indicators

25

• 3 contractors died in 3 separate ‘Drilling, workover, well services’ incidents –– 1 worker was struck and fatally injured while preparing to transfer water. –– 1 worker was killed when an S-pipe slipped / turned and hit the Floor man on his head. –– 1 worker died on a workover operation on a production platform. During a tripping out operation, the scraping between the pickup system and the racking board caused the fingerboard and its rail to fall from the racking board which fell on the safety helmet of a contractor. • 1 contractor died in a ‘Production operations’ incident. When monitoring a water injection well the contractor climbed the top of the water filter trying to install a plug. The vent valve departed from its position and hit the IP in the face.

Explosions or burns 9 workforce fatalities, 18% of the total reported in 2016, and 15 3rd party fatalities, were categorised as ‘Explosions or burns’ (33% in 2015). • There was 1 contractor and 15 3rd party fatalities in a single ‘Transport – land’ incident. Approximately 0.5-1 kilometres from the refinery gate. While parking the tanker on an un-compacted road bank, the tanker overturned. Oil started spilling from the damaged compartments and then a fire and explosion occurred across a radius of around 10-15 metres. People (locals and drivers of other tankers) who had gathered near the tanker were caught in the flames of fire. • 4 contractors died in 3 separate ‘maintenance, inspection, testing’ incidents: –– 1 worker died after working on top of a slurry heating tank. The IP lifted the grating and fell into the tank containing heated slurry with an estimated pH of 4. –– 1 worker died after sustaining severe burns from a fire in an overflow ditch of a surge tank. –– 2 workers were fatally injured by a fire that occurred in a materials storage container at a project site. • 2 company employees died in a ‘production operations’ incident in explosion at the company's oil sands facility. • 1 contractor died in a ‘Drilling, workover, well services’ incident. • 1 contractor died in a ‘Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations’ incident a deflagration occurred under the rig floor, followed by an extended fire encompassing the workover rig and platform, resulting in 5 injured persons and the death of a crane operator.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

26

Caught in, under or between 6 contractor fatalities, 12% of the total reported in 2016, were categorised as ‘Caught in, under or between’ (20% in 2015). • 2 workers died in a ‘Construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ incident – they had been working on a weld repair on a section of 36" gas export pipeline and were critically injured when the pipe dropped from the wooden blocks supporting it. • 1 worker died in a ‘Drilling, workover, well services’ incident. While a surge tank was being lifted to load it on a trailer, the contractor, who had not been visible to the crane operator, got caught in between the surge tank and the catwalk. • 1 worker died in a ‘Seismic / survey operations’ incident. While waiting for the water supply to continue drilling activities on the site, a driller was hit from behind by a falling tree. • 1 worker died in a ‘Transport – water, incl. marine activity’ incident. A Bosun (Deck Lead) was pinned between metal baskets when a large wave washed onto the vessel stern and closed the gap between the baskets. • 1 worker died in a ‘Transport – land’ rollover incident.

Confined space 2 contractor fatalities, 4% of the total reported in 2016, were categorised as ‘Confined space’ (0 in 2015). • 2 welders collapsed after entering a pipe to inspect an external weld repair.

Falls from height 2 contractor fatalities, 4% of the total reported in 2016, were categorised as ‘Falls from height’ (4% in 2015). • A Cargo handling assistant was manually transporting a piece of equipment when, while moving over a footbridge with grillage floor, one of the grills detached, resulting in his fall from a height of 12 meters. • A Derrickman fell from the monkey board to the Drill floor deck when he released the drill stand to the buckled elevator during an operation to lay down a drill stand.

2. Key performance indicators

27

Cut, puncture, scrape 1 contractor fatality, 2% of the total reported in 2016, was categorised as ‘Cut, puncture, scrape’ (0 in 2015). • 1 worker died while welding for diesel oil pipe line on sack store walkway. The work included electric grinding with a 4 inch grinder to smooth the surface of the pipe connection point. It is assumed that the blade got stuck and bounced. Grinder inflicted a cut of the main artery in the right thigh.

Pressure release 1 company employee fatality, 2% of the total reported in 2016, was categorised as ‘Pressure release’ (9% in 2015). • While repairing a gas leakage around the door of a filter in a Refrigeration Unit, the door burst open. The Senior Mechanic, who was standing right in front of the door, was hit on the head by the door and died immediately afterwards. There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories: • Assault or violent act • Exposure electrical • Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration • Overexertion, strain • Slips, trips, falls (at same height) • Water related, drowning.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

28

Struck by 20%

Aviation accident 38%

Pressure release 2% Falls 4%

Struck by Pressure release

Aviation accident

Falls Explosions/burns Confined space Caught between Cut

Explosions/burns 18% Caught between 12% Confined space 4%

Cut 2%

Figure 18: Percentage of fatalities by incident category (2016)

Transport – Water 2%

Construction 12%

Transport – Land 10% Drilling 12% Transport Transport - Land - Water Construction Drilling

Lifting

Lifting 6%

Transport - Air

Transport – Air 38%

Maintenance Seismic Production

Maintenance 12% Production 6% Seismic 2%

Figure 19: Percentage of fatalities by incident activity (2016)

2. Key performance indicators

29

Table 5: Fatalities by category 2012–2016 Category

Number of fatalities 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Assault or violent act

3

9

0

1

0

Aviation accident

2

17

0

0

19

Caught in, under or between

16

7

7

11

6

Confined space

2

0

1

0

2

Cut, puncture, scrape

0

0

0

0

1

Explosions or burns

39

4

9

18

9

Exposure electrical

3

1

3

2

0

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

0

1

0

1

0

Falls from height

3

3

5

2

2

Overexertion, strain

1

1

0

0

0

Pressure release

4

6

1

5

1

Struck by

14

10

15

10

10

Water related, drowning

1

17

3

1

0

Other

0

4

1

3

0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Assault or violent act Aviation accident Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut, puncture, scrape Explosions or burns Exposure electrical Exposure N, C, B, V Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Struck by Water related, drowning Other 0

10

20

Figure 20: Fatalities by category 2012–2016

30

40

50

60

70

80

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

30

Table 6: Fatalities by activity 2012–2016 Activity

Number of fatalities 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

14

6

6

4

6

Diving, subsea, ROV

0

0

0

2

0

Drilling, workover, well services

11

13

16

12

6

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

2

2

6

5

3

Maintenance, inspection, testing

41

10

4

3

6

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

0

0

0

1

0

Production operations

3

9

3

14

3

Seismic / survey operations

2

2

1

2

1

Transport – Air

2

17

0

0

19

Transport – Land

9

6

6

7

5

Transport – Water, incl. marine activity

2

12

2

1

1

Unspecified – other

2

3

1

3

0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic / survey operations Transport - Air Transport - Land Transport - Water, incl. marine activity Unspecified - other 0

Figure 21: Fatalities by activity 2012–2016

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2. Key performance indicators

31

2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Table 7: Total recordable injury rate (2015 & 2016) Total recordable incident rate (TRIR) 2015

2016

Relative to 2015 TRIR

Company

0.89

0.82

$ 8% lower

Contractor

1.30

1.09

$ 16% lower

Overall

1.21

1.03

$ 15% lower

Onshore

1.08

0.83

$ 23% lower

Offshore

1.65

1.60

$ 3% lower

Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a dataset of 2,890 million hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

An overall reduction in TRIR of 15% is seen in 2016. Company

Contractor

Overall

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 22: Total recordable injury rate by company & contractor (2007–2016)

2015

2016

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Onshore

Offshore

32

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Figure 23: Total recordable injury rate by onshore & offshore (2007–2016)

Definitions Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per million hours worked

Summary of 2016 results

33

2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Table 8: Lost time injury frequency (2015 & 2016) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 2015

2016

Relative to 2015 LTIF

Company

0.30

0.24

$ 20% lower

Contractor

0.29

0.28

$ 3% lower

Overall

0.29

0.27

$ 7% lower

Onshore

0.23

0.20

$ 13% lower

Offshore

0.47

0.45

$ 4% lower

There were 726 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 14 injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of the year or 2 injuries every day of the year. For calculations of LTIF, all hours in the database were used. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has reduced (1,032 in 2015), the time away from work has increased in all activities compared with 2015. See section 2.8 for further information on Lost Work Day Case severity.

Definitions Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Company

Contractor

34

Overall

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2015

2016

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Figure 24: Lost time injury frequency by company & contractor (2007–2016)

Onshore

Offshore

Overall

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 25: Lost time injury frequency by onshore & offshore (2007–2016)

Summary of 2016 results

35

2.7 Lost work day case categories and activities Table 9: Lost work day cases by category (2016) Category

Number

% of total

16

2.2

1

0.1

119

16.4

4

0.6

Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape

57

7.9

Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns

31

4.3

Exposure electrical

5

0.7

Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

8

1.1

Falls: Falls from height

59

8.1

Overexertion: Overexertion, strain

42

5.8

Assault: Assault or violent act Aviation accident Caught between: Caught in, under or between Confined space

Pressure release

8

1.1

Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)

123

16.9

Struck by

138

19.0

1

0.1

Other

114

15.7

Overall

726

Water related: Water related, drowning

Assault 2.20% Aviation accident 0.14% Other 15.70% Water related 0.14%

Caught between 16.39% Assault

Aviation accident Other Caught between

Struck by 19.01%

Confined space Water related Cut Struck by Explosions/burns

Electrical ExposureFalls N, C,Exposure B, V Slips/trips Overexertion Pressure release

Confined space 0.55% Cut 7.85% Explosions/burns 4.27% Exposure electrical 0.69% Exposure N, C, B, V 1.10% Falls 8.13%

Slips/trips 16.94%

Overexertion 5.79% Pressure release 1.10%

Figure 26: Percentage of lost work day cases by category (2016)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

36

Of the 726 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 572 incidents (79%) were contractor-related and 154 (21%) were company-related (777 and 255 respectively for 2015). The lost work day case category was provided for all of the Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 16% of the cases were categorised as ‘Other’. The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting categories for 2016. • The greatest number of incidents was reported as ‘Struck by’ (138 cases accounting for 19.0% of LWDCs), (2015 results showed 193 cases accounting for 18.7%). • ‘Slips and trips (at same height)’ accounted for 123 cases, 16.9% of the total (194 cases, 18.8% of the total in 2015). • ‘Caught in, under or between’ accounted for 119 of the cases, 16.4% of the total (216 cases, 20.9% of the total in 2015). • In comparison with 2015, the 2016 results were very similar.

Definitions Lost work day case (LWDC) An incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.

2. Key performance indicators

37

Table 10: Lost work day cases by category – company & contractor data (2016) Category

Company

Contractor

Assault: Assault or violent act

3

13

Aviation accident

1

0

10

109

0

4

17

40

Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns

5

26

Exposure electrical

2

3

Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

1

7

Falls: Falls from height

13

46

Overexertion: Overexertion, strain

14

28

Caught between: Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape

Pressure release

0

8

Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)

38

85

Struck by

28

110

0

1

22

92

154

572

Water related: Water related, drowning Other Overall

Assault 1.9% Other 14.3%

Aviation accident 0.6% Cut 11.0% Explosions/burns 3.2% Exposure electrical 1.3% Exposure N, C, B, V 0.6%

Struck by 18.2%

Falls 8.4% Overexertion 9.1%

Slips/trips 24.7%

Figure 27: Lost work day cases by category – company data (2016)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

38

Assault 2.3% Caught between 19.1%

Other 16.1%

Water related 0.2% Confined space 0.7% Cut 7.0%

Struck by 19.2%

Explosions/burns 4.5% Exposure electrical 0.5% Exposure NCBV 1.2% Falls 8.0%

Slips/trips 14.9% Pressure release 1.4%

Overexertion 4.9%

Figure 28: Lost work day cases by category – contractor data (2016)

Table 11: Lost work day cases by category – onshore & offshore (2016) Category

Onshore

Offshore

0

1

Assault: Assault or violent act

13

3

Caught between: Caught in, under or between

53

66

4

0

Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape

26

31

Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns

15

16

Exposure electrical

4

1

Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

5

3

Falls: Falls from height

34

25

Overexertion: Overexertion, strain

22

20

3

5

Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)

72

51

Struck by

78

60

0

1

71

43

400

326

Aviation accident

Confined space

Pressure release

Water related: Water related, drowning Other Overall

Of the 726 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 400 incidents (55%) were related to onshore activity and 326 (45%) were related to offshore activity (606 and 426 respectively for 2015).

2. Key performance indicators

39

Assault 3.3% Caught between 13.3% Other 17.8% Confined space 1.0% Cut 6.5% Explosions/burns 3.8%

Struck by 19.5%

Exposure electrical 1.0% Exposure NCBV 1.3% Falls 8.5%

Slips/trips 18.0%

Overexertion 5.5% Pressure release 0.8%

Figure 29: Lost work day cases by category – onshore operations (2016)

Assault 0.9% Other 13.2%

Aviation accident 0.3% Caught between 20.2%

Water related 0.3%

Struck by 18.4%

Cut 9.5% Explosions/burns 4.9% Exposure electrical 0.3% Exposure NCBV 0.9%

Slips/trips 15.6%

Falls 7.7% Pressure release 1.5%

Overexertion 6.1%

Figure 30: Lost work day cases by category – offshore operations (2016)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

40

Table 12: Lost work day cases by activity (2016) Activity

Number

% of total

Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

75

10.3

Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV

25

3.4

154

21.2

Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

63

8.7

Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing

117

16.1

Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

40

5.5

Production: Production operations

93

12.8

Seismic: Seismic / survey operations

8

1.1

Transport - Air

8

1.1

Transport - Land

24

3.3

Transport – Water: Transport - Water, incl. marine activity

29

4

Unspecified : Unspecified - other

90

12.4

726

12

Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services

Overall

Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 726 Lost Work Day Cases reported.

Unspecified 12.4%

Construction 10.3% Diving 3.4%

Transport – Water 4.0% Transport – Land 3.3% Transport – Air 1.1% Seismic 1.1%

Drilling 21.2%

Production 12.8% Office 5.5% Lifting 8.7% Maintenance 16.1%

Figure 31: Lost work day cases by activity (2016)

2. Key performance indicators

41

Table 13: Lost work day cases by activity - company & contractor (2016) Activity

Company

Contractor

Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

2

73

Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV

0

25

16

138

Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

5

58

Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing

33

84

Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

14

26

Production: Production operations

47

46

Seismic: Seismic / survey operations

0

8

Transport – Air

4

4

Transport – Land

5

19

Transport – Water: Transport - Water, incl. marine activity

1

28

27

63

154

572

Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services

Unspecified: Unspecified –other Overall

Construction 1.30% Unspecified 17.53%

Transport – Water 0.65%

Drilling 10.39% Lifting 3.25%

Transport – Land 3.25% Transport – Air 2.60%

Production 30.52%

Figure 32: Lost work day cases by activity – company (2016)

Maintenance 21.43%

Office 9.09%

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

42

Unspecified 11.01%

Construction 12.76%

Transport – Water 4.90%

Diving 4.37%

Transport – Land 3.32% Transport – Air 0.70% Seismic 1.40% Production 8.04%

Drilling 24.13%

Office 4.55%

Lifting 10.14%

Maintenance 14.69%

Figure 33: Lost work day cases by activity – contractor (2016)

Table 14: Lost work day cases by activity – onshore & offshore (2016) Activity Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

Onshore

Offshore

64

11

0

25

Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services

73

81

Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

24

39

Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing

58

59

Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

29

11

Production: Production operations

Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV

58

35

Seismic: Seismic / survey operations

7

1

Transport – Air

3

5

24

0

5

24

55

35

400

326

Transport – Land Transport – Water: Transport - Water, incl. marine activity Unspecified: Unspecified – other Overall

2. Key performance indicators

43

Unspecified 13.75%

Construction 16.00%

Transport – Water 1.25% Transport – Land 6.00% Transport – Air 0.75% Seismic 1.75%

Drilling 18.25%

Production 14.50% Lifting 6.00% Office 7.25%

Maintenance 14.50%

Figure 34: Lost work day cases by activity – onshore (2016)

Construction 3.37% Unspecified 10.74%

Diving 7.67%

Transport – Water 7.36% Transport – Air 1.53% Seismic 0.31% Production 10.74%

Drilling 24.85%

Office 3.37% Maintenance 18.10%

Figure 35: Lost work day cases by activity – offshore (2016)

Lifting 11.96%

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

44

2.8 Severity of lost work day cases Table 15: Severity of lost work day cases (2016 compared with 2011–2015) Severity of LWDC (Average days lost per LWDC) 2011-2015

2015

2016

2016 relative to 2011-2015 LTIF

2016 relative to 2015 LTIF

Company

44.9

53.7

37.6

$ 16% lower

$ 30% lower

Contractor

43.2

54.1

66.9

# 55% higher

# 24% higher

Overall

43.6

54.0

61.4

# 41% higher

# 14% higher

Onshore

39.0

45.2

46.9

# 20% higher

# 4% higher

Offshore

49.8

66.4

79.2

# 59% higher

# 19% higher

IOGP member companies reported a total of 30,102 days lost (LWDC days) through injuries. • The number of days lost was reported for 77% of the database (see Appendix A and Appendix C). • The offshore LWDC severity is 69% higher than onshore. • The LWDC severity for contractors is 78% higher than for company employees.

Definitions Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.

2. Key performance indicators

Company

Contractor

45

Overall

Average days lost per LWDC

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2014

2015

2016

Figure 36: Severity of LWDC by company & contractor (2007–2016)

Onshore

Offshore

Overall

Average days lost per LWDC

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Figure 37: Severity of LWDC by onshore & offshore (2007–2016)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

46

The figure below shows the average number of days lost per LWDC in 2016 compared with the average for the previous five-year period. A 41% increase is shown in overall LWDC severity when compared with the previous five-year period.

LWDC Severity (average days of lost work per LWDC)

2011–2015

2016

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Figure 38: Severity of lost work day cases (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Offshore

2. Key performance indicators

47

2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases Table 16: Severity of restricted work day cases (2016 compared with 2011–2015) Severity of RWDC (Average days lost per RWDC) 2011-2015

2015

2016

2016 relative to 2011-2015 LTIF

2016 relative to 2015 LTIF

Company

16.3

22.4

14.4

$ 12% lower

$ 36% lower

Contractor

13.0

18.7

14.4

# 11% higher

$ 23% lower

Overall

13.3

19.1

14.4

# 8% higher

$ 25% lower

Onshore

13.6

18.2

13.8

# 1% higher

$ 24% lower

Offshore

12.9

21.0

15.6

# 21% higher

$ 25% lower

A total of 5,957 days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted work day cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed (see Appendix A and Appendix C).

Definitions Severity of restricted work day cases The average number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case. Restricted work day cases are not reported by all companies. RWDC days are not reported by all companies that report RWDC. See Appendix A.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Company

Contractor

48

Overall

Average days lost per RWDC

25 20 15 10 5 0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Figure 39: Severity of restricted work day cases by company & contractor (2007–2016)

Onshore

Offshore

Overall

Average days lost per RWDC

25 20 15 10 5 0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Figure 40: Severity of restricted work day cases by onshore & offshore (2007–2016)

2016

2. Key performance indicators

49

The figure below shows the average number of days lost per RWDC in 2016 compared with the average for the previous five-year period. The overall average shows an increase of 8% compared with the average for the previous five-year period.

RWDC Severity (average days of lost work per RWDC)

2011–2015

2016

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

Figure 41: Severity of restricted work day cases (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

50

2.10 Incident triangles In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases. Table 17: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

16:1

60:1

2015

20:1

74:1

2014

35:1

134:1

2013

21:1

73:1

2012

20:1

72:1

2011

22:1

93:1

2010

15:1

60:1

Definitions Lost time injuries:

Lost work day cases and fatalities

Recordable injuries:

Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities:

The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (lost time injuries/fatalities)

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)

2. Key performance indicators

50 776

51

6 160

2978

543

Overall

Company

44 616 2435

Fatalities

Lost time injuries Total recordable injuries

Contractor

Figure 42: Incident triangles by company & contractor (2016)

54 1086

12 267

4014

650

Overall

Company

42 819 3364

Fatalities

Lost time injuries Total recordable injuries

Contractor

Figure 43: Incident triangles by company & contractor (2015)

The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for 2015-2016 challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries overall as a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In some incident categories however such as 'confined space, 'assault or violent act' and 'water related, drowning', the ratio will be higher as shown in Tables 18 and 19.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

52

Table 18: Ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries by category (2016) Category

LTIs (fatalities + LWDCs)

Fatalities

Ratio LTI: Fatality

Assault or violent act

16

0

n/a

Aviation accident

20

19

1:1

125

6

21:1

6

2

3:1

Cut, puncture, scrape

58

1

58:1

Explosions or burns

40

9

4:1

Exposure electrical

5

0

n/a

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

8

0

n/a

Falls from height

61

2

31:1

Overexertion, strain

42

0

n/a

Caught in, under or between Confined space

Pressure release

9

1

9:1

Slips and trips (at same height)

123

0

n/a

Struck by

148

10

15:1

1

0

n/a

114

0

n/a

Water related, drowning Other

Table 19: Ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries by activity (2016) Activity

LTIs (fatalities + LWDCs)

Fatalities

Ratio LTI: Fatality

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

81

6

14:1

Diving, subsea, ROV

25

0

n/a

160

6

27:1

66

3

22:1

123

6

21:1

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

40

0

n/a

Production operations

96

3

32:1

9

1

9:1

Transport – Air

27

19

1:1

Transport – Land

29

5

6:1

Transport – Water, incl. marine activity

30

1

30:1

Unspecified – other

90

0

n/a

Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing

Seismic / survey operations

2. Key performance indicators

53

2.11 Causal factors The allocation of ‘causal factors’ to fatal incidents and high potential events was requested as part of the 2016 data submission. This request was first made in 2010, therefore a comparison of seven years of data is possible. To standardize the response an IOGP list of causal factors and a glossary was provided to the member companies as part of the IOGP user guide. The causal factors list is divided into two sections: • People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. • Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories.

2.12 Fatal Incident Causal Factors Causal factors are divided into two separate groups, People (Acts) and Process (Conditions), see Report 2016su Safety data reporting users' guide – 2016 data and Glossary for details. • 20 of the 29 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors (29 of 40 in 2015) • 107 causal factors were assigned for the 20 fatal incidents • Between 1 and 10 causal factors were assigned per incident (between 1 and 15 in 2015). Table 20: Causal factors assigned to fatal incidents Causal factor group

2015

2016

PEOPLE (ACTS)

63

55

PROCESS (CONDITIONS)

87

52

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

54

The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown in Table 21. The highlighted content indicates the top ten causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2016 compared with the previous six years. Five of the top ten were the same for all seven years. Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the IOGP Safety Zone website: http://safetyzone.iogp.org. The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company.

2. Key performance indicators

55

Table 21: Causal factors assigned to fatal incidents (2010–2016) Causal factors

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment

14

16

11

16

13

10

13

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)

16

9

13

12

14

6

11

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment

30

15

17

13

18

11

10

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision

18

18

16

14

13

9

9

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence

13

10

13

21

16

11

6

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress

5

7

5

4

3

4

6

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard

7

8

4

6

4

5

5

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/procedures

10

8

15

15

18

8

4

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/ inspection/testing

4

6

5

9

5

3

4

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate communication

12

9

6

8

6

6

3

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/ equipment/materials/products

9

6

7

10

6

4

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/ equipment/materials/products

4

5

7

9

5

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads

1

7

4

3

1

4

3

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)

12

9

13

11

9

9

2

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers

7

11

6

10

6

4

2

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices

5

6

5

5

5

4

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)

12

4

4

2

5

4

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation

3

3

3

4

3

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured

6

4

4

8

3

3

2

2

1

2

1

3

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading

8

2

7

4

1

2

2

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Failure to report/learn from events

3

1

1

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/ specification/management of change

10

5

7

4

4

7

8

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly

1

6

4

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion

2

4

4

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems

5

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)

1

4

9

1

1

1

2

2 3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature

2

5

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices

2

2

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task

3 5

5

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment

7

2

2

2 7 6

1

3

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1 2

1

1 4

5

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems

2

2

4

1

3

3

9

4

4

6

3

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence

6

1

2 1

Causal factors are listed in order of frequency for 2016. The top 10 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents for each year are highlighted in yellow. 2016: five causal factors were equal 9th with three assigned incidents (13 factors are highlighted) 2014: three causal factors were equal 9th with six assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted) 2013: two causal factors were equal 10th with nine assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted) 2012: four causal factors were equal 9th with seven assigned incidents (12 factors are highlighted)

1 1

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Poor leadership/organizational culture PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol

1

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

56

2.13 High Potential Event Causal Factors High potential events are defined as ‘any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities’. Participating companies are invited to submit a small number of high potential event reports and to select those with the greatest learning value. The data reported here therefore do not represent the total number of events for the participating companies, so care should be taken in interpreting the data presented in this section. • 103 of the 105 high potential events were assigned causal factors (98 of 120 in 2015) • 513 causal factors were assigned for the 103 high potential events (383 in 2015) • Between 1 and 13 causal factors were assigned per event (between 1 and 16 in 2015) Table 22: Causal factors assigned to high potential events (2016 & 2015) Causal factors assigned to high potential events

2015

2016

PEOPLE (ACTS)

130

226

PROCESS (CONDITIONS)

253

287

The causal factors assigned to high potential events are shown in Table 23. The highlighted content indicates the top ten causal factors assigned to high potential events in 2016 compared with the previous six years. Six of the top ten were the same for all seven years. Additional information on the high potential events reported by region can be found on the IOGP Safety Zone website: http://safetyzone.iogp.org. The information provided includes a narrative description of the event, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company.

Definitions High potential event Any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities.

2. Key performance indicators

57

Table 23: Causal factors assigned to high potential events (2010–2016) Causal factors

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment

47

24

61

35

28

45

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment

23

21

38

24

21

22

40

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/procedures

37

20

54

44

35

26

38

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)

27

15

23

11

17

17

29

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/ specification/management of change

13

18

16

29

23

21

28

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence

22

15

36

29

17

28

27

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/ inspection/testing

21

12

37

29

26

27

24

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/ stress

15

8

21

11

6

7

21

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision

31

18

44

24

21

21

20

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate communication

19

15

36

26

22

18

20

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products

9

17

21

22

16

14

19

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured

3

9

15

9

13

7

19

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers

10

9

22

21

8

12

18

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard

9

13

31

12

6

7

18

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems

2

12

19

9

5

10

16

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)

9

6

7

9

10

13

15

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/ equipment/materials/products

16

13

27

28

14

14

14

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices

13

15

8

14

5

12

14

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)

9

3

13

8

4

9

11

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)

6

5

6

3

4

5

11

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation

6

3

5

3

2

7

9

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Failure to report/learn from events

4

2

3

4

5

6

8

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading

5

9

11

5

4

4

8

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices

1

3

4

2

3

1

6

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue

4

4

1

1

1

2

5

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Poor leadership/organizational culture

15

9

10

9

4

9

4

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed

3

3

5

2

4

1

4

PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly

6

3

8

4

5

7

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion

3

3

5

4

2

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads

5

2

5

2

3

1

3

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems

1

3

4

2

0

3

2

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature

0

2

2

3

2

2

2

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence

0

1

2

0

1

2

PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment

3

1

2

4

0

1

1

PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

PEOPLE (ACTS): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task

3

1

1

2

2

1

0

50

Causal factors are listed in order of frequency for 2016. The top 10 causal factors assigned to high potential events for each year are highlighted in yellow. 2015: two causal factors were equal 10th with 14 assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted) 2010: two causal factors were equal 10th with 15 assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

58

The following eight causal factors were common to the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events in 2016. • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment • PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/ procedures • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing • PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate supervision • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate communication The following five causal factors appear consistently in the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events for 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010. • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment • PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate supervision • PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/ procedures

2. Key performance indicators

59

2.14 Life-Saving Rules IOGP has released a set of Life-Saving Rules (OGP Life-Saving Rules, Report 459), intended for use by the oil and gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities. Each Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple and consistent communication about risks in the workplace. These rules were developed by using the fatal incident and high potential event data from the 1991 to 2010 safety performance indicators reports to identify the events and activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear instructions on how to mitigate against these risks. The Life-Saving Rules are split into eight ‘Core Rules’ and ten ‘Supplementary Rules’ (previously called 'Supplemental Rules').

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Personal Safety

8.

10.

11.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

12.

13.

Driving

Site Safety

7.

9.

Control of Work

Figure 44: Life-Saving Rules (from IOGP Report 459)

Assessment of the applicability of the Life-Saving Rules to fatal incident descriptions for 2016 data shows that at least 58% of the fatal incidents reported are covered by the Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption of this system. Insufficient information was provided to be able to assign a rule for six of the incidents.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

60

Confined space 3%

Work at height 9% System override 3% Suspended load 1% Speeding / phone 5% Seat belt 4% PPE (Including flotation device) 7%

Dropped objects 10% Excavation 1% Gas test 3% Isolation 5% Journey management 8%

Permit to work 3%

Lift plan 4%

Overhead power lines 2%

Line of fire – safe area 33%

Figure 45: Percentage of Life-Saving Rules allocated to fatal incidents (2012-2016)

Table 24: IOGP Life-Saving Rules allocated to fatal incidents (2012–2016) Life-Saving Rule Confined space

Fatal incidents 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2

0

1

0

1

Dropped objects

0

1

7

5

2

Excavation

2

0

0

0

0

Gas test

1

1

1

1

0

Isolation

3

0

2

2

1

Journey management

3

1

4

3

1

Lift plan

4

0

1

0

1

Line of fire - safe area

14

14

6

9

6

Overhead power lines

0

1

1

1

0

Permit to work

0

0

3

0

1

PPE (Including flotation device)

1

5

1

2

1

Seat belt

1

2

0

2

1

Speeding / phone

3

0

1

2

1

Suspended load

1

1

0

0

0

System override

4

0

0

0

0

Work at height

2

3

5

2

1

No appropriate Rule

11

8

2

6

6

Insufficient information to assign a Rule

0

6

7

5

6

Overall

52

43

42

40

29

2. Key performance indicators

61

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Confined space Dropped objects Excavation Gas test Isolation Journey management Lift plan Line of fire - safe area Overhead power lines Permit to work PPE (Including flotation device) Seat belt Speeding / phone Suspended load System override Work at height Insufficient information to assign a Rule No appropriate Rule 0

10

20

30

Figure 46: IOGP Life-Saving Rules allocated to fatal incidents (2012–2016)

40

50

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

62

3. Results by region In this section the safety performance of the contributing IOGP Members is presented for regions and individual countries within those regions. Maps showing the division of countries into regions, and the work hours and number of participating companies by country, are provided in Appendix D.

NORTH AMERICA

RUSSIA, CENTRAL ASIA EUROPE

ASIA/ AUSTRALASIA MIDDLE EAST AFRICA SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA

3.1 Fatalities Table 25 shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities in each of the seven regions into which the data are partitioned. Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in section 3.5, where five-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. Table 25: Fatalities, fatal incidents and fatal accident rate by region (2015 & 2016) Region Africa

Fatalities

FAR

Fatal Incidents

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

10

10

1.84

2.25

7

4

Asia/Australasia

7

15

0.76

2.01

4

14

Europe

4

14

1.17

5.11

4

2

Middle East North America Russia, Central Asia South & Central America Overall

7

6

1.07

0.99

7

5

20

4

2.31

1.23

13

3

4

0

1.60

0.00

3

0

2

1

1.41

0.30

2

1

54

50

1.45

1.73

40

29

3. Results by region

63

3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) Further Fatal Accident Rate analysis is presented in section 3.5, where five-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. Table 26: Fatal accident rate by region (2012–2016) FAR

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

2.83

4.53

0.86

1.84

2.25

Asia/Australasia

1.35

0.87

1.02

0.76

2.01

Europe

0.52

2.26

1.04

1.17

5.11

Middle East

1.95

0.63

0.33

1.07

0.99

North America

7.50

2.03

1.56

2.32

1.23

0.55

1.25

0.81

1.60

0.00

0.54

4.37

1.13

1.41

0.30

Overall

2.38

2.12

1.03

1.45

1.73

Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

Russia, Central Asia South & Central America

8

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North Russia, South & America Central Asia Central America

Figure 47: Fatal accident rate by region (2012–2016)

Definitions Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked

All regions

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

64

3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,890 million hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A). Table 27: Total recordable injury rate by region (2012–2016) TRIR

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

1.14

1.05

1.02

0.76

0.50

Asia/Australasia

1.37

0.97

1.01

0.92

0.81

Europe

2.64

2.58

2.58

2.22

2.07

Middle East

1.02

0.90

0.86

0.73

0.48

2.82

2.58

2.40

2.13

1.84

0.99

0.81

0.59

0.69

0.52

South & Central America

3.05

3.13

2.82

2.08

1.83

Overall

1.74

1.60

1.54

1.21

1.03

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

North America Russia, Central Asia

3.5

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North Russia, South & America Central Asia Central America

All regions

Figure 48: Total recordable injury rate by region (2012–2016)

Definitions Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per million hours worked

3. Results by region

65

3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in section 3.5, where fiveyear rolling averages of LTIF are presented for each of the regions, 100% of the database (see Appendix A). Table 28: Lost time injury frequency by region (2012–2016) LTIF

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

0.33

0.31

0.30

0.19

0.15

Asia/Australasia

0.26

0.15

0.17

0.14

0.16

Europe

0.91

1.02

0.81

0.70

0.70

Middle East

0.24

0.21

0.17

0.17

0.10

0.94

0.74

0.39

0.41

0.40

0.28

0.33

0.18

0.19

0.08

South & Central America

0.69

0.85

0.77

0.66

0.59

Overall

0.48

0.45

0.36

0.29

0.27

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

North America Russia, Central Asia

1.2

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North Russia, South & America Central Asia Central America

All regions

Figure 49: Lost time injury frequency by region (2012–2016)

Definitions Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

66

3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF five-year rolling averages In order to smooth out variability in the annual values for the regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, five-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends. The five-year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five-year rolling average for 2016 is calculated by: (Number of injuries in 2012+2013+2014+2015+2016) (Total work hours in 2012+2013+2014+2015+2016) The number series involved in the calculation is frame-shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2016 is calculated from 2012–2016 data. The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF five-year rolling averages for each of the regions, and includes the ‘overall’ curve.

FAR five-year rolling average (per 100 million hours)

The increase in the North America five-year rolling average FAR for 2012 can be attributed to the effect of a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico (onshore) in which 31 individuals lost their lives.

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

5

South & Central America

Overall

4 3 2 1 0

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 50: FAR five-year rolling average by region (2011–2016)

2015

2016

TRIR five-year rolling average (per million hours)

3. Results by region

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

67

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

4

South & Central America

Overall

3

2

1

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

LTIF five-year rolling average (per million hours)

Figure 51: TRIR five-year rolling average by region (2011–2016)

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

1.5

South & Central America

Overall

1.0

0.5

0.0

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 52: LTIF five-year rolling average by region (2011–2016)

2015

2016

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

68

3.6 Severity of lost work day cases The number of days lost was reported for 77% of lost work day cases. The severity of lost work day cases is the highest in the South & Central America region compared with the other regions (93 days lost per LWDC in 2016). This is a 53% increase compared with the average for the previous five-year period. The greatest increase in lost work day case severity is shown in the Middle East, where the 2016 average days lost was 62.2, 183% higher than the 2011–2015 average. Appendix A provides further information on the proportion of the database which can be used for lost work day case severity. More than 86% of the data submitted for Africa, Asia/Australasia, the Middle East and South & Central America was usable for this metric, in comparison with only 40% of equivalent data for North America.

Definitions Lost work day case (LWDC) An incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.

Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case.

3. Results by region

69

Table 29: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015) Average days lost per LWDC Region

2011-2015

2015

2016

2016 relative to 2011-2015 severity

2016 relative to 2015 severity

Africa

32.8

42.7

33.1

# 1% higher

$ 22% lower

Asia/Australasia

27.7

27.7

39.5

# 42% higher

# 42% higher

Europe

39.8

38.8

45.3

# 14% higher

# 17% higher

Middle East

22.0

24.6

62.2

# 183% higher

# 153% higher

North America

52.1

87.8

25.1

$ 52% lower

$ 71% lower

Russia, Central Asia

50.3

70.8

55.3

# 10% higher

$ 22% lower

South & Central America

61.2

55.9

93.4

# 53% higher

# 67% higher

Overall

43.6

54.0

61.4

# 41% higher

# 14% higher

Average days lost per LWDC

100

2011–2015 2016 2016 Overall

80

61.4

60 40 20 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 53: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

70

3.7 Individual country performance The safety performance reported by participating IOGP member companies of individual countries is presented in terms of the lost time injury frequency of companies jointly with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies, performance is only published for those countries for which at least 2 companies have reported statistics. Countries with less than 50,000 reported work hours are excluded, since results for such small populations of hours would be unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages include data from all countries regardless of work hours or number of contributing companies. 24 of the 103 countries for which data have been reported are excluded by these constraints. TRIR calculations exclude data where medical treatment cases are not reported. The chart of relative TRIR performance therefore compares the 2016 performance with that of 2015 and 2014 for 78 of the 79 countries. The majority of countries in Africa, Asia/Australasia, Middle East and Russia, Central Asia, achieved a TRIR equal to or lower than the overall average TRIR (1.03). The majority of countries in Europe, North America and South & Central America show a TRIR higher than the global average. The chart of relative LTIF performance for the remaining 79 countries compares the 2016 performance with that of 2015 and 2014. The majority of countries in Africa, Asia/Australasia, the Middle East and Russia, Central Asia achieved an LTIF equal to or lower than the overall average LTIF (0.27). The majority of countries in Europe, North America and South & Central America show an LTIF higher than the global average. For comparison, the five-year rolling average FAR is shown for each of the regions. There appears to be little if any correlation between these values and the regional average LTIF and TRIR values.

3. Results by region

71

2016 average TRIR Five-year rolling average FAR (0.0)

2016 2015

2016 Global average TRIR

2014

Africa Morocco Ivory Coast Mauritania Equatorial Guinea Tunisia Tanzania Ghana Gabon Senegal Kenya Angola Mozambique Libya Congo Uganda Egypt Nigeria Algeria South Africa Liberia

(2.5)

Asia-Australasia New Zealand Japan South Korea Australia Papua New Guinea Vietnam Thailand Pakistan Myanmar Malaysia China Brunei Indonesia India Philippines Singapore

(1.2)

Europe Germany Hungary Norway Denmark Croatia Spain Poland Ireland Netherlands UK France Italy Romania Bulgaria Monaco Cyprus

(1.9)

Middle East Oman UAE Iraq Qatar Kuwait Iran Kurdistan Region of Iraq Yemen

(1.0)

North America Canada USA Mexico

(2.8)

Russia, Central Asia Turkmenistan Kazakhstan Azerbaijan Russia Ukraine

(0.9)

(1.6)

South & Central America Guyana Bolivia Brazil Colombia Ecuador Argentina Peru Trinidad & Tobago Venezuela Uruguay Surinam

41.67

0

1.03

3

6

9

TRIR (per million hours worked) and FAR 5-year rolling average (per 100 million hours worked)

Figure 54: Total recordable injury rate by region (2016) and country (2014–2016) and FAR five-year rolling average by region (2016)

12

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

72

2016 average LTIF Five-year rolling average FAR (0.0)

2016 2015

2016 Global average LTIF

2014

One or more fatalities (2016) in red

(2.5)

Africa Senegal Mozambique Equatorial Guinea Tunisia Congo Libya Angola Egypt Gabon Algeria Nigeria South Africa Ghana Morocco Ivory Coast Kenya Mauritania Tanzania Uganda Liberia

(1.1)

Asia-Australasia New Zealand Vietnam South Korea Pakistan China Australia Japan Papua New Guinea Malaysia Thailand Myanmar Indonesia Singapore Philippines Brunei India

(1.9)

Europe Hungary Spain Croatia Poland Norway Italy France UK Germany Denmark Netherlands Romania Bulgaria Ireland Monaco Cyprus (1.0)

Middle East Oman UAE Kuwait Iraq Qatar Iran Kurdistan Region of Iraq Yemen

(2.8)

North America USA Canada Mexico

(0.9)

Russia, Central Asia Turkmenistan Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Russia Ukraine

(1.6)

South & Central America Venezuela Brazil Colombia Ecuador Peru Argentina Trinidad & Tobago Bolivia Uruguay Guyana Surinam 0

0.23

1

2

LTIF (per million hours worked) and FAR 5-year rolling average (per 100 million hours worked)

Figure 55: Lost time injury frequency by region (2016) and country (2014–2016) and FAR five-year rolling average by region (2016)

3

3. Results by region

73

3.8 Incident triangles by region In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.

Definitions Lost time injuries:

Lost work day cases and fatalities

Recordable injuries:

Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities:

The number of lost time injuries (LTI) divided by the total number of fatalities (LTI/fatalities)

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities)

Table 30: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Africa (2013-2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

7:1

22:1

2015

11:1

41:1

2014

34:1

116:1

2013

7:1

23:1

10 65 221 Overall

1

9

11 30 Company

54 191 Contractor

Figure 56: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Africa (2016)

Fatalities

Lost time injuries Total recordable incidents

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

74

Table 31: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Asia/Australasia (2013–2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

8:1

40:1

2015

18:1

117:1

2014

17:1

97:1

2013

17:1

107:1

15

14

1

116

22

Fatalities

Lost time injuries

94

603

93

510

Overall

Company

Contractor

Total recordable incidents

Figure 57: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Asia/Australasia (2016)

Table 32: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Europe (2013–2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

14:1

40:1

2015

60:1

189:1

2014

78:1

239:1

2013

45:1

113:1

14 193

2 54

12

Fatalities

139

Lost time injuries Total recordable incidents

566

129

437

Overall

Company

Contractor

Figure 58: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Europe (2016)

3. Results by region

75

Table 33: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Middle East (2013–2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

10:1

49:1

2015

16:1

67:1

2014

53:1

255:1

2013

34:1

141:1

6

0

62

6

12

292

61

Overall

50 231

Company

Fatalities

Lost time injuries Total recordable incidents

Contractor

Figure 59: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Middle East (2016)

Table 34: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – North America (2013–2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

33:1

150:1

2015

18:1

55:1

2014

25:1

96:1

2013

36:1

116:1

4 131

2 32

600

138

Overall

Company

2 99 462 Contractor

Figure 60: Incident triangles by company & contractor – North America (2016)

Fatalities

Lost time injuries Total recordable incidents

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

76

Table 35: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Russia, Central Asia (2013-2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

n/a

n/a

2015

12:1

43:1

2014

22:1

72:1

2013

27:1

65:1

0

0

0

Fatalities

13

3

10

Lost time injuries

86

18

Overall

Company

Total recordable incidents

68 Contractor

Figure 61: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Russia, Central Asia (2016)

Table 36: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – South & Central America (2013–2016) Year

Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities

Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities

2016

196:1

610:1

2015

47:1

143:1

2014

68:1

247:1

2013

19:1

72:1

0

1

26

196 610

74

Overall

Company

1

Fatalities

170

Lost time injuries

536

Total recordable incidents

Contractor

Figure 62: Incident triangles by company & contractor – South & Central America (2016)

4. Results by function

77

4. Results by function In this section the safety performance within different functions performed in the E&P industry is presented. Functions are defined as ‘exploration’, ‘drilling’, ‘production’, ‘construction’ and ‘unspecified’. The category ‘other’ is no longer in use. See the Glossary of Terms at Appendix E for definitions. The percentage of the total work hours reported under each function has been detailed below. See Appendix B for further data. Table 37: Percentage of total work hours reported under each function (2012–2016) % of 2012 work hours

% of 2013 work hours

% of 2014 work hours

% of 2015 work hours

% of 2016 work hours

1.7

2.5

2.7

1.9

1.7

Drilling

14.4

15.4

16.2

14.8

14.4

Production

35.7

34.8

37.3

35.5

35.7

Construction

23.5

24.7

22.9

24.5

23.5

Unspecified

24.6

22.6

20.9

23.3

24.6

Exploration

4.1 Fatalities The distribution of company and contractor fatal incidents and fatalities between the functions is shown for both 2016 and 2015. Table 38: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents by function (2012–2016) Fatal incidents

Fatalities

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Exploration

3

3

1

3

1

4

3

1

3

1

Drilling

11

14

17

9

8

12

15

19

10

8

Production

13

15

14

22

14

15

33

15

35

28

Construction

18

6

8

4

4

19

18

8

4

6

Unspecified

7

5

2

2

2

38

11

2

2

7

Overall

52

43

42

40

29

88

80

45

54

50

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

78

4.2 FAR, LTIF and TRIR – five-year rolling averages In order to smooth out variability in the annual values for the regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, five-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends. The five-year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five-year rolling average for 2016 is calculated by: (Number of fatalities in function in 2012+2013+2014+2015+2016) (Total work hours in function 2012+2013+2014+2015+2016)

FAR five-year rolling average (per 100 million hours)

The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 2016 will calculate from 2012–2016, inclusive.

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Figure 63: Fatal accident rate five-year rolling average

For calculations of TRIR submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,890 million hours, almost 100% of the database (see Appendix A).

TRIR five-year rolling average (per million hours)

4. Results by function

Exploration

Drilling

Production

79

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

4

3

2

1

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

LTIF five-year rolling average (per million hours)

Figure 64: Total recordable injury rate five-year rolling average

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 65: Lost time injury frequency five-year rolling average

2015

2016

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

80

Severity of LWDC – Average lost days per LWDC

4.3 Severity of lost work day cases (LWDC) 80

2011–2015 2016

70

2016 Overall 61.4

60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Figure 66: Average severity of lost work day cases

The overall average number of days lost per lost work day case (LWDC) is 61.4 in 2016 (54.0 in 2015). Offshore the LWDC severity is 79.2 days lost per LWDC compared with 46.9 days for onshore activities (66.4 and 45.2 respectively for 2015). See section 2.8 for additional information and section 3.6 for LWDC severity by region.

4.4 Exploration performance 4.4.1 Total recordable injury rate – exploration Figures 67 and 68 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world. 50 million work hours (99% of reported exploration work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 34% and contractor activities represent 66%. This is a decrease of 11 million work hours compared with 2015 (61 million work hours in 2015; 32% company, 68% contractor).

Definitions Exploration Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.

4. Results by function

81

In 2016 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.24 and 1.50 respectively; the overall average TRIR for exploration activities is 1.07. The company only total recordable injury rates for the Russia, Central Asia region show a high average for the 2011-2015 five-year period. This is against a relatively small number of work hours (168,000 in 2016).

Company TRIR (per million hours worked) – exploration

Further information on exploration TRIR by region is available in Appendix B Table B 35. 6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.24

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor TRIR (per million hours worked) – exploration

Figure 67: Company total recordable injury rate for exploration activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2

1.50

1 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 68: Contractor total recordable injury rate for exploration activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

82

4.4.2 Lost time injury frequency – exploration Figures 69 and 70 show the LTIF for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world. The 2016 result is compared with average LTIF results in the previous five-year period. 50 million work hours (100% of reported exploration work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 34% and contractor activities represent 66%. This is a reduction of 20 million work hours compared with 2015 (32% company, 68% contractor in 2015). In 2016 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are 0.06 and 0.31 respectively; the overall average LTIF for exploration activities is 0.22. Company LTIF values associated with exploration show an LTIF of zero (no fatalities or LWDC reported) in all regions except Europe in 2016.

Company LTIF (per million hours worked) – exploration

Further information on exploration LTIF by region is available in Appendix B Table B 36.

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.06

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 69: Company lost time injury frequency for exploration activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Contractor LTIF (per million hours worked) – exploration

4. Results by function

83

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.31

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 70: Contractor lost time injury frequency for exploration activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

4.5 Drilling performance 4.5.1 Total recordable injury rate – drilling Figures 71 and 72 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for drilling related activities in different regions of the world. 417 million work hours (almost 100% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 16% and contractor activities represent 84%. This represents a decrease of 46 million work hours compared with 2015, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (10% to 90% respectively). In 2016 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are 0.89 and 1.87 respectively; the overall TRIR for drilling activities is 1.71. Further information on drilling TRIR by region is available in Appendix B Table B.37.

Definitions Drilling All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.

Company TRIR (per million hours worked) – drilling

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

84

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.89

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor TRIR (per million hours worked) – drilling

Figure 71: Company total recordable injury rate for drilling activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2

1.87

1 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 72: Contractor total recordable injury rate for drilling activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

4. Results by function

85

4.5.2 Lost time injury frequency – drilling 417 million work hours (100% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 16% and contractor activities represent 84%. This represents a decrease of 133 million work hours compared with 2015, with almost the same ratio of company to contractor activities (17% to 83% respectively in 2015). The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors in drilling related activities in different regions of the world. In 2016 the overall LTIF for both companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities is 0.54. In 2016 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are 0.31 and 0.59 respectively.

Company LTIF (per million hours worked) – drilling

Further information on drilling LTIF by region is available in Appendix B Table B 38. 6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.31

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor LTIF (per million hours worked) – drilling

Figure 73: Company lost time injury frequency for drilling activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015) 6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.59

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 74: Contractor lost time injury frequency for drilling activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

86

4.6 Production performance Definitions Production Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. It does not cover production drilling and workover. See the Appendix E: Glossary of Terms for details.

4.6.1 Total recordable injury rate – production Figures 75 and 76 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world. 1,032 million work hours (almost 100% of reported production work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 28% and contractor activities represent 72%. This represents a reduction of 94 million work hours compared with 2015, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities (28% to 72% respectively). In 2016 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are 1.33 and 1.32 respectively; the overall average TRIR for production activities is 1.32. Further information on production TRIR by region is available in Appendix B Table B 39.

Company TRIR (per million hours worked) – production

4. Results by function

87

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1.33

1 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor TRIR (per million hours worked) – production

Figure 75: Company total recordable injury rate for production activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1.32

1 0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 76: Contractor total recordable injury rate for production activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

88

4.6.2 Lost time injury frequency – production Figures 77 and 78 show the LTIF for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world. 1,035 million work hours (100% of reported production work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 28% and contractor activities represent 72%. This is a reduction of 286 million work hours compared with 2015, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (29% to 71% respectively). In 2016 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are 0.38 and 0.33 respectively; the overall average LTIF for production activities is 0.34. Further information on production LTIF by region is available in Appendix B Table B 40. Company LTIF (per million hours worked) – production

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0.38

0

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor LTIF (per million hours worked) – production

Figure 77: Company lost time injury frequency for production activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015) 6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.33

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 78: Contractor lost time injury frequency for production activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

4. Results by function

89

4.7 Construction performance Definitions Construction All major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities

The company and contractor results for 2016 construction performance are presented below. Construction activities are predominately conducted by contractors therefore the work hours reported for contractors are much greater than those reported for company employees. Refer to Appendix B for detailed information.

4.7.1 Total recordable injury rate – construction 680 million work hours (almost 100% of reported construction work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 7% and contractor activities represent 93%. This is a reduction of 176 million work hours compared with 2015, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities (7% to 93% respectively). In 2016 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.35 and 0.71 respectively; the overall average TRIR for construction activities is 0.69. Further information on construction TRIR by region is available in Appendix B Table B 41.

Company TRIR (per million hours worked) – construction

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

90

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.35

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor TRIR (per million hours worked) – construction

Figure 79: Company total recordable injury rate for construction activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.71

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 80: Contractor total recordable injury rate for construction activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

4. Results by function

91

4.7.2 Lost time injury frequency – construction 680 million work hours (100% of reported construction work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 7% and contractor activities represent 93%. This represents a reduction of 232 million work hours compared with 2015, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities (7% to 93% respectively). In 2016 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are 0.06 and 0.13 respectively; the overall average LTIF for construction activities is 0.13. Further information on construction LTIF by region is available in Appendix B Table B 42.

Company LTIF (per million hours worked) – construction

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.06

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor LTIF (per million hours worked) – construction

Figure 81: Company lost time injury frequency for construction activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.13

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 82: Contractor lost time injury frequency for construction activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

92

4.8 Unspecified performance Definitions Unspecified Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel who’s work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function.

4.8.1 Total recordable injury rate – unspecified 711 million work hours (almost 100% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 34% and contractor activities represent 66%. This represents a reduction of 99 million work hours compared with 2015, with a similar ratio company to contractor activities (36% to 64% respectively in 2015). In 2016 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in activities where the work function was not specified are 0.33 and 0.64 respectively; the overall average TRIR for unspecified activities is 0.53. Further information on unspecified TRIR by region is available in Appendix B Table B 43.

Company TRIR (per million hours worked) – unspecified

4. Results by function

93

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.33

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor TRIR (per million hours worked) – unspecified

Figure 83: Company total recordable injury rate for unspecified activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.63

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 84: Contractor total recordable injury rate for unspecified activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

94

4.8.2 Lost time injury frequency – unspecified 714 million work hours (100% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 35% and contractor activities represent 65%. This represents a reduction of 153 million work hours compared with 2015, with a similar ratio company to contractor activities (35% to 65% respectively in 2015). In 2016 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in activities in the ‘unspecified’ work function are 0.11 and 0.16 respectively; the overall average LTIF for unspecified activities is 0.14. Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function in 2016 were: • 1 company fatality and 6 contractor fatalities • 26 company and 68 contractor lost work day cases Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function from 2011 to 2015 were: • 12 company and 46 contractor fatalities • 270 company and 697 contractor lost work day cases Further information on unspecified LTIF by region is available in Appendix B Table B 44.

Company LTIF (per million hours worked) – unspecified

4. Results by function

95

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.11

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Contractor LTIF (per million hours worked) – unspecified

Figure 85: Company lost time injury frequency for unspecified activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

6

2011–2015 2016

5

2016 Overall

4 3 2 1 0

0.16

Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Figure 86: Contractor lost time injury frequency for unspecified activities – by region (2016 compared with 2011–2015)

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

96

5. Results by company This section compares the safety performance of individual companies with each other and with their performance in previous years.

5.1 Overall company results For reasons of anonymity each of the 43 companies that has contributed relevant data and is to be included in this analysis has been allocated a unique code letter (A to QQ). These codes change every year in line with LTIF performance. All companies reported both company and contractor data. Results for all of the 43 participating companies are therefore shown in this section. In 2016 IOGP member companies reported 44 contractor and 6 company employee fatalities.

5.1.1 Fatal accident rate In the figure below the FAR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours reported. 15 companies met this criterion in 2016, compared with 20 companies in 2015. Companies are shown in rank order of company-with-contractor FAR. • 10 of the 15 companies with their contractors had a lower FAR than the average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million work hours reported (1.90).

Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)

• 12 of the 15 companies suffered one or more fatalities.

Company with contractors

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

1.57

B

Z

T

LL

GG

JJ

CC

BB

DD

II

AA

J

Figure 87: Fatal accident rate (2016), total workforce hours >50 million

U

EE

HH

5. Results by company

97

5.1.2 Total recordable injury rate The TRIR for companies together with their contractors is presented below. Data are only included where Medical Treatment Cases (MTC) are reported. All of the 43 participating companies qualified for inclusion in this section. The TRIR for company alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and contractors jointly. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

In six instances, contractors achieved a lower TRIR than the companies they were employed by. Company with contractors

Company only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors

4.5

Compa

4.0

Compa

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.03

1.0 0.5 0.0

S

F

G

M

H

B

V

R

A

C

E

J

L

X

N

Y

Q

K

I

NN CC W AA P

D

PP GG O

KK FF U DD EE T

LL Z

HH JJ

II BB MM QQ OO

Figure 88: Total recordable injury rate (2016)

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

In Figure 89 the TRIR for contractors alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and contractors jointly. Company with contractors

Contractor only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors

10

Contrac

9

Compan

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.03

1 0

S

F

G

M

H

B

V

R

A

C

E

J

L

X

N

Y

Q

K

I

NN CC W AA P

Figure 89: Total recordable injury rate (2016)

D

PP GG O

KK FF U DD EE T

LL Z

HH JJ

II BB MM QQ OO

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

98

In Figures 90 and 91 the TRIR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours. Fifteen companies met this criterion in 2016, compared with the 19 in 2015. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR for companies alone vs. companywith-contractor TRIR and for contractors alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR.

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

Ten of the 15 companies with their contractors had a lower TRIR than the overall average for companies with their contractors reporting more than 50 million work hours (0.87).

Company with contractors

Company only

2016 Overall companies with contractors

Top quartile

3.5

Compa

3.0

Compa

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0

0.87

0.5 0.0

B

J

CC

AA

GG

DD

U

EE

T

LL

Z

HH

JJ

II

BB

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

Figure 90: Total recordable injury rate (2016), total workforce hours >50 million

Company with contractors

Contractor only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors

3.5

Contrac

3.0

Compa

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0

0.87

0.5 0.0

B

J

CC

AA

GG

DD

U

EE

T

LL

Z

HH

JJ

Figure 91: Total recordable injury rate (2016), total workforce hours >50 million

II

BB

5. Results by company

99

The remaining 28 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 50 million work hours are presented below in rank order of the company-withcontractor TRIR for companies alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR and for contractors alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR.

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

Nine of the 28 companies with their contractors had a lower TRIR than the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (1.17).

Company with contractors

Company only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors

4.5

Compan

4.0

Compan

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

1.17

1.0 0.5 0.0

S

F

G

M

H

V

R

A

C

E

L

X

N

Y

Q

K

I

NN

W

P

D

PP

O

KK

FF MM QQ OO

Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)

Figure 92: Total recordable injury rate (2016), total workforce hours <50 million

Company with contractors

Contractor only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors

10

Contractor on

9

Company with

8 7 6 5 4 3 2

1.17

1 0

S

F

G

M

H

V

R

A

C

E

L

X

N

Q

K

I

NN

W

P

D

PP

O

KK

FF MM QQ

Figure 93: Total recordable injury rate (2016), total workforce hours <50 million

OO

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

100

5.1.3 Lost time injury frequency The figure shows the LTIF in rank order for companies together with their contractors. All of the 43 participating companies (A to QQ) contributed both company and contractor data, although not always for every country in which operations were conducted. Data for all 43 participating companies are therefore included in this section. The LTIF for the company alone and contractors alone is plotted alongside the LTIF for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also indicated*. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B. • 39 of the 43 companies with their contractors delivered a LTIF of less than 1 • 13 of the companies presented below suffered one or more fatality • In 8 instances, contractors achieved a lower LTIF than the companies they were employed by.

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

5. Results by company

Company with contractors

Company only

101

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

1.8

Compa

1.6

Compa

1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4

0.27

0.2 0.0

A *

B *

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J *

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T *

U

V

X

Y

Z *

AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II * * * * * *

JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ * *

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Figure 94: Lost time injury frequency (2016)

Company with contractors

Contractor only

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

Top quartile

2.0

Contrac

Compa

1.5

1.0

0.5 0.27

0.0

A *

B *

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J *

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

U

Figure 95: Lost time injury frequency (2016)

T *

V

W *

Y

Z *

AA BB CC DD FF EE GG II HH JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ * * * * * * * *

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

102

In Figures 96 and 97 below the LTIF is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours. Fifteen companies met this criterion in 2016, compared with 20 companies in 2015. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF. • 10 of the 15 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million work hours reported (0.24).

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

• 12 of the 15 companies suffered one or more fatalities.

Company with contractors

Company only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

2.0

Compan

Compan

1.5

1.0

0.5 0.24 0.0

B*

J*

T*

U

Z*

AA*

BB*

CC*

DD*

EE

GG*

HH

II*

JJ*

LL*

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Figure 96: Lost time injury frequency (2016), joint hours >50 million

Company with contractors

Contractor only

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

Top quartile

2.0

Contractor on

Company wit

1.5

1.0

0.5 0.24 0.0

B*

J*

T*

U

Z*

AA*

BB*

CC*

DD*

EE

GG*

Figure 97: Lost time injury frequency (2016), joint hours >50 million

HH

II*

JJ*

LL*

5. Results by company

103

The remaining 28 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 50 million work hours reported are presented below in rank order of the companywith-contractor LTIF. • 12 of the 28 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (0.41).

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

• Two of the 28 smaller companies presented below suffered one or more fatalities.

Company with contractors

Company only

Top quartile

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

2.0

Compa

Compa

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.41

A*

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

V

W*

X

Y

FF

KK MM NN OO PP QQ

Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)

Figure 98: Lost time injury frequency (2016), joint hours <50 million

Company with contractors

Contractor only

2016 Overall companies with contractors *2016 Fatality

Top quartile

1.8

Contractor on

1.6 1.4

Company with

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.41

0.4 0.2 0.0

A*

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

V

W*

X

Y

Figure 99: Lost time injury frequency (2016), joint hours <50 million

FF

KK MM NN OO PP QQ

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

104

5.2 Company results by function Results of companies together with their contractors have been analysed by function to allow more in-depth benchmarking between companies. The TRIR indicator has been selected, and the ranked results are shown in the following charts. Only companies that provided data by function are included, and then only those companies that reported more than 100,000 hours worked. Results against smaller numbers of hours would not have statistical significance. The company code letters are the same as used elsewhere in this section. Exploration was the only function where the top quartile company with contractors shows a TRIR of zero. It is also the function with the smallest number of work hours reported (2% of the total in 2016, see Appendix A). LTIF results by function can be found in Appendix B.

TRIR (per million hours worked) – exploration

Company with contractors

2016 Overall companies with contractors

Top quartile

12 10 8 6 4 2 1.07

0

J

H

M

AA

B

L

Y

W

JJ

EE

BB

C

CC

HH

I

KK

LL

NN

O

PP

R

S

T

X

Z

Figure 100: Total recordable injury rate (2016), Exploration activities

TRIR (per million hours worked) – drilling

Company with contractors

2016 Overall companies with contractors

Top quartile

12 10 8 6 4 2 0

1.72

S

Y

K

B NN M

C

F

V

L

R

JJ H

X

O

I

J

GG AA DD W KK CC D

Q

Figure 101: Total recordable injury rate (2016), Drilling activities

T

FF HH PP LL BB EE Z

E

P

5. Results by company

TRIR (per million hours worked) – production

Company with contractors

105

2016 Overall companies with contractors

Top quartile

12 10 8 6 4 2 0

1.32 V

S

F

E

H

R

B

M

X

J

C

A

L

CC Q

PP W

P

GG

I

DD EE FF AA LL

T

Y

Z

HH KK K

BB MM QQ JJ

O

OO

Figure 102: Total recordable injury rate (2016), Production activities

TRIR (per million hours worked) – construction

Company with contractors

2016 Overall companies with contractors

Top quartile

12 10 8 6 4 2 0.69

0

S

Q

F

E

X

H

KK

B

M

R

W

I

T

LL

GG

AA

EE

FF

CC MM DD BB HH

Z

JJ

Figure 103: Total recordable injury rate (2016), Construction activities

C

G

K

L

O

QQ

Y

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

106

Appendix A – Database dimensions

Number of work hours reported (millions)

Company

Contractor

5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2016

Figure A.1: Work hours reported by company and contractor (1985–2016)

Table A.1: Work hours reported by data type and operations (2016) Data type

Work hours reported (thousands) Onshore

Offshore

Overall

521,580

145,755

667,335

Contractor

1,613,366

614,920

2,228,286

Overall

2,134,946

760,675

2,895,621

Company

The database for the year 2016 covers 2,895,621,000 work hours reported in the exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry. The database is 22% smaller than it was in 2015. • 74% of the hours reported were associated with onshore activities, 26% with offshore activities. • 103 countries are represented in the database, 5 fewer than in the 2015 database. Countries are listed in Appendix D. • 43 companies contributed data, of which all companies contributed contractor statistics, though not in every case for each country of operation. • Of the 43 companies, 40 had contributed data in 2015 which accounted for 82% of the database in 2015 and 91% of the database in 2016. 41 of the companies submitting 2016 data had also provided data in 2014. • 17 of the companies contributed 90% of the hours. 6 companies between them covered 52% of the hours, and the largest contributor accounted for 13%. • 23% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel and 77% were related to contractors.

Appendix A

107

A summary of the key elements of the database is shown in the table at the end of this section.

2016 South & Central America 12%

Africa 15%

Russia, Central Asia 6% Asia/Australasia 26%

North America 11%

Middle East 21% Europe 9%

2015 South & Central America 4%

Africa 15%

Russia, Central Asia 7%

North America 23%

Asia/Australasia 25%

Middle East 17%

Figure A.2: Percentage of work hours reported by region (2015 and 2016)

Europe 9%

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

108

‘Unspecified (as a work function)’ is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not separated out by function are reported as ‘unspecified’.

2016 Exploration 2% Drilling 14%

Unspecified 25%

Production 36%

Construction 23%

2015 Exploration 2% Unspecified 23%

Construction 25%

Drilling 15%

Production 35%

Figure A3: Percentage of work hours reported by function (2015 and 2016)

Appendix A

109

Proportion of database used in analysis For calculations of FAR, Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and LTIF: • All hours in the database were used. For calculations of TRIR: • Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,890 million hours, almost 100% of the database. • In 2015, the TRIR database was 3,317 million hours, 89% of the total database. For calculations of lost work day case severity: • Submissions without information on days off work were filtered out, leaving a database of 2,233 million hours, 77% of the total database. • In 2015, this database was 2,728 million hours, 73% of the total database. For calculations of restricted work day case severity: • Submissions without information on days assigned to restricted activities were filtered out, leaving a database of 1,567 million hours (54% of the total database), and 414 restricted work day cases. • In 2015 this database was 1,903 million hours, 51% of the total database. More detailed information is shown in the tables below.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

110

Table A.2: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses by region (2016) Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis TRIR

Lost work day case severity

Restricted work day case severity

Africa

99%

87%

57%

Asia/Australasia

100%

88%

84%

Europe

100%

56%

49%

Middle East

100%

86%

48%

North America

100%

40%

38%

Russia, Central Asia

100%

52%

50%

South & Central America

100%

89%

16%

Region

Table A.3: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses by function (2016) Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis TRIR

Lost work day case severity

Restricted work day case severity

Exploration

99%

78%

51%

Drilling

99%

82%

53%

Production

99%

74%

46%

Construction

99%

74%

57%

Unspecified

99%

79%

62%

Function

Table A.4: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses overall (2016) Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis

Overall

TRIR

Lost work day case severity

Restricted work day case severity

100%

77%

54%

Table A.5: Percentage of reported RWDC included in RWDC severity calculations (2016) Percentage of reported work hours included in RWDC severity analysis Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

57%

65%

63%

65%

59%

Appendix B

111

Appendix B – Data tables Table B.1: Summary of 2016 data by region Region

Data type

Africa

Company Contractor

Operations Onshore

Asia/Australasia Europe MIddle East North America Russia, Central Asia South & Central America

Contractor

Total

Contractor

Grand Total

0.28

6

0.00

0.11

0.56

2.89

0.14

0.44

Onshore

73,861

1

15

23

29

1.35

0.22

0.92

444,534

10

55

62

96

2.25

0.15

0.50

114,011

1

13

21

24

0.88

0.12

0.52

Offshore

42,094

0

8

14

12

0.00

0.19

0.81

Onshore

405,254

11

47

94

199

2.71

0.14

0.87

Onshore

183,736

3

33

48

75

1.63

0.20

0.87

745,095

15

101

177

310

2.01

0.16

0.81

85,982

1

29

10

20

1.16

0.35

0.70

Offshore

24,544

1

23

11

34

4.07

0.98

2.81

Onshore

74,153

0

40

33

48

0.00

0.54

1.63

89,170

12

87

61

156

13.46

1.11

3.55

273,849

14

179

115

258

5.11

0.70

2.07

Onshore

82,043

0

10

16

21

0.00

0.12

0.57

Offshore

9,044

0

2

8

4

0.00

0.22

1.55

Onshore

482,675

6

38

50

98

1.24

0.09

0.40

33,916

0

6

14

19

0.00

0.18

1.15

607,678

6

56

88

142

0.99

0.10

0.48

Onshore

109,362

2

25

30

67

1.83

0.25

1.13

Offshore

11,958

0

5

6

3

0.00

0.42

1.17

Onshore

168,626

2

80

92

209

1.19

0.49

2.27

35,923

0

17

31

31

0.00

0.47

2.20

325,869

4

127

159

310

1.23

0.40

1.84

Onshore

16,575

0

2

0

10

0.00

0.12

0.72

Offshore

10,355

0

1

3

2

0.00

0.10

0.58

Onshore

86,003

0

6

7

30

0.00

0.07

0.50

Offshore

53,202

0

4

8

13

0.00

0.08

0.47

166,135

0

13

18

55

0.00

0.08

0.52

Onshore

37,876

0

14

3

14

0.00

0.37

0.82

Offshore

29,941

0

12

1

30

0.00

0.40

1.44

Onshore

119,532

0

58

25

115

0.00

0.49

1.66

Offshore

145,112

1

111

9

217

0.69

0.77

2.33

332,461

1

195

38

376

0.30

0.59

1.83

Subtotal Company

0.12

54

Subtotal Company

1.32

2

Offshore

Contractor

7

32

Subtotal Company

TRIR

2

Offshore

Contractor

LTIF

30

Subtotal Company

FAR

0

Offshore

Contractor

5

MTCs

(number)

8

Subtotal Company

8

RWDCs

(number)

17,819

Offshore

Contractor

1

LWDCs

(number)

277,123

Subtotal Company

(number)

Onshore Offshore

Contractor

75,731

Fatalities

Offshore

Subtotal Company

Hours worked (thousands)

Onshore

521,580

5

101

85

163

0.96

0.20

0.68

Offshore

145,755

1

53

45

91

0.69

0.37

1.30

Onshore

1,613,366

26

299

333

753

1.61

0.20

0.87

Offshore

614,920

17

273

194

540

2.76

0.47

1.67

2,895,621

50

726

657

1547

1.73

0.27

1.03

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

112

Table B.2: Summary of 2016 data, company, contractor, onshore, offshore Hours worked (thousands)

Company

Fatalities (number)

LWDCs

(number)

RWDCs

(number)

MTCs

FAR

LTIF

TRIR

(number)

667,335

6

154

130

254

0.90

0.24

0.82

Contractor

2,228,286

44

572

527

1293

1.97

0.28

1.09

Onshore

2,134,946

32

400

418

916

1.50

0.20

0.83

Offshore

760,675

18

326

239

631

2.37

0.45

1.60

Table B.3: Summary of 2016 data by function Function

Data type

Exploration

Company Contractor

Operations

Drilling

Contractor

Production

Contractor

Construction

Contractor

Unspecified Total

TRIR

0.06

0.25

Offshore

911

0

0

0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

Onshore

26,714

1

8

25

8

3.74

0.34

1.57

Offshore

5,968

0

1

4

2

0.00

0.17

1.17

49,870

1

10

32

10

2.01

0.22

1.07

45,292

0

17

13

12

0.00

0.38

0.91

Onshore Offshore

21,896

0

4

7

8

0.00

0.18

0.87

Onshore

165,122

6

69

138

87

3.63

0.45

1.82

Offshore

184,833

2

128

155

70

1.08

0.70

1.92

417,143

8

218

313

177

1.92

0.54

1.71

190,934

4

55

106

51

2.09

0.31

1.14

Onshore Offshore

96,279

1

48

80

35

1.04

0.51

1.70

Onshore

482,807

8

106

268

104

1.66

0.24

1.01

Offshore

264,523

15

115

299

69

5.67

0.49

1.88

1,034,543

28

324

753

259

2.71

0.34

1.32

40,266

0

3

5

7

0.00

7.45

37.44

Onshore Offshore

8,736

0

0

1

1

0.00

0.00

22.89

Onshore

545,546

6

64

218

75

1.10

12.83

66.54

Onshore

85,934

0

13

43

32

0.00

15.13

102.40

680,482

6

80

267

115

0.88

12.64

68.80

228,811

1

25

36

15

2.09

0.11

0.34

Offshore

17,933

0

1

3

1

1.04

0.06

0.28

Onshore

393,177

6

52

104

59

1.66

0.15

0.56

Onshore

73,662

0

16

39

21

5.67

0.22

1.03

713,583

7

94

182

96

2.71

0.14

0.53

521,580

5

101

163

85

0.96

20.32

36.75

Offshore

145,755

1

53

91

45

0.69

37.05

67.92

Onshore

1,613,366

27

299

753

333

1.67

20.21

40.80

614,920

17

273

540

194

2.76

47.16

78.74

2,895,621

50

726

1547

657

1.73

26.80

49.51

Offshore Grand Total

LTIF

0.00

Offshore

Contractor

FAR

0

Subtotal Company

MTCs

(number)

3

Offshore

Contractor

RWDCs

(number)

1

Subtotal Company

LWDCs

(number)

0

Subtotal Company

(number)

16,277

Subtotal Company

Fatalities

Onshore

Subtotal Company

Hours worked (thousands)

Appendix B

113

The following data are presented in relation to the sections where they were used.

Section 1 Summary Intentionally excluded.

Section 2 Overall results Table B.4: Fatal accident rate (2007–2016) Year

Company

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2007

1.65

3.39

2.99

3.01

2.92

2008

2.81

3.20

3.12

3.38

2.25

2009

1.58

3.11

2.76

2.75

2.78

2010

3.17

2.64

2.76

2.62

3.16

2011

1.33

2.03

1.88

1.94

1.67

2012

1.58

2.59

2.38

2.87

0.89

2013

1.83

2.20

2.12

1.70

3.27

2014

0.53

1.17

1.03

0.96

1.22

2015

1.34

1.49

1.45

1.19

2.21

2016 Hours 2016 (thousands)

Contractor

0.90

1.97

1.73

1.50

2.37

667,335

2,228,286

2,895,621

2,134,946

760,675

Table B.5: Fatal incident rate (2007-2016) Year

Company

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2007

1.35

2.85

2.51

2.74

1.69

2008

2.53

2.47

2.48

2.71

1.72

2009

1.22

2.06

1.87

1.86

1.90

2010

1.10

1.86

1.70

1.70

1.69

2011

0.80

1.63

1.45

1.57

1.03

2012

0.79

1.57

1.41

1.58

0.89

2013

0.85

1.22

1.14

0.94

1.68

2014

0.32

1.14

0.96

0.92

1.06

2015

0.67

1.20

1.08

0.94

1.47

2016 Hours 2016 (thousands)

Contractor

0.45

1.17

1.00

1.08

0.79

667,335

2,228,286

2,895,621

2,134,946

760,675

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

114

Table B.6: Total recordable injury rate (2007–2016) Year

Company

2007

2.41

2008

1.49

2009

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2.76

2.68

2.51

3.26

2.23

2.08

1.75

3.09

1.28

1.89

1.75

1.45

2.79

2010

1.19

1.81

1.68

1.41

2.45

2011

1.32

1.88

1.76

1.45

2.84

2012

1.12

1.90

1.74

1.49

2.53

2013

0.95

1.77

1.60

1.33

2.34

2014

0.90

1.70

1.54

1.33

2.16

2015

0.89

1.30

1.21

1.08

1.65

2016

0.82

1.09

1.03

0.83

1.60

662,816

2,227,185

2,890,001

2,129,706

760,295

Hours 2016 (thousands)

Contractor

Table B.7: Lost time injury frequency (2007–2016) Year

Company

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2007

0.54

0.70

0.66

0.62

0.82

2008

0.52

0.56

0.55

0.47

0.81

2009

0.44

0.46

0.45

0.38

0.70

2010

0.41

0.42

0.42

0.35

0.62

2011

0.42

0.43

0.43

0.34

0.74

2012

0.47

0.49

0.48

0.38

0.81

2013

0.40

0.47

0.45

0.34

0.77

2014

0.26

0.39

0.36

0.29

0.52

2015

0.30

0.29

0.29

0.23

0.47

2016 Hours 2016 (thousands)

Contractor

0.24

0.28

0.27

0.20

0.45

667,335

2,228,286

2,895,621

2,134,946

760,675

Table B.8: Fatalities by category (2016) Category Assault or violent act

Company

Contractor

Overall

0

0

0

Onshore

Offshore

0

0

% of total N/A

Aviation accident

2

17

19

6

13

38.0

Caught in, under or between

0

6

6

5

1

12.0

Confined space

0

2

2

2

0

4.0

Cut, puncture, scrape

0

1

1

1

0

2.0

Explosions or burns

2

7

9

8

1

18.0

Exposure electrical

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Falls from height

0

2

2

0

2

4.0

Overexertion, strain

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Pressure release

1

0

1

1

0

2.0

Slips and trips (at same height)

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Struck by

1

9

10

9

1

20.0

Water related, drowning

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Other

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Overall

6

44

50

32

18

Appendix B

115

Table B.9: Fatalities by activity (2016) Activity

Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

% of total

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

0

6

6

6

0

12.0

Diving, subsea, ROV

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Drilling, workover, well services

0

6

6

4

2

12.0

Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

0

3

3

1

2

6.0

Maintenance, inspection, testing

2

4

6

6

0

12.0

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Production operations

2

1

3

3

0

6.0

Seismic/survey operations

0

1

1

1

0

2.0

Transport – Air

2

17

19

6

13

38.0

Transport – Land

0

5

5

5

0

10.0

Transport – Water, incl. marine activity

0

1

1

0

1

2.0

Unspecified – other

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

Overall

6

44

50

32

18

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

Table B.10: Lost work day cases by category (2016) Category

Company

% of total

Assault or violent act

3

13

16

13

3

2.2

Aviation accident

1

0

1

0

1

0.1

10

109

119

53

66

16.4

0

4

4

4

0

0.6

Caught in, under or between Confined space

17

40

57

26

31

7.9

Explosions or burns

Cut, puncture, scrape

5

26

31

15

16

4.3

Exposure electrical

2

3

5

4

1

0.7

Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration

1

7

8

5

3

1.1

Falls from height

13

46

59

34

25

8.1

Overexertion, strain

14

28

42

22

20

5.8

0

8

8

3

5

1.1

Slips and trips (at same height)

38

85

123

72

51

16.9

Struck by

28

110

138

78

60

19.0

0

1

1

0

1

0.1

22

92

114

71

43

15.7

154

572

726

400

326

Pressure release

Water related, drowning Other Overall

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

116

Table B.11: Lost work day cases by activity (2016) Activity

Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

% of total

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning

2

73

75

64

11

10.3

Diving, subsea, ROV

0

25

25

0

25

3.4

16

138

154

73

81

21.2

5

58

63

24

39

8.7

Maintenance, inspection, testing

33

84

117

58

59

16.1

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering

14

26

40

29

11

5.5

Production operations

47

46

93

58

35

12.8

Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations

Seismic/survey operations

0

8

8

7

1

1.1

Transport – Air

4

4

8

3

5

1.1

Transport – Land

5

19

24

24

0

3.3

Transport – Water, incl. marine activity Unspecified – other Overall

1

28

29

5

24

4.0

27

63

90

55

35

12.4

154

572

726

400

326

Table B.12: Lost work day case severity (2007–2016) Year

Average number of days lost per LWDC Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2007

32.7

35.6

35.0

33.0

42.0

2008

35.2

34.6

34.7

32.1

41.0

2009

35.3

38.3

37.5

34.8

44.4

2010

35.4

46.0

43.9

39.4

52.6

2011

41.1

42.6

42.3

39.8

46.4

2012

38.8

41.3

40.7

36.8

46.0

2013

43.5

42.9

43.0

35.8

51.2

2014

51.6

40.3

42.2

39.9

45.5

2015

53.7

54.1

54.0

45.2

66.4

2016

37.6

66.9

61.4

46.9

79.2

Table B.13: Restricted work day case severity (2007–2016) Year

Average number of days lost per RWDC Company

Contractor

Overall

Onshore

Offshore

2007

15.3

10.5

10.9

8.9

16.0

2008

16.1

13.4

13.7

13.3

14.4

2009

15.3

13.8

13.9

12.4

15.8

2010

14.7

13.8

13.9

13.6

14.4

2011

12.9

10.2

10.4

11.7

8.6

2012

13.8

12.1

12.2

11.5

13.4

2013

17.2

14.2

14.5

15.4

13.0

2014

14.6

11.6

11.8

12.2

11.2

2015

22.4

18.7

19.1

18.2

21.0

2016

14.4

14.4

14.4

13.8

15.6

Appendix B

117

Table B.14: Life-Saving Rules attributable to fatal incidents (2016) Rule

Fatal incidents

Core Rule

Confined space

1

yes

Isolation

1

yes

Journey management

1

yes

Permit to work

1

yes

Seat belt

1

yes

Speeding / phone

1

yes

Suspended load

0

yes

Work at height

1

yes

Dropped objects

2

Drugs and alcohol

0

Excavation

0

Gas test

0

Lift plan

1

Line of fire – safe area

6

Overhead power lines

0

PPE (Including flotation device)

1

Smoking

0

System override

0

No appropriate Rule

6

Insufficient information to assign a Rule

6

Overall

29

Section 3 Results by region Table B.15: Fatalities and fatal incidents by region (2012–2016) Region

Fatalities

Fatal Incidents

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

17

27

5

10

10

13

9

5

7

4

Asia/Australasia

10

8

11

7

15

10

7

10

4

14

Europe

2

9

4

4

14

2

5

4

4

2

Middle East

13

4

2

7

6

11

4

2

7

5

North America

42

12

16

20

4

12

10

14

13

3

Russia, Central Asia

2

3

2

4

0

2

3

2

3

0

South & Central America

2

17

5

2

1

2

5

5

2

1

Overall

88

80

45

54

50

52

43

42

40

29

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

118

Table B.16: Fatal accident rate by region (2012–2016) Region

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

2.83

4.53

0.86

1.84

2.25

Asia/Australasia

1.35

0.87

1.02

0.76

2.01

Europe

0.52

2.26

1.04

1.17

5.11

Middle East

1.95

0.63

0.33

1.07

0.99

North America

7.50

2.03

1.56

2.31

1.23

Russia, Central Asia

0.55

1.25

0.81

1.60

0.00

South & Central America

0.54

4.37

1.13

1.41

0.30

Overall

2.38

2.12

1.03

1.45

1.73

Table B.17: Total recordable injury rate by region (2012–2016) Region

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

1.14

1.05

1.02

0.76

0.50

Asia/Australasia

1.37

0.97

1.01

0.92

0.81

Europe

2.64

2.58

2.58

2.22

2.07

Middle East

1.02

0.90

0.86

0.73

0.48

North America

2.82

2.58

2.40

2.13

1.84

Russia, Central Asia

0.99

0.81

0.59

0.69

0.52

South & Central America

3.05

3.13

2.82

2.08

1.83

Overall

1.74

1.60

1.54

1.21

1.03

Table B.18: Lost time injury frequency by region (2012–2016) Region

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

0.33

0.31

0.29

0.19

0.15

Asia/Australasia

0.26

0.15

0.17

0.14

0.16

Europe

0.91

1.02

0.81

0.70

0.70

Middle East

0.24

0.21

0.17

0.17

0.10

North America

0.94

0.74

0.39

0.41

0.40

Russia, Central Asia

0.28

0.33

0.18

0.19

0.08

South & Central America

0.69

0.85

0.77

0.66

0.59

Overall

0.48

0.45

0.36

0.29

0.27

Table B.19: Work hours reported by region (2007–2016) Thousand work hours

Year

Africa

2007

496,830

2008

499,818

2009

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

Russia, South & Central Central Asia America

Overall

540,809

296,407

553,424

285,769

418,534

321,028

2,912,801

562,677

310,258

835,031

304,046

444,115

348,223

3,304,168

542,110

697,524

319,176

1,018,682

320,541

350,794

337,015

3,585,842

2010

562,121

725,171

308,870

676,337

295,339

461,827

381,479

3,411,144

2011

558,573

609,466

344,762

690,171

400,902

439,420

412,784

3,456,078

2012

600,478

741,523

384,668

666,915

560,027

363,944

373,485

3,691,040

2013

595,637

919,063

398,820

637,244

590,089

240,596

389,097

3,770,546

2014

580,464

1,077,835

385,335

607,954

1,025,254

248,328

440,789

4,365,959

2015

543,205

924,392

342,781

653,049

864,115

249,902

141,872

3,719,316

2016

444,534

745,095

273,849

607,678

325,869

166,135

332,461

2,895,621

Appendix B

119

Table B.20: Fatal accident rate five-year rolling average by region (2007–2016) Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

2007

6.0

1.5

3.0

4.2

3.6

5.5

3.8

4.1

2008

5.1

1.4

3.5

3.6

2.8

5.2

3.9

3.7

2009

4.1

1.4

4.6

2.8

2.4

4.4

3.7

3.2

2010

3.8

2.1

4.0

2.5

3.1

3.7

3.3

3.1

2011

2.9

2.3

3.4

2.3

2.7

2.9

2.9

2.7

2012

2.8

2.3

2.5

2.0

4.4

2.3

2.4

2.6

2013

2.9

2.1

2.2

1.7

4.1

1.8

2.3

2.4

2014

2.6

1.9

1.2

1.3

3.2

1.4

2.0

2.0

2015

2.3

1.3

1.2

1.2

2.8

1.2

2.1

1.8

2016

2.5

1.2

1.9

1.0

2.8

0.9

1.6

1.7

Year

Russia, South & Central Central Asia America

Overall

Table B.21: Total recordable injury rate five-year rolling average by region (2007–2016) Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

2007

2.9

1.7

5.3

3.0

5.2

2.2

4.1

3.2

2008

2.8

1.6

4.7

1.9

4.9

2.1

3.8

2.8

2009

2.2

1.4

4.3

1.5

4.4

1.9

3.5

2.4

2010

2.0

1.4

3.9

1.3

4.0

1.8

3.2

2.2

2011

1.7

1.3

3.4

1.1

3.6

1.6

3.1

2.0

2012

1.5

1.3

3.1

0.9

3.2

1.1

3.1

1.8

2013

1.3

1.2

2.9

0.9

2.9

1.0

3.1

1.7

2014

1.2

1.2

2.7

0.9

2.7

0.9

3.0

1.7

2015

1.0

1.1

2.6

0.9

2.6

0.9

3.0

1.6

2016

0.9

1.0

2.5

0.8

2.4

0.8

2.7

1.5

Year

Russia, South & Central Central Asia America

Overall

Table B.22: Lost time injury frequency five-year rolling average by region (2007–2016) Africa

Asia/ Australasia

Europe

Middle East

North America

2007

0.7

0.4

1.7

0.9

0.9

0.8

2.0

1.0

2008

0.7

0.3

1.5

0.6

0.8

0.7

1.7

0.8

2009

0.6

0.3

1.5

0.4

0.7

0.6

1.4

0.7

2010

0.5

0.3

1.4

0.4

0.6

0.5

1.2

0.6

2011

0.5

0.3

1.2

0.3

0.6

0.4

0.8

0.5

2012

0.4

0.3

1.1

0.3

0.7

0.3

0.7

0.5

2013

0.3

0.3

1.1

0.2

0.7

0.3

0.7

0.5

2014

0.3

0.2

1.0

0.2

0.6

0.3

0.7

0.4

2015

0.3

0.2

0.9

0.2

0.6

0.3

0.7

0.4

2016

0.3

0.2

0.8

0.2

0.6

0.2

0.7

0.4

Year

Russia, South & Central Central Asia America

Overall

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

120

Table B.23: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2012–2016) Average number of days lost per LWDC Region

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Africa

35.9

29.2

33.2

42.7

33.1

Asia/Australasia

24.2

30.4

31.0

27.7

39.5

Europe

38.1

42.3

33.8

38.8

45.3

Middle East

26.2

13.6

34.6

24.6

62.2

North America

36.7

49.6

49.2

87.8

25.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

55.3

Russia, Central Asia South & Central America

69.5

60.3

49.1

55.9

93.4

Overall

40.7

43.0

42.2

54.0

61.4

Table B.24: Total recordable injury rate by country (2014–2016) Note: data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.

Region

Country

2014

2015

2016

Morocco

4.53

2.56

10.20

Ivory Coast

4.18

9.74

3.81

Mauritania

1.63

1.53

2.56

Equatorial Guinea

1.19

0.43

1.32

Tunisia

1.77

1.98

1.25

Tanzania

1.35

0.00

1.15

Ghana

0.91

0.80

0.98

Gabon

1.90

2.04

0.97

Senegal

4.08

0.00

0.85

Kenya

2.53

0.98

0.82

Angola

1.40

0.75

0.77

Mozambique

1.22

0.79

0.77

Libya

0.84

0.76

0.60

Congo

0.95

0.63

0.59

Uganda

1.01

0.35

0.38

Egypt

0.71

0.56

0.34

Nigeria

0.35

0.39

0.27

Algeria

2.32

1.47

0.12

South Africa

0.00

6.85

0.00

Liberia

8.58

0.00

0.00

Africa

Africa average

0.50

Appendix B

Region

121

Country

2014

2015

2016

New Zealand

5.05

3.29

3.93

Japan

4.83

2.34

2.01

South Korea

0.91

1.03

1.65

Australia

2.08

1.76

1.56

Papua New Guinea

1.46

1.34

1.47

Vietnam

0.32

1.05

1.40

Thailand

0.96

1.02

Asia-Australasia

Asia-Australasia average

1.12 0.81

Pakistan

0.25

1.07

0.71

Myanmar

1.00

0.36

0.61

Malaysia

0.57

0.41

0.50

China

0.38

0.39

0.45

Brunei

1.55

0.82

0.43

Indonesia

0.46

0.42

0.25

India

1.00

1.26

0.00

Philippines

0.46

0.47

0.00

Singapore

0.33

0.00

0.00

Germany

4.86

3.76

3.53

Hungary

2.03

2.52

3.21

Norway

3.25

2.82

2.77

Denmark

7.39

4.62

2.75

Croatia

3.06

3.20

2.65

Ireland

3.74

2.67

2.45

Spain

1.06

1.63

2.40

Poland

0.00

0.00

2.19

UK

2.30

2.23

2.09

Netherlands

3.39

2.21

2.09

Europe

Europe average

2.07

France

1.08

2.22

1.26

Italy

0.80

0.42

1.06

Romania

0.90

0.52

0.53

Bulgaria

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyprus

1.88

0.00

0.00

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Region

122

Country

2014

2015

2016

Oman

1.24

0.78

0.58

UAE

0.53

0.60

0.51

Iraq

1.53

0.64

0.51

Middle East

Middle East average

0.48

Qatar

0.94

0.76

0.44

Kuwait

0.72

0.80

0.44

Iran

0.00

0.00

0.00

Kurdistan Region of Iraq

0.00

3.61

0.00

Yemen

0.84

0.97

0.00

Canada

2.49

2.10

2.05

North America North America average

1.84

USA

2.37

2.14

1.78

Mexico

0.00

0.00

0.00

Turkmenistan

0.19

0.27

0.71

Kazakhstan

0.54

0.53

0.59

Azerbaijan

0.40

0.40

0.50

Russia

0.80

1.15

0.22

Ukraine

0.00

0.00

0.00

Guyana

41.67

0.00

2.87

Bolivia

1.73

2.04

2.43

Brazil

3.13

2.64

1.99

Russia, Central Asia

Russia, Central Asia average

0.52

South & Central America

South & Central America average

1.83

Colombia

2.69

6.95

1.74

Ecuador

2.49

1.16

1.69

Argentina

2.05

1.70

1.37

Peru

1.55

2.02

1.14

Trinidad & Tobago

1.33

1.33

1.10

Venezuela

6.04

4.90

1.09

Uruguay

5.68

0.00

0.00

Surinam

0.00

0.00

0.00

Appendix B

123

Table B.25: Lost time injury frequency by country (2014–2016) Region

Country

2014

2015

2016

One or more fatalities in 2016

Senegal

1.02

0.00

0.85

no

Mozambique

0.30

0.18

0.67

no

Africa

Equatorial Guinea

0.22

0.00

0.53

no

Tunisia

1.07

0.51

0.50

no

Congo

0.24

0.17

0.29

yes

Libya

0.19

0.28

0.18

no

Angola

0.23

0.11

0.16

yes

Egypt

0.25

0.13

0.15

yes

Gabon

0.39

0.40

0.15

no

Algeria

1.53

0.82

0.08

no

Nigeria

0.10

0.11

0.07

yes

Africa average

0.15

South Africa

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Ghana

0.15

0.40

0.00

no

Morocco

0.57

0.00

0.00

no

Ivory Coast

2.79

0.00

0.00

no

Kenya

0.99

0.25

0.00

no

Mauritania

0.82

0.51

0.00

no

Tanzania

0.45

0.00

0.00

no

Uganda

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Liberia

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

New Zealand

1.25

0.00

1.31

no

Vietnam

0.32

0.26

0.70

no

South Korea

0.17

0.29

0.47

yes

Pakistan

0.22

0.43

0.27

yes

China

0.17

0.12

0.22

yes

Australia

0.22

0.19

0.20

yes

Asia-Australasia

Japan

0.60

0.31

0.17

no

Papua New Guinea

0.19

0.10

0.16

no

Asia-Australasia average

0.16

Malaysia

0.20

0.10

0.12

yes

Thailand

0.12

0.09

0.12

no

Myanmar

0.28

0.09

0.10

no

Indonesia

0.08

0.08

0.06

yes

Singapore

0.04

0.00

0.00

no

Philippines

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Brunei

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

India

0.30

0.54

0.00

no

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Region

Country

124

2014

2015

2016

One or more fatalities in 2016

Europe Hungary

0.25

1.26

2.41

no

Spain

0.27

0.54

2.40

no

Croatia

1.68

1.68

1.99

no

Poland

0.00

0.00

1.64

no

Norway

1.04

1.03

0.99

yes

Italy

0.75

0.28

0.73

no

Europe average

0.70

France

0.33

0.99

0.63

no

UK

0.70

0.57

0.57

no

Germany

1.43

1.36

0.55

no

Denmark

1.24

0.56

0.55

no

Netherlands

0.68

0.61

0.36

no

Romania

0.40

0.23

0.29

yes

Bulgaria

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Ireland

0.83

0.00

0.00

no

Monaco

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Cyprus

1.88

0.00

0.00

no

Oman

0.31

0.09

0.17

yes

Middle East UAE

0.06

0.12

0.11

no

Kuwait

0.18

0.15

0.10

yes

Middle East average Iraq

0.10 0.20

0.12

0.08

no

Qatar

0.17

0.27

0.06

no

Iran

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Kurdistan Region of Iraq

0.00

0.36

0.00

no

Yemen

0.35

0.12

0.00

no

USA

0.44

0.41

0.42

yes

Canada

0.32

0.29

0.36

yes

Mexico

0.37

0.47

0.00

no

North America North America average

0.40

Appendix B

Region

Country

125

2014

2015

2016

One or more fatalities in 2016

Russia, Central Asia Turkmenistan

0.09

0.20

0.71

no

Azerbaijan

0.00

0.06

0.08

no

Russia, Central Asia average Kazakhstan

0.08 0.18

0.14

0.06

no

Russia

0.27

0.32

0.06

no

Ukraine

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Venezuela

2.12

1.62

0.91

no

Brazil

0.84

0.97

0.68

yes

Colombia

0.78

0.74

0.65

no

South & Central America

South & Central America average

0.59

Ecuador

0.36

0.66

0.42

no

Peru

0.77

0.84

0.38

no

Argentina

0.48

0.63

0.35

no

Trinidad & Tobago

0.37

0.08

0.34

no

Bolivia

0.26

0.34

0.23

no

Uruguay

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Guyana

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Surinam

0.00

0.00

0.00

no

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

126

Section 4 Results by function Table B.26: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents by function (2015 and 2016) Fatalities

Function

Fatal incidents

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Exploration

4

3

1

3

1

3

3

1

3

1

Drilling

12

15

19

10

8

11

14

17

9

8

Production

15

33

15

35

28

13

15

14

22

14

Construction

19

18

8

4

6

18

6

8

4

4

Unspecified

38

11

2

2

7

7

5

2

2

2

Overall

88

80

45

54

50

52

43

42

40

29

Table B.27: Exposure hours by function (2012–2016) Hours (thousands)

Function Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

84,947

95,197

117,859

69,865

49,870

672,728

579,757

706,179

550,112

417,143

1,220,365

1,313,488

1,628,568

1,320,658

1,034,543

911,045

930,481

1,001,301

911,697

680,482

801,955

851,623

911,052

866,984

713,583

3,691,040

3,770,546

4,365,959

3,719,316

2,895,621

Table B.28: Fatal accident rate five-year rolling average by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

1.91

3.82

3.35

1.80

2.35

2.69

2012

2.42

3.43

2.90

1.69

2.62

2.57

2013

2.50

3.19

2.58

1.71

2.30

2.38

2014

1.97

2.92

1.82

1.56

2.03

1.99

2015

2.49

2.16

1.94

1.41

1.41

1.75

2016

2.87

2.19

1.93

1.24

1.45

1.72

Table B.29: Fatal accident rate by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

0.00

1.87

2.65

1.91

0.72

1.88

2012

4.71

1.78

1.23

2.09

4.74

2.38

2013

3.15

2.59

2.51

1.93

1.29

2.12

2014

0.85

2.69

0.92

0.80

0.22

1.03

2015

4.29

1.82

2.65

0.44

0.23

1.45

2016

2.01

1.92

2.71

0.88

0.98

1.73

Appendix B

127

Table B.30: Total recordable injury rate five-year rolling average by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

2.74

3.62

2.41

1.06

1.54

1.97

2012

2.63

3.14

2.18

1.04

1.34

1.80

2013

2.24

2.96

2.01

1.06

1.17

1.71

2014

2.05

2.83

1.91

1.13

1.01

1.66

2015

1.82

2.70

1.78

1.14

0.91

1.58

2016

1.56

2.51

1.64

1.07

0.84

1.45

Table B.31: Total recordable injury rate by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

2.70

2.84

2.05

1.13

0.95

1.76

2012

2.14

2.59

1.92

1.32

1.21

1.74

2013

1.87

3.05

1.75

1.13

0.90

1.60

2014

1.48

2.78

1.75

1.08

0.85

1.54

2015

0.88

2.12

1.39

1.01

0.67

1.21

2016

1.07

1.71

1.32

0.69

0.53

1.03

Table B.32: Lost time injury frequency five-year rolling average by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

0.60

0.96

0.64

0.25

0.35

0.50

2012

0.56

0.88

0.58

0.23

0.34

0.47

2013

0.56

0.84

0.55

0.22

0.31

0.45

2014

0.50

0.81

0.50

0.21

0.27

0.43

2015

0.47

0.75

0.47

0.20

0.25

0.40

2016

0.43

0.73

0.43

0.18

0.23

0.38

Table B.33: Lost time injury frequency by function (2011–2016) Year

Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

0.53

0.70

0.55

0.21

0.22

0.43

2012

0.60

0.81

0.49

0.24

0.46

0.48

2013

0.74

0.94

0.53

0.21

0.24

0.45

2014

0.30

0.78

0.40

0.16

0.17

0.36

2015

0.20

0.48

0.40

0.16

0.16

0.29

2016

0.22

0.54

0.34

0.13

0.14

0.27

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

128

Table B.34: Severity of lost work day cases by function (2011–2016) Year

Average days lost per LWDC Exploration

Drilling

Production

Construction

Unspecified

Overall

2011

42.4

51.8

40.4

36.4

22.8

42.3

2012

37.6

50.3

39.6

36.8

26.2

40.7

2013

27.0

51.4

47.5

23.7

27.7

43.0

2014

32.1

49.6

41.5

31.9

31.2

42.2

2015

29.3

63.9

60.0

42.2

30.5

54.0

2016

19.5

65.7

72.5

55.0

20.8

61.4

Table B.35: Exploration TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only TRIR Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

Africa

0.15

0.00

1.86

0.79

1,966

2016 3,810

Asia/Australasia

0.34

0.00

1.73

0.76

2,947

9,173

Europe

0.82

0.54

2.05

0.00

3,731

1,326

Middle East

0.70

0.00

2.30

0.51

793

9,845

North America

0.51

0.00

2.88

1.60

6,216

3,130

Russia, Central Asia

2.60

0.00

0.97

0.00

168

33

South & Central America

0.90

1.89

4.52

5.41

1,058

5,365

Overall

0.55

0.24

2.25

1.50

16,879

32,682

Table B.36: Exploration LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only LTIF Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

Africa

0.07

0.00

0.48

0.26

2,275

2016 3,810

Asia/Australasia

0.19

0.00

0.19

0.33

2,947

9,173

Europe

0.42

0.27

1.05

0.00

3,731

1,326

Middle East

0.67

0.00

0.59

0.00

793

9,845

North America

0.03

0.00

0.81

0.64

6,216

3,130

Russia, Central Asia

0.81

0.00

0.55

0.00

168

33

South & Central America

0.00

0.00

1.17

0.75

1,058

5,365

Overall

0.20

0.06

0.56

0.31

17,188

32,682

Appendix B

129

Table B.37: Drilling TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only TRIR Region

Company 2011-2015

2016

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

2011-2015

Company

2016

Contractor 2016

Africa

0.77

0.42

2.28

0.98

7,097

46,880

Asia/Australasia

0.61

0.13

1.72

1.19

7,620

66,474

Europe

1.96

1.11

4.88

3.67

9,951

26,412

Middle East

0.46

1.46

2.37

1.55

23,950

67,655

North America

0.32

0.14

4.07

2.73

7,307

47,247

Russia, Central Asia

1.48

1.16

1.17

0.91

1,727

10,987

South & Central America

1.51

0.74

4.35

2.24

9,433

84,284

Overall

1.16

0.89

2.89

1.87

67,085

349,939

Table B.38: Drilling LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only LTIF Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

Africa

0.17

0.42

0.68

0.28

7,200

2016 46,896

Asia/Australasia

0.15

0.00

0.46

0.41

7,620

66,474

Europe

1.05

0.50

1.87

1.33

9,951

26,412

Middle East

0.37

0.33

0.47

0.27

23,950

67,655

North America

1.03

0.00

0.81

0.66

7,307

47,247

Russia, Central Asia

0.40

1.16

0.34

0.27

1,727

10,987

South & Central America

0.58

0.32

1.14

0.93

9,433

84,284

Overall

0.71

0.31

0.75

0.59

67,188

349,955

Table B.39: Production TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only TRIR Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

Africa

0.86

0.44

1.02

0.47

36,139

2016 129,952

Asia/Australasia

0.91

1.04

0.84

0.79

60,626

155,323

Europe

1.86

1.80

3.94

3.08

53,746

70,843

Middle East

1.22

0.53

0.83

0.44

30,189

100,779

North America

2.71

2.45

3.27

2.38

46,072

90,176

Russia, Central Asia

0.64

1.03

0.73

0.47

13,582

47,014

South & Central America

1.99

1.37

2.87

1.97

44,623

152,941

Overall

1.49

1.33

1.88

1.32

284,977

747,028

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

130

Table B.40: Production LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only LTIF Region

Company 2011-2015

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

2016

2011-2015

Company

2016

Contractor 2016

Africa

0.25

0.05

0.30

0.14

38,375

130,225

Asia/Australasia

0.20

0.23

0.22

0.13

60,626

155,352

Europe

0.78

0.78

1.27

0.99

53,746

70,843

Middle East

0.36

0.10

0.18

0.07

30,189

100,779

North America

0.59

0.52

0.62

0.48

46,072

90,176

Russia, Central Asia

0.29

0.07

0.19

0.04

13,582

47,014

South & Central America

0.59

0.49

0.63

0.55

44,623

152,941

Overall

0.46

0.38

0.47

0.33

287,213

747,330

Table B.41: Construction TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only TRIR Region Africa

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

0.29

0.00

1.31

0.52

Company

Contractor 2016

7,672

45,834

Asia/Australasia

0.47

0.66

1.41

1.06

9,058

193,698

Europe

0.53

0.81

2.55

2.06

4,917

35,458

Middle East

0.20

0.00

0.54

0.21

9,380

255,712

North America

0.48

0.53

2.45

2.34

13,148

24,817

Russia, Central Asia

0.63

0.00

0.74

0.37

3,061

61,996

South & Central America

0.51

0.00

2.73

0.93

1,560

13,965

Overall

0.41

0.35

1.19

0.71

48,796

631,480

Table B.42: Construction LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only LTIF Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

2016

Africa

0.09

0.00

0.26

0.15

7,878

45,834

Asia/Australasia

0.12

0.11

0.15

0.14

9,058

193,698

Europe

0.17

0.00

0.71

0.51

4,917

35,458

Middle East

0.03

0.00

0.09

0.06

9,380

255,712

North America

0.11

0.15

0.29

0.40

13,148

24,817

Russia, Central Asia

0.24

0.00

0.23

0.03

3,061

61,996

South & Central America

0.13

0.00

0.90

0.21

1,560

13,965

Overall

0.11

0.06

0.20

0.13

49,002

631,480

Appendix B

131

Table B.43: Unspecified TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only TRIR Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

2016

Africa

0.42

0.30

0.57

0.46

36,159

123,574

Asia/Australasia

0.47

0.30

0.75

0.58

75,854

164,286

Europe

0.59

0.39

1.57

1.68

38,181

29,155

Middle East

0.83

0.37

0.97

0.28

26,775

82,600

North America

0.73

0.35

2.11

1.40

48,577

39,179

Russia, Central Asia

0.62

0.24

0.61

0.68

8,390

19,173

South & Central America

0.37

0.36

1.30

0.49

11,143

8,089

Overall

0.60

0.33

1.07

0.64

245,079

466,056

Table B.44: Unspecified LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2016 & 2011–2015) and the number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2016 only LTIF Region

Company

Work hours (thousands) Contractor

Company

Contractor

2011-2015

2016

2011-2015

2016

Africa

0.14

0.16

0.14

0.12

37,822

2016 124,219

Asia/Australasia

0.12

0.09

0.10

0.10

75,854

164,293

Europe

0.25

0.16

0.48

0.55

38,181

29,284

Middle East

0.22

0.04

0.34

0.12

26,775

82,600

North America

0.26

0.12

0.56

0.33

48,577

39,179

Russia, Central Asia

0.18

0.00

0.22

0.16

8,392

19,175

South & Central America

0.10

0.09

0.27

0.12

11,143

8,089

Overall

0.20

0.11

0.28

0.16

246,744

466,839

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

132

Section 5 Results by company Table B.45: FAR, TRIR and LTIF results by company (2016) Company code

FAR FAR Total

TRIR TRIR Total

Company

LTIF Contractor

LTIF Total

Company

Contractor

A

19.58

2.45

1.71

3.43

1.57

1.54

1.60

B

15.38

2.83

2.08

3.13

1.07

0.93

1.12

C

0.00

2.11

1.26

2.72

1.05

0.84

1.21

D

0.00

1.04

0.00

1.62

1.04

0.00

1.62

E

0.00

2.01

0.00

3.19

0.93

0.00

1.47

F

0.00

3.89

2.13

5.14

0.88

0.47

1.16

G

0.00

3.51

1.71

4.49

0.85

0.34

1.12

H

0.00

2.94

1.88

3.42

0.80

0.69

0.85

I

0.00

1.31

0.87

1.40

0.71

0.58

0.73

J

0.45

2.00

1.33

2.16

0.69

0.47

0.74

K

0.00

1.36

0.00

1.64

0.68

0.00

0.82

L

0.00

1.98

0.49

2.58

0.65

0.32

0.77

M

0.00

3.09

2.27

3.61

0.60

0.60

0.60

N

0.00

1.58

0.00

2.59

0.59

0.00

0.97

O

0.00

0.93

0.00

1.20

0.56

0.00

0.72

P

0.00

1.06

0.00

2.03

0.53

0.00

1.01

Q

0.00

1.44

1.05

1.77

0.48

1.05

0.00

R

0.00

2.46

1.91

2.75

0.43

0.27

0.51

S

0.00

4.06

2.97

5.12

0.37

0.50

0.24

T

3.35

0.80

0.77

0.83

0.34

0.35

0.33

U

0.00

0.86

0.39

1.10

0.34

0.20

0.41

V

0.00

2.59

0.42

9.59

0.32

0.00

1.37

X

0.00

1.64

0.83

2.51

0.29

0.14

0.44

W

2.78

1.17

0.79

1.35

0.28

0.35

0.24

OVERALL

1.73

1.03

0.82

1.09

0.27

0.24

0.28

Y

0.00

1.53

0.00

2.17

0.26

0.00

0.36

Z

4.10

0.57

0.28

0.72

0.25

0.14

0.30

AA

0.78

1.10

0.64

1.21

0.24

0.06

0.28

BB

1.09

0.37

0.37

0.36

0.19

0.28

0.15

CC

1.33

1.26

1.37

1.20

0.18

0.19

0.18

DD

1.03

0.86

0.64

0.92

0.18

0.18

0.17

EE

0.00

0.81

0.31

0.99

0.16

0.09

0.18

FF

0.00

0.86

0.64

0.92

0.16

0.00

0.20

GG

2.43

0.97

1.06

0.96

0.13

0.12

0.14

HH

0.00

0.50

0.88

0.41

0.11

0.20

0.09

II

0.91

0.44

0.18

0.50

0.11

0.09

0.11

JJ

1.79

0.46

0.58

0.45

0.10

0.11

0.10

KK

0.00

0.88

0.56

1.01

0.10

0.00

0.14

LL

2.57

0.76

0.58

0.79

0.09

0.04

0.10

MM

0.00

0.30

0.45

0.25

0.07

0.15

0.04

NN

0.00

1.30

0.00

2.31

0.00

0.00

0.00

OO

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

PP

0.00

0.98

0.83

1.04

0.00

0.00

0.00

QQ

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

Note: company codes are allocated according to company & contractor LTIF performance

Appendix B

133

Table B.46: Company TRIR results by function (2016) TRIR Exploration Code J

TRIR Drilling Total 5.90

Code A

TRIR Production Total 14.14

Code V

TRIR Construction Total 8.90

Code S

Total 10.42

H

3.25

S

6.57

S

5.34

Q

6.85

M

3.17

Y

6.29

F

4.91

F

5.96

AA

2.68

K

5.69

E

4.39

E

4.51

B

1.52

B

5.24

H

3.75

X

2.36

L

1.44

NN

5.07

R

3.39

H

2.34

Y

1.36

M

5.00

B

3.36

KK

2.24

W

1.08

C

4.45

M

3.16

B

1.89

Overall

1.07

F

4.33

X

2.50

M

1.79

JJ

0.67

V

3.56

J

1.94

R

1.60

EE

0.42

L

3.48

C

1.92

W

1.51

BB

0.00

R

3.36

A

1.85

I

1.49

C

0.00

JJ

2.97

L

1.83

T

1.15

CC

0.00

H

2.81

CC

1.78

LL

0.98

HH

0.00

X

2.71

Q

1.76

GG

0.92

I

0.00

O

2.32

PP

1.67

AA

0.87

KK

0.00

I

2.20

W

1.54

EE

0.76

LL

0.00

J

2.10

P

1.52

Overall

0.69

NN

0.00

GG

2.07

GG

1.49

FF

0.54

O

0.00

DD

1.84

I

1.33

CC

0.44

PP

0.00

AA

1.84

Overall

1.32

MM

0.44

R

0.00

W

1.78

DD

1.26

DD

0.38

S

0.00

KK

1.75

EE

1.17

BB

0.30

T

0.00

CC

1.73

FF

1.17

HH

0.24

X

0.00

Overall

1.72

AA

1.16

Z

0.21

Z

0.00

D

1.69

LL

0.84

JJ

0.12

Q

1.41

T

0.69

C

0.00

T

1.24

Y

0.68

G

0.00

FF

1.07

Z

0.67

K

0.00

HH

1.05

HH

0.63

L

0.00

PP

0.97

KK

0.62

O

0.00

LL

0.94

K

0.57

QQ

0.00

BB

0.91

BB

0.42

Y

0.00

EE

0.87

MM

0.36

Z

0.81

QQ

0.19

E

0.00

JJ

0.16

P

0.00

O

0.00

OO

0.00

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

134

Table B.47: Company LTIF results by function (2016) LTIF Exploration Code J

LTIF Drilling Total 4.43

Code A

LTIF Production Total 8.08

Code E

LTIF Construction Total 2.19

Code S

Total 1.74

H

1.62

K

1.90

Q

1.76

E

1.50

Y

1.36

B

1.89

B

1.49

I

1.49

B

0.38

D

1.69

C

1.49

F

1.19

W

0.27

L

1.49

V

1.27

H

0.73

Overall

0.22

C

1.48

A

1.23

T

0.52

AA

0.21

F

1.44

F

1.13

B

0.50

BB

0.00

O

1.39

H

0.99

X

0.39

C

0.00

Y

1.26

P

0.76

AA

0.16

CC

0.00

I

1.10

M

0.72

EE

0.13

EE

0.00

J

1.00

I

0.63

GG

0.13

HH

0.00

T

0.79

X

0.63

Overall

0.13

I

0.00

R

0.75

K

0.57

MM

0.11

JJ

0.00

GG

0.69

J

0.52

Z

0.10

KK

0.00

Z

0.68

W

0.46

BB

0.07

L

0.00

BB

0.54

R

0.42

DD

0.06

LL

0.00

Overall

0.54

L

0.41

HH

0.06

M

0.00

JJ

0.48

FF

0.39

LL

0.05

NN

0.00

H

0.47

Overall

0.34

JJ

0.04

O

0.00

CC

0.46

AA

0.33

C

0.00

PP

0.00

DD

0.36

S

0.31

CC

0.00

R

0.00

KK

0.35

DD

0.28

FF

0.00

S T

0.00 0.00

AA

0.35

CC

0.24

G

0.00

HH

0.23

Z

0.23

K

0.00

X Z

0.00 0.00

W EE LL FF E M NN P PP Q S V X

0.20 0.18 0.17 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BB T EE HH LL JJ MM GG KK O OO PP QQ Y

0.21 0.21 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

KK L M O Q QQ R W Y

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Appendix B

135

Database Dimensions (Appendix A) Table B.48: Total work hours reported (1985–2016) Year

Hours (thousands) Overall

Company

Contractor

1985

655,650

410,409

245,241

1986

544,053

305,637

238,416

1987

602,480

355,578

246,902

1988

616,448

363,530

252,918

1989

655,945

330,970

324,975

1990

720,652

331,986

388,666

1991

940,538

441,141

499,397

1992

944,143

431,139

513,004

1993

919,176

410,474

508,702

1994

871,973

397,258

474,715

1995

840,811

355,695

485,186

1996

911,540

360,149

551,391

1997

1,161,335

389,442

771,893

1998

1,131,229

385,619

745,610

1999

1,197,460

395,141

802,319

2000

1,633,855

571,915

1,061,940

2001

1,976,646

633,039

1,343,607

2002

2,120,829

636,414

1,484,415

2003

2,247,026

663,894

1,583,132

2004

2,290,453

638,739

1,651,714

2005

2,380,670

639,292

1,741,378

2006

2,936,974

734,425

2,202,549

2007

2,912,801

667,986

2,244,815

2008

3,304,168

712,482

2,591,686

2009

3,585,842

822,240

2,763,602

2010

3,411,144

725,673

2,685,471

2011

3,456,078

753,100

2,702,978

2012

3,691,040

759,600

2,931,440

2013

3,770,546

820,856

2,949,690

2014

4,365,959

945,572

3,420,387

2015

3,719,316

896,862

2,822,454

2016

2,895,621

667,335

2,228,286

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

136

Table B.49: Exposure hours by region (2015 and 2016) Region

Hours (thousands) 2015

2016

Africa

543,205

444,534

Asia/Australasia

924,392

745,095

Europe

342,781

273,849

Middle East

653,049

607,678

North America

864,115

325,869

Russia, Central Asia

249,902

166,135

South & Central America

141,872

332,461

3,719,316

2,895,621

Overall

Table B.50: Exposure hours by function (2015 and 2016) Region Exploration Drilling Production

Hours (thousands) 2015

2016

69,865

49,870

550,112

417,143

1,320,658

1,034,543

Construction

911,697

680,482

Unspecified

866,984

713,583

3,719,316

2,895,621

Overall

Appendix C

137

Appendix C – Contributing companies Table C.1 shows the size of the database in thousands of work hours reported for each contributing company and whether reported data include information on contractor statistics, breakdown by function, medical treatment cases, restricted work day cases, days lost following lost work day and restricted work day cases. All company submissions include data on numbers of fatalities and lost work day cases. Table C.1: Contributing companies (2016) Hours (thousands)

Contractor data

Data by function

RWDCs

LWDC days

RWDC days

230,877

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

ANADARKO

33,590

yes

yes

mostly

no

no

BHP BILLITON

11,397

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

193,892

yes

yes

yes

no

no

958

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Company ADNOC

BP CAIRN ENERGY CCED

5,072

yes

no

yes

no

no

CHEVRON

389,361

yes

yes

mostly

mostly

mostly

CNOOC

121,854

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

61,562

yes

no

yes

no

no

DEA DEUTSCHE ERDOEL AG

3,083

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

DOLPHIN ENERGY

7,167

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

DONG O&G

2,083

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

ENGIE E&P INTERNATIONAL

8,275

yes

yes

mostly

yes

mostly

ENI

183,440

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

EXXONMOBIL

150,538

yes

yes

yes

no

no

CONOCOPHILLIPS

GALP

253

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

2,934

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

HESS CORPORATION

21,690

yes

yes

yes

no

no

HUSKY

21,675

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

INPEX

82,387

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

2,313

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

GEOPARK

KOSMOS KUWAIT OIL COMPANY

223,128

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

MAERSK OIL

21,125

yes

yes

yes

no

no

MOL

10,217

yes

yes

no

partly

no

7,837

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

OMV

59,686

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

ORIGIN

10,270

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

OIL SEARCH

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

138

Contractor data

Data by function

RWDCs

LWDC days

RWDC days

24,328

yes

yes

yes

no

no

PETROBRAS

224,477

yes

yes

no

yes

no

PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD

110,000

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

PLUSPETROL

19,832

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

PREMIER OIL

6,464

yes

yes

yes

mostly

mostly

PTTEP

29,609

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

RASGAS

30,383

yes

yes

yes

no

no

REPSOL

35,964

yes

yes

yes

mostly

no

5,397

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

257,116

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

STATOIL

91,056

yes

yes

yes

no

no

SUNCOR

1,884

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Company PAN AMERICAN ENERGY

SASOL SHELL COMPANIES

TOTAL

Hours (thousands)

161,099

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

TULLOW OIL

9,176

yes

yes

yes

no

no

WINTERSHALL

8,135

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

14,037

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

WOODSIDE

A data row is a single entry for a company for one country and location (one of company onshore, company offshore, contractor onshore, contractor offshore), e.g. A company, UK, company offshore. yes = reported for all data rows mostly = reported for more than 50% of data rows partly = reported for less than 50% of data rows no = not reported at all.

Appendix D

139

Appendix D – Countries represented The tabulation shows the breakdown of reported hours worked in regions and countries. Also shown is the number of companies reporting data in each country. The table does not necessarily show all hours worked in the exploration and production sectors of the oil and gas industry in each country. Table D.1: Countries represented (2016) Region

Country

No. reporting companies

Hours (thousands)

Algeria

8

25,529

Angola

8

77,087

Africa

Chad

1

5,272

Congo

3

42,065

DRC - Democratic Republic of the Congo (Formerly Zaire)

1

471

Egypt

6

52,406

Equatorial Guinea

2

3,776

Ethiopia

1

22

Gabon

5

13,367

Ghana

4

8,178

Ivory Coast

3

1,061

Kenya

4

1,214

Liberia

2

148

Libya

12

16,548

Madagascar

2

12

Mauritania

3

1,174

Morocco

4

98

Mozambique

4

7,443

Namibia

2

11

Nigeria

7

170,987

Senegal

3

1,178

South Africa

5

156

Sudan

1

15

Tanzania

2

1,733

Tunisia

4

11,970

Uganda

3

2,613

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Region

140

Country

No. reporting companies

Hours (thousands)

Australia

17

176,872

Bangladesh

1

6,687

Brunei

2

2,348

China

8

104,087

India

3

3,545

Indonesia

15

171,520

Japan

3

5,970

Malaysia

9

147,758

Myanmar

7

9,822

New Zealand

5

1,527

Pakistan

5

18,255

Papua New Guinea

4

18,381

Philippines

2

2,066

Singapore

5

325

South Korea

5

23,644

Tadjikistan

1

22

Taiwan

1

11

Thailand

6

50,820

Timor Leste

1

5

Vietnam

4

1,430

Albania

1

427

Austria

1

1,711

Belgium

1

257

Bulgaria

2

588

Croatia

2

3,020

Cyprus

2

122

Denmark

5

10,906

France

5

11,091

Germany

4

9,056

Hungary

2

2,494

Ireland

3

924

Asia/Australasia

Europe

Italy

4

12,284

Monaco

2

78

Netherlands

6

16,777

Norway

17

80,536

Poland

2

1,825

Portugal

1

36

Romania

2

41,192

Spain

2

2,085

Sweden

1

120

UK

18

78,320

Appendix D

Region

Country

141

No. reporting companies

Hours (thousands)

Middle East Iran

2

55

Iraq

6

25,455

Jordan

1

202

Kurdistan Region of Iraq

2

612

Kuwait

4

233,977

Oman

4

46,579

Palestine

1

5

Qatar

8

63,574

Saudi Arabia

1

68

Turkey

1

37

UAE

11

235,462

Yemen

2

1,652

Canada

13

78,161

North America Jamaica

1

22

Mexico

4

135

USA

17

247,551

Azerbaijan

6

62,543

Kazakhstan

8

82,477

Russia

11

18,175

Turkmenistan

3

2,805

Ukraine

3

135

Argentina

8

40,107

Aruba

1

2

Russia, Central Asia

South & Central America

Bolivia

4

13,144

Brazil

14

234,323

Chile

1

481

Colombia

9

4,609

Ecuador

2

4,742

Falkland Islands

1

330

Guyana

2

1,044

Honduras

1

36

Peru

3

15,801

Surinam

2

112

Trinidad & Tobago

5

11,786

Uruguay

3

449

Venezuela

7

5,495

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

142

RUSSIA, CENTRAL ASIA

EUROPE

NORTH AMERICA

ASIA/ AUSTRALASIA MIDDLE EAST AFRICA

SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA

Number of participating companies

Country represented/Not represented

ASIA/ AUSTRALASIA

AFRICA

RUSSIA, CENTRAL ASIA

EUROPE

NORTH AMERICA

Algeria

Angola

Australia

Bangladesh

Albania

Austria

Azerbaijan

Kazakhstan

Canada

Jamaica

8

8

17

1

1

1

6

8

13

1

Chad

Congo

Brunei

China

Belgium

Bulgaria

Russia

Turkmenistan

Mexico

USA

1

3

2

8

1

2

11

3

4

17

DRC

Egypt

India

Indonesia

Croatia

Cyprus

Ukraine

1

6

3

15

2

2

3

Ethiopia

Japan

Malaysia

Denmark

France

1

3

9

5

5

Gabon

Ghana

Myanmar

New Zealand

Germany

Hungary

5

4

7

5

4

2

Ivory Coast

Kenya

Pakistan

Ireland

Italy

Iran

Iraq

Argentina

Aruba

3

4

5

3

4

2

6

8

1

Bolivia

Brazil

Equatorial Guinea 2

Papua New Guinea 4

MIDDLE EAST

Liberia

Libya

Philippines

Singapore

Monaco

Netherlands

Jordan

2

12

2

5

2

6

1

Kurdistan Region of Iraq 2

Madagascar

Mauritania

South Korea

Tadjikistan

Norway

Poland

Kuwait

2

3

5

1

17

2

4

SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA

4

14

Oman

Chile

Colombia

4

1

9

Morocco

Mozambique

Taiwan

Thailand

Portugal

Romania

Palestine

Qatar

Ecuador

4

4

1

6

1

2

1

8

2

Falkland Islands 1

Namibia

Nigeria

Timor Leste

Vietnam

Spain

Sweden

Saudi Arabia

Turkey

Guyana

Honduras

2

7

1

4

2

1

1

1

2

1

Senegal

South Africa

UK

UAE

Yemen

Peru

Surinam

3

5

18

11

2

3

2 Uruguay

Sudan

Tanzania

1

2

Trinidad & Tobago 5

Tunisia

Uganda

Venezuela

4

3

7

Figure D1: Number of companies represented by country and region (2016)

3

Appendix D

143

RUSSIA, CENTRAL ASIA

EUROPE

NORTH AMERICA

ASIA/ AUSTRALASIA MIDDLE EAST AFRICA

SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA

Number of reported work hours (thousands) ASIA/ AUSTRALASIA

AFRICA

Country represented/Not represented

EUROPE

RUSSIA, CENTRAL ASIA

NORTH AMERICA

Algeria

Angola

Australia

Bangladesh

Albania

Austria

Azerbaijan

Kazakhstan

Canada

Jamaica

25,529

77,087

176,872

6,687

427

1,711

62,543

82,477

78,161

22

Chad

Congo

Brunei

China

Belgium

Bulgaria

Russia

Turkmenistan

Mexico

USA

5,272

42,065

2,348

104,087

257

588

18,175

2,805

135

247,551

DRC

Egypt

India

Indonesia

Croatia

Cyprus

Ukraine

471

52,406

3,545

171,520

3,020

122

135

Ethiopia

Japan

Malaysia

Denmark

France

22

5,970

147,758

10,906

11,091

Equatorial Guinea 3,776 Gabon

Ghana

Myanmar

New Zealand

Germany

Hungary

13,367

8,178

9,822

1,527

9,056

2,494

Ivory Coast

Kenya

Pakistan

1,061

1,214

18,255

Papua New Guinea 18,381

MIDDLE EAST

SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA

Ireland

Italy

Iran

Iraq

Argentina

Aruba

924

12,284

55

25,455

40,107

2

Liberia

Libya

Philippines

Singapore

Monaco

Netherlands

Jordan

148

16,548

2,066

325

78

16,777

202

Madagascar

Mauritania

South Korea

Tadjikistan

Norway

Poland

Kuwait

12

1,174

23,644

22

80,536

1,825

233,977

Kurdistan Region of Iraq 612

Bolivia

Brazil

13,144

234,323

Oman

Chile

Colombia

46,579

481

4,609

Morocco

Mozambique

Taiwan

Thailand

Portugal

Romania

Palestine

Qatar

Ecuador

98

7,443

11

50,820

36

41,192

5

63,574

4,742

Falkland Islands 330

Namibia

Nigeria

Timor Leste

Vietnam

Spain

Sweden

Saudi Arabia

Turkey

Guyana

Honduras

11

170,987

5

1,430

2,085

120

68

37

1,044

36

Senegal

South Africa

UK

UAE

Yemen

Peru

Surinam

1,178

156

78,320

235,462

1,652

15,801

112 Uruguay

Sudan

Tanzania

15

1,733

Trinidad & Tobago 11,786

Tunisia

Uganda

Venezuela

11,970

2,613

5,495

Figure D2: Number of work hours (thousands) reported by country and region (2016)

449

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

144

Appendix E – Glossary of terms A Assault and violent act (as an incident/event category) Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a person or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of unknown intent, includes intentional acts of damage to property.

Aviation accident (as an incident/event category) An occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which, in the case of a manned aircraft, takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked or, in the case of an unmanned aircraft, takes place between the time the aircraft is ready to move with the purpose of flight until such time as it comes to rest at the end of the flight and the primary propulsion system is shut down,

C Caught in, under or between (as an incident/ event category) Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly injured between machinery moving parts or other objects, caught between rolling tubulars or objects being moved, crushed between a ship and a dock, or similar incidents. Also includes vehicle incidents involving a rollover.

Causal factors See IOGP Report 2016su, Safety data reporting users' guide – 2016 data.

Company employee Any person employed by and on the payroll of the reporting company, including corporate and management personnel specifically involved in E&P. Persons employed under short-service contracts are included as company employees provided they are paid directly by the company.

Confined space (as an incident/event category) Spaces that are considered confined because their configurations hinder the activities of employee who must enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces include, but are not limited to underground vaults, tanks, storage bins, manholes, pits, silos, process vessels and pipelines.

Construction (as a work function) Major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities.

Construction, commissioning, decommissioning (as a type of activity) Activities involving the construction, fabrication and installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing activities to verify design objectives or specification, and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life.

Contractor A contractor is defined as an individual or organization performing work for the reporting company, following verbal or written agreement. Subcontractor is synonymous with contractor.

Contractor employee Any person employed by a contractor or contractor’s subcontractor(s) who is directly involved in execution of prescribed work under a contract with the reporting company.

Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/event category) Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin.

Glossary

145

D

E

Diving operations

Event

The personnel, equipment and management systems to support a person who dives. A person dives if they enter water or any other liquid, or a chamber in which they are subject to pressure greater than 100 millibars above atmospheric pressure, and in order to survive in such an environment breathes air or other gas at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for such a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where a sealed internal atmospheric pressure is maintained and where the external pressure differential is greater than 100 millibars.

An unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business operation or activity that has or could have contributed to an injury, illness, physical or environmental damage.

Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity) Operations involving diving (see definition for diving operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or operations involving underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV).

Drilling (as a work function) All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.

Drilling/workover/well services (as a type of activity) Activities involving the development, maintenance work or remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well.

Exploration (as a work function) Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.

Explosion or burn (as an incident/ event category) Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and extremes of temperature. Explosion means a rapid combustion, not an overpressure.

Exposure: Electrical (as an incident/ event category) Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc.

Exposure: Noise, chemical, biological, vibration (as an incident/event category) Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen not associated with a confined space), hazardous biological material, vibration or radiation.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

146

F

I

Falls from height (as an incident/ event category)

Incident

A person falls from one level to another.

An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable injury or illness, or physical or environmental damage.

Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 000 000 (100 million) hours worked.

K

Fatal incident rate (FIR)

In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rate.

The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100,000,000 (100 million) hours worked.

Fatality The number of incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 100,000,000 (100 million) hours worked.

First aid case Cases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported as medical treatment or more serious cases but nevertheless require minor first aid treatment, e.g. dressing on a minor cut, removal of a splinter from a finger. First aid cases are not recordable incidents.

H

Key performance indicators (KPI)

L Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a type of activity) Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and hoisting equipment, assembling and dis-assembling drilling rig equipment and drill pipe handling on the rig floor.

Lost time injury (LTI) A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is the sum of fatalities and lost work day cases.

High potential event

Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)

Any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities.

The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) incidents per 1,000,000 hours worked.

Hours worked

Lost work day case (LWDC)

The actual hours worked, including overtime hours, are recorded in the case of onshore operations. The hours worked by an individual will generally be about 2,000 per year. For offshore workers, the hours worked are calculated on a 12-hour work day. Consequently, average hours worked per year will vary from 1,600 to 2,300 hours per person depending upon the on/off shift ratio. Vacations and leave are excluded.

Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which results in a person being unfit for work on any day after the day of occurrence of the occupational injury. Any day includes rest days, weekend days, leave days, public holidays or days after ceasing employment.

Hours worked in year (thousands) Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand.

LWDC severity The average number of lost days per lost work day case.

Glossary

147

M Maintenance, inspection and testing (as a type of activity) Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities.

Medical cause of death This is the cause of death given on the death certificate. Where two types of causes are provided, such as pulmonary oedema caused by inhalation of hot gases from a fire, both are recorded.

Number of fatalities The total number of a company’s employees and or contractor’s employees who died as a result of an incident. Delayed deaths that occur after the incident are included if the deaths were a direct result of the incident. For example, if a fire killed one person outright, and a second died three weeks later from lung damage caused by the fire, both are reported.

O

Medical treatment case (MTC)

Occupational injury

Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as fatalities or lost work day cases or restricted work day cases but are more severe than requiring simple first aid treatment.

Any injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation, or any fatality, which results from a work-related activity or from an exposure involving a single incident in the work environment, such as deafness from explosion, one-time chemical exposure, back disorder from a slip/trip, insect or snake bite.

N Near miss An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has not resulted in recordable injury, illness, physical or environmental damage but had the potential to do so in other circumstances.

Number of days unfit for work The sum total of calendar days (consecutive or otherwise) after the days of the occupational injuries on which the employees involved were unfit for work and did not work.

Number of employees Average number of full-time and part-time employees involved in exploration and production, calculated on a full-time basis, during the reporting year.

Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering (as a type of activity) Activities related to work conducted in offices, warehouses, workshops, accommodation and catering facilities.

Offshore work All activities and operations that take place at sea, including activities in bays, in major inland seas such as the Caspian Sea, or in other inland seas directly connected to oceans. Incidents including transportation of people and equipment from shore to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter, should be recorded as offshore.

Onshore work All activities and operations that take place within a landmass, including those on swamps, rivers and lakes. Land-to-land aircraft operations are counted as onshore, even though flights are over water.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

148

Other (as an incident/event category)

Process safety related

Used to specify where an incident cannot be logically classed under any other category. In the case of incident activities, includes air transport incidents

Process safety related events are those which do not meet the specific criteria to be classified as Tier 1 or 2 process safety events but which have learning potential in the prevention of process safety events.

Note: the work function ‘other’ was replaced by ‘construction’ for the first time in 2006.

Overexertion or strain (as an incident/ event category) Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain.

P Pressure release (as an incident/ event category) Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a pressurized system.

Process safety event A process safety event, which can also be referred to as an asset integrity event, is a loss of primary containment (LOPC) and is recordable if: i. the consequence was a reportable employee or contractor injury or fatality, a third party hospital admission or fatality, a community or site evacuation or a fire/explosion; or ii. a pressure relief device discharge or material release occurs which exceeded defined thresholds (even if none of the consequences above occurred) as specified within IOGP Report 456, Process safety – recommended practice on key performance indicators which provides consequence and threshold definitions consistent with API Recommended Practice No.754 http://www.iogp.org/ bookstore/product/process-safety-recommendedpractice-on-key-performance-indicators. The supplement to IOGP Report 456 provides process safety upstream PSE examples http://www.iogp. org/bookstore/product/upstream-pse-examplessupplement-to-report-456.

Production (as a work function) Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. Gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale including: • work on production wells under pressure • oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and separation (primary production) • heavy oil production where it is inseparable from upstream (i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage) production • primary oil processing (water separation, stabilization) • primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids separation, sweetening, CO2 removal) • floating storage units (FSUs) and sub-sea storage units • gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale • secondary liquid separation (i.e. natural gas liquids [NGL] extraction using refrigeration processing) • liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas to liquids (GTL) operations • flow-lines between wells and pipelines between facilities associated with field production operations • oil and gas loading facilities including land or marine vessels (trucks and ships) when connected to an oil or gas production process • pipeline operations (including booster stations) operated by company E&P business.

Glossary

149

Production excludes:

S

• production drilling or workover • mining processes associated with the extraction of heavy oil tar sands • heavy oil when separable from upstream operations • secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader) • refineries.

Seismic/survey operations (as a type of activity)

Production operations (as a type of activity) Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons from source such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon bearing geological structure, including primary processing, storage and transport operations. Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations.

R Recordable A type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or other outcome which has been determined to meet or exceed definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion and classification in reported data.

Restricted work day case (RWDC) Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day case which results in a person being unfit for full performance of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury. Work performed might be: • an assignment to a temporary job • part-time work at the regular job • working full-time in the regular job but not performing all the usual duties of the job. Where no meaningful restricted work is being performed, the incident is recorded as a lost work day case (LWDC).

Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas deposits including geophysical and seismic data acquisition.

Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an incident/event category) Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto something at the same height.

Struck by (as an incident/event category) Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by moving equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling objects. Also includes vehicle incidents where the vehicle is struck by or struck against another object.

T Third party A person with no business relationship with the company or contractor.

Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,000,000 hours worked.

Transport – Air (as a type of activity) Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters. Injuries caused by accidents on the ground at airports are classified in one of the other categories.

Safety performance indicators – 2016 data

Transport – Land (as a type of activity) Involving motorized vehicles designed for transporting people and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks. Pedestrians struck by a vehicle are classified as land transport incidents. Incidents from a mobile crane would only be land transport incidents if the crane were being moved between locations.

Transport – Water, including marine activity (as a type of activity) Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for transporting people and goods over water (including inland, marine, ice roads and marsh/swamp) e.g. supply vessels, crew boats.

U Unspecified – Other (as a type of activity) Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other headings or where the activity is unknown.

Unspecified (as a work function) Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not sepa­rated out by function are reported as unspecified.

W Water related/drowning (as an incident/ event category) Incidents/events in which water played a significant role including drowning.

Work-related injury See occupational injury.

150

Registered Office

Brussels Office

Houston Office

City Tower 40 Basinghall Street 14th Floor London EC2V 5DE United Kingdom

Bd du Souverain,165 4th Floor B-1160 Brussels Belgium

16225 Park Ten Place Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77084 United States

T +44 (0)20 3763 9700 F +44 (0)20 3763 9701 [email protected]

T +32 (0)2 566 9150 F +32 (0)2 566 9159 [email protected]

T +1 (713) 338 3494 [email protected]

The IOGP safety performance indicators – 2016 data report summarizes the safety performance of contributing IOGP member companies for 2016 based on the analysis of 2,896 million work hours of data. Submissions were made by 43 of the 50 operating company IOGP Members and cover operations in 103 countries. The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are: • number of fatalities • fatal accident and incident rates • total recordable injury rate, and • lost time injury frequency. Against the background of a 22% decrease in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has decreased from 54 in 2015 to 50 in 2016. The resulting fatal accident rate (FAR) of 1.73 is 19% higher than last year.

www.iogp.org