Rosario Di Lorenzo 13. May 2009
How do I approach a Problem? and what could be the solution!
A Problem is always connect to other Organisations. Although I received many information from you I still do not know HOW the rest of the Service, Sales and last but not leas the Customer itself perceives the issue PTC Services is facing today. 2
Six Sigma
D
Define The Problem
1. What is the Problem? 2. Is the Problem impacting the Service? 3. Is the Problem affecting the Internal / External Customer?
M
Measure what you have
1. Do we have Data to analyze? 2. Do we need to create or request data? 3. What is the current performance? 4. When it was observed the first deviation?
A
Analyze Root Causes
1. Fishbone (potential root causes) 2. 5 Why's: Drill down from symptoms to root causes 3. Priority Matrix
I C 3
Identify possible solutions
Control The Solution
1. Team Work 2. Check for best solution (Pugh Matrix) 3. Analyze Solution using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
1. Use Reports 2. Discuss results with the Team 3. Understand deviation (return to A )
D
Define The Problem
1. What is the Problem? 2. Is the Problem impacting the Service? 3. Is the Problem affecting the Internal / External Customer?
1
Today TSAMs work as individuals. Management has no real Control / Visibility on their activities nor how they are accomplishing their Duty.
2
Acting in their own shell, TSAMs do not communicate effectively with other Service Unit which is Key for a smoothly Service Delivery.
3
At this stage it is difficult to say who is effected, however the fact that Customers are renewing their contracts is a clear sign that the customer less perceive the problem we are facing today.
M
1
5
Measure what you have
1. Do we have Data to analyze? 2. Do we need to create or request data? 3. What is the current performance? 4. When it was observed the first deviation?
Currently we do not have any real data. However, looking at the Problem definition (Section D) we are presumably facing a real Communication or even an organisational problem.
2
In order to get more visibility Uwe was asked to collect data Interviewing the Teams affected. The results would probably give a better view of the situation of today. I would get the outcome.
3
It is difficult to measure TSAM performance today. The only real indicator seems to be that Customers renews their Premium Contract.
4
The Management believes to have recognized the first deviation right after the implementation of the Premium Service. We will see more in the next section
Poor Comm.
Wrong structure No TSAM Process
No Weekly Calls with Services
No Devel. Plan
No 1:1 with Manager
No enthusiasm No Team Spirit
Able to solve an Incident
No Company Identity
No Perf. Mapping TSAM Role is not clear to Service
Role is not clear to TSAM TSAM is wrong to the job
Job
Why “TSAM Role is not clear to Service?”, because nobody advertised the new role when it was introduced. Why “the new Role was never introduced?”, because the Mgm had to introduce the new strategy within a very short time.
No Mgm. guidance
Why “had to introduce the new strategy within a very short time?”, because the Product Life Cycle Team developed the new Strategy too late …. And so on …
TSAMs work as individuals
3
Low
Products
2
Personality
Frustration
Emotional
1
People
High
Commun.
Medium
Process
Impact on Problem
A
1. Fishbone (potential root causes) 2. 5 Why's: Drill down from symptoms to root causes 3. Priority Matrix
Analyze Root Causes
Difficult
Able to solve an Incident Poor No Team Comm. No Perf. Spirit Mapping TSAM Role is not clear to Service No Devel. Plan Role is not clear to TSAM Medium Ease of Fix
6
Very Easy
I Preamble
Implement possible solutions
1. Team Work 2. Check for best solution (Pugh Matrix / Stakeholder Analysis) 3. Analyze Solution using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
A solution works only if it is clear and accepted for the whole Service Community (1+2). Here the most important recommendations based on the Information received in the last few days. Creativity Enhancers: In my career I realized that even where you get a clear buy-in you meet resistance afterwards. A good way to understand IF it is something real behind the resistance is to use tools like: Anti-Solution / Assumption Busting!!
Root EMEA PTC Service not clear
TSAM Job Role is not clear
No Dev. Plan No Per. Map.
No 1:1 with TSAM Leader
7
Solution
Who
Target Groups
Advertise the EMEA Service Pitch
Stephane Pinault
EMEA Service Groups (Leaders), Sales Force, Onsite, ….
Clarify TSAM Role
TSAM Lead
Develop a Dev. Plan + Per. Map. (Templates) Set up weekly 1:1 with TSAMs
TSAM Lead.
TSAM Lead.
TSAMs Team
TSAMs Team
TSAMs Team
How F2F Meeting
F2F Meeting
1:1 or conf call
1:1 or conf call
I Root
1. Team Work 2. Check for best solution (Pugh Matrix / Stakeholder Analysis) 3. Analyze Solution using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
Solution
Who
Lack of Communication within Services
Promote Technical Conf Calls (Forums)
SR Team leaders
Lack of Communication with Sales Force
Encourage Interaction
TSAM Lead
Develop Procedure (Customer 1:1, Performance Pres, etc.)
TSAM Leader
TSAMs
Build Relationship with Team
TSAM Lead
TSAMs
No TSAM Process
No enthusiasm No Team Spirit
8
Implement possible solutions
Target Groups TSAMs / SR Engineers / Partners
TSAMs / SR Engineers / Partners
How Conf calls
F2F
F2F
F2F
C
D
Control The Solution
M
1. Use Reports 2. Discuss results with the Team 3. Understand deviation (return to AI )
A
I
C
Deviation
y
9
n
OK
This is just the beginning. I believe there are more consideration you need to consider. As I mentioned in the first slide, …a Problem is always linked to different groups. I would be more then glad to help
10