Returned Results Could Slightly Differ From

  • Uploaded by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Returned Results Could Slightly Differ From as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 815
  • Pages: 3
Gin for PostgreSQL ================== Gin was sponsored by jfg://networks (http://www.jfg-networks.com/) Gin stands for Generalized Inverted Index and should be considered as a genie, not a drink. Generalized means that the index does not know which operation it accelerates. It instead works with custom strategies, defined for specific data types (read "Index Method Strategies" in the PostgreSQL documentation). In that sense, Gin is similar to GiST and differs from btree indices, which have predefined, comparison-based operations. An inverted index is an index structure storing a set of (key, posting list) pairs, where 'posting list' is a set of documents in which the key occurs. (A text document would usually contain many keys.) The primary goal of Gin indices is support for highly scalable, full-text search in PostgreSQL. Gin consists of a B-tree index constructed over entries (ET, entries tree), where each entry is an element of the indexed value (element of array, lexeme for tsvector) and where each tuple in a leaf page is either a pointer to a B-tree over item pointers (PT, posting tree), or a list of item pointers (PL, posting list) if the tuple is small enough. Note: There is no delete operation for ET. The reason for this is that from our experience, a set of unique words over a large collection change very rarely. This greatly simplifies the code and concurrency algorithms. Gin comes with built-in support for one-dimensional arrays (eg. integer[], text[]), but no support for NULL elements. The following operations are available: * contains: value_array @ query_array * overlap: value_array && query_array * contained: value_array ~ query_array Synopsis -------=# create index txt_idx on aa using gin(a); Features -------* * * *

Concurrency Write-Ahead Logging (WAL). (Recoverability from crashes.) User-defined opclasses. (The scheme is similar to GiST.) Optimized index creation (Makes use of maintenance_work_mem to accumulate postings in memory.) * Tsearch2 support via an opclass * Soft upper limit on the returned results set using a GUC variable: gin_fuzzy_search_limit Gin Fuzzy Limit --------------There are often situations when a full-text search returns a very large set of

results. Since reading tuples from the disk and sorting them could take a lot of time, this is unacceptable for production. (Note that the search itself is very fast.) Such queries usually contain very frequent lexemes, so the results are not very helpful. To facilitate execution of such queries Gin has a configurable soft upper limit of the size of the returned set, determined by the 'gin_fuzzy_search_limit' GUC variable. This is set to 0 by default (no limit). If a non-zero search limit is set, then the returned set is a subset of the whole result set, chosen at random. "Soft" means that the actual number of returned results could slightly differ from the specified limit, depending on the query and the quality of the system's random number generator. From experience, a value of 'gin_fuzzy_search_limit' in the thousands (eg. 5000-20000) works well. This means that 'gin_fuzzy_search_limit' will have no effect for queries returning a result set with less tuples than this number. Limitations ----------* No support for multicolumn indices * Gin doesn't uses scan->kill_prior_tuple & scan->ignore_killed_tuples * Gin searches entries only by equality matching. This may be improved in future. * Gin doesn't support full scans of indices. * Gin doesn't index NULL values. Gin Interface ------------Opclass interface pseudocode. An example for a Gin opclass can be found in ginarayproc.c. Datum* extractValue(Datum inputValue, uint32* nentries) Returns an array of Datum of entries of the value to be indexed. should contain the number of returned entries.

nentries

int compareEntry(Datum a, Datum b) Compares two entries (not the indexing values) Datum* extractQuery(Datum query, uint32* nentries, StrategyNumber n) Returns an array of Datum of entries of the query to be executed. n contains the strategy number of the operation. bool consistent(bool[] check, StrategyNumber n, Datum query) The size of the check array is the same as sizeof of the array returned by extractQuery. Each element of the check array is true if the indexed value has a corresponding entry in the query. i.e. if (check[i] == TRUE) then the i-th entry of the query is present in the indexed value. The Function

should return true if the indexed value matches by StrategyNumber and the query. Open Items ---------We appreciate any comments, help and suggestions. * Teach optimizer/executor that GIN is intrinsically clustered. i.e., it always returns ItemPointer in ascending order. * Tweak gincostestimate. * GIN stores several ItemPointer to heap tuple, so VACUUM FULL produces this warning message: WARNING: HINT:

index "idx" contains 88395 row versions, but table contains 51812 row versions Rebuild the index with REINDEX.

TODO ---Nearest future: * Opclasses for all types (no programming, just many catalog changes). Distant future: * Replace B-tree of entries to something like GiST * Add multicolumn support * Optimize insert operations (background index insertion) Authors ------All work was done by Teodor Sigaev ([email protected]) and Oleg Bartunov ([email protected]).

Related Documents


More Documents from ""

October 2019 15
October 2019 27
October 2019 22