Public-private Partnership (seminar Presentation) (september'06)

  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Public-private Partnership (seminar Presentation) (september'06) as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,021
  • Pages: 21
Institutional Prerequisites for 3Ps in Developing Countries Submitted to The First Seminar of I2ED Research Team

Aung Kyaw Oo Ph.D. Student SNU-TEMAP September 12, 2006.

Reviewed Papers: (1)Dima Jamali, American Univ. of Beirut: A publicprivate partnership in the Lebanese Telecommunications Industry: Critical Success factors and Policy Lessons; Public Works management and Policy Vol 9, No. 2. (2)Axel Borrmann and Matthias Busse: Institutional Prerequisites of Economic Partnership Agreements; Intereconomics, July/ August, 2006. (3)Axel Borrmann, Matthias Busse and Silke Neuhaus : Institutional Qualities and the Gains from Trade; HWWA Discussion Paper 341. I 2ED First Seminar

2

Reviewed Papers:

( Cont’d)

 Werner Heinz: Public-Private Partnerships: Principles, Opportunities and Risks; Lecture given in AER CENTURIO INTERREG III Conference, May 6, 2005.  UNIDO: Building Productive Capacity for Poverty Alleviations in LDCs; The Role of Industry– Executive Summary, 2001.

I 2ED First Seminar

3

Outline        

Definition Public-Private Partnership Institutional Infrastructure Past Experiences Prerequisites between partners PPP in developing countries Case Study : Lebanese Telecom Comments on Prerequisites for PPP I 2ED First Seminar

4

Definition:  Institution can be defined as humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic and social interactions (North, 1990).

 A PPP is an institutionalized form of cooperation of public and private actors, who on the basis of their own indigenous objectives, work together toward a joint target (Nijkamp et al., 2002).

I 2ED First Seminar

5

Public-Private Partnership A contractual arrangement whereby, according to a shared ownership agreement, the resources, risks, and rewards of both the public agency and the private company are pooled to create greater efficiency in the production and provision of public or private goods. The term classifies a spectrum of possible relationships oriented variously to the development and dissemination of wholly public or relatively private goods. I 2ED First Seminar

6

Institutional Infrastructure ( UNIDO) Policy should focus on development of public-private consultation and partnership mechanisms, as well as fostering clusters and networking among enterprises both at national and international levels. This requires development of appropriate regulatory regimes, appraisal of existing institutional structures and firmand branch-level diagnostic surveys for promotion of international institutional linkages.

I 2ED First Seminar

7

Past Experiences:  Although private-sector participation is increasingly invoked in the context of developing countries, the success or failure of PPP projects has not been systematically assessed (Roseneau, 1999).  The opportunities and challenges posed by these new partnering arrangements have also not been systematically explored, including longterm benefits to participants as well as potential conflicts of interest and cost-shifting problems.

I 2ED First Seminar

8

Prerequisites between the Partners  Pongsiri (2002) emphasizes the establishment of a transparent and sound regulatory framework as a necessary precursor to private-sector participation in a PPP.  Commitment Symmetry, Common Goal Symmetry, Resource dependency, Intensive communication, and Converging working culture among others. ( Samii et al.,2002)  Partner Selection. ( Hagen ,2002)

I 2ED First Seminar

9

Investment in Developing Countries Applying PPP

I 2ED First Seminar

10

Case Study: Lebanese Telecomm: PPP

I 2ED First Seminar

11

Implementation of PPP :1994-1999  In 1994, two cellular operators were granted 10-year GSM concessions under a build, operate, and transfer (BOT) contract (with a possible extension of 2 years) that entailed an escalating revenuesharing scheme.

I 2ED First Seminar

12

Aftermath of PPP implementation  The alleged violations primarily relate to surpassing the 125,000 subscriber limit specified in each contract, unpaid fees and taxes especially for microwave links, and insufficient geographic and network coverage (Anchassi, 2000, pp. 53-55). The government has even threatened to cancel the contracts and seize the two companies’ assets if an agreement is not reached through negotiation. I 2ED First Seminar

13

Aftermath

( Cont’d)

 However, even the international consulting firm, Booz Allen and Hamilton, called on to mediate and interpret the contract, concluded that there could be two legal interpretations of the same clause. Excerpts from their report indeed confirm that, in certain respects, the terms of the contracts are not transparent and the impact of supervening law, documentation, and discussions not clear (Vance, 2000).  Not a single coordination meeting has been held between the partners since December 1998!  GL cancelled BOT of two operators in the late 2001 ahead of (3) years’ contract terms. I 2ED First Seminar

14

Success from PPP

I 2ED First Seminar

15

Lessons Learnt from PPP MPT found responsible for supervising the BOT contracts that were granted to Cellis and Libancell overnight. MPT, however, was not ready for this responsibility. It did not have the technical/ organizational capacity to exercise adequate control and supervision over the newly established GSM concessions. The conflict arose that the operators have gone beyond the scope of the contract, which specified a maximum subscriber base of 250,000. The GSM operators also introduced a range of new services that were not foreseen in the contracts. (A. Oueidat, Director General, personal interview, July 21, 2002) I 2ED First Seminar

16

Issues at Hand: Between the Partners  Conflicts of Interest-- informational confidential for proprietary reasons  Value for Money – Contentious –Performance measurement System by Procurer (e.g. performance, pricing, feedback from users, etc…)  Risks transfer lies at the heart of PPP-Technical, construction, revenue, operating, financial, regulatory, environmental, etc..  Regular and intense communication between the parties I 2ED First Seminar

17

Partnership Results ???  This stream of literature generally indicates that partnerships are high-risk strategies, particularly at the level of implementation; however, the advantages and/ or mutual benefits, when successful, by far outweigh the risks involved (Hagen, 2002;Horton, 1998).

I 2ED First Seminar

18

Comments on Prerequisites for PPP  Technical expertise ( Fields of mutual interest).  Organizational Capacity ( Both parties).  Foresightedness in contractual terms ( Private actor).  Proper allocation of Risks.  Legal & Regulatory scheme should be done favoring one’s social groundings. I 2ED First Seminar

19

Thank you. Q & A

I 2ED First Seminar

20

This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com. The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only. This page will not be added after purchasing Win2PDF.

Related Documents