Property Rights: Twin Promises For Post-war Iraq

  • Uploaded by: The Institute for Liberty
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Property Rights: Twin Promises For Post-war Iraq as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 932
  • Pages: 23
Property Rights: Twin Promises for Post-War Iraq Andrew M. Langer, President The Institute for Liberty Seton Hall University February 11, 2008

Introduction Who I am… What Is The Institute for Liberty? Background on Property Rights

and International Issues

About Andrew Langer and IFL…  Started In Public Policy After College…  Committed to Individual Rights and Free Markets

 Small Business Advocate  IFL founded in 2005, focused on Tech Issues

 Now Focused on Small Business and the “petty

tyrannies” of government

The Property Rights Issue  Worked on Property Rights Early In Career  Property Rights underpin all other rights…  Currently under siege in the United States

Property Rights: the rights to hold, enjoy, and use private property free from unreasonable regulation, uncompensated confiscation, and unwarranted interference.

The Development Context  Left out of the international affairs/international

development arena  American foreign policy focused on “building

democracy” abroad  Aid tends to go willy-nilly to economic development projects  Neither have succeeded.  Property Rights are the missing planks.

 The International Property Rights Working Group

Building on the Work of 2 Scholars

Hernando De Soto

Dr. Richard Pipes

DeSoto: 2 Seminal Works (1)  The Other Path  Focused on Peruvian

problem with Marxist Terrorism!  Discovered problem founded in land and title issues for campesinos.  Solutions broke Sendero Luminoso’s back!

DeSoto: 2 Seminal Works (2) The Mystery of Capital  Comprehensive look at

property systems worldwide.  Looks at the relationship between protection of private property, and the ease of getting title to property.  Forms the basis of the work worldwide of The Institute for Liberty and Democracy

Pipes: Foreign Policy Architect  Historical tracing of

property rights protection.  Charts boom and bust cycles of societies given their protection of property rights.  Demonstrates clear interplay between the two.

Preliminary Conclusion Property Rights are an essential element in building civil societies. They create twin promises:  Economic Prosperity

 Political Stability

Economic Prosperity  One is able to make investments in one’s property,

with a reasonable certainty that one can reap the benefit of that investment.  One can use that property as leverage (ie, capital) in

making investments in one’s future.

Political Stability  By having some certainty that one’s personal economy

is protected, one then has a stake in the society.  By having some glimpse that opportunity is both available and possible, one has hope in that society’s future. Without hope and a vested interest, One has no incentive to support a nation’s direction. Chaos Ensues, along with economic ruin.

The Issue As Applied: Iraq  Background: The International Property Rights

Working Group  The Run-up to the Iraq War  The Specific Underlying Issues in Iraq  What Happened with the Recommendations

The IPRWG  Formed in the Summer of 2002  Comprised of property rights activists, academics,

former Development and Diplomatic professionals  Included DeSoto’s representative in DC  Consulted additional experts in order to create background.  Originally conceived to make recommendations generally to State, Defense, USAID

The Run-Up To War  As War become clear, focus changed  Focus now on Middle East and Post War Iraq

 Necessary to understand unique attributes to Islamic

societies  Necessary to make recommendations of post-war reconstruction. A more focused goal was actually more helpful.

Unique Attributes of Islamic Societies  Long-standing tradition of private property rights

protection (cf, Pipes)  Capital investment different because of usury rules  Complicated land-ownership traditions (eg Morocco)  Nevertheless, real potential exists Because none were experts in Islamic market background, the IPRWG consulted with the Minaret of Freedom Institute, an Islamic think tank.

Initial Recommendations Looking at Post-war Japan, A MacArthur-style post-war reconstruction would be recommended:  Inculcate local traditions/institutions into the

property rights process.  Have provisional government lay framework for governance, let citizens fill in the blanks  Invest local religious and civic leaders in the process

Laying the Case: As Applied (1)  The case for investment: without titled property rights,

foreign investment for reconstruction would be limited (the power company example)  Why build if there was fear that the government might

nationalize within 3-5 years?  Why invest if you don’t know who owns the house that

you’d want to stick a meter to… who are you going to bill?

Laying the Case: As Applied (2)  The case for national security: without titled property

rights, Iraq would continue to be a chaotic system.  The Twin Promises wouldn’t be realized.  More practically, there is a relationship between

knowing who owns property and keeping the peace. (cf. Gen. Petraeus’ post-surge deployment strategy)

Selling the Recommendations  

 

IPRWG spent the Summer of 2003 making recommendations to the following agencies: Department of Defense Department of Commerce Department of the Treasury The White House The State Department was Uninterested. (But then again, the recommendations were ignored)

IGNORED??!!!  Yes. Like a lot of recommendations that were made,

these, too were ignored.  Not Surprising, and Not entirely hubris.  Property rights not in the mainstream of ideas in the

international development/diplomacy community.

Conclusions and the Future  Stability, prosperity and investment continue to be a

problem in Iraq  Not saying property rights are a panacea  They are a part of a series of things, perhaps one of the most important aspects of nation building  Valuable lessons in terms of future events We are seeing, and will continue to see, property rights as an issue both here and aborad.

THANK YOU!

[email protected] http://www.instituteforliberty.org (202) 261-6592

Related Documents


More Documents from "Jamil Alkhatib"