Performance Management

  • Uploaded by: zydeco.14
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Performance Management as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 524
  • Pages: 25
Eval ua ting Emp lo yee Perfor man ce

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ❘ 1: Performance management system purpose ❘ 2: Appraisal process steps ❘ 3: Absolute standards ❘ 4: Relative standards ❘ 5: MBO ❘ 6: Performance appraisal distortions ❘ 7: More effective performance appraisal ❘ 8: Alternative appraisal methods ❘ 9: Global issues

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURPOSES ❚ Performance Management Systems ❚ Feedback ❚ Development ❚ Documentation

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROBLEMS ❚ Focus on individual personality ❙ Emotions, anger, resentment, satisfaction ❙ Expectations

❚ Focus on process ❙ Tied to budget ❙ Training ❙ AND….

APPRAISAL PROCESS STEPS ❚ 1. Establish performance appraisal standards ❚ 2. Mutually set measurable goals ❚ 3. Measure actual performance ❚ AND….

APPRAISAL PROCESS STEPS ❚ 4. Compare actual with standard ❚ 5. Discuss appraisal with employee ❚ 6. Corrective action ❙ Basic ❙ Immediate

APPRAISAL METHODS ❚ Absolute standards ❙ Measure against external reference

❚ Relative standards ❙ Evaluate employees against each other

❚ Objectives ❙ Measure against goals

ABSOLUTE STANDARDS Essay Critical incident Checklist Adjective rating scale ❚ Forced-choice ❚ BehaviorallyAnchored Rating Scale (BARS) ❚ ❚ ❚ ❚

ESSAYS ❚ Subjective ❚ Hard to compare with others ❚ Simple ❙ ❙ ❙ ❙

Strengths Weaknesses Potential Suggestions for improvement

CRITICAL INCIDENT ❚ Essay about what was most effective or ineffective in a key job situation ❚ Focus on behavior, not personality ❚ Weekly is timeconsuming

CHECKLIST ❚ Yes or No ❚ Predefined behaviors or qualities ❚ Items may be irrelevant ❚ Helps reduce bias

ADJECTIVE RATING SCALE ❚ Factors present ❙ Job knowledge ❙ Cooperation ❙ Quality and quantity of work

❚ 5 to 10 points on a continuum

Sample Adjective Rating Items and Format

FORCED-CHOICE ❚ Bias and distortion reduced ❚ Frustration about lack of feedback ❚ Simple ❚ Like a multiple choice test question

B.A.R.S. ❚ Simple ❚ Reduces rating errors ❚ Definite, observable job behaviors

Sample BARS for an Employee Relations Specialist

RELATIVE STANDARDS ❚ Group order ranking ❙ Quartiles

❚ Individual ranking ❙ Best to worst

❚ Paired comparison ❙ Similar to job ranking ❙ Compare each one to all others

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVE (MBO) ❚ ❚ ❚ ❚ ❚

STEPS Goal setting Action planning Self control Periodic review

?

MBO ISSUES ❚ Advantages ❙ Results oriented ❙ Commitment

❚ Problems ❙ Trust needed

❚ Satisfaction ❙ Time-consuming ❙ Important to followup ❙ Frustration builder

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL DISTORTIONS Leniency Halo Similarity Central tendency Inflationary pressures ❚ Inappropriate substitutes ❚ AND…. ❚ ❚ ❚ ❚ ❚

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL DISTORTIONS ❚ Attribution theory ❚ Varies by control ❙ Internal ❙ External

❚ Impression management

TO IMPROVE APPRAISALS ❚ Behavior based measures ❚ Combine absolute and relative measures ❚ Provide ongoing feedback ❚ Have multiple raters ❚ Rate selectively

MORE EFFECTIVE APPRAISALS - PEERS ❚ Positives ❙ Constructive criticism ❙ Specific feedback

❚ Negatives ❙ Fear ❙ Halo, leniency error ❙ Training

❚ Upward appraisal

MORE EFFECTIVE APPRAISAL (360-DEGREE) ❚ Multiple appraisers ❙ ❙ ❙ ❙ ❙ ❙

Self Boss Peers Team members Customers Suppliers

360-DEGREE APPRAISALS ❚ Positives ❙ Increase manager’s awareness of own actions ❙ More accurate feedback ❙ Empowerment ❙ Developing leadership ❙ Reduces subjectivity

Related Documents

Performance Management
April 2020 25
Performance Management
November 2019 35
Performance Management
November 2019 43
Performance Management
December 2019 37
Performance Management
December 2019 36