Patentability Criteria In India & Us .

  • Uploaded by: ashutosh
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Patentability Criteria In India & Us . as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 461
  • Pages: 18
Patentability Criteria in INDIA & US . ASHUTOSH

Patent Policy 

CONVERGENCE



vIndian & US Patent Laws are converging  on substantive aspects of patentability  criteria. 

Patentability Criteria v v v vNovelty  - Prior art based 

vIndian Patent Offices – rely on prior art 

vUSPTO now insists on Prior Art Disclosure as compulsory – 

Patentability Criteria 

Non-obviousness / inventive step

 

vIndia liberal on obviousness  

vUS was liberal on obviousness but now it is behaving bit exceptionally rigid after some specific cases. 

Patentability 

USA

 

“Anything under the sun involving manual intervention”.



INDIA “INVENTIONS not PATENTABLE” 3(a) TO 3(p) 3(d) New Forms without enhanced efficancy. 3(p) Traditional Knowledge. 



Non-patentability 

Compulsory for microorganisms and life forms including plants –



v v v 

Disclosure of Origin (Budapest Treaty) Benefit Sharing Biodiversity Act

(The Biological Diversity Act, 2002)

Plant Patentability 

US - Plant Patents India - Plant Varieties Protection Act 



(

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001 (http://agricoop.nic.in)

Patentability Criteria 

Anticipation – India - rigid on single Prior art-based anticipation Insists “mosaic” of Prior arts are not “anticipation” PCT/US - Often cites close prior arts as affecting Patentability 

Unity of Invention 

India – more liberal on  group of inventions 



USPTO – very restrictive Insists on electing one invention / Filing Divisionals 

 

Even Process / Composition / use as separate inventions

Timelines India – Rigid on extensions  Normally extensions not granted 



US – very liberal  protracted prosecution  Court order based fast tracking 

Publication / Public Domain Information India – Bibliography

 

US/EU – Full Patent

 

US – Total Transparency – “Public Pair” EU – Legal Status  Patent Family 

Patent Office Procedures India – Post dating (allows) Complete to Provisional  Cognates  Addition Patents 



US – Liberal procedures (allows) C.I.Ps  Amendments / RCE 

US vs. INDIA US grants 4Patent Term extensions/adjustments 4Data Exclusivity 4Orange Book Listings 4180 Day Exclusivity 4 INDIA does not grant any of above 

Indian Patent/Regulatory Unlike USA/Europe, the Patent Regulatory link has not been formalised.





Generic launch friendly Indian policy



Oppositions USA – Opportunity to protest “Amicus Curie” in litigation 



India– Pre-grant Opposition Post-grant Opposition Counterclaim for Revocation Government use option 

Research Exemptions 

India – Research & Educational Exemptions More liberal & broad Sec. 47A – Educational Sec. 107A – Research for ANDA 

Compulsory Licence USA – 28 USC 1498 



India – Sec. 63 to 94 & 92A Govt. use – Sec. 99 to 103 



THANK YOU

Related Documents


More Documents from "takshi"