P11 Lab Rubric
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View P11 Lab Rubric as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 412
- Pages: 1
Physics Report Submitted by:
Date: Beginning 1
Graphs
Theoretical Background
Calculations
Conclusions
Discussion
Accomplished 3
Exemplary 4
Graphs are discussed in the lab report with some mention of discrepencies or comparison to the theoretical results.
Graphs are analysed (described) in the lab report. A comparison to the theoretical results is made, and all discrepencies are fully discussed.
An attempt to explain the An understanding of the underlying concepts concepts regarding the regarding the experiment experiment is is made and/or communicated with contained significant perhaps some error. error. Expectations for results is attempted and/or contains error.
The theory of the experiment is explained clearly (included a formula being tested). Expectations of results are communciated with minor error.
The theory of the experiment is explained clearly (including formula being tested), and expectations are linked to the results of the experiment without error.
Calculations contain errors or are difficult to follow (or read).
Calculations are easily followed and accurate.
Calculations are explained, easily followed and accurate.
Conclusions follow from Conclusions follow from the data, but makes no the data, but are poortly reference to Theory. communicated, and a comparison to theoretical results is made.
Conclusions follow from the data, are clearly communicated, and a comparison to theoretical results is made.
Conclusions follow from the data; make reference to and support the Theoretical Background.
Discussion of lab questions is made with some errors. Mention of results is limited to findings
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of possible sources of error is made with supporting reference made to graphs and/or calculations.
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of lab results is insightful, demonstrates understanding, and poses questions worthy of further experiementation.
Graphs are present, but not mentioned in the report. Neatness may still be a goal.
Developing 2 Graphs are neat and easily read with titles. Little mention of them is made elsewhere in the report.
Calculations are accurate.
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of results is limited to possible sources of error.
Score
/4
/4
/4
/4
/4
Errors are evident. Some minor errors (2 or No spelling, grammar, or Mechanics of language & Errors are evident. Communiction could be Communiction could be 3). Does not distract usage errors (or Organization
clearer. Organization is clearer. An attempt to from the report. excellent use of poor. organize the information Organization of materials language). Organization is clearly present. is good. Attempts at and presentation of improving presentation is materials is excellent. made
/4
Date: Beginning 1
Graphs
Theoretical Background
Calculations
Conclusions
Discussion
Accomplished 3
Exemplary 4
Graphs are discussed in the lab report with some mention of discrepencies or comparison to the theoretical results.
Graphs are analysed (described) in the lab report. A comparison to the theoretical results is made, and all discrepencies are fully discussed.
An attempt to explain the An understanding of the underlying concepts concepts regarding the regarding the experiment experiment is is made and/or communicated with contained significant perhaps some error. error. Expectations for results is attempted and/or contains error.
The theory of the experiment is explained clearly (included a formula being tested). Expectations of results are communciated with minor error.
The theory of the experiment is explained clearly (including formula being tested), and expectations are linked to the results of the experiment without error.
Calculations contain errors or are difficult to follow (or read).
Calculations are easily followed and accurate.
Calculations are explained, easily followed and accurate.
Conclusions follow from Conclusions follow from the data, but makes no the data, but are poortly reference to Theory. communicated, and a comparison to theoretical results is made.
Conclusions follow from the data, are clearly communicated, and a comparison to theoretical results is made.
Conclusions follow from the data; make reference to and support the Theoretical Background.
Discussion of lab questions is made with some errors. Mention of results is limited to findings
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of possible sources of error is made with supporting reference made to graphs and/or calculations.
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of lab results is insightful, demonstrates understanding, and poses questions worthy of further experiementation.
Graphs are present, but not mentioned in the report. Neatness may still be a goal.
Developing 2 Graphs are neat and easily read with titles. Little mention of them is made elsewhere in the report.
Calculations are accurate.
Discussion of lab questions is correct. Discussion of results is limited to possible sources of error.
Score
/4
/4
/4
/4
/4
Errors are evident. Some minor errors (2 or No spelling, grammar, or Mechanics of language & Errors are evident. Communiction could be Communiction could be 3). Does not distract usage errors (or Organization
clearer. Organization is clearer. An attempt to from the report. excellent use of poor. organize the information Organization of materials language). Organization is clearly present. is good. Attempts at and presentation of improving presentation is materials is excellent. made
/4
Related Documents
P11 Lab Rubric
October 2019 17
P11
April 2020 8
Lab Rubric
May 2020 9
P11
May 2020 10
P11
November 2019 10